液化天然气、管道天然气与煤制天然气的比较分析

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

采用LCA方法对煤制天然气方案及其替代方案（俄罗斯进口管道天然气以及澳大利亚进口液化天然气）进行了评价，揭示了煤制天然气全生命周期各环节的环境效应。3种方案中，煤制天然气的CO₂等环境排放最高。煤制天然气对原材料价格的承受能力低下，随着褐煤价格的上涨，煤制天然气项目的经济性将受到较大的挑战。

关键词:

煤制天然气, 液化天然气, 管道天然气, 环境排放, 经济效益

Abstract:

Coal based substitute natural gas industry is advocated to develop on a large scale with the aim of reducing gas supply gap in China.Compared with natural gas coming from other approaches，will coal based substitute natural gas show environmental and economic advantages? Therefore life cycle assessment is adopted here.Coal based substitute natural gas is compared with pipe natural gas imported from Russia and liquefied natural gas imported from Australia in term of energy consumption，environment emission and economic benefit.In the calculation，the related items in gas consumption link are omitted.Included industry links are construction link，mining link，production link and transportation link. Environment emission from production link of substitute natural gas project is serious.Although CO₂ produced from coal transform process can be compressed and used in oil field to increase oil yield，substitute natural gas project still shows the highest CO₂and SO₂ emission.As admitted，coal mining regions have already involved severe ecology destroy.It is no doubt that coal based substitute natural gas industry which always develops in coal mining regions will sharpen environment deterioration there.Construction link of pipe natural gas project involves the largest amount of emission in the whole industry chain.So does the liquefied natural gas project.But Russia and Australia possess excellent environment capacity.The same amount of emission will produce less damage in Russia and Australia than in China.Therefore pipe natural gas project and liquefied natural gas project show advantages in term of environment emission.Energy efficiency of coal based substitute natural gas industry is about 35%.If the final gas burning efficiency is computed too，then it can be concluded that the efficiency of the whole industry chain will lower than that of coal power industry， which is the general coal consumption routine in China.The price of wood coal，the raw material of substitute natural gas industry，grows fast nowadays.The economic benefit of coal based substitute natural gas industry is sensitive to the price of wood coal.As a result，economic prospect of coal based substitute natural gas industry is suffering challenge in term of economic benefit.

Key words:

煤制天然气, 液化天然气, 管道天然气, 环境排放, 经济效益

王小伍, 华贲. 液化天然气、管道天然气与煤制天然气的比较分析 [J]. 化工学报, 2009, 60(S1): 35-38.

WANG Xiaowu, HUA Ben. Comparison between liquefied natural gas，pipe natural gas and substitute natural gas[J]. CIESC Journal, 2009, 60(S1): 35-38.

[1]	徐健玮, 梁颖宗, 罗向龙, 陈健勇, 杨智, 陈颖. 液化天然气深冷-膜蒸馏海水淡化系统集成与分析[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(S1): 437-444.
[2]	杜旭, 陈煜, 巨永林. 液化天然气(LNG)的长距离输送及其冷能利用[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(S2): 442-449.
[3]	王弢, 安毓辉, 常烜宇. C型独立货舱LNG船温度压力变化分析[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(S2): 473-479.
[4]	马帅杰, 林文胜. 天然气分输站压力能利用方式经济性分析[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(S2): 413-419.
[5]	何婷, 林文胜. 高含乙烷天然气氮膨胀液化分离流程[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(S2): 226-231.
[6]	房萍, 陈煜. LNG燃料汽车储罐自增压系统仿真计算与分析[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(S2): 309-315.
[7]	朱琳琳, 皇甫立霞, 郭开华. 液化天然气航运安全标准的现状及最新进展[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(S2): 1-8.
[8]	陈桃强, 李宁, 魏光华, 高一峰, 刘奔, 皇甫立霞, 郭开华. 用户负荷特性对LNG接收站经济运行策略的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(S2): 436-441.
[9]	杨晓东, 鲁雪生, 舒小琴, 白改玲, 林文胜, 刘世民. QRA方法在LNG项目中的应用及存在的问题[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(S2): 431-435.
[10]	张乾熙, 梁栋. 基于可见蒸汽云对LNG喷射泄漏爆炸下限区域的预测[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(S2): 425-429.
[11]	邓文源, 田连军, 童文龙, 李宁, 郭开华, 黎文锋. 大型LNG储罐预冷动态模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(S2): 399-404.
[12]	陈煜, 巨永林. 利用液化天然气冷能的朗肯循环与联合法发电系统流程的工艺模拟与对比分析[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(S2): 387-391.
[13]	李国隆, 巨永林, 傅允准. 新型独立B型液化天然气船围护系统及蒸发率计算[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(S2): 101-107.
[14]	郑捷宇, 李广鹏, 厉彦忠, 司标, 杨宇杰. 利用LNG冷能的空分系统换热网络布置及多能级匹配性能[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(S2): 76-84.
[15]	徐彬, 石玉美. 竖直微肋管内LNG流动沸腾传热特性的分析[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(S2): 66-75.

液化天然气、管道天然气与煤制天然气的比较分析

Comparison between liquefied natural gas，pipe natural gas and substitute natural gas

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价