反硝化微生物菌剂提升A2/O工艺TN去除效果

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20210097

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

反硝化是污水脱氮的关键步骤。投加反硝化微生物菌剂是提升总氮去除效率的有效方法。本实验从城市污水处理厂A²/O工艺厌氧池和缺氧池获取活性污泥并筛选出Pseudomonas aeruginosa F5（以下简称F5）。构建以实际生活污水为基础的培养基培养F5，通过正交试验的方式确定关键营养物质的最适投加量。研究发现，牛肉膏、K₂SO₄和MgSO₄·7H₂O的最适投加量分别为5.0 g/L、6.7 mg/L和5.0 mg/L。为验证F5作为反硝化微生物菌剂的可行性，在50 m³A²/O中试反应器中以1∶10000（V_菌剂/V_{日处理污水}）比例连续投加F5，总氮去除率提升了19.6% ~ 24.0%。为进一步提高反硝化微生物菌剂的效能，采用常压室温等离子体育种法诱变F5后获得两株诱变菌株A75和A82。结果表明，A75和A82的总氮去除率较F5分别提高了14.5% ~ 16.2%和16.8% ~ 18.0%。该研究为污水处理厂提升氮排放标准提供了可靠的理论依据。

关键词: 反硝化细菌, 总氮, A²/O, 常压室温等离子体育种法, 微生物菌剂

Abstract:

Denitrification is a key step in sewage denitrification. Adding denitrifying microbial agents is an effective method to improve the removal efficiency of total nitrogen. In this experiment, Pseudomonas aeruginosa F5 (F5 in short hereafter) was harvested from the anaerobic/anoxic tank of an A²/O process in a municipal sewage treatment plant. A culture medium based on actual domestic sewage was prepared to cultivate F5, and the optimal dosage of key nutrients were determined through orthogonal experiments. The optimum dosage of beef extract, K₂SO₄ and MgSO₄·7H₂O were 5.0 g/L, 6.7 mg/L and 5.0 mg/L, respectively. In order to verify the feasibility of denitrification, F5 was added continuously to a pilot-scale (50 m³) A²/O reactor at a ratio of 1∶10000 (V_inoculant/V_{daily sewage}). The addition of F5 increased the total nitrogen removal rate by 19.6%—24.0%. For further improving denitrification efficiency, two mutant strains A75 and A82 were obtained after mutagenizing F5 by atmospheric and room-temperature plasma method (ARTP). The results showed that the total nitrogen removal rate increased by 14.5%—16.2% and 16.8%—18.0%, respectively, by adding A75 and A82 compared with F5. This research provides a reliable and theoretical basis for sewage treatment plants to improve denitrification capability.

Key words: denitrifying bacteria, total nitrogen, A²/O, ARTP, microbial agents

中图分类号:

X 703.1

车林, 金文标, 陈洪一, 迟惠中, 梁云跃. 反硝化微生物菌剂提升A²/O工艺TN去除效果[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(S1): 467-474.

CHE Lin, JIN Wenbiao, CHEN Hongyi, CHI Huizhong, LIANG Yunyue. Denitrifying microbial agents improving TN removal of A²/O process[J]. CIESC Journal, 2021, 72(S1): 467-474.

图/表 12

参考文献 31

1	Saktaywin W, Tsuno H, Nagare H, et al. Advanced sewage treatment process with excess sludge reduction and phosphorus recovery[J]. Water Res., 2005, 39(5): 902-910.
2	Zhuang H C, Guan J Y, Leu S Y, et al. Carbon footprint analysis of chemical enhanced primary treatment and sludge incineration for sewage treatment in Hong Kong[J]. J. Clean. Prod., 2020, 272: 122630.
3	Seuntjens D, Han M, Kerckhof F M, et al. Pinpointing wastewater and process parameters controlling the AOB to NOB activity ratio in sewage treatment plants[J]. Water Res., 2018, 138: 37-46.
4	Lin J T, Hu Y Y, Wang G H, et al. Sludge reduction in an activated sludge sewage treatment process by lysis-cryptic growth using ClO₂-ultrasonication disruption[J]. Biochem. Eng. J., 2012, 68: 54-60.
5	Painter H A. Review of literature on inorganic nitrogen metabolism in microorganisms[J]. Water Res., 1970, 4(6): 393-450.
6	Liu Y, Capdeville B. Specific activity of nitrifying biofilm in water nitrification process[J]. Water Res., 1996, 7(30): 1645-1650.
7	张民权, 刘永, 范杰, 等. 新型高效复合碳源的制备及其在反硝化脱氮中的应用[J]. 给水排水, 2019, 55(S1): 153-155, 158.
	Zhang M Q, Liu Y, Fan J, et al. Preparation of a new high-efficiency composite carbon source and its application in denitrification and denitrification[J]. Water and Wastewater Engineering, 2019, 55(S1): 153-155, 158.
8	Duan J M, Fang H D, Su B, et al. Characterization of a halophilic heterotrophic nitrification-aerobic denitrification bacterium and its application on treatment of saline wastewater[J]. Bioresource Technol., 2015, 179: 421-428.
9	Xia X H, Yang Z F, Huang G H, et al. Nitrification in natural waters with high suspended-solid content—a study for the Yellow River[J]. Chemosphere, 2004, 57(8): 1017-1029.
10	Xu G J, Xu X C, Yang F L, et al. Partial nitrification adjusted by hydroxylamine in aerobic granules under high DO and ambient temperature and subsequent Anammox for low C/N wastewater treatment[J]. Chem. Eng. J., 2012, 213: 338-345.
11	Qian W T, Ma B, Li X Y, et al. Long-term effect of pH on denitrification: high pH benefits achieving partial-denitrification[J]. Bioresource Technol., 2019, 278: 444-449.
12	Li Q L, Mahendra S, Lyon D Y, et al. Antimicrobial nanomaterials for water disinfection and microbial control: potential applications and implications[J]. Water Res., 2008, 42(18): 4591-4602.
13	Galanakis C M, Tsatalas P, Charalambous Z, et al. Control of microbial growth in bakery products fortified with polyphenols recovered from olive mill wastewater[J]. Environ. Technol. Inno., 2018, 10: 1-15.
14	He Z Q, Han W, Jin W B, et al. Cultivation of Scenedesmus obliquus and Chlorella pyrenoidosa in municipal wastewater using monochromatic and white LED as light sources[J]. Waste Biomass Valor., 2021, doi: 10.1007/s12649-021-01359-4. DOI
15	Gao D W, An R,Tao Y, et al. Simultaneous methane production and wastewater reuse by a membrane-based process: evaluation with raw domestic wastewater[J]. J. Hazard. Mater., 2011, 186(1): 383-389.
16	Arrigo K R. Marine microorganisms and global nutrient cycles[J]. Nature, 2005, 437: 349-355.
17	Peterson W H, Peterson M S. Relation of bacteria to vitamins and other growth factors[J]. Bacteriology Reviews, 1945, 9(2): 49-109.
18	黄彬, 周新程, 陈冬, 等. 功能菌剂强化-无回流多级A/O处理村镇生活污水工艺研究[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2017, 56(13): 2446-2450.
	Huang B, Zhou X C, Chen D, et al. Research on treatment of rural domestic wastewater with technical process of multiple stages A/O without reflux and enhancement by functional bacteria[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 56(13): 2446-2450.
19	王为. 复合微生物制剂对于低碳源CASS工艺污水厂脱氮除磷优化研究[D]. 成都:西南交通大学, 2017.
	Wang W. Optimized strategies in utilizing compound microorganism preparation at low carbon source CASS technology oriented sewage plants to neutralize nitrogen and phosphorous[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2017.
20	Zhu Z M, Zhang J, Ji X M, et al. Evolutionary engineering of industrial microorganisms-strategies and applications[J]. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 2018, 102: 4615-4627.
21	Yin K, Wang Q N, Lv M, et al. Microorganism remediation strategies towards heavy metals[J]. Chem. Eng. J., 2019, 360: 1553-1563.
22	Viana D, Comos M, McAdam P R, et al. A single natural nucleotide mutation alters bacterial pathogen host tropism[J]. Nat. Genet., 2015, 47: 361-366.
23	Ben-Jacob E, Cohen I, Levine H. Cooperative self-organization of microorganisms[J]. Adv. Phys., 2000, 49(4): 395-554.
24	Dahabieh M S, Thevelein J M, Gibson B. Multimodal microorganism development: integrating top-down biological engineering with bottom-up rational design[J]. Trends Biotechnol., 2020, 38(3): 241-253.
25	Guo J, Luo W, Wu X M, et al. Improving RNA content of salt-tolerant Zygosaccharomyces rouxii by atmospheric and room temperature plasma (ARTP) mutagenesis and its application in soy sauce brewing[J]. World J. Microb. Biot., 2019, 35(12):1-10.
26	Zhang X, Zhang X F, Li H P, et al. Atmospheric and room temperature plasma (ARTP) as a new powerful mutagenesis tool[J]. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 2014, 98: 5387-5396.
27	Cui L Y, Wang S S, Guan C G, et al. Breeding of methanol-tolerant Methylobacterium extorquens AM1 by atmospheric and room temperature plasma mutagenesis combined with adaptive laboratory evolution[J]. Biotechnol. J., 2018, 13(6): 1700679.
28	Zheng B, Ma X Y, Wang N, et al. Utilization of rare codon-rich markers for screening amino acid overproducers[J]. Nature Communications, 2018, 9(1): 3616.
29	Zhang X, Zhang C, Zhou Q Q, et al. Quantitative evaluation of DNA damage and mutation rate by atmospheric and room-temperature plasma (ARTP) and conventional mutagenesis[J]. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 2015, 99:5639-5646.
30	封勇, 舒青龙. 一株环境Klebsiella pneumoniae硝化与反硝化研究[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2016, 39(S1):41-46.
	Feng Y, Shu Q L. Characteristics of nitrifying and denitrifying of an environmental Klebsiella pneumoniae strain[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2016, 39(S1):41-46.
31	刘小英, 冯晟, 班宜辉, 等. 一株异养硝化-好氧反硝化细菌的分离鉴定及其脱氮性能研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2016, 25(12):1983-1990.
	Liu X Y, Feng S, Ban Y H, et al. Study on isolation, identification and nitrogen removal performance of a heterotrophic nitrification-aerobic denitrification bacterium [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2016, 25(12):1983-1990.

水质指标	范围/（mg/L）
COD	439.0±106.7
NH₄⁺-N	46.6±5.8
TN	56.6±6.5
TP	4.9±1.1
SS	139.0±146.0

水质指标	范围/（mg/L）
COD	439.0±106.7
NH₄⁺-N	46.6±5.8
TN	56.6±6.5
TP	4.9±1.1
SS	139.0±146.0

K₂SO₄/(mg/L)	MgSO₄·7H₂O/(mg/L)	微量元素溶液/(ml/L)	牛肉膏/(g/L)
0	0	0	0
2.2	2.5	0.5	0.5
4.5	5.0	1.0	1.5
6.7	7.5	1.5	2.5

K₂SO₄/(mg/L)	MgSO₄·7H₂O/(mg/L)	微量元素溶液/(ml/L)	牛肉膏/(g/L)
0	0	0	0
2.2	2.5	0.5	0.5
4.5	5.0	1.0	1.5
6.7	7.5	1.5	2.5

因子	K₂SO₄/(mg/L)	MgSO₄·7H₂O/(mg/L)	微量元素/ (ml/L)	牛肉膏/(g/L)
试验1	2.2	2.5	0.5	0.5
试验2	2.2	5.0	1.0	1.5
试验3	2.2	7.5	1.5	2.5
试验4	4.5	2.5	1.0	2.5
试验5	4.5	5.0	1.5	0.5
试验6	4.5	7.5	0.5	1.5
试验7	6.7	2.5	1.5	1.5
试验8	6.7	5.0	0.5	2.5
试验9	6.7	7.5	1.0	0.5

反硝化微生物菌剂提升A²/O工艺TN去除效果

Denitrifying microbial agents improving TN removal of A²/O process

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 12

参考文献 31

相关文章 13

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

因子	K₂SO₄/(mg/L)	MgSO₄·7H₂O/(mg/L)	微量元素/ (ml/L)	牛肉膏/ (g/L)	F5/(个/ 毫升)
对照组	0	0	0	0	5.1×10⁶
试验1	2.2	2.5	0.5	1.0	5.9×10⁷
试验2	2.2	5.0	1.0	3.0	2.2×10⁸
试验3	2.2	7.5	1.5	5.0	2.0×10⁸
试验4	4.5	2.5	1.0	5.0	1.8×10⁸
试验5	4.5	5.0	1.5	1.0	6.5×10⁷
试验6	4.5	7.5	0.5	3.0	2.8×10⁸
试验7	6.7	2.5	1.5	3.0	2.2×10⁸
试验8	6.7	5.0	0.5	5.0	2.9×10⁸
试验9	6.7	7.5	1.0	1.0	6.8×10⁷

因子	K₂SO₄	MgSO₄·7H₂O	微量元素	牛肉膏
均值（水平1）	1.6×10⁸	1.5×10⁸	2.1×10⁸	0.6×10⁸
均值（水平2）	1.7×10⁸	1.9×10⁸	1.5×10⁸	2.4×10⁸
均值（水平3）	1.9×10⁸	1.8×10⁸	1.6×10⁸	2.2×10⁸
极差	3.3×10⁷	3.9×10⁷	5.4×10⁷	1.8×10⁸

编号	6 h	12 h	24 h	编号	6 h	12 h	24 h
A1	-	-	+	A42	-	-	-
A2	-	-	-	A43	-	-	-
A3	-	-	+++	A44	-	-	-
A4	-	-	+	A45	-	-	+
A5	-	-	-	A46	+	+	+++
A6	-	-	-	A47	+	+	+
A7	-	-	-	A48	++	+	++
A8	-	-	+	A49	++	++	+
A9	-	-	++	A50	+	+	++
A10	-	-	++	A52	+	+	+
A11	-	-	-	A53	+	+	+
A12	-	-	++	A54	+	+	+
A13	-	-	+	A55	+	+	+
A14	-	-	+	A56	+	+	+
A15	-	-	++	A57	+	+	+
A16	-	-	+	A58	+	+	+++
A17	-	-	-	A59	+	+	+
A18	-	-	-	A60	+	++	++
A19	-	-	-	A61	+	++	+++
A20	-	-	++	A64	+	+	+
A21	-	-	+	A65	+	+	+
A22	-	-	-	A66	+	+	+
A23	-	-	-	A67	+	+	+
A24	-	-	-	A68	+	+	+
A25	-	-	+	A69	+	+	+++
A26	-	-	-	A70	+	+	+
A27	-	-	+	A71	+	++	++
A28	-	-	-	A72	+	++	+
A29	-	-	-	A73	++	++	++
A30	-	-	-	A74	+++	+++	++
A31	-	-	-	A75	+++	+++	++
A32	-	-	+	A76	+++	+++	++
A33	-	-	-	A77	+++	+++	++
A34	-	-	-	A78	++	++	++
A35	-	-	-	A79	+++	+++	++
A36	-	-	-	A80	+++	++	++
A37	+	+	+	A81	+++	+++	++
A38	+	+	-	A82	+++	+++	+++
A39	+	-	-	A83	+++	+++	++
A40	-	-	-	A84	+++	+++	++
A41	-	-	-

编号	6 h	12 h	24 h	编号	6 h	12 h	24 h
A1	-	-	+	A42	-	-	-
A2	-	-	-	A43	-	-	-
A3	-	-	+++	A44	-	-	-
A4	-	-	+	A45	-	-	+
A5	-	-	-	A46	+	+	+++
A6	-	-	-	A47	+	+	+
A7	-	-	-	A48	++	+	++
A8	-	-	+	A49	++	++	+
A9	-	-	++	A50	+	+	++
A10	-	-	++	A52	+	+	+
A11	-	-	-	A53	+	+	+
A12	-	-	++	A54	+	+	+
A13	-	-	+	A55	+	+	+
A14	-	-	+	A56	+	+	+
A15	-	-	++	A57	+	+	+
A16	-	-	+	A58	+	+	+++
A17	-	-	-	A59	+	+	+
A18	-	-	-	A60	+	++	++
A19	-	-	-	A61	+	++	+++
A20	-	-	++	A64	+	+	+
A21	-	-	+	A65	+	+	+
A22	-	-	-	A66	+	+	+
A23	-	-	-	A67	+	+	+
A24	-	-	-	A68	+	+	+
A25	-	-	+	A69	+	+	+++
A26	-	-	-	A70	+	+	+
A27	-	-	+	A71	+	++	++
A28	-	-	-	A72	+	++	+
A29	-	-	-	A73	++	++	++
A30	-	-	-	A74	+++	+++	++
A31	-	-	-	A75	+++	+++	++
A32	-	-	+	A76	+++	+++	++
A33	-	-	-	A77	+++	+++	++
A34	-	-	-	A78	++	++	++
A35	-	-	-	A79	+++	+++	++
A36	-	-	-	A80	+++	++	++
A37	+	+	+	A81	+++	+++	++
A38	+	+	-	A82	+++	+++	+++
A39	+	-	-	A83	+++	+++	++
A40	-	-	-	A84	+++	+++	++
A41	-	-	-

[1]	孙雅雯, 张建华, 彭永臻, 王淑莹. 外加碳源类型对A²/O-BCO系统脱氮除磷性能的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(8): 3626-3634.
[2]	何佳敏, 孟佳, 张永, 李建政. 温度降低对UMSR处理高氨氮低碳氮比养猪废水效能的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(5): 2074-2080.
[3]	王成, 孟佳, 李玖龄, 李建政, 赵贞. 升流式微氧生物膜反应器处理高氨氮低C/N比养猪废水的效能[J]. 化工学报, 2016, 67(9): 3895-3901.
[4]	罗亚红, 李冬, 鲍林林, 许达, 蔡言安, 张杰. 长泥龄改良A²/O工艺的短程硝化反硝化除磷[J]. 化工学报, 2014, 65(12): 4985-4996.
[5]	金羽, 李建政, 任南琪, 刘淑丽. 耐冷氨氧化功能菌群的富集及其对A²/O系统的生物强化[J]. 化工学报, 2013, 64(9): 3367-3372.
[6]	李德生, 范太兴, 申彦冰, 吴为中. 污水处理厂尾水的电化学脱氮技术[J]. 化工学报, 2013, 64(3): 1084-1090.
[7]	李思敏, 杜国帅, 唐锋兵. 多点进水改良型复合A²/O处理低C/N污水[J]. 化工学报, 2013, 64(10): 3805-3811.
[8]	张兰河1，田宇1，郭静波2，赵可3，唐同同1，王立刚1，马放3. 微生物菌剂的构建及其在城市污水处理中的应用[J]. 化工进展, 2013, 32(08): 1943-1948.
[9]	李芳1，2，崔红梅1，2,吕炳南3. 生物转盘同步去除化学需氧量和氮的实验研究[J]. 化工进展, 2012, 31(07): 1615-1619.
[10]	张兰河1，2，王璐瑶1，张万友1，王旭明3. 进水负荷与硝化液回流比对低污泥浓度A2/O工艺脱氮效果的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2012, 31(03): 693-698.
[11]	陈永志，彭永臻，王建华，顾升波. A²/O-曝气生物滤池工艺反硝化除磷 [J]. CIESC Journal, 2011, 62(3): 797-804.
[12]	乔楠，张静，张金榜，孙伟，于大禹. 纳米Fe₃O₄负载好氧反硝化菌脱氮除磷性能 [J]. CIESC Journal, 2009, 28(11): 2058-.
[13]	王晓莲, 王淑莹, 彭永臻. 进水C/P比对A²/O工艺性能的影响 [J]. 化工学报, 2005, 56(9): 1765-1770.

编号	6 h	12 h	24 h	编号	6 h	12 h	24 h
A1	-	-	+	A42	-	-	-
A2	-	-	-	A43	-	-	-
A3	-	-	+++	A44	-	-	-
A4	-	-	+	A45	-	-	+
A5	-	-	-	A46	+	+	+++
A6	-	-	-	A47	+	+	+
A7	-	-	-	A48	++	+	++
A8	-	-	+	A49	++	++	+
A9	-	-	++	A50	+	+	++
A10	-	-	++	A52	+	+	+
A11	-	-	-	A53	+	+	+
A12	-	-	++	A54	+	+	+
A13	-	-	+	A55	+	+	+
A14	-	-	+	A56	+	+	+
A15	-	-	++	A57	+	+	+
A16	-	-	+	A58	+	+	+++
A17	-	-	-	A59	+	+	+
A18	-	-	-	A60	+	++	++
A19	-	-	-	A61	+	++	+++
A20	-	-	++	A64	+	+	+
A21	-	-	+	A65	+	+	+
A22	-	-	-	A66	+	+	+
A23	-	-	-	A67	+	+	+
A24	-	-	-	A68	+	+	+
A25	-	-	+	A69	+	+	+++
A26	-	-	-	A70	+	+	+
A27	-	-	+	A71	+	++	++
A28	-	-	-	A72	+	++	+
A29	-	-	-	A73	++	++	++
A30	-	-	-	A74	+++	+++	++
A31	-	-	-	A75	+++	+++	++
A32	-	-	+	A76	+++	+++	++
A33	-	-	-	A77	+++	+++	++
A34	-	-	-	A78	++	++	++
A35	-	-	-	A79	+++	+++	++
A36	-	-	-	A80	+++	++	++
A37	+	+	+	A81	+++	+++	++
A38	+	+	-	A82	+++	+++	+++
A39	+	-	-	A83	+++	+++	++
A40	-	-	-	A84	+++	+++	++
A41	-	-	-

编号	6 h	12 h	24 h	编号	6 h	12 h	24 h
A1	-	-	+	A42	-	-	-
A2	-	-	-	A43	-	-	-
A3	-	-	+++	A44	-	-	-
A4	-	-	+	A45	-	-	+
A5	-	-	-	A46	+	+	+++
A6	-	-	-	A47	+	+	+
A7	-	-	-	A48	++	+	++
A8	-	-	+	A49	++	++	+
A9	-	-	++	A50	+	+	++
A10	-	-	++	A52	+	+	+
A11	-	-	-	A53	+	+	+
A12	-	-	++	A54	+	+	+
A13	-	-	+	A55	+	+	+
A14	-	-	+	A56	+	+	+
A15	-	-	++	A57	+	+	+
A16	-	-	+	A58	+	+	+++
A17	-	-	-	A59	+	+	+
A18	-	-	-	A60	+	++	++
A19	-	-	-	A61	+	++	+++
A20	-	-	++	A64	+	+	+
A21	-	-	+	A65	+	+	+
A22	-	-	-	A66	+	+	+
A23	-	-	-	A67	+	+	+
A24	-	-	-	A68	+	+	+
A25	-	-	+	A69	+	+	+++
A26	-	-	-	A70	+	+	+
A27	-	-	+	A71	+	++	++
A28	-	-	-	A72	+	++	+
A29	-	-	-	A73	++	++	++
A30	-	-	-	A74	+++	+++	++
A31	-	-	-	A75	+++	+++	++
A32	-	-	+	A76	+++	+++	++
A33	-	-	-	A77	+++	+++	++
A34	-	-	-	A78	++	++	++
A35	-	-	-	A79	+++	+++	++
A36	-	-	-	A80	+++	++	++
A37	+	+	+	A81	+++	+++	++
A38	+	+	-	A82	+++	+++	+++
A39	+	-	-	A83	+++	+++	++
A40	-	-	-	A84	+++	+++	++
A41	-	-	-