低旋流配置下氨-甲烷-空气预混旋流火焰稳定性和排放特性

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20241165

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

通过实验与数值模拟相结合的方法，系统研究了低旋流配置对氨-甲烷-空气预混旋流火焰稳定性极限及污染物排放方面的影响。结果显示，高旋流配置下，各种工况均表现出较高的污染物排放，尤其是未燃氨、一氧化碳和氮氧化物。而低旋流配置显著降低了这些污染物的排放，仅略微缩小了火焰稳定性极限。然而，低旋流配置下的氨-甲烷-空气火焰产生了较高的氧化二氮，这归因于低旋流配置降低了火焰温度，抑制了氧化二氮的热裂解。此外，随着非旋流气流比例的增加，尽管污染物排放量进一步减少，但火焰稳定性极限显著收缩，这与低旋流下火焰结构和流场结构的变化密切相关。综合而言，低旋流配置在污染物排放与火焰稳定性之间可以达到较优的平衡，适用于需要降低污染物排放的燃烧应用场景。

关键词: 氨燃烧, 低旋流配置, 稳定性极限, 火焰拓扑, 流动结构, 污染物排放

Abstract:

A combination of experiments and numerical simulations was employed to investigate the effects of low swirl configurations on the flame stability limits and emissions of ammonia-methane-air premixed swirling flames. The results indicated that high pollutant emissions were observed under all conditions in high swirl combustion, particularly unburned ammonia, carbon monoxide, and nitrogen oxides. In contrast, the low swirl configuration effectively reduced these pollutant emissions with only slightly narrowing the stability limits. However, ammonia-methane-air flames under low-swirl configurations produced higher levels of nitrous oxide $(N ₂ O)$ , which can be attributed to the lower flame temperature that inhibited the thermal decomposition of $N ₂ O$ . When the non-swirling flows were further increased, the stability limits became very narrow, even though emissions were further reduced. Overall, the low-swirl configuration achieves an optimal balance between pollutant emissions and flame stability, making it suitable for combustion applications requiring reduced pollutant emissions. In general, the low swirl configuration can achieve an optimal balance between pollutant emissions and flame stability, and is suitable for combustion application scenarios that require reducing pollutant emissions.

Key words: ammonia combustion, low swirl configuration, stability limits, flame topology, flow structures, emissions

中图分类号:

TK 16

杨浩杰, 刘春雨, 李雪娇, 于亮, 吕兴才. 低旋流配置下氨-甲烷-空气预混旋流火焰稳定性和排放特性[J]. 化工学报, 2025, 76(6): 3029-3040.

Haojie YANG, Chunyu LIU, Xuejiao LI, Liang YU, Xingcai LYU. Study of stability limits and emission characteristics in premixed ammonia-methane-air swirling flames in low swirl configurations[J]. CIESC Journal, 2025, 76(6): 3029-3040.

图/表 15

图1 旋流器配置示意图

Fig.1 Schematic of the swirler configurations

表1 旋流器的几何尺寸

Table 1 Geometric dimensions of the swirlers

参数	LSI₁	LSI₂	HSI
旋流数S_N	0.6	0.6	0.6
叶片角度θ/(°)	40	40	40
叶片数N_b	8	8	8
中心通孔个数N_h	39	55	—
通孔直径d/mm	2	2	—
旋流器内径R_i/mm	10	12	7
旋流器外径R_o/mm	16	16	16
非旋流与旋流气体的质量流量之比R_m /%	25	49	0

图2 实验设备示意图

Fig.2 Schematic of experimental equipment

图3 模型结构与网格设置

Fig.3 Schematic of model structure and mesh distribution

图4 旋流火焰模拟网格无关性验证

Fig.4 Mesh independence verification

表2 实验工况

Table 2 Operating conditions

参数	数值
热功率P	20 kW
甲烷流量U_m	16.1~33.5 SLPM
氨气流量U_a	0.0~44.8 SLPM
空气流量U_air	180~600 SLPM
氨气体积分数 $η N H 3$	0~75%

表2 实验工况

Table 2 Operating conditions

参数	数值
热功率P	20 kW
甲烷流量U_m	16.1~33.5 SLPM
氨气流量U_a	0.0~44.8 SLPM
空气流量U_air	180~600 SLPM
氨气体积分数 $η N H 3$	0~75%

图5 旋流火焰模拟准确性验证

Fig.5 Verification of the accuracy of the swirl flame simulation

图6 模型准确性验证

Fig.6 Model accuracy validation

图7 模拟流场结构对比

Fig.7 Numerical simulation of the flow field structure

图8 不同NH3体积分数下数值模拟温度等值线

Fig.8 Numerical simulation temperature contour plots for different NH3 volume fractions

图9 三种旋流器配置下NH3-CH4-air旋流火焰稳定性极限

Fig.9 NH3-CH4-air flame stability limits for three different swirler configurations

图10 数值模拟三种旋流器配置下NO平均质量分数分布（ηNH3=50%和φ = 0.9）

Fig.10 Numerical simulation of NO mass fraction distribution for three swirler configurations(ηNH3=50% and φ = 0.9)

图11 HSI配置下NO和OH的平均质量分数分布（ηNH3=50%和φ = 0.9）

Fig.11 Average mass fraction distribution of NO and OH in HSI configuration(ηNH3=50% and φ = 0.9)

图12 火焰区OH-T和NH-N的散点图

Fig.12 Scatter plots of OH-T and NH-N in flame zone

图13 三种旋流器配置下污染物排放与ηNH3和φ关系函数图（HSI配置被用作参考）

Fig.13 Plots of emissions as a function of φ and ηNH3 for three swirler configurations(HSI is used as the refence for subtraction)

参考文献 42

[1]	Medina A V, Hua X, Owen-Jones M, et al. Ammonia for power[J]. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2018, 69: 63-102.
[2]	Hayakawa A, Goto T, Mimoto R, et al. Laminar burning velocity and Markstein length of ammonia/air premixed flames at various pressures[J]. Fuel, 2015, 159: 98-106.
[3]	Lesmana H, Zhu M M, Zhang Z Z, et al. An experimental investigation into the effect of spark gap and duration on minimum ignition energy of partially dissociated NH₃ in air[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2022, 241: 112053.
[4]	Katoch A, Guiberti T F, de Campos D V, et al. Dual-fuel, dual-swirl burner for the mitigation of thermoacoustic instabilities in turbulent ammonia-hydrogen flames[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2022, 246: 112392.
[5]	Goldmann A, Dinkelacker F. Investigation of boundary layer flashback for non-swirling premixed hydrogen/ammonia/nitrogen/oxygen/air flames[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2022, 238: 111927.
[6]	De S, Mondal S, Bhattacharya A, et al. Dynamics of premixed flames near lean and rich blowout[J]. Combustion Science and Technology, 2024, 196(11): 1685-1701.
[7]	Li S H, Zhang X Y, Zhong D, et al. Effects of inert dilution on the lean blowout characteristics of syngas flames[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(21): 9075-9086.
[8]	Li Y J, Zheng H T, Cai L. Numerical simulation on H₂ rich blowout limit in bluff-body burner[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2013, 52(5): 2094-2102.
[9]	Valera-Medina A, Marsh R, Runyon J, et al. Ammonia-methane combustion in tangential swirl burners for gas turbine power generation[J]. Applied Energy, 2017, 185: 1362-1371.
[10]	Li S, Zhang S S, Zhou H, et al. Analysis of air-staged combustion of NH₃/CH₄ mixture with low NO _x emission at gas turbine conditions in model combustors[J]. Fuel, 2019, 237: 50-59.
[11]	Kurata O, Iki N, Matsunuma T, et al. Performances and emission characteristics of NH₃-air and NH₃-CH₄-air combustion gas-turbine power generations[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2017, 36(3): 3351-3359.
[12]	Ji L J, Wang J H, Hu G Y, et al. Experimental study on structure and blow-off characteristics of NH₃/CH₄ co-firing flames in a swirl combustor[J]. Fuel, 2022, 314: 123027.
[13]	Kim J H, Song J H, Ku J W, et al. Combustion characteristics of premixed ammonia-hydrogen/air flames in a swirl model combustor[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 49: 1075-1086.
[14]	Okafor E C, Somarathne K D K A, Hayakawa A, et al. Towards the development of an efficient low-NO _x ammonia combustor for a micro gas turbine[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2019, 37(4): 4597-4606.
[15]	Elbaz A M, Albalawi A M, Wang S X, et al. Stability and characteristics of NH₃/CH₄/air flames in a combustor fired by a double swirl stabilized burner[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2023, 39(4): 4205-4213.
[16]	Somarathne K D K A, Hayakawa A, Kobayashi H. Numerical investigation on the combustion characteristics of turbulent premixed ammonia/air flames stabilized by a swirl burner[J]. Journal of Fluid Science and Technology, 2016, 11(4): JFST0026.
[17]	Durox D, Moeck J P, Bourgouin J F, et al. Flame dynamics of a variable swirl number system and instability control[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2013, 160(9): 1729-1742.
[18]	Jeong H, Han M, Kang K, et al. An experimental study on the effect of a turbulence generating plate in low swirl combustor[J]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2017, 31(12): 6077-6084.
[19]	Chan C K, Lau K S, Chin W K, et al. Freely propagating open premixed turbulent flames stabilized by swirl[J]. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1992, 24(1): 511-518.
[20]	Littlejohn D, Cheng R K, Noble D R, et al. Laboratory investigations of low-swirl injectors operating with syngases[J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2010, 132(1): 011502.
[21]	Verbeek A A, Bouten T W F M, Stoffels G G M, et al. Fractal turbulence enhancing low-swirl combustion[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2015, 162(1): 129-143.
[22]	毛晨林, 王平, Shrotriya Prashant, 等. 含氨燃料预混火焰的层流火焰速度及NO排放特性[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(10): 5330-5343.
	Mao C L, Wang P, Shrotriya P, et al. Laminar flame speed and NO emission characteristics of premixed flames with different ammonia-containing fuels[J]. CIESC Journal, 2021, 72(10): 5330-5343.
[23]	Pashchenko D. Ammonia fired gas turbines: recent advances and future perspectives[J]. Energy, 2024, 290: 130275.
[24]	Wu F H, Chen G B. Numerical study of hydrogen peroxide enhancement of ammonia premixed flames[J]. Energy, 2020, 209: 118118.
[25]	Xiao Y L, Cao Z B, Wang C W. Flame stability limits of premixed low-swirl combustion[J]. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 2018, 10(9): 168781401879087.
[26]	Clemens N T, Mungal M G. A planar Mie scattering technique for visualizing supersonic mixing flows[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 1991, 11(2): 175-185.
[27]	Shih T H, Liou W W, Shabbir A, et al. A new k-ϵ eddy viscosity model for high Reynolds number turbulent flows[J]. Computers & Fluids, 1995, 24(3): 227-238.
[28]	Liu C Y, Gao C H, Huang Y, et al. Experimental and numerical study of combustion characteristics of ammonia-hydrogen-air swirling flame with/without secondary air injection[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2024, 37(4): 243-255.
[29]	Sun Y Z, Cai T, Shahsavari M, et al. RANS simulations on combustion and emission characteristics of a premixed NH₃/H₂ swirling flame with reduced chemical kinetic model[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2021, 34(12): 17-27.
[30]	Belal B Y, Li G S, Zhang Z H, et al. The effect of swirl burner design configuration on combustion and emission characteristics of lean pre-vaporized premixed flames[J]. Energy, 2021, 228: 120622.
[31]	Singh G, Chander S, Ray A. Heat transfer characteristics of natural gas/air swirling flame impinging on a flat surface[J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2012, 41: 165-176.
[32]	Oh J, Noh D, Lee E. The effect of CO addition on the flame behavior of a non-premixed oxy-methane jet in a lab-scale furnace[J]. Applied Energy, 2013, 112: 350-357.
[33]	Tao C F, Liu B, Dou Y L, et al. The experimental study of flame height and lift-off height of propane diffusion flames diluted by carbon dioxide[J]. Fuel, 2021, 290: 119958.
[34]	Hardalupas Y, Orain M. Local measurements of the time-dependent heat release rate and equivalence ratio using chemiluminescent emission from a flame[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2004, 139(3): 188-207.
[35]	Khateeb A A, Guiberti T F, Zhu X R, et al. Stability limits and NO emissions of technically-premixed ammonia-hydrogen-nitrogen-air swirl flames[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(41): 22008-22018.
[36]	Guiberti T F, Durox D, Zimmer L, et al. Analysis of topology transitions of swirl flames interacting with the combustor side wall[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2015, 162(11): 4342-4357.
[37]	Li G, Jiang X, Zhu J Q, et al. Combustion control using a lobed swirl injector and a plasma swirler[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2019, 152: 92-102.
[38]	Ariemma G B, Sorrentino G, Ragucci R, et al. Ammonia/methane combustion: stability and NO _x emissions[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2022, 241: 112071.
[39]	Sayad P, Schönborn A, Klingmann J. Experimental investigation of the stability limits of premixed syngas-air flames at two moderate swirl numbers[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2016, 164: 270-282.
[40]	肖申, 沈来宏, 牛欣, 等. 含氮模型化合物用于化学链燃烧的氮氧化物释放特性[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(11): 4588-4596.
	Xiao S, Shen L H, Niu X, et al. NO _x release in chemical looping combustion of N-containing model compounds[J]. CIESC Journal, 2015, 66(11): 4588-4596.
[41]	程康, 王平, 毛晨林, 等. 氨气-氢气富燃湍流旋转火焰的大涡模拟[J]. 燃烧科学与技术, 2023, 29(5): 561-568.
	Cheng K, Wang P, Mao C L, et al. Large eddy simulation of rich ammonia-hydrogen turbulent swirling flame[J]. Journal of Combustion Science and Technology, 2023, 29(5): 561-568.
[42]	Mashruk S, Okafor E C, Kovaleva M, et al. Evolution of N₂O production at lean combustion condition in NH₃/H₂/air premixed swirling flames[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2022, 244: 112299.