CIESC Journal

• 能源和环境工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

增压浸没燃烧装置热经济分析

江瀚,刘中良,宫小龙   

  1. 北京工业大学环境与能源工程学院,教育部传热强化与过程节能重点实验室, 北京 100124
  • 出版日期:2011-12-05 发布日期:2011-12-05

Thermal economics and application of pressurized submerged  combustion evaporators

<JIANG Han, LIU Zhongliang, GONG Xiaolong   

  • Online:2011-12-05 Published:2011-12-05

摘要:

常压浸没燃烧装置比普通锅炉有显著优势,如不存在固体加热面、加热效率高、污染物排放低等特点。增压浸没燃烧是对常压浸没燃烧的二次开发,提高了输出混合气的压力和温度,拓展了浸没燃烧应用领域。依据热力学第一定律,在单位时间内生产相同质量的纯蒸汽条件下,考虑了压缩机和风机分别在增压浸没燃烧装置和锅炉中的工作能耗,对比了两种系统的能耗明细,计算了增压浸没燃烧技术的节能效率。结果表明,增压浸没燃烧装置的加热效率高、回收烟气余热的特点不仅弥补了压缩机能耗损失大的缺点,而且比普通锅炉有更好的节能潜力。

Abstract:

Compared with conventional steam boilers, slightly-pressurized submerged combustion evaporator is advantageous, which is in the absence of a heat transfer surface, with higher efficiency of heat transfer and lower emission of pollutants.Pressurized submerged combustion evaporator (PSCEreported in this paper is its extension to high pressures and temperatures.Based on the first law of thermodynamics and with the consideration of energy consumption of compressors in PSCE and fans in steam boiler, the PSCE is compared with the steam injection boiler under the same condition.For 821 MPa steam, although the energy consumption of compressors constitutes a large proportion of the whole energy consumption in PSCE, the heating efficiency is high and the heat recovery of PSCE is effective.The energy saving rate of PSCE is estimated, which is usually 6%12%.The results show that PSCE has a greater potential for energy saving than steam boiler.

中图分类号: