游离氨调理污泥厌氧消化优化产甲烷过程与强化有机物释放

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20220494

化工学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 73 ›› Issue (9): 4147-4155.DOI: 10.11949/0438-1157.20220494

游离氨调理污泥厌氧消化优化产甲烷过程与强化有机物释放

沈嘉辉¹^,²^,³(), 王侃宏², 郁达伟¹^,³(), 胡大洲¹^,³, 魏源送¹^,³

^1.中国科学院生态环境研究中心，水污染控制实验室，北京 100085
^2.河北工程大学能源与环境工程学院，河北邯郸 056038
^3.中国科学院生态环境研究中心，环境模拟与污染控制国家重点联合实验室，北京 100085

收稿日期:2022-04-06 修回日期:2022-06-06 出版日期:2022-09-05 发布日期:2022-10-09
通讯作者: 郁达伟
作者简介:沈嘉辉（1996—），男，硕士研究生， 473545949@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金面上项目(52170062);江西省科学院科技计划项目(2020-YZD-09)

Free ammonia conditioning promoted micro-molecule organics release and methanogenesis of thickened sludge

Jiahui SHEN¹^,²^,³(), Kanhong WANG², Dawei YU¹^,³(), Dazhou HU¹^,³, Yuansong WEI¹^,³

^1.Laboratory of Water Pollution Control Technology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
^2.School of Energy and Environmental Engineering, Hebei University of Engineering, Handan 056038, Hebei, China
^3.State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China

Received:2022-04-06 Revised:2022-06-06 Online:2022-09-05 Published:2022-10-09
Contact: Dawei YU

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对污泥减量和资源化目标，采用游离氨调理浓缩污泥，评估了有机物释放和产甲烷促进效果。结果表明，浓缩污泥经游离氨(200~800 mg·L^-1，24 h)调理，累积产甲烷量和产甲烷潜势分别提高了34.6%、23.3%。不同于高能耗预处理的彻底溶胞破壁，游离氨调理主要强化了小分子有机物穿胞透壁的释放，较对照组提升SCOD浓度5.19%~23.81%、溶解性蛋白质浓度1.47%~14.55%、溶解性多糖浓度-0.64%~14.63%。后续厌氧消化过程中VS水解明显，溶解性SCOD的降解提升34.2%~62.24%。基于三维荧光光谱(3D-EEM)的平行因子法(PARAFAC)分析结果表明，可利用程度较高的色氨酸类物质荧光组分明显提高，表明游离氨强化了生物难降解性有机物转化和可降解性有机物的降解。在此过程中，厌氧消化第一次产气高峰(0~5 d)以及第二次产气高峰(9~12 d)的速率分别提升21.04%、120.39%。上述结果表明，游离氨调理强化了浓缩污泥中有机物的初期释放和后期转化，从而提升了甲烷产率，是一种绿色低耗的污泥资源化技术。

关键词: 游离氨, 调理, 浓缩污泥, 产甲烷, 小分子有机物

Abstract:

To facilitate reduction and resource recovery from excess sludge, thickened sludge was conditioned with free ammonia conditioning (200-800 mg·L^-1, 24 h). The results demonstrate that the methanogenesis was promoted by release of micro-molecules organics through the cell membrane. The accumulated methane production and biochemical methane potential was promoted by 34.6% and 23.3%, respectively. The soluble organic matters was released as soluble chemical oxygen demand (SCOD), including soluble protein, and soluble carbohydrate which were promoted by 5.19%-23.81%, 1.47%-14.55%, and -0.64%-14.63%, respectively. Hydrolysis of the released organic matters was further enhanced by 34.2%-62.24% in form of SCOD. The first methane production peak (0-5 d) and the secondary peak (9-12 d) was improved by 21.04%, 120.39%, respectively. Parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC) based on 3-D fluorescence spectroscopy (3D-EEM) indicated that the refractory organic matter converted to biodegradable tryptophan. The above results show that free ammonia conditioning strengthens the initial release and later conversion of organic matter in the thickened sludge, thereby improving the methane yield, which is a green and low-consumption sludge resource technology.

Key words: free ammonia, conditioning, thickened sludge, methanogenesis, micro-molecule organics

中图分类号:

X 703.1

沈嘉辉, 王侃宏, 郁达伟, 胡大洲, 魏源送. 游离氨调理污泥厌氧消化优化产甲烷过程与强化有机物释放[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 4147-4155.

Jiahui SHEN, Kanhong WANG, Dawei YU, Dazhou HU, Yuansong WEI. Free ammonia conditioning promoted micro-molecule organics release and methanogenesis of thickened sludge[J]. CIESC Journal, 2022, 73(9): 4147-4155.

图/表 8

参考文献 28

1	安叶, 张义斌, 黎攀, 等. 我国市政生活污泥处置现状及经验总结[J]. 给水排水, 2021, 57(S1): 94-98.
	An Y, Zhang Y B, Li P, et al. Current situation and experience summary of municipal sewage sludge treatment and disposal in China[J]. Water & Wastewater Engineering, 2021, 57(S1): 94-98.
2	刘鑫, 惠秀娟, 唐凤德. 我国典型城市污泥产生量处理处置现状及经济学趋势分析[J]. 环境保护与循环经济, 2021, 41(4): 88-93.
	Liu X, Hui X J, Tang F D. Analysis of current situation and economic trend of treatment and disposal of typical urban sludge production in China[J]. Environmental Protection and Circular Economy, 2021, 41(4): 88-93.
3	李乔洋. 基于碳减排分析的我国城镇污泥处置现状及发展趋势研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2020.
	Li Q Y. Current situation and development trend of urban sludge disposal in China based on carbon emission reduction analysis[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2020.
4	韩芸, 曹玉芹, 卓杨, 等. 高含固污泥厌氧消化中Fe/S及pH对原位抑硫效率影响及其交互作用[J]. 环境科学, 2018, 39(1): 269-275.
	Han Y, Cao Y Q, Zhuo Y, et al. Influence on desulfurization efficiency and interactions of Fe/S and pH during H₂S in situ depression of high solid anaerobic digestion[J]. Environmental Science, 2018, 39(1): 269-275.
5	牛雨彤, 刘吉宝, 马爽, 等. 零价铁和微波预处理组合强化污泥厌氧消化[J]. 环境科学, 2019, 40(3): 1431-1438.
	Niu Y T, Liu J B, Ma S, et al. Enhancement for anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge based on microwave pretreatment combined with zero valent iron[J]. Environmental Science, 2019, 40(3): 1431-1438.
6	Liu X R, Xu Q X, Wang D B, et al. Improved methane production from waste activated sludge by combining free ammonia with heat pretreatment: performance, mechanisms and applications[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2018, 268: 230-236.
7	Liu H, Li X, Zhang Z H, et al. Semi-continuous anaerobic digestion of secondary sludge with free ammonia pretreatment: focusing on volatile solids destruction, dewaterability, pathogen removal and its implications[J]. Water Research, 2021, 202: 117481.
8	Wei W, Zhou X, Wang D B, et al. Free ammonia pre-treatment of secondary sludge significantly increases anaerobic methane production[J]. Water Research, 2017, 118: 12-19.
9	Pan X F, Zhao L X, Li C X, et al. Deep insights into the network of acetate metabolism in anaerobic digestion: focusing on syntrophic acetate oxidation and homoacetogenesis[J]. Water Research, 2021, 190: 116774.
10	Schnurer A, Schink B, Svensson B H. Clostridium ultunense sp. nov., a mesophilic bacterium oxidizing acetate in syntrophic association with a hydrogenotrophic methanogenic bacterium[J]. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology, 1996, 46(4): 1145-1152.
11	Wang Y T, Wang J G, Pang J J, et al. Introduction of protonic potential of Brønsted-Lowry acids and bases to the quantification of the energy of proton translocation and elucidation of oxidative phosphorylation[J]. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 2020, 860: 113909.
12	DuBois M, Gilles K A, Hamilton J K, et al. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances[J]. Analytical Chemistry (Washington), 1956, 28(3): 350-356.
13	Yu D W, Zhang J Y, Chulu B H, et al. Ammonia stress decreased biomarker genes of acetoclastic methanogenesis and second peak of production rates during anaerobic digestion of swine manure[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2020, 317: 124012.
14	王凯丽, 董滨, 戴晓虎. 不同VS比例的黄花和污泥联合厌氧消化的研究[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2014, 37(5): 126-131.
	Wang K L, Dong B, Dai X H. Anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and Solidago canadensis L. with different volatile solid ratios in feedstock[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2014, 37(5): 126-131.
15	刘建伟, 夏雪峰. 不同TS浓度下污水厂剩余污泥和生活垃圾混合厌氧消化特性研究[J]. 安全与环境工程, 2015, 22(3): 60-64, 69.
	Liu J W, Xia X F. Study on the characteristics of anaerobic digestion of mixture of sewage sludge from sewage plant and garbage under different concentrations of TS[J]. Safety and Environmental Engineering, 2015, 22(3): 60-64, 69.
16	Wang D B, Wang Y F, Liu X R, et al. Heat pretreatment assists free ammonia to enhance hydrogen production from waste activated sludge[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2019, 283: 316-325.
17	Wang D B, Liu B W, Liu X R, et al. How does free ammonia-based sludge pretreatment improve methane production from anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge[J]. Chemosphere, 2018, 206: 491-501.
18	Wu Q L, Guo W Q, Bao X, et al. Enhancing sludge biodegradability and volatile fatty acid production by tetrakis hydroxymethyl phosphonium sulfate pretreatment[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2017, 239: 518-522.
19	Zhang C, Qin Y G, Xu Q X, et al. Free ammonia-based pretreatment promotes short-chain fatty acid production from waste activated sludge[J]. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2018, 6(7): 9120-9129.
20	杜士林, 李强, 丁婷婷, 等. 沙颍河流域水体中溶解性有机质(DOM)的荧光光谱解析[J]. 环境化学, 2019, 38(9): 2027-2037.
	Du S L, Li Q, Ding T T, et al. Fluorescence spectra analysis of DOM in water of Shaying River Basin[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2019, 38(9): 2027-2037.
21	刘博文. 游离氨预处理对污泥厌氧消化的影响机理研究[D]. 长沙: 湖南大学, 2018.
	Liu B W. The effects and mechanism of free ammonia pre-treatment on waste activated sludge during anaerobic digestion[D]. Changsha: Hunan University, 2018.
22	段玉莹. 游离氨预处理对污泥暗发酵产氢的影响及机理研究[D]. 长沙: 湖南大学, 2019.
	Duan Y Y. Effect of free ammonia pretreatment on hydrogen production from sludge by dark fermentation and its mechanisms[D]. Changsha: Hunan University, 2019.
23	秦玉格. 游离氨预处理提高污泥厌氧发酵产酸量[D]. 长沙: 湖南大学, 2018.
	Qin Y G. Free ammonia-based pretreatment promotes short-chain fatty acid production from waste activated sludge[D]. Changsha: Hunan University, 2018.
24	Astals S, Peces M, Batstone D J, et al. Characterising and modelling free ammonia and ammonium inhibition in anaerobic systems[J]. Water Research, 2018, 143: 127-135.
25	高连敬, 杜尔登, 崔旭峰, 等. 三维荧光结合荧光区域积分法评估净水厂有机物去除效果[J]. 给水排水, 2012, 48(10): 51-56.
	Gao L J, Du E D, Cui X F, et al. Evaluation of organic matter removal efficiency of water treatment plant by three-dimensional excitation emission matrix combined with fluorescence region integral method[J]. Water & Wastewater Engineering, 2012, 48(10): 51-56.
26	程寒, 荆肇乾, 张锺一, 等. 厌氧消化过程中氨抑制及其调控策略[J]. 应用化工, 2020, 49(5): 1308-1312.
	Cheng H, Jing Z Q, Zhang Z Y, et al. Ammonia inhibition and its regulation strategy during anaerobic digestion[J]. Applied Chemical Industry, 2020, 49(5): 1308-1312.
27	Costa J C, Barbosa S G, Alves M M, et al. Thermochemical pre- and biological co-treatments to improve hydrolysis and methane production from poultry litter[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2012, 111: 141-147.
28	高文萱, 张克强, 梁军锋, 等. 氨胁迫对猪粪厌氧消化性能的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2015, 34(10): 1997-2003.
	Gao W X, Zhang K Q, Liang J F, et al. Effects of ammonia stresses on anaerobic digestion of swine manure[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2015, 34(10): 1997-2003.

样品	TS/%	VS/%	(VS/TS)/%	TCOD/ (mg·L^-1)	SCOD/ (mg·L^-1)	多糖/ (mg·L^-1)	蛋白质/ (mg·L^-1)	TAN/ (mg·L^-1)	pH	FA/ (mg·L^-1)
浓缩污泥	1.15	0.70	60.87	3550	230	8.59	20.23	103.5	7.47	20.64
接种污泥	10.58	7.78	73.51	664	-	54.22	167.91	129.9	7.51	-
调理污泥^①	1.05	0.76	72.38	5400	3850	158.3	653	1863.0	7.78	24.21

样品	TS/%	VS/%	(VS/TS)/%	TCOD/ (mg·L^-1)	SCOD/ (mg·L^-1)	多糖/ (mg·L^-1)	蛋白质/ (mg·L^-1)	TAN/ (mg·L^-1)	pH	FA/ (mg·L^-1)
浓缩污泥	1.15	0.70	60.87	3550	230	8.59	20.23	103.5	7.47	20.64
接种污泥	10.58	7.78	73.51	664	-	54.22	167.91	129.9	7.51	-
调理污泥^①	1.05	0.76	72.38	5400	3850	158.3	653	1863.0	7.78	24.21

Item	CK	FA2	FA4	FA6	FA8
FAN level/(mg·L^-1)	0	200	400	600	800
FAN/(mg·L^-1)	24.21±1.83	250.78±17.71	505.37±34.58	751.57±61.12	962.43±69.01
TAN/(mg·L^-1)	1503.67±58.51	1863.00±11.34	2054.67±59.25	2662.00±65.91	2705.50±47.50
pH	7.78±0.02	7.83±0.02	7.87±0.05	7.73±0.01	7.80±0.00
TCOD/(mg·L^-1)	5400±286	5950±579	5967±272	6600±248	7350±100
SCOD/(mg·L^-1)	3850±188	4050±141	4767±586	4383±103	4475±175
ORP/mV	-322.60±6.65	-360.73±32.46	-216.40±11.03	-205.47±12.83	-204.45±2.15
EC/(mS·cm^-1）	16.43±0.15	19.14±0.08	22.03±0.17	25.20±0.00	27.70±0.10
polysaccharide/(mg·L^-1)	158.30±2.51	173.20±19.32	175.28±12.02	181.46±3.87	157.28±2.19
protein/(mg·L^-1)	653.80±34.31	664.89±97.13	682.68±13.48	748.91±40.97	663.41±43.01
TOC/(mg·L^-1)	603.00±104.00	589.47±88.51	548.97±19.79	941.87±381.40	639.90±26.50
TIC/(mg·L^-1)	3063.00±180.00	2981.33±70.5	3181.67±200.15	3975.00±1102.50	3040.50±56.50
SMY/(ml CH₄·(g VS_added)^-1)	111.11±7.82	93.50±4.71	115.25±3.08	96.08±1.41	93.25±1.41
BMP_∞/(ml CH₄·(g VS_added)^-1)	242.84±30.33	256.37±17.26	299.37±0.76	269.45±16.36	252.83±3.74

Item	CK	FA2	FA4	FA6	FA8
FAN level/(mg·L^-1)	0	200	400	600	800
FAN/(mg·L^-1)	24.21±1.83	250.78±17.71	505.37±34.58	751.57±61.12	962.43±69.01
TAN/(mg·L^-1)	1503.67±58.51	1863.00±11.34	2054.67±59.25	2662.00±65.91	2705.50±47.50
pH	7.78±0.02	7.83±0.02	7.87±0.05	7.73±0.01	7.80±0.00
TCOD/(mg·L^-1)	5400±286	5950±579	5967±272	6600±248	7350±100
SCOD/(mg·L^-1)	3850±188	4050±141	4767±586	4383±103	4475±175
ORP/mV	-322.60±6.65	-360.73±32.46	-216.40±11.03	-205.47±12.83	-204.45±2.15
EC/(mS·cm^-1）	16.43±0.15	19.14±0.08	22.03±0.17	25.20±0.00	27.70±0.10
polysaccharide/(mg·L^-1)	158.30±2.51	173.20±19.32	175.28±12.02	181.46±3.87	157.28±2.19
protein/(mg·L^-1)	653.80±34.31	664.89±97.13	682.68±13.48	748.91±40.97	663.41±43.01
TOC/(mg·L^-1)	603.00±104.00	589.47±88.51	548.97±19.79	941.87±381.40	639.90±26.50
TIC/(mg·L^-1)	3063.00±180.00	2981.33±70.5	3181.67±200.15	3975.00±1102.50	3040.50±56.50
SMY/(ml CH₄·(g VS_added)^-1)	111.11±7.82	93.50±4.71	115.25±3.08	96.08±1.41	93.25±1.41
BMP_∞/(ml CH₄·(g VS_added)^-1)	242.84±30.33	256.37±17.26	299.37±0.76	269.45±16.36	252.83±3.74

[1]	石德智, 王攀, 胡春艳, 李鹏飞, 张超, 魏云梅, 古励. 硅铝调控与晶种诱导对水热稳定飞灰中重金属的协同影响[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(8): 3651-3661.
[2]	李海燕, 刘欢, 汪家兴, 金明灏, 邓红苹, 卢更, 张秀菊, 姚洪. 基于化学改性的脱水污泥低温热风干化特性[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(7): 3257-3262.
[3]	孙洪伟, 于雪, 李维维, 祁国平, 马娟, 吕心涛, 吕慧. 游离氨抑制Nitrobacter活性动力学试验[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(10): 4386-4393.
[4]	卢更, 刘欢, 胡红云, 张强, 易琳琳, 姚洪. 氧化钙调理污泥气化过程中重金属的迁移转化规律[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(1): 272-280.
[5]	谢丽, 殷紫, 尹志轩, 王悦超, 周琪. 一段式厌氧氨氧化工艺亚硝酸盐氧化菌抑制方法研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2016, 67(7): 2647-2655.
[6]	许琪, 邓超, 时亚飞, 徐新宇, 虞文波, 郦超, 陈烨, 梁莎, 胡敬平, 何姝, 王荣, 杨昌柱, 杨家宽. 市政污泥化学调理装置CFD模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(10): 4145-4154.
[7]	吴美容, 张瑞, 周俊, 谢欣欣, 雍晓雨, 闫志英, 葛明民, 郑涛. 温度对产甲烷菌代谢途径和优势菌群结构的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2014, 65(5): 1602-1606.
[8]	王韬，王枢，张兆利，柳琦杰，王娇. 有机小分子/无机盐混合溶液纳滤膜分离研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2012, 31(10): 2144-2151.
[9]	刘牡, 彭永臻, 宋燕杰, 吴莉娜, 赵艳琳. 回流比对单级UASB-A/O处理晚期垃圾渗滤液短程脱氮的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2011, 62(6): 1675-1681.
[10]	谢丽，陈金荣，周琪. 厌氧同时反硝化产甲烷研究进展 [J]. CIESC Journal, 2011, 62(3): 589-597.
[11]	刘牡, 彭永臻, 吴莉娜, 王燕, 杨莹莹. FA与FNA对两级UASB-A/O处理垃圾渗滤液短程硝化的影响 [J]. 化工学报, 2010, 61(1): 172-179.
[12]	孙洪伟, 王淑莹, 王希明, 时晓宁, 彭永臻. 高氨氮垃圾渗滤液SBR法短程深度生物脱氮 [J]. 化工学报, 2009, 60(7): 1806-1811.
[13]	孙洪伟, 王淑莹, 时晓宁, 张树军, 杨庆, 彭永臻. 单一缺氧/厌氧UASB同步反硝化产甲烷与A/O组合工艺处理实际晚期渗滤液 [J]. 化工学报, 2009, 60(11): 2891-2896.
[14]	李勇智;彭永臻;王淑滢. 高氨氮制药废水短程生物脱氮 [J]. CIESC Journal, 2003, 54(10): 1482-1485.

游离氨调理污泥厌氧消化优化产甲烷过程与强化有机物释放

Free ammonia conditioning promoted micro-molecule organics release and methanogenesis of thickened sludge

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 28

相关文章 14

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价