聚合物-金属有机框架材料的研究进展

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20201415

化工学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 72 ›› Issue (2): 709-726.DOI: 10.11949/0438-1157.20201415

聚合物-金属有机框架材料的研究进展

张家赫¹(),原野¹,王明²,王志¹(),王纪孝¹

^1.天津大学化工学院化学工程研究所，天津市膜科学与海水淡化技术重点实验室，化学工程联合国家重点实验室，天津化学化工协同创新中心，天津 300350
^2.滨州学院化工与安全学院，山东省工业污水资源化工程技术研究中心，山东滨州 256600

收稿日期:2020-10-10 修回日期:2020-12-30 出版日期:2021-02-05 发布日期:2021-02-05
通讯作者: 王志
作者简介:张家赫(1996—)，男，硕士研究生，zhangjiahe@tju.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金重点项目(21938007);河北省自然科学基金项目(E2020402036)

Research progress in polymer-metal-organic frameworks

ZHANG Jiahe¹(),YUAN Ye¹,WANG Ming²,WANG Zhi¹(),WANG Jixiao¹

^1.Chemical Engineering Research Center, School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Membrane Science and Desalination Technology; State Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering; Tianjin Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemical Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China
^2.Shandong Engineering Research Center for Industrial Wastewater Resources Reuse, Department of Chemical Engineering and Safety, Binzhou University, Binzhou 256600, Shandong, China

Received:2020-10-10 Revised:2020-12-30 Online:2021-02-05 Published:2021-02-05
Contact: WANG Zhi

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

金属有机框架（MOFs）因其大孔隙率、高比表面积和规则可调的孔径结构等优势受到了广泛关注，然而该材料较差的热塑性和力学性能限制了其可加工性，不利于大规模工业应用。为解决此问题，研究者们将聚合物作为多孔材料的一部分，通过直接或间接的方法合成了一种三维且高度多孔的材料——聚合物-金属有机框架（polymer-metal-organic frameworks， polyMOFs）。此材料兼具MOFs出色的性能与聚合物的可加工性，在气体分离、生物医用和催化等领域具有广阔的应用前景。本文综述了polyMOFs的三种合成方法，包括合成后聚合、单晶到单晶转换和直接合成法，介绍了三种方法的特点与不足，并展望了未来polyMOFs的发展方向。

关键词: 聚合物-金属有机框架, 合成后聚合, 单晶到单晶转换, 直接合成

Abstract:

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have received extensive attention due to their advantages such as large porosity, high specific surface area, and regular and adjustable pore structure. The processability of MOFs is limited by poor thermoplasticity and mechanical properties, which seriously handicaps their further industrial application. In order to solve this problem, researchers used polymers as a component of porous materials to synthesize a three-dimensional and highly porous monolithic material—polyMOFs by direct or indirect methods. PolyMOFs can combine the excellent functionality of MOFs with the processability of polymers, and have broad application prospects in the fields of gas separation, biomedicine, and catalysis. In this paper, three synthetic methods of polyMOFs are reviewed, including postsynthetic polymerization and single-crystal to single-crystal transformations and direct synthesis. The characteristics and shortcomings of the three methods are summarized, and the future development direction of polyMOFs is prospected.

Key words: polyMOFs, postsynthetic polymerization, single-crystal to single-crystal transformations, direct synthesis

中图分类号:

TQ 028.8

张家赫, 原野, 王明, 王志, 王纪孝. 聚合物-金属有机框架材料的研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(2): 709-726.

ZHANG Jiahe, YUAN Ye, WANG Ming, WANG Zhi, WANG Jixiao. Research progress in polymer-metal-organic frameworks[J]. CIESC Journal, 2021, 72(2): 709-726.

图/表 16

图1 2000—2019年发表的与polyMOFs相关的论文数(数据来源: Web of Science；搜索的关键词为：MOFs, polymers, polyMOFs)

Fig.1 The number of papers on polyMOFs published from 2000 to 2019(Database source: Web of Science; search using keywords: MOFs, polymers, polyMOFs)

图2 MOFs中有机配体的交联和随后分解以获得聚合物凝胶(PG)的示意图(a)；有机配体和炔烃交联剂的分子结构(b)[52]

Fig.2 Schematic illustration of cross-linking of the organic linkers in MOF (AzM) and subsequent decomposition to obtain polymer gel (PG) (a). Molecular structures of the organic ligand (AzTPDC) and the cross-linkers (b) [52]

图3 使用二苄基环辛炔(DBCO)官能化的DNA对UiO-66-N3纳米颗粒进行功能化修饰 (a)； ICP-MS测定的细胞对纳米颗粒的摄取量(b)[33]

Fig.3 DNA functionalization of UiO-66-N3 nanoparticles, using DNA functionalized with dibenzylcyclooctyne (DBCO) (a). Nanoparticle uptake per cell determined by ICP-MS (b)[33]

图4 使用PCP进行序列调控的自由基聚合示意图[63]

Fig.4 Schematic illustration of sequence-regulated radical copolymerization using PCPs[63]

图5 制备P@MOF的示意图[35]

Fig.5 Schematic representation of the preparation of P@MOF[35]

图6 PMMA @ IRMOF-3 @ MOF-5的合成路线[75]

Fig.6 Synthetic route to PMMA@IRMOF-3@MOF-5[75]

图7 加热作用下一维配位聚合物转化为三维立体结构示意图[79]

Fig.7 Schematic diagram for the transformation from 1D coordination polymer chains to 3D frameworks by heating[79]

图8 通过[2 + 2]光二聚作用从1D交错式链到3D框架的转换示意图[80]

Fig.8 Schematic diagram for the transformation from 1D staggered-sculls chains to 3D frameworks through [2+2] photodimerization[80]

图9 将一维(线性)、无孔、大部分为非晶态的聚合物转变为三维、多孔、结晶polyMOF杂化材料的策略[88]

Fig.9 The strategy described herein to convert a one-dimensional (linear), non-porous, mostly amorphous polymer into a three-dimensional, porous, crystalline polyMOF hybrid material[88]

图10 对位取代(上)和邻位取代(下)聚合物配体的比较(a)； o-pbdc-xa-u配体的制备及polyIRMOF-1的合成(b)[91]

Fig.10 Comparison of para-substituted (top) and ortho-substituted (bottom) polymer ligands (a). Synthesis of o-pbdc-xa-u and subsequent formation of polyIRMOF-1 (b)[91]

图11 嵌段共聚物的结构和质量分数对polyMOFs形貌的影响[100]

Fig.11 Effect of block copolymer architecture and mass fractions on polyMOFs morphology[100]

图12 PEI-g-ZIF-8纳米颗粒的原位合成方案(a)； PEI-g-ZIF-8纳米颗粒的结构图(仅显示了Hmim和PEI的部分主要连接体)(b)[38]

Fig.12 In situ synthesis protocol of PEI-g-ZIF-8 nanoparticles (a). Structure illustration of PEI-g-ZIF-8 nanoparticles(only showing some main linkers of Hmim and PEI) (b)[38]

表1 两种混合基质膜的掺杂量及气体分离性能对比

Table 1 Comparison of doping amount and gas separation performance of two mixed matrix membranes

混合基质膜	掺杂量/%(质量)	气体分离性能^①		文献
混合基质膜	掺杂量/%(质量)	CO₂渗透速率/GPU	CO₂/N₂分离因子	文献
PVAm/ZIF-8/PSf	13.1	600	95	[101]
PVAm/PEI-g-ZIF-8/PSf	20	1600	75	[38]

图13 MPF-1晶体的主要框架结构 (a)； MPF-1晶体主要框架中的聚合物链段(b)； PVAmacid的结构(c)[39]

Fig.13 The main structure of each independent MPF-1 framework (a). The polymer segments of the main MPF-1 framework (b). The structure of PVAmacid (c) [39]

图14 使用PDCS构建MMP框架(a); MMP-1和MMP-2的框架结构(b); MMP-3和MMP-4的框架结构(c)[40]

Fig.14 Construction of MMP frameworks using the PDCS process (a). Independent frameworks of MMP-1 and MMP-2 (b). Independent frameworks of MMP-3 and MMP-4 (c)[40]

表2 不同合成方法制备的典型polyMOF材料及其优缺点

Table 2 Typical polyMOFs synthesized by different methods and their advantages and disadvantages

合成方法		polyMOF材料	优点	缺点	文献
合成后聚合	点击化学法	polySURMOF	反应条件温和；催化剂高效稳定；反应速率高，几乎无副产物	铜盐作催化剂时后处理烦琐, 不易从产物中去除；环炔与叠氮的反应便于后处理但效率相对较低	[53]
	点击化学法	UiO-66-N₃-DNA-Conjugate	反应条件温和；催化剂高效稳定；反应速率高，几乎无副产物	铜盐作催化剂时后处理烦琐, 不易从产物中去除；环炔与叠氮的反应便于后处理但效率相对较低	[33]
	MOFs孔道内聚合	聚乙烯型polyMOFs	polyMOFs中的聚合物结构可控、分子量分布窄	易堵塞孔道，降低孔隙率	[36,54,60,62-68]
	表面接枝法	P@MOF	操作方便，步骤简单；大大提升MOFs表面的聚合物质量分数；有效改善MOFs的机械性与稳定性	对侧链的分子量分布及接枝密度的控制难度较大；接枝效率较低；易堵塞MOFs孔道	[35]
		terpolymer@ZIF-8@BA			[32]
		PMMA-g-GMA-UiO-66			[37]
		PMMA@IRMOF-3@MOF-5			[75]
单晶到单晶转换		MOPF	操作简单且效率较高；能够可逆地合成polyMOFs	金属与聚合物结合处易断裂，往往制备的polyMOFs的热稳定性和化学稳定性较差	[85]
		[Zn(poly-bppcb)(bdc)]_n			[84]
		[Zn₂(S-poly-bppcb)(obc)₂]? 2.5H₂O			[86]
直接合成法		MPF-1	合成步骤简单；材料结构可控；有效提升MOFs的稳定性与功能性	分离过程烦琐；产率较低	[39]
		MMPs			[40]
		HMMP-1			[102]
		PEI-g-ZIF-8			[38]
		polyIRMOF-1			[88,93-94,97-98,100] [87,90,94,100]
		polyUiO-66, polyUiO-67,polyUiO-68			[88,93-94,97-98,100] [87,90,94,100]
		[Zn₂(BME-bdc)₂(bpy)]_n, [Zn₇(bdc)₆(H₂O)₆(bpe)₂(NO₃)₂]_n			[89]

参考文献 103

1	原野, 王明, 周云琪, 等. 金属有机框架孔径调控进展[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(2): 429-450.
	Yuan Y, Wang M, Zhou Y Q, et al. Progress in pore size regulation of metal-organic frameworks[J]. CIESC Journal, 2020, 71(2): 429-450.
2	Kalaj M, Bentz K C, Ayala S, et al. MOF-polymer hybrid materials: from simple composites to tailored architectures[J]. Chemical Reviews, 2020, 120(16): 8267-8302.
3	赵云, 向中华. 微流控制备金属/共价有机框架功能材料研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(6): 2547-2563.
	Zhao Y, Xiang Z H. Progress of microfluidic synthesis of metal/covalent organic frameworks[J]. CIESC Journal, 2020, 71(6): 2547-2563.
4	Venna S R, Carreon M A. Metal organic framework membranes for carbon dioxide separation[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2015, 124: 3-19.
5	Chaoui N, Trunk M, Dawson R, et al. Trends and challenges for microporous polymers[J]. Chemical Society Reviews, 2017, 46(11): 3302-3321.
6	Chen Y, Huang X, Zhang S, et al. Shaping of metal-organic frameworks: from fluid to shaped bodies and robust foams[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2016, 138(34): 10810-10813.
7	Schmidt B. Metal-organic frameworks in polymer science: polymerization catalysis, polymerization environment, and hybrid materials[J]. Macromolecular Rapid Communications, 2020, 41(1): 1900333-1900361.
8	Qiu S, Xue M, Zhu G. Metal-organic framework membranes: from synthesis to separation application[J]. Chemical Society Reviews, 2014, 43(16): 6116-6140.
9	Wang Q, Astruc D. State of the art and prospects in metal-organic framework (MOF)-based and MOF-derived nanocatalysis[J]. Chemical Reviews, 2020, 120(2): 1438-1511.
10	Chi W S, Kim S J, Lee S J, et al. Enhanced performance of mixed-matrix membranes through a graft copolymer-directed interface and interaction tuning approach[J]. ChemSusChem, 2015, 8(4): 650-658.
11	Ghalei B, Sakurai K, Kinoshita Y, et al. Enhanced selectivity in mixed matrix membranes for CO₂ capture through efficient dispersion of amine-functionalized MOF nanoparticles[J]. Nature Energy, 2017, 2(7): 17086-17095.
12	Nagata S, Kokado K, Sada K. Metal-organic framework tethering pnipam for ON-OFF controlled release in solution[J]. Chemical Communications, 2015, 51(41): 8614-8617.
13	Kango S, Kalia S, Celli A, et al. Surface modification of inorganic nanoparticles for development of organic-inorganic nanocomposites—a review[J]. Progress in Polymer Science, 2013, 38(8): 1232-1261.
14	Lyu F, Zhang Y, Zare R N, et al. One-pot synthesis of protein-embedded metal-organic frameworks with enhanced biological activities[J]. Nano Letters, 2014, 14(10): 5761-5765.
15	Koh K, Wong-Foy A G, Matzger A J. Coordination copolymerization mediated by Zn₄O(CO₂R)₆ metal clusters: a balancing act between statistics and geometry[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2010, 132(42): 15005-15010.
16	Le Ouay B, Watanabe C, Mochizuki S, et al. Selective sorting of polymers with different terminal groups using metal-organic frameworks[J]. Nature Communications, 2018, 9(1): 3635-3643.
17	Kitao T, Bracco S, Comotti A, et al. Confinement of single polysilane chains in coordination nanospaces[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2015, 137(15): 5231-5238.
18	Lykourinou V, Chen Y, Wang X S, et al. Immobilization of MP-11 into a mesoporous metal-organic framework, MP-11@mesoMOF: a new platform for enzymatic catalysis[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2011, 133(27): 10382-10385.
19	Liu S, Zhai L, Li C, et al. Exploring and exploiting dynamic noncovalent chemistry for effective surface modification of nanoscale metal-organic frameworks[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2014, 6(8): 5404-5412.
20	Liu H, Zhu H, Zhu S. Reversibly dispersible/collectable metal-organic frameworks prepared by grafting thermally responsive and switchable polymers[J]. Macromolecular Materials and Engineering, 2015, 300(2): 191-197.
21	Dong S, Chen Q, Li W, et al. A dendritic catiomer with an MOF motif for the construction of safe and efficient gene delivery systems[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry B, 2017, 5(42): 8322-8329.
22	Tabatabaii M, Khajeh M, Oveisi A R, et al. Poly(lauryl methacrylate)-grafted amino-functionalized zirconium-terephthalate metal-organic framework: efficient adsorbent for extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from water samples[J]. ACS Omega, 2020, 5(21): 12202-12209.
23	Hou L, Wang L, Zhang N, et al. Polymer brushes on metal-organic frameworks by UV-induced photopolymerization[J]. Polymer Chemistry, 2016, 7(37): 5828-5834.
24	Abánades Lázaro I, Haddad S, Rodrigo-Muñoz J M, et al. Mechanistic investigation into the selective anticancer cytotoxicity and immune system response of surface-functionalized, dichloroacetate-loaded, UiO-66 nanoparticles[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2018, 10(6): 5255-5268.
25	Lu Y, Zhu H, Wang W J, et al. Rapid collection and re-dispersion of MOF particles by a simple and versatile method using a thermo-responsive polymer[J]. RSC Advances, 2016, 6(68): 63398-63402.
26	Abánades Lázaro I, Haddad S, Sacca S, et al. Selective surface pegylation of UiO-66 nanoparticles for enhanced stability, cell uptake, and pH-responsive drug delivery[J]. Chem, 2017, 2(4): 561-578.
27	Giménez-Marqués M, Bellido E, Berthelot T, et al. Graftfast surface engineering to improve MOF nanoparticles furtiveness[J]. Small, 2018, 14(40): 1801900-1801911.
28	Zhao D, Tan S, Yuan D, et al. Surface functionalization of porous coordination nanocages via click chemistry and their application in drug delivery[J]. Advanced Materials, 2011, 23(1): 90-93.
29	Zhu Q L, Xu Q. Metal-organic framework composites[J]. Chemical Society Reviews, 2014, 43(16): 5468-5512.
30	Bentz K C, Cohen S M. Supramolecular metallopolymers: from linear materials to infinite networks[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2018, 57(46): 14992-15001.
31	Giliopoulos D, Zamboulis A, Giannakoudakis D, et al. Polymer/metal organic framework (MOF) nanocomposites for biomedical applications[J]. Molecules, 2020, 25(1):185-213.
32	Saleem S, Sajid M S, Hussain D, et al. Highly porous terpolymer-ZIF-8@BA MOF composite for identification of mono- and multi-glycosylated peptides/proteins using MS-based bottom-up approach[J]. Microchimica Acta, 2020, 187(10): 555-564.
33	Morris W, Briley W E, Auyeung E, et al. Nucleic acid-metal organic framework (MOF) nanoparticle conjugates[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2014, 136(20): 7261-7264.
34	Goetjen T A, Liu J, Wu Y, et al. Metal-organic framework (MOF) materials as polymerization catalysts: a review and recent advances[J]. Chemical Communications, 2020, 56(72): 10409-10418.
35	Xie K, Fu Q, He Y, et al. Synthesis of well dispersed polymer grafted metal-organic framework nanoparticles[J]. Chemical Communications, 2015, 51(85): 15566-15569.
36	Lee H C, Antonietti M, Schmidt B V K J. A Cu(Ⅱ) metal-organic framework as a recyclable catalyst for ARGET ATRP[J]. Polymer Chemistry, 2016, 7(47): 7199-7203.
37	Molavi H, Shojaei A, Mousavi S A. Improving mixed-matrix membrane performance via PMMA grafting from functionalized NH₂-UiO-66[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2018, 6(6): 2775-2791.
38	Gao Y Q, Qiao Z H, Zhao S, et al. In situ synthesis of polymer grafted ZIFs and application in mixed matrix membrane for CO₂ separation[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2018, 6(7): 3151-3161.
39	Qiao Z H, Sheng M L, Wang J X, et al. Metal-induced polymer framework membrane with high performance for CO₂ separation[J]. AIChE Journal, 2019, 65(1): 239-249.
40	Qiao Z H, Zhao S, Sheng M L, et al. Metal-induced ordered microporous polymers for fabricating large-area gas separation membranes[J]. Nature Materials, 2019, 18(2): 163-168.
41	Cohen S M. The postsynthetic renaissance in porous solids[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2017, 139(8): 2855-2863.
42	Zhang Y, Feng X, Li H, et al. Photoinduced postsynthetic polymerization of a metal-organic framework toward a flexible stand-alone membrane[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2015, 54(14): 4259-4263.
43	Xu R, Wang Z, Wang M, et al. High nanoparticles loadings mixed matrix membranes via chemical bridging-crosslinking for CO₂ separation[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2019, 573: 455-464.
44	Marti A M, Venna S R, Roth E A, et al. Simple fabrication method for mixed matrix membranes with in situ MOF growth for gas separation[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2018, 10(29): 24784-24790.
45	Yao B J, Jiang W L, Dong Y, et al. Post-synthetic polymerization of UiO-66-NH₂ nanoparticles and polyurethane oligomer toward stand-alone membranes for dye removal and separation[J]. Chemistry-A European Journal, 2016, 22(30): 10565-10571.
46	Qin A, Lam J W Y, Tang B Z. Click polymerization[J]. Chemical Society Reviews, 2010, 39(7): 2522-2544.
47	Tajima K, Aida T. Controlled polymerizations with constrained geometries[J]. Chemical Communications, 2000, 24: 2399-2412.
48	Sun W, Liu W, Wu Z, et al. Chemical surface modification of polymeric biomaterials for biomedical applications[J]. Macromolecular Rapid Communications, 2020, 41(8): 1900430-1900456.
49	Decker C, Nguyen T V T, Decker D, et al. UV-radiation curing of acrylate/epoxide systems[J]. Polymer, 2001, 42(13): 5531-5541.
50	Döhler D, Michael P, Binder W H. CUAAC-based click chemistry in self-healing polymers[J]. Accounts of Chemical Research, 2017, 50(10): 2610-2620.
51	Goto Y, Sato H, Shinkai S, et al.“Clickable” metal-organic framework[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2008, 130(44): 14354-14355.
52	Ishiwata T, Furukawa Y, Sugikawa K, et al. Transformation of metal-organic framework to polymer gel by cross-linking the organic ligands preorganized in metal-organic framework[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2013, 135(14): 5427-5432.
53	Tsotsalas M, Liu J, Tettmann B, et al. Fabrication of highly uniform gel coatings by the conversion of surface-anchored metal-organic frameworks[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2014, 136(1): 8-11.
54	Uemura T, Ono Y, Kitagawa K, et al. Radical polymerization of vinyl monomers in porous coordination polymers: nanochannel size effects on reactivity, molecular weight, and stereostructure[J]. Macromolecules, 2008, 41(1): 87-94.
55	Uemura T, Ono Y, Hijikata Y, et al. Functionalization of coordination nanochannels for controlling tacticity in radical vinyl polymerization[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2010, 132(13): 4917-4924.
56	Uemura T, Uchida N, Higuchi M, et al. Effects of unsaturated metal sites on radical vinyl polymerization in coordination nanochannels[J]. Macromolecules, 2011, 44(8): 2693-2697.
57	Takashi U, Yukari O, Susumu K. Radical copolymerizations of vinyl monomers in a porous coordination polymer[J]. Chemistry Letters, 2008, 37(6): 616-617.
58	Uemura T, Mochizuki S, Kitagawa S. Radical copolymerization mediated by unsaturated metal sites in coordination nanochannels[J]. ACS Macro Letters, 2015, 4(7): 788-791.
59	Uemura T, Kaseda T, Sasaki Y, et al. Mixing of immiscible polymers using nanoporous coordination templates[J]. Nature Communications, 2015, 6(1): 7473-7481.
60	Uemura T, Kaseda T, Kitagawa S. Controlled synthesis of anisotropic polymer particles templated by porous coordination polymers[J]. Chemistry of Materials, 2013, 25(18): 3772-3776.
61	Furukawa Y, Ishiwata T, Sugikawa K, et al. Nano- and microsized cubic gel particles from cyclodextrin metal-organic frameworks[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2012, 51(42): 10566-10569.
62	Distefano G, Suzuki H, Tsujimoto M, et al. Highly ordered alignment of a vinyl polymer by host-guest cross-polymerization[J]. Nature Chemistry, 2013, 5(4): 335-341.
63	Mochizuki S, Ogiwara N, Takayanagi M, et al. Sequence-regulated copolymerization based on periodic covalent positioning of monomers along one-dimensional nanochannels[J]. Nature Communications, 2018, 9(1): 329-335.
64	Uemura T, Kitagawa K, Horike S, et al. Radical polymerisation of styrene in porous coordination polymers[J]. Chemical Communications, 2005, 48: 5968-5970.
65	Uemura T, Horike S, Kitagawa K, et al. Conformation and molecular dynamics of single polystyrene chain confined in coordination nanospace[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2008, 130(21): 6781-6788.
66	Gamage N D H, McDonald K A, Matzger A J. MOF-5-polystyrene: direct production from monomer, improved hydrolytic stability, and unique guest adsorption[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2016, 55(39): 12099-12103.
67	Uemura T, Uchida N, Asano A, et al. Highly photoconducting π-stacked polymer accommodated in coordination nanochannels[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2012, 134(20): 8360-8363.
68	Bai L, Wang P, Bose P, et al. Macroscopic architecture of charge transfer-induced molecular recognition from electron-rich polymer interpenetrated porous frameworks[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2015, 7(9): 5056-5060.
69	Matyjaszewski K, Xia J. Atom transfer radical polymerization[J]. Chemical Reviews, 2001, 101(9): 2921-2990.
70	何鹏鹏, 赵颂, 毛晨岳, 等. 耐溶剂复合纳滤膜的研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(2): 727-747.
	He P P, Zhao S, Mao C Y, et al. Research progress of solvent-resistant composite nanofiltration membrane[J]. CIESC Journal, 2021, 72(2): 727-747.
71	潘祖仁. 高分子化学[M]. 5版. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2011: 243.
	Pan Z R. Polymer Chemistry[M]. 5th ed. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2011: 243.
72	Hansson S, Trouillet V, Tischer T, et al. Grafting efficiency of synthetic polymers onto biomaterials: a comparative study of grafting-from versus grafting-to[J]. Biomacromolecules, 2013, 14(1): 64-74.
73	Bentz K C, Ejaz M, Arencibia S, et al. Hollow amphiphilic crosslinked nanocapsules from sacrificial silica nanoparticle templates and their application as dispersants for oil spill remediation[J]. Polymer Chemistry, 2017, 8(34): 5129-5138.
74	Bentz K C, Savin D A. Chain dispersity effects on brush properties of surface-grafted polycaprolactone-modified silica nanoparticles: Unique scaling behavior in the concentrated polymer brush regime[J]. Macromolecules, 2017, 50(14): 5565-5573.
75	McDonald K A, Feldblyum J I, Koh K, et al. Polymer@MOF@MOF: “grafting from” atom transfer radical polymerization for the synthesis of hybrid porous solids[J]. Chemical Communications, 2015, 51(60): 11994-11996.
76	Mendes R F, Paz F A A. Transforming metal-organic frameworks into functional materials[J]. Inorganic Chemistry Frontiers, 2015, 2(6): 495-509.
77	He W W, Li S L, Lan Y Q. Liquid-free single-crystal to single-crystal transformations in coordination polymers[J]. Inorganic Chemistry Frontiers, 2018, 5(2): 279-300.
78	Marti-Rujas J. Thermal reactivity in metal organic materials (MOMs): from single-crystal-to-single-crystal reactions and beyond[J]. Materials, 2019, 12(24): 4088-4114.
79	Lässig D, Lincke J, Gerhardt R, et al. Solid-state syntheses of coordination polymers by thermal conversion of molecular building blocks and polymeric precursors[J]. Inorganic Chemistry, 2012, 51(11): 6180-6189.
80	Ou Y C, Zhi D S, Liu W T, et al. Single-crystal-to-single-crystal transformation from 1D staggered-sculls chains to 3D NbO-type metal-organic framework through [2+2] photodimerization[J]. Chemistry-A European Journal, 2012, 18(24): 7357-7361.
81	Medishetty R, Koh L L, Kole G K, et al. Solid-state structural transformations from 2D interdigitated layers to 3D interpenetrated structures[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2011, 50(46): 10949-10952.
82	Medishetty R, Tandiana R, Koh L L, et al. Assembly of 3D coordination polymers from 2D sheets by [2+2] cycloaddition reaction[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2014, 20(5): 1231-1236.
83	Xie M H, Yang X L, Wu C D. From 2D to 3D: a single-crystal-to-single-crystal photochemical framework transformation and phenylmethanol oxidation catalytic activity[J]. Chemistry-A European Journal, 2011, 17(41): 11424-11427.
84	Park I H, Chanthapally A, Zhang Z, et al. Metal-organic organopolymeric hybrid framework by reversible 2+2 cycloaddition reaction[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2014, 53(2): 414-419.
85	Park I H, Chanthapally A, Lee H H, et al. Solid-state conversion of a MOF to a metal-organo polymeric framework (MOPF) via [2+2] cycloaddition reaction[J]. Chemical Communications, 2014, 50(28): 3665-3667.
86	Park I H, Medishetty R, Lee H H, et al. Formation of a syndiotactic organic polymer inside a MOF by a [2+2] photo-polymerization reaction[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2015, 54(25): 7313-7317.
87	Schukraft G E M, Ayala S, Dick B L, et al. Isoreticular expansion of polyMOFs achieves high surface area materials[J]. Chemical Communications, 2017, 53(77): 10684-10687.
88	Zhang Z, Nguyen H T, Miller S A, et al. PolyMOFs: a class of interconvertible polymer-metal-organic-framework hybrid materials[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2015, 54(21): 6152-6157.
89	Zhang Z, Ha Thi Hoang N, Miller S A, et al. Polymer-metal-organic frameworks (PolyMOFs) as water tolerant materials for selective carbon dioxide separations[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2016, 138(3): 920-925.
90	Ayala S, Zhang Z J, Cohen S M. Hierarchical structure and porosity in UiO-66 polyMOFs[J]. Chemical Communications, 2017, 53(21): 3058-3061.
91	Palomba J M, Ayala S J, Cohen S M. PolyMOF formation from kinked polymer ligands via ortho-substitution[J]. Israel Journal of Chemistry, 2018, 58(9/10): 1123-1126.
92	Mileo P G M, Yuan S, Ayala S, et al. Structure of the polymer backbones in polyMOF materials[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2020, 142(24): 10863-10868.
93	Yazaki K, Takahashi M, Miyajima N, et al. Construction of a polyMOF using a polymer ligand bearing the benzenedicarboxylic acid moiety in the side chain[J]. New Journal of Chemistry, 2020, 44(14): 5182-5185.
94	赵小燕, 单国荣. RAFT聚合制备PMPS-b-PNIPAM嵌段共聚物及温敏性纳米粒子[J].化工学报, 2019, 70(10): 4080-4088.
	Zhao X Y, Shan G R. PMPS-b-PNIPAM copolymers synthesized by RAFT polymerization and their thermo-responsive nanoparticles[J]. CIESC Journal, 2019, 70(10): 4080-4088.
95	Bates C M, Bates F S. 50th anniversary perspective: block polymers—pure potential[J]. Macromolecules, 2017, 50(1): 3-22.
96	Jain S, Bates F S. On the origins of morphological complexity in block copolymer surfactants[J]. Science, 2003, 300(5618): 460-464.
97	Macleod M J, Johnson J A. Block co-polymofs: assembly of polymer-polyMOF hybrids via iterative exponential growth and “click” chemistry[J]. Polymer Chemistry, 2017, 8(31): 4488-4493.
98	Gu Y W, Huang M J, Zhang W X, et al. PolyMOF nanoparticles: Dual roles of a multivalent polyMOF ligand in size control and surface functionalization[J]. Angewandte Chemie-International Edition, 2019, 58(46): 16676-16681.
99	Kaye S S, Dailly A, Yaghi O M, et al. Impact of preparation and handling on the hydrogen storage properties of Zn₄O(1,4-benzenedicarboxylate)₃ (MOF-5)[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2007, 129(46): 14176-14177.
100	Ayala S, Bentz K C, Cohen S M. Block co-polyMOFs: morphology control of polymer-MOF hybrid materials[J]. Chemical Science, 2019, 10(6): 1746-1753.
101	Zhao S, Cao X, Ma Z, et al. Mixed-matrix membranes for CO₂/N₂ separation comprising a poly(vinylamine) matrix and metal-organic frameworks[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2015, 54(18): 5139-5148.
102	Yuan Y, Qiao Z H, Xu J Y, et al. Mixed matrix membranes for CO₂ separations by incorporating microporous polymer framework fillers with amine-rich nanochannels[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2021, 620: 118923.
103	Kitao T, Uemura T. Polymers in metal-organic frameworks: from nanostructured chain assemblies to new functional materials[J]. Chemistry Letters, 2020, 49(6): 624-632.

[1]	张眉佳, 吴登峰, 许昊翔, 程道建. 氢氧直接合成过氧化氢用钯基催化剂研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(1): 292-303.
[2]	笪国进, 欧阳李科, 徐晶, 韩一帆. 吡啶改性Pd/SiO₂催化剂用于H₂和O₂直接合成H₂O₂[J]. 化工学报, 2013, 64(2): 561-567.
[3]	管永川，李韦华，张金利. 过氧化氢绿色合成工艺研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2012, 31(08): 1641-1646.
[4]	王淑芳;崔咏梅;赵新强;王延吉. 合成碳酸二甲酯PdCl₂-CuCl₂-KOAc/AC催化剂失活过程分析 [J]. CIESC Journal, 2004, 55(12): 2008-2014.

聚合物-金属有机框架材料的研究进展

Research progress in polymer-metal-organic frameworks

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 16

参考文献 103

相关文章 4

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价