绕管式换热器管板的有限元应力分析与结构优化

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20181132

化工学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 69 ›› Issue (S2): 128-134.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20181132

绕管式换热器管板的有限元应力分析与结构优化

陈杰¹, 纪博文², 庄大伟², 鹿来运¹, 张晓慧¹, 丁国良²

1 中海油气电集团技术研发中心, 北京 100027;
2 上海交通大学机械与动力工程学院, 上海 200240

收稿日期:2018-10-08 修回日期:2018-10-15 出版日期:2018-12-31 发布日期:2018-12-31
通讯作者: 丁国良
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（51674165）；上海市优秀学术带头人计划项目（16XD1401500）。

Finite element analysis and structural optimization of tubesheet in coil-wound heat exchanger

CHEN Jie¹, JI Bowen², ZHUANG Dawei², LU Laiyun¹, ZHANG Xiaohui¹, DING Guoliang²

1 R & D Center, CNOOC Gas & Power Group, Beijing 100027, China;
2 School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China

Received:2018-10-08 Revised:2018-10-15 Online:2018-12-31 Published:2018-12-31
Supported by:
supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51674165) and the Program of Shanghai Academic Research Leader (16XD1401500).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

绕管式换热器广泛应用于大型天然气液化装置，而管板是绕管式换热器的重要组成部件。由于管板处于管程、壳程交界处且布有密集的孔洞，降低了结构强度，使其成为LNG绕管式换热器的相对薄弱部位。利用Ansys有限元计算软件，对LNG绕管式换热器管板及其相连的管箱、换热器壳体进行整体建模和多工况下的有限元应力分析，并根据JB4732—1995进行强度校核。计算结果显示，换热器壳体对管箱短节部分的应力有较大影响；实例中换热器外壳的拉伸作用导致短节内侧局部薄膜应力过大，超出许用强度。增加短节厚度可以有效提高管箱强度；通过将原短节厚度由45 mm增加到57.5 mm，解决了局部薄膜应力过大的问题。

Abstract:

The coil-wound heat exchanger is widely used in large-scale liquefied natural gas (LNG) installations. The tubesheet is an important component of the coil-wound heat exchanger. Due to the fact that the tubesheet is located at the junction of the tube-side and the shell-side and the densely holes reduce the structural strength, the tubesheet is a weak part of the LNG coil-wound heat exchanger, and a prediction model of the stress on the tubesheet is needed to check the stress intensity. In this paper, a model of tubesheet unit including short section, shell cover and shell of heat exchanger is developed and finite element calculations of tubesheet under multiple working conditions are carried out by Ansys. The stress intensity is checked according to JB4732-1995. The modeling results show that the tensile stress inside the shell causes the large local membrane stress at the short section connected to the tubesheet due to the shell-side fluid pressure acting on the shell of the heat exchanger, and the local membrane stress exceeds the allowable stress intensity. By increasing the thickness of the short section of the tubesheet from 45 mm to 57.5 mm, the excessive local membrane stress can be avoided.

中图分类号:

TQ051

陈杰, 纪博文, 庄大伟, 鹿来运, 张晓慧, 丁国良. 绕管式换热器管板的有限元应力分析与结构优化[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(S2): 128-134.

CHEN Jie, JI Bowen, ZHUANG Dawei, LU Laiyun, ZHANG Xiaohui, DING Guoliang. Finite element analysis and structural optimization of tubesheet in coil-wound heat exchanger[J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(S2): 128-134.

参考文献 14

[1]	浦晖, 陈杰.绕管式换热器在大型天然气液化装置中的应用及国产化技术分析[J].制冷技术, 2011,(3):26-29.PU H, CHEN J.Application and technical analysis on localization of spiral-wound heat exchanger in large-scale Natural gas liquefaction plant[J].Chinese Journal of Refrigeration Technology, 2011, (3):26-29.
[2]	GARDNER K A.Heat-exchanger tube-sheet design[J].Journal of Applied Mechanics-Transactions of the ASME, 1948, 15(4):377-385.
[3]	GARDNER K A.Heat-exchanger tube-sheet design(Ⅱ):Fixed tube sheets[J].Journal of Applied Mechanics-Transactions of the ASME, 1952, 19(2):159-166.
[4]	DUNCAN J P.The structural efficiency of tube-plates for heat exchangers[J].Proceedings of The Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 1955, 169(1):789-810.
[5]	MALKIN I.Notes on a theoretical basis for design of tube sheets of triangular layout[J].Trans.ASME, 1952, 74:387-396.
[6]	HORVAY G.Bending of Honeycombs and of Perforated Plates[M].New York:Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory, 1952.
[7]	SAMPSON R C.Photoelastic Frozen Stress Study of the Effective Elastic Constants of Perforated Materials:A Progress Report[M].Pittsburgh:Westinghouse Research Laboratories, 1959.
[8]	LEVEN M M, JOHNSON R L.Thermal stresses on the surface of tube-sheet plates of 10 and 331/3 percent ligament efficiency[J].Experimental Mechanics, 1964, 4(12):356-365.
[9]	O'DONNELL W J, LANGER B F.Design of perforated plates[J].Journal of Engineering for Industry, 1962, 84 (3):307-319.
[10]	JONES D P.Finite element analysis of perforated plates containing triangular penetration patterns of 5 and 10 percent ligament efficiency[J].Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, 1975, 97(3):199-205.
[11]	徐定耿, 叶维娟.核电站蒸汽发生器管板三维有限元应力分析及其工程应用[J].核科学与工程, 1990, 10(2):160-167.XU D G, YE W J.The tridimensional finite element stress analysis of tube-sheet of a PWR stream cinerator and its application in engineering[J].Chinese Journal of Nuclear Science and Engineering, 1990, 10(2):160-167.
[12]	刘俊明, 陈绪.高压厚管板的有限元分析计算[J].压力容器, 1997,(2):25-29.LIU J M, CHEN X.The analysis calculation of thick tubesheet under high pressure by finite element method[J].Pressure Vessel Technology, 1997,(2):25-29.
[13]	JIN W, GAO Z, LIANG L, et al.Comparison of two FEA models for calculating stresses in shell-and-tube heat exchanger[J].International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2004, 81(6):563-567.
[14]	胡锡文, 林兴华.管壳式换热器管板的有限元分析[J].压力容器, 2004, 21(10):26-28.HU X W, LIN X H.Heat exchanger tubesheets stress research by finite element analysis[J].Pressure Vessel Technology, 2004, 21(10):26-28.

[1]	许婧煊, 林文胜, 阮斌辉. 浸没燃烧式LNG气化器传热计算初探[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(S2): 147-152.
[2]	田雅洁, 林文胜. 船用绕管式LNG气化器方案对比[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(S2): 141-146.
[3]	刘海潮, 邵双全, 张海南, 田长青. 回路热管微通道换热器蒸发冷却实验[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(S2): 161-166.
[4]	李登稳, 程振民. 文丘里型气液分布器的实验与数值研究[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(11): 4625-4632.
[5]	刘军, 张钰, 毛祥, 张振涛, 杨鲁伟. 基于乙醇压缩的超重力热泵精馏热集成系统性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(10): 4342-4352.
[6]	李斌, 张尚彬, 张磊, 滕昭钰, 王佑天. 基于LBM-DEM的鼓泡床内气泡-颗粒动力学数值模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(9): 3843-3850.
[7]	王璐, 张兴芳, 董振洲, 赵忠凯, 杨景轩, 郝晓刚. 旋风分离器入口形式对内流场非稳态特性的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(8): 3488-3501.
[8]	高思鸿, 张丹丹, 范怡平, 卢春喜. 气体干法净化旋流吸附耦合设备压降特性[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(5): 1873-1883.
[9]	孙占朋, 孙国刚, 独岩. 进料位置与风速对旋风分级器颗粒分级效果的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(4): 1324-1331.
[10]	刘义伦, 刘思琪, 赵先琼, 刘驰, 张喆. 偏心楔形喂料斗卸料过程中颗粒流动特性[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(4): 1469-1475.
[11]	王建军, 郭颖, 陈帅甫, 金有海, 丁健, 韩兆玉. 烟气轮机动叶流道内颗粒运动的流动显示实验[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(4): 1454-1460.
[12]	满长卓, 范怡平, 范瀚文. 新型气液逆流接触洗涤器流动-传质模型[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(2): 642-649.
[13]	李斌, 于洋, 马梦祥, 张磊, 陈翠玲. 三维喷动床内异径干湿颗粒混合特性数值模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(12): 4545-4555.
[14]	王擎, 李建, 王智超, 张立栋. 回转干馏炉内颗粒间传热特性的数值模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(11): 4137-4146.
[15]	颜深, 孙国刚, 詹敏述, 姬忠礼. 固定床颗粒层过滤性能分析及预测[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(10): 3841-3850.

绕管式换热器管板的有限元应力分析与结构优化

Finite element analysis and structural optimization of tubesheet in coil-wound heat exchanger

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 14

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价