N-SBR单元硝化时间分配比对A2N2系统运行性能的影响

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20160861

化工学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 67 ›› Issue (12): 5259-5267.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20160861

N-SBR单元硝化时间分配比对A₂N₂系统运行性能的影响

王梅香, 赵伟华, 黄宇, 潘聪, 彭永臻, 王淑莹

北京工业大学城镇污水深度处理与资源化利用技术国家工程实验室, 北京市水质科学与水环境恢复工程重点实验室, 北京市污水脱氮除磷处理与过程控制工程技术研究中心, 北京 100124

收稿日期:2016-06-27 修回日期:2016-09-08 出版日期:2016-12-05 发布日期:2016-12-05
通讯作者: 王淑莹。wsy@bjut.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（51578014）；北京市教委资助项目。

Effect of nitrification duration distribution ratio in N-SBR unit on performance of A₂N₂ system operation

WANG Meixiang, ZHAO Weihua, HUANG Yu, PAN Cong, PENG Yongzhen, WANG Shuying

National Engineering Laboratory for Advanced Municipal Wastewater Treatment and Reuse Technology, Key Laboratory of Beijing for Water Quality Science and Water Environment Recovery Engineering, Engineering Research Center of Beijing, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China

Received:2016-06-27 Revised:2016-09-08 Online:2016-12-05 Published:2016-12-05
Supported by:
supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51578014) and the Funding Projects of Beijing Municipal Commission of Education.

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以低C/N实际生活污水为处理对象，重点考察了N-SBR单元硝化时间分配比对A₂N₂系统运行性能的影响。在A²/O-SBR单元厌氧1.5 h，缺氧2 h，好氧0.5 h，A²/O-SBR和N-SBR单元的曝气量分别恒定在100、120 L·h^-1的条件下，将硝化时间分配比分别设定为5：1、4：1、3.5：1、3：1、7：1、8：1进行试验。结果表明，系统在A²/O-SBR单元可实现碳源的高效利用，有机物的去除受硝化时间分配比影响不大；为保证系统良好的硝化和反硝化除磷性能，一次硝化时间必须≥3.5 h；在总曝气时间一定的条件下，适当增加一次硝化时间，更有利于提高系统TN去除率；适当增加二次硝化时间，可以降低出水浓度，使出水达标排放。当硝化时间分配比为4：1时，系统脱氮除磷效果最好。TN、PO₄^3--P平均出水浓度分别为11.5、0 mg·L^-1，平均去除率分别为75%、100%。

关键词: 低C/N生活污水, 反硝化除磷, A₂N₂系统, 同步脱氮除磷, 硝化时间分配比

Abstract:

A novel A₂N₂ system was developed to deal with low C/N domestic wastewater. The operating performance under different nitrification duration distribution ratio in N-SBR unit was investigated. The experiment was conducted as follows: under the condition of A²/O-SBR unit anaerobic was set as 1.5 h, anoxic 2 h, aerobic 0.5 h and the aeration flow rate of A²/O-SBR and N-SBR units was 100 and 120 L·h^-1, respectively, and then the nitrification time distribution ratios were set as 5:1, 4:1, 3.5:1, 3:1, 7:1 and 8:1 to determine the optimal operation parameter. The results indicated that the efficient utilization of carbon sources was achieved in the A²/O-SBR unit, while the nitrification duration distribution ratio had little impact on the removal of organic substances. In order to ensure a better nitrification and denitrification and phosphorus removal performance, the first nitrification duration time must be≥3.5 h. Under the condition of total nitrification time was unchanged, an appropriate increase in the first nitrification time would greatly improve the system TN removal. An appropriate increase in the secondary nitrification time can reduce the effluent NH₄⁺-N concentration to meet the first A discharge standard in China(GB 18918-2002). When nitrification time allocation ratio was 4:1, the system achieved the optimal nitrogen and phosphorus removal performance with average effluent concentrations of TN and PO₄^3--P of 11.5 and 0 mg·L^-1, respectively, and the corresponding average removal efficiency was 75% and 100%, respectively.

Key words: low C/N ratio domestic wastewater, denitrifying phosphorus removal, A₂N₂ system, simultaneous biological nitrogen and phosphorus removal, nitrification duration distribution ratio

中图分类号:

X703.1

王梅香, 赵伟华, 黄宇, 潘聪, 彭永臻, 王淑莹. N-SBR单元硝化时间分配比对A₂N₂系统运行性能的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2016, 67(12): 5259-5267.

WANG Meixiang, ZHAO Weihua, HUANG Yu, PAN Cong, PENG Yongzhen, WANG Shuying. Effect of nitrification duration distribution ratio in N-SBR unit on performance of A₂N₂ system operation[J]. CIESC Journal, 2016, 67(12): 5259-5267.

参考文献 28

[1]	杨瑞丰. 以硝氮为主要氮源反硝化除磷细菌的驯化及影响因素研究[D]. 大连:大连理工大学, 2015. YANG R F. Acclimation and influence factors study of denitrifying phosphorous removal bacteria with nitrate as main nitrogen source[D]. Dalian:Dalian University of Technology, 2015.
[2]	王辉, 沈耀良. 硝酸盐对反硝化除磷过程的影响分析[J]. 环境工程学报, 2009,(6):977-980. WANG H, SHEN Y L. Impact analysis of nitrate on denitrifying dephosphatation[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2009,(6):977-980.
[3]	王亚宜, 彭永臻, 殷芳芳, 等. 双污泥SBR工艺反硝化除磷脱氮特性及影响因素[J]. 环境科学, 2008,(6):1526-1532. WANG Y Y, PENG Y Z, YIN F F, et al. Characteristics and affecting factors of denitrifying phosphorus removal in two-sludge sequencing batch reactor[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2008,(6):1526-1532.
[4]	令云芳. 厌氧/缺氧/硝化双污泥反硝化除磷[D]. 北京:北京工业大学, 2006. LING Y F. Denitrifying phosphorus removal in anaerobic-anoxic-nitrification double sludge system[D]. Beijing:Beijing University of Technology, 2006.
[5]	王梅香, 赵伟华, 王淑莹, 等. A2N2双污泥系统反硝化除磷工艺的启动与稳定[J]. 化工学报, 2016, 67(7):2987-2997. WANG M X, ZHAO W H, WANG S Y, et al. Startup and stability of A2N2 double sludge system denitrifying phosphorus removal process[J]. CIESC Journal, 2016, 67(7):2987-2997.
[6]	KUBA T, VANLOOSDRECHT M, HEIJNEN J J. Phosphorus and nitrogen removal with minimal cod requirement by integration of denitrifying dephosphatation and nitrification in a two-sludge system[J]. Water Research, 1996, 30(7):1702-1710.
[7]	HU J Y, ONG S L, NG W J, et al. A new method for characterizing denitrifying phosphorus removal bacteria by using three different types of electron acceptors[J]. Water Research, 2003, 37(14):3463-3471.
[8]	彭永臻, 王建华, 陈永志. A2O-BAF联合工艺处理低碳氮比生活污水[J]. 北京工业大学学报, 2012,(4):590-595. PENG Y Z, WANG J H, CHEN Y Z. Treating low carbon and nitrogen ratio sewage with an A2O-BAF system[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Technology, 2012,(4):590-595.
[9]	张雅静, 王社平, 王建军, 等. 水力停留时间对SBR工艺脱氮除磷效果的影响分析[J]. 水处理技术, 2013,(4):59-61. ZHANG Y J, WANG S P, WANG J J, et al. Effect of hydraulic retention time on nitrogen and phosphorus removal of SBR process[J]. Water Treatment Technology, 2013,(4):59-61.
[10]	张淼, 彭永臻, 王聪, 等. 容积分配比对A2/O-生物接触氧化工艺反硝化除磷特性的影响[J]. 东南大学学报(自然科学版), 2015,(3):531-538. ZHANG M, PENG Y Z, WANG C, et al. Effect on denitrifying phosphorus removal by optimizing volume ratios in A2/O-biological contact oxidation(A2/O-BCO) process[J]. Journal of Southeast University(Natural Science Edition), 2015,(3):531-538.
[11]	郭春艳. 不同电子受体及pH值对聚磷菌代谢的影响[D]. 北京:北京工业大学, 2011. GUO C Y. Effects of different electron acceptors and pH on metabolism of polyphosphate accumulating organisms[D]. Beijing:Beijing University of Technology, 2011.
[12]	姚伟涛. A2N-SBMBBR对生活污水反硝化除磷研究[D]. 北京:北京工业大学, 2011. YAO W T. Study on denitrifying phosphorus removal from domestic sewage in A2N-SBMBBR[D]. Beijing:Beijing University of Technology, 2011.
[13]	张晓洁, 周少奇, 丁进军, 等. 不同电子受体影响下的反硝化除磷过程[J]. 华南理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2007,(6):120-126. ZHANG X J, ZHOU S Q, DING J J, et al. Denitrifying phosphorus removal affected by different electron acceptors[J]. Journal of South China University of Technology(Natural Science Edition), 2007,(6):120-126.
[14]	张立成, 傅金祥, 李冬, 等. 不同电子受体反硝化除磷脱氮性能研究[J]. 沈阳建筑大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 25(3):544-547. ZHANG L C, FU J X, LI D,et al. Research on the characteristics of denitrifying phosphorus and nitrogen removal by different electron acceptors[J]. Journal of Shenyang Jianzhu University(Natural Science), 2009, 25(3):544-547.
[15]	赵璐, 傅金祥, 池福强.NO3-、NO2-作为反硝化除磷最终电子受体的研究初探[J]. 水处理技术, 2009,(5):31-34. ZHAO L, FU J X, CHI F Q. Preliminary study of nitrate and nitrite as final electron acceptor of denitrification phosphorous removal[J]. Water Treatment Technology, 2009,(5):31-34.
[16]	高大文, 李强, 梁红, 等. NO3-和NO2-作为电子受体时的反硝化除磷实时控制[J]. 环境科学, 2009,(4):1073-1078. GAO D W, LI Q, LIANG H, et al. Real-time process control of denitrifying phosphorus and nitrogen removal systems with NO3- and NO2- as electron acceptors[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2009,(4):1073-1078.
[17]	王建龙, 王淑莹, 高永青. SBR工艺强化反硝化除磷及控制参数[J]. 北京工业大学学报, 2008, 34(2):178-183. WANG J L, WANG S Y, GAO Y Q. Controlling parameters in SBR with enhanced anoxic phosphate uptake[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Technology, 2008, 34(2):178-183.
[18]	KUBA T, VAN LOOSDRECHT M, HEIJNEN J J. Biological dephosphatation by activated sludge under denitrifying conditions:pH influence and occurrence of denitrifying dephosphatation in a full-scale waste water treatment plant[J]. Water Science and Technology, 1997, 36(12):75-82.
[19]	KUBA T, MURNLEITNER E, VAN LOOSDRECHT M, et al. A metabolic model for biological phosphorus removal by denitrifying organisms[J]. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 1996, 52(6):685-695.
[20]	SMOLDER G, VANDERMEIJ J, VAN LOOSDRECHT M, et al. Stoichiometric model of the aerobic metabolism of the biological phosphorus removal process[J]. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 1994, 44(7):837-848.
[21]	王亚宜, 王淑莹, 彭永臻. 反硝化除磷的生物化学代谢模型[J]. 中国给水排水, 2006,(6):4-7. WANG Y Y, WANG S Y, PENG Y Z. Metabolic model for denitrifying biochemical phosphorus removal[J]. China Water & Wastewater, 2006,(6):4-7.
[22]	SCHULER A J, JENKINS D. Effects of pH on enhanced biological phosphorus removal metabolisms[J]. Water Science and Technology, 2002, 46(4/5):171-178.
[23]	曾薇, 彭永臻, 王淑莹. 以DO、ORP、pH作为两段SBR工艺的实时控制参数[J]. 环境科学学报, 2003,(2):252-256. ZENG W, PENG Y Z, WANG S Y. Application of DO, ORP and pH as on-line control parameters in a two-stage SBR process[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2003,(2):252-256.
[24]	陈永志, 彭永臻, 王建华, 等. A2/O-曝气生物滤池工艺处理低C/N比生活污水脱氮除磷[J]. 环境科学学报, 2010,(10):1957-1963. CHEN Y Z, PENG Y Z, WANG J H, et al. Biological phosphorus and nitrogen removal in low C/N ratio domestic sewagetreatment by a A2/O-BAF combined system[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2010,(10):1957-1963.
[25]	ZHANG W, PENG Y, REN N, et al. Improvement of nutrient removal by optimizing the volume ratio of anoxic to aerobic zone in AAO-BAF system[J]. Chemosphere, 2013, 93(11):2859-2863.
[26]	尹航, 何理, 卢健聪, 等. 水力停留时间对生物膜/颗粒污泥耦合工艺脱氮除磷的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2014, 65(6):2294-2300. YIN H, HE L, LU J C, et al. Effect of hydraulic retention time on nitrogen and phosphorus removal by biofilm and granular coupling process[J]. CIESC Journal, 2014, 65(6):2294-2300.
[27]	张为堂, 侯锋, 刘青松, 等. HRT和曝气量对AAO-BAF系统反硝化除磷性能的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2014, 65(4):1436-1442. ZHANG W T, HOU F, LIU Q S, et al. Effect of HRT and aeration rate on performance of AAO-BAF system for denitrifying phosphorus removal.[J]. CIESC Journal, 2014, 65(4):1436-1442.
[28]	吉芳英, 高茜, 袁春华. 温度和COD对SBR反硝化同时除磷系统除磷能力的影响[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2005,(6):30-33. JI F Y, GAO Q, YUAN C H. Effect of temperature and COD on ability of denitrifying phosphorus removal in SBR[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2005,(6):30-33.

N-SBR单元硝化时间分配比对A₂N₂系统运行性能的影响

Effect of nitrification duration distribution ratio in N-SBR unit on performance of A₂N₂ system operation

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 28

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	巩有奎, 罗佩云, 孙洪伟. 厌氧-限氧SBR处理低C/N生活污水SNDPR启动及N₂O释放[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(8): 4381-4390.
[2]	孙雅雯, 张建华, 彭永臻, 王淑莹. 外加碳源类型对A²/O-BCO系统脱氮除磷性能的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(8): 3626-3634.
[3]	王梅香, 赵伟华, 王淑莹, 张勇, 彭永臻, 潘聪, 黄宇. A₂N₂双污泥系统反硝化除磷工艺的启动与稳定[J]. 化工学报, 2016, 67(7): 2987-2997.
[4]	张为堂, 薛晓飞, 庞洪涛, 张杰, 李冬, 彭永臻. 碳氮比对AAO-BAF工艺运行性能的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(5): 1925-1930.
[5]	王聪, 王淑莹, 张淼, 彭永臻, 曾薇. 多因素对反硝化除磷过程中COD、N和P的去除分析[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(4): 1467-1475.
[6]	张建华, 彭永臻, 张淼, 王淑莹, 王聪. 不同电子受体配比对反硝化除磷特性及内碳源转化利用的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(12): 5045-5053.
[7]	张勇, 王淑莹, 赵伟华, 孙事昊, 彭永臻, 曾薇. 中试规模AAO-曝气生物滤池双污泥系统的启动运行[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(10): 4228-4235.
[8]	张为堂, 侯锋, 刘青松, 邵彦青, 薛晓飞, 彭永臻. HRT和曝气量对AAO-BAF系统反硝化除磷性能的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2014, 65(4): 1436-1442.
[9]	罗亚红, 李冬, 鲍林林, 许达, 蔡言安, 张杰. 长泥龄改良A²/O工艺的短程硝化反硝化除磷[J]. 化工学报, 2014, 65(12): 4985-4996.
[10]	李思敏, 杜国帅, 唐锋兵. 多点进水改良型复合A²/O处理低C/N污水[J]. 化工学报, 2013, 64(10): 3805-3811.
[11]	刘鹏，陈银广. 污水脱氮除磷新工艺研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2013, 32(10): 2491-2496.
[12]	徐微，吕锡武. 连续流双污泥反硝化除磷工艺数学模型[J]. 化工学报, 2012, 63(2): 618-625.
[13]	郭海燕, 郭祯, 冯腾腾, 张寿通, 周集体. 序批式移动床生物膜反应器脱氮除磷影响因素及特性[J]. 化工学报, 2012, 63(1): 251-257.
[14]	葛士建1，王淑莹1,曹旭1,马斌2,路聪聪1,彭永臻1,2. 分段进水脱氮除磷工艺中反硝化除磷的实现与维持 [J]. CIESC Journal, 2011, 62(9): 2615-2622.
[15]	王荣昌, 司书鹏, 郑翔, 杨殿海, 励建全, 赵建夫. 溶解氧浓度对连续流活性污泥工艺反硝化除磷的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2011, 62(6): 1708-1715.