爆轰火焰在管道阻火器内的传播与淬熄特性

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20151383

化工学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 67 ›› Issue (5): 2176-2184.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20151383

• 其他 • 上一篇

爆轰火焰在管道阻火器内的传播与淬熄特性

孙少辰^1,2, 毕明树¹, 刘刚², 邓进军^1,3

1 大连理工大学化工机械学院, 辽宁大连 116024;
2 沈阳特种设备检测研究院, 辽宁沈阳110035;
3 大庆师范学院化学工程学院, 黑龙江大庆163712

收稿日期:2015-09-01 修回日期:2016-01-25 出版日期:2016-05-05 发布日期:2016-05-05
通讯作者: 毕明树
基金资助:
沈阳市科技计划项目(F14-048-2-00);大庆师范学院青年基金项目(12ZR19)。

Detonation flame propagation and quenching characteristics in crimped-ribbon flame arrester

SUN Shaochen^1,2, BI Mingshu¹, LIU Gang², DENG Jinjun^1,3

1 School of Chemical Machinery, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, Liaoning, China;
2 Shenyang Institute of Special Equipment Inspection and Research, Shenyang 110035, Liaoning, China;
3 College of Chemical Engineering, Daqing Normal University, Daqing 163712, Heilongjiang, China

Received:2015-09-01 Revised:2016-01-25 Online:2016-05-05 Published:2016-05-05
Supported by:
supported by the Shenyang Science and Technology Project (F14-048-2-00) and the Youth Foundation of Daqing Normal University (12ZR19).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在水平封闭的直管中,采用自主研制的阻爆实验系统(包括传感器系统、配气系统、数据采集系统、点火系统等)对不同活性预混气体爆轰火焰在波纹管道阻火器内的传播与淬熄过程进行了实验研究。结果显示当可燃气体接近当量浓度时(丙烷4.2%、乙烯6.6%、氢气28.5%,均为体积分数),预混气体从点燃到火焰淬熄过程历时非常短,总体可分为4个阶段,缓慢燃烧阶段、快速燃烧阶段、加速燃烧阶段和超压振荡阶段。丙烷-空气、乙烯-空气预混气体在D=80 mm的管道阻火器中,爆炸压力峰值较高。当管道直径增加至400 mm时,爆炸压力峰值逐渐降低,其中乙烯-空气预混气体的爆炸压力峰值仅为3 MPa左右;氢气-空气预混气体的爆炸压力峰值随管径的增加呈递增趋势。对爆轰速度的研究结果表明,丙烷-空气、乙烯-空气预混气体爆轰速度数值相差不大,丙烷-空气预混气体甚至稍高些;而氢气-空气的爆轰速度数值较高。而且随着管径的增加,管壁热损失增大及其阻力因素等原因影响使预混气体爆轰速度趋向平稳。最后,从经典传热学理论出发,推导出了阻火单元厚度与爆轰火焰速度之间的关系。并结合实验数据,提出了爆轰安全阻火速度的计算方法,为工业装置阻火器的设计和选型提供更为准确的参考依据。

关键词: 阻爆实验系统, 爆轰火焰, 波纹管道阻火器, 爆炸压力, 安全阻火速度

Abstract:

A self-designed explosion suppression experimental system including sensor detection system, gas mixing equipment, data acquisition device and electric spark ignition device was set up to investigate various fuel/air premix detonation flame propagation and quenching by crimped-ribbon flame arresters in horizontal pipe that closed at both ends. Detonation experiment showed that when the concentration of flammable gas was close to the stoichiometric ratio, (4.2% propane, 6.6% ethylene and 28.5% hydrogen, percentage by volume), the evolution process from ignition to flame quenching was very short. It could be divided into four stages: slow rise, quick rise, accelerate rise and pressure fluctuation. The peak detonation pressure for propane-air and ethylene-air was higher in D 80 mm flame arrester than other diameters. When pipe diameter increased to 400 mm, the detonation pressure was decreased gradually, especially for ethylene-air the pressure was only about 3 MPa. However, the peak detonation pressure of hydrogen-air was gradually increased with the increase of the pipe diameter. The result on detonation velocity indicated that its value for the premixed gas of propane-air was quite close to ethylene-air, even a little higher. However, the value of hydrogen-air premixed gas was relatively high. With the increase of the pipe diameter, the detonation velocity tended to be more stable due to the wall heat loss, the resistance factors and some other reasons. At the same time, it might be expected that the detonation safety flame velocity would be proportional to element thickness base on the classic theory of the heat transfer. Then, by using the experimental data, the detonation safety flame velocity calculation method was derived, which would provide more accurate reference for design and selection of crimped-ribbon flame arrester.

Key words: explosion suppression experimental system, detonation flame, crimped-ribbon flame arrester, detonation pressure, safety flame velocity

中图分类号:

X937

孙少辰, 毕明树, 刘刚, 邓进军. 爆轰火焰在管道阻火器内的传播与淬熄特性[J]. 化工学报, 2016, 67(5): 2176-2184.

SUN Shaochen, BI Mingshu, LIU Gang, DENG Jinjun. Detonation flame propagation and quenching characteristics in crimped-ribbon flame arrester[J]. CIESC Journal, 2016, 67(5): 2176-2184.

参考文献 24

[1]	STANLEY S G. Deflagration and Detonation Flame Arresters [M]. New York: Process Safety and Design Inc., 2002: 5-14.
[2]	BAUER P. Experimental investigation on flame and detonation quenching: applicability of static flame arresters [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2005, 2 (18): 63-68.
[3]	KAKUTKINA N A, KORZHAVIN A A, NAMYATOV I G, et al. Flame propagation through the header of an in-line flame arrester [J]. Combustion, Explosion, and Shock Waves, 2007, 43 (4): 391-404.
[4]	PALMER K N, TONKIN P S. The quenching of flames of various fuels in narrow apertures [J]. Combustion and Flame, 1963, 7: 121-127.
[5]	THOMAS G O, OAKLEY G L. On practical difficulties encountered when testing flame and detonation arresters to BS7244 [J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 1993, 71 (1): 187-193.
[6]	HOWARD W B. Process safety technology and the responsibility of industry [J]. Chemical Engineering Progress, 1988, 84 (9): 25-33.
[7]	DESAI V M. A flare deflagration incident at Rohm and Haas [J]. Process Safety Progress, 1996, 15 (3): 166-167.
[8]	HOWARD W B. Flame arresters and flashback preventers [J]. Plant/Operations Progress, 1983, 1 (4): 203-208.
[9]	ROUSSAKIS, LAPP L. A comprehensive test method for inline flame [J]. Plant/Operations Progress, 1991, 10 (2): 85-92.
[10]	ASANO S, IKEDA S, YOUN Y, et al. Visualization of behaviors of a propagating flame quenching for hydrogen-air gas mixture [J]. Journal of Visualization, 2010, 13 (2): 107-119.
[11]	BEAUVAIS R, MAYINGER F, STRUBE G. Turbulent flame acceleration mechanisms and significance for safety considerations [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 1994, 19 (8): 701-708.
[12]	BRITTON L G. Using maximum experimental safe gap to select flame arresters [J]. Process Safety Progress, 2000, 19 (3): 140-145.
[13]	KAKUTKINA N A, KORZHAVIN A A, RYCHKOV A D. Burning-through of porous flame arresters with a channel flame-arrester element [J]. Combustion, Explosion, and Shock Waves, 2009, 45 (3): 266-273.
[14]	KAWASHIMA K, YOUN Y, KAGAWA T. Development of a nozzle-flapper type servo valve using a slit structure [J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2007, 129: 573-578.
[15]	LEE J H, KNYSTAUTAS R, CHAN C. High speed turbulent deflagrations and transition to detonation in H2-Air air mixtures [J]. Combustion and Flame, 1984, 56 (2): 227-239.
[16]	LIETZE D. Crimped metal ribbon flame arrestors for the protection of gas measurement systems [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2002, 15 (1): 29-35.
[17]	LIETZE D. Limit of safety against flame transmission for sintered metal flame arrester elements in the case of flashback in fuel gas-oxygen mixtures [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 1995, 8 (6): 325-332.
[18]	MALLENS R M M, DE GOEY L P H. Flame cooling by a curved burner wall [J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 1998, 41 (4): 699-707.
[19]	孙少辰, 毕明树, 刘刚, 等. 阻火器性能测试方法实验性研究 [J]. 化工学报, 2014, 65 (S1): 441-450. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2014.zl.071. SUN S C, BI M S, LIU G, et al. A pilot study of flame arrester performance test methods [J]. CIESC Journal, 2014, 65 (S1): 441-450. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2014.zl.071.
[20]	CUBBAGE P. Flame Traps for Use with Town Gas/Air Mixtures [M]. London: Gas Council, 1959: 30-47.
[21]	MAAS W, QUADEN P. Testing and application of flame traps for use in a firedamp-drainage installation [C]//PERELES K J. The Ninth International Conference of Directors of Safety in Mines Research. Sheffield, England, 1956: 8-14.
[22]	KERSTEN C, FÖRSTER H. Investigation of deflagrations and detonations in pipes and flame arresters by high-speed framing [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2004, 17 (1): 43-50.
[23]	孙少辰, 刘刚, 毕明树, 等. 阻火器性能测试试验系统的研制 [J]. 化工进展, 2014, 33 (11): 2853-2860. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6613.2014.11.005. SUN S C, LIU G, BI M S, et al. Development of flame arrester performance testing system [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2014, 33 (11): 2853-2860. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6613.2014.11.005.
[24]	MACADAMS W H. Heat Transmission [M]. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1954: 219-221.

爆轰火焰在管道阻火器内的传播与淬熄特性

Detonation flame propagation and quenching characteristics in crimped-ribbon flame arrester

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 24

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	纪文涛, 李璐, 李忠, 何佳, 杨晶晶, 王燕. 聚磷酸铵抑制PMMA粉尘爆炸特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(1): 461-469.
[2]	齐心歌, 王海清, 宋贤生, 陈国明. 基于控制室爆炸载荷的可燃气云等价尺寸阈值[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(12): 4857-4864.
[3]	喻健良, 纪文涛, 孙会利, 闫兴清, 于小哲. 乙烯/聚乙烯两相体系爆炸特性[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(12): 4841-4847.
[4]	胡瑾秋, 郭家洁. 基于尺度效应的过程安全事故概率估计[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(12): 4848-4856.
[5]	喻健良, 朱海龙, 郭晓璐, 闫兴清, 曹琦, 刘少荣. 超临界CO₂管道减压过程中的热力学特性[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(9): 3350-3357.
[6]	喻健良, 郑阳光, 闫兴清, 郭晓璐, 曹琦, 朱海龙, 刘少荣. 工业规模CO₂管道大孔泄漏过程中的射流膨胀及扩散规律[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(6): 2298-2305.
[7]	吴秋洁, 陈相, 谭柳, 李敏, 徐森, 刘大斌. 结晶亚硝酸钠混入对乳化炸药安全性的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(5): 2211-2215.
[8]	姚箭, 刘健, 王永旭, 李斌, 解立峰, 宋庆学. 新型阻火器阻爆性能检测系统研制[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(4): 1728-1733.
[9]	付建民, 张伯伦, 陈国明, 郑晓云, 叶闯, 郭超, 朱渊. 液位控制系统干预下小孔全过程泄漏速率模型[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(1): 473-480.
[10]	何凡, 蒋军成, 潘勇, 倪磊. 基于电性拓扑状态指数的二元液体混合物自燃温度的预测[J]. 化工学报, 2016, 67(7): 3109-3117.
[11]	胡瑾秋, 张来斌, 王安琪. 炼化装置故障链式效应定量安全预警方法[J]. 化工学报, 2016, 67(7): 3091-3100.
[12]	喻健良, 郭晓璐, 闫兴清, 张永春, 陈绍云. 工业规模CO₂管道泄放过程中的压力响应及相态变化[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(11): 4327-4334.
[13]	徐森, 陈相, 谭柳, 夏良洪, 刘大斌, 潘峰. 磷酸一铵对硝酸铵危险特性的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(5): 1996-2002.
[14]	孙少辰, 毕明树, 刘刚, 刘铎. 阻火器性能测试方法试验性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2014, 65(S1): 441-450.
[15]	徐森, 陈相, 段瑞坤, 刘大斌, 潘峰. 硝酸铵乳胶在持续受热条件下的热失控特性[J]. 化工学报, 2014, 65(3): 1135-1141.