载气流量及升温速率对污染土壤中多氯联苯热脱附的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2014.06.041

化工学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (6): 2256-2263.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2014.06.041

载气流量及升温速率对污染土壤中多氯联苯热脱附的影响

白四红, 陈彤, 祁志福, 刘洁, 陆胜勇, 薄拯, 李晓东

浙江大学热能工程研究所能源清洁利用国家重点实验室, 浙江杭州 310027

收稿日期:2013-09-06 修回日期:2013-11-21 出版日期:2014-06-05 发布日期:2014-06-05
通讯作者: 陈彤
作者简介:白四红（1990- ），男，硕士研究生
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究发展计划项目（2011CB201500）；国家高技术研究发展计划项目（2009AA061304）。

Effect of carrier gas flow rate and heating rate on thermal desorption of polychlorinated biphenyls in contaminated soil

BAI Sihong, CHEN Tong, QI Zhifu, LIU Jie, LU Shengyong, BO Zheng, LI Xiaodong

State Key Laboratory of Clean Energy Utilization, Institute for Thermal Power Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, Zhejiang, China

Received:2013-09-06 Revised:2013-11-21 Online:2014-06-05 Published:2014-06-05
Supported by:
supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (2011CB201500) and the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (2009AA061304).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 利用小型管式炉进行了载气流量和升温速率对多氯联苯污染土壤的热脱附过程影响的实验研究。结果表明流量的增大对多氯联苯含量和毒性当量的去除效率影响不大，载气流量小于400 ml·min^-1时，气相中的脱附量明显增大，载气流量大于400 ml·min^-1则脱附量变化较小，而多氯联苯的毒性当量则随着载气流量增大呈线性增加趋势。实验结果还表明污染土壤中多氯联苯变化速率与升温速率呈明显的正线性相关，随着升温速率增加，污染土壤中多氯联苯去除效率总体呈上升趋势，毒性当量去除效率降低。总体结果分析可以看到升温速率越大，总体效果也越好。污染土壤经热脱附处理后气固相的二英毒性当量则有不同程度提升，尤其气相内检测到了大量多氯二苯并呋喃生成。

关键词: 热脱附, 载气流量, 停留时间, 升温速率, 多氯联苯, 二英, 热降解

Abstract: A real soil contaminated by high concentration polychlorinated biphenyl (PCBs) was heated in a tube furnace at various carrier gas flow rate and at various heating rate to investigate their effect on thermal desorption of PCBs in contaminated soil. With the rising of carrier gas flow rate, a slight increase of PCBs removal efficiency (from 93.5% to 95.1%) and toxic equivalency quantity (TEQ) in soil were observed. With increase of the flow rate desorption amount of PCBs was obvious large when it was lower than 400 ml·min^-1, then a little chang at >400 ml·min^-1, while TEQ of PCBs showed a trend of linear increase with the rising of flow rate. The TEQ of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin/dibenzofuran (PCDD/Fs) in treated soil decreased, while in carrier gas a large increase of TEQ of PCDD/Fs especially PCDFs was observed.The removal rate of PCBs in soil showed a significant positive linear relationship with the heating rate. With the rising of heating rate, the removal efficiency of PCBs in soil increased, and the TEQ of PCBs had a little change. The desorption amount of PCBs decreased. The TEQ removal efficiency of PCDD/Fs increased. After thermal desoption there was significant formation of PCDD/Fs while there was TEQ high increase of PCDD/Fs. Generally, the effect of flow rate on the removal efficiency of PCBs in soil was less but on the desorption amount of PCBs was significant. Higher heating rate can make a better removal efficiency of PCBs and lower formation of PCDD/Fs.

Key words: thermal desorption, carrier gas flow rate, residue time, heating rate, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin/dibenzofuran (PCDD/Fs), thermal degradation

中图分类号:

白四红, 陈彤, 祁志福, 刘洁, 陆胜勇, 薄拯, 李晓东. 载气流量及升温速率对污染土壤中多氯联苯热脱附的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2014, 65(6): 2256-2263.

BAI Sihong, CHEN Tong, QI Zhifu, LIU Jie, LU Shengyong, BO Zheng, LI Xiaodong. Effect of carrier gas flow rate and heating rate on thermal desorption of polychlorinated biphenyls in contaminated soil[J]. CIESC Journal, 2014, 65(6): 2256-2263.

参考文献 23

[1]	Que Mingxue(阙明学). The distribution and source apportionment of PCBs contaminated in soil [D]. Harbin: Harbin Engineering University, 2007
[2]	Cao Xianzhong(曹先仲), Shen Songmei(申松梅), Song Yanhui(宋艳辉), Lian Xiaoying(连小英). The nature and environmental impact of PCBs [J]. Sciencepaper Online(中国科技论文在线), 2008, 3(5): 375-381
[3]	Kang Zhuangwu(康壮武), Shu Shenghui(舒生辉), Zhang Zhi(张志). Research progress in chemical treatment of PCBs [J]. Guangxi Journal of Light Industry(广西轻工业), 2010(7): 23-24
[4]	Hu Fang(胡芳), Xu Zhencheng(许振成). Pollution of PCBs in environment media in China [J]. Guangdong Chemical Industry(广东化工), 2009, 39(1): 87-88
[5]	Hu Jinzhao(胡劲召), Chen Shaojin(陈少瑾), Wu Shuangtao(吴双桃), Chen Yifei(陈宜菲), Xie Ningzi(谢凝子). The contaminant of PCBs and treatment methods progress [J]. Jiangxi Chemical Industry(江西化工), 2004(4): 1-5
[6]	Meng Qingyu(孟庆昱), Chu Shaogang(储少岗), Xu Xiaobai(徐晓白). Research of the adsorption behavior of PCBs in the environment [J]. Chinese Science Bulletin(科学通报), 2000, 45(12): 1572-1583
[7]	Izadifard M, Achari G, Langford C H. The pathway of dechlorination of PCB congener by a photochemical chain process in 2-propanol: the role of medium and quenching [J]. Chemosphere, 2008, 73(8): 1328-1334
[8]	Varanasi P, Fullana A, Sidhu S. Remediation of PCB contaminated soils using iron nano-particles [J]. Chemosphere, 2007, 66(6): 1031-1038
[9]	Application guide for thermal desorption systems: Naval Facilities Engineering Service Center[R]. 1998: 3-16
[10]	Xing Ying(邢颖), Lü Yonglong(吕永龙), Shi Yajuan(史雅娟), Zhang Hong(张红), Wang Tieyu(王铁宇), He Guizhen(贺桂珍). Analysis on the research status of PCDD/Fs and PCBs in China and the strategies [J]. Environmental Protection Science(环境保护科学), 2006(5): 33-35
[11]	Zhao Yi(赵毅), Shen Yanmei(沈艳梅), Ma Xiaoying(马萧颖). Application of thermal desorption technology in remediation of soil polluted by PCBs [J]. Electric Power Environmental Protection, 2009, 25(2):57-59
[12]	Risoul V, Renauld V, Trouvé G, Gilot P. A laboratory pilot study of thermal decontamination of soils polluted by PCBs. Comparison with thermogravimetric analysis[J]. Waste Manag., 2002, 22(1): 61-72
[13]	Aresta M, Dibenedetto A, Fragale C, Giannoccaro P, Pastore C, Zammiello D, Ferragina C. Thermal desorption of polychlorobiphenyls from contaminated soils and their hydrodechlorination using Pd-and Rh-supported catalysts [J]. Chemosphere, 2008, 70(6): 1052-1058
[14]	Sato T, Todoroki T, Shimoda K, Terada A, Hosomi M. Behavior of PCDDs/PCDFs in remediation of PCBs-contaminated sediments by thermal desorption[J]. Chemosphere, 2010, 80(2): 184-189
[15]	Weber R. Relevance of PCDD/PCDF formation for the evaluation of POPs destruction technologies-review on current status and assessment gaps [J]. Chemosphere, 2007, 67(9): 109-117
[16]	Zhao L, Hou H, Shimoda K, Terada A, Hosomi M. Formation pathways of polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs) in sediments contaminated with PCBs during the thermal desorption process [J]. Chemosphere, 2012, 88(11): 1368-1374
[17]	Chen T, Li X, Yan J, Jin Y. Polychlorinated biphenyls emission from a medical waste incinerator in China [J]. J. Hazard. Mater., 2009, 172(2-3): 1339-1343
[18]	U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Method 1613 Tetra-through Octa-Chlorinated Dioxins and Furans by Isotope Dilution HRGC/HRMS [S].1994
[19]	U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Method 1668B Chlorinated Biphenyl Congeners in Water, Soil, Sediment, Biosolids, and Tissue by HRGC/HRMS [S]. 2008
[20]	van den Berg M, Birnbaum L S, Denison M, et al. The 2005 world health organization re-evaluation of human and mammalian toxic equivalency factors for dioxins and dioxin-like compounds [J]. Toxicol. Sci., 2006, 93(2): 223-241
[21]	Mechati F, Roth E, Renault V, et al. Pilot scale and theoretical study of thermal remediation of soils [J]. Environmental Engineering Science, 2004, 21(3):361-370
[22]	Pichon C, Risoul V, Trouvé G, Peters W A, Gilot P, Prado G. Study of evaporation of organic pollutants by thermogravimetric analysis: experiments and modelling[J]. Thermochimica Acta, 1997, 306(1): 143-151
[23]	Qiu Y, Wang T, Song C. Study on the effect of heating rate on the pyrolysis and kinetics of polyacrylonitrile film[J]. Carbon Techniques, 2005, 24(2):5-8

载气流量及升温速率对污染土壤中多氯联苯热脱附的影响

Effect of carrier gas flow rate and heating rate on thermal desorption of polychlorinated biphenyls in contaminated soil

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 23

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	赵晶, 李伯耿, 卜志扬, 范宏. 微通道内低黏聚合物流体的停留时间分布研究[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(8): 4030-4038.
[2]	胡丹丹, 耿素龙, 曾玺, 王芳, 岳君容, 许光文. 返混对气-固反应特性测试和活化能表征的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(3): 1354-1363.
[3]	刘红蕾, 彭亚旗, 陶鋆奕, 汤明慧, 陆胜勇. Mn-Ce-Co-O_x/PPS催化滤料催化降解气相二英的研究[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(2): 1018-1025.
[4]	黄正梁, 王超, 郭燕妮, 杨遥, 孙婧元, 王靖岱, 阳永荣. 基于停留时间分布的缠绕管内二次流研究[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(2): 921-927.
[5]	兰斌, 徐骥, 刘志成, 王军武. 连续操作密相流化床颗粒停留时间分布特性模拟放大研究[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(1): 521-533.
[6]	王少伦, 杨宏. 高效包埋硝化活性填料硝化特性及应用研究[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(5): 2305-2311.
[7]	田凤国, 朱田, 孔德正, 雷鸣. 非均匀布风流化床内大颗粒停留时间特性[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(4): 1520-1527.
[8]	李春利, 李景玉, 张明霞. 隔壁塔内半圆填料层中壁流与返混特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(4): 1460-1468.
[9]	乔俊飞,郭子豪,汤健. 基于改进大趋势扩散和隐含层插值的虚拟样本生成方法及应用[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(12): 5681-5695.
[10]	梁咏诗, 赵香龙, 秦强, 郭屹, 程易. 气流床气化炉的CPFD数值模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(9): 3291-3299.
[11]	邓锋, 解强, 刘德钱, 万超然, 黄小晴, 顾雪梅. 2~5 nm孔集中分布泥炭基中孔活性炭的制备[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(11): 4457-4468.
[12]	聂丽君, 李德豪, 何京东, 钟华文, 林培喜, 周如金. ABR-MAP-MBR组合工艺处理高浓度养殖废水研究[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(6): 2722-2729.
[13]	邹潺, 王春波, 郭辉, 王贺飞. 燃煤过程中砷的赋存形态及其挥发特性[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(4): 1670-1677.
[14]	姚东, 刘明言, 李翔南. 小型气-液-固流化床液相的停留时间分布[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(11): 4754-4762.
[15]	周虹佳, 刘飞, 周明, 仲兆祥, 邢卫红. 双膜强化类Fenton工艺处理制浆废水的研究[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(1): 490-498.