亲水改性碳钢极板用于PM2.5脱除

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20160150

化工学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 67 ›› Issue (10): 4446-4454.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20160150

亲水改性碳钢极板用于PM_2.5脱除

徐纯燕¹, 常景彩^1,2, 王翔¹, 张静¹, 崔琳¹, 张波², 马春元¹

1 山东大学燃煤污染物减排国家工程实验室, 山东济南 250061;
2 山东神华山大能源环境有限公司, 山东济南 250000

收稿日期:2016-02-03 修回日期:2016-07-24 出版日期:2016-10-05 发布日期:2016-10-05
通讯作者: 马春元
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（51206097，51006063）；山东省自然科学基金（青年基金）项目（ZR2011EEQ019，2014EEM040，2014ZZCX05201）；山东大学基本科研业务费专项资金项目（2014QY001-04）。

PM_2.5 collection using surface-modified hydrophilic carbon steel collector

XU Chunyan¹, CHANG Jingcai^1,2, WANG Xiang¹, ZHANG Jing¹, CUI Lin¹, ZHANG Bo², MA Chunyuan¹

1 National Engineering Laboratory For Coal-Fired Pollutants Emission Reduction, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, Shandong, China;
2 Shandong Shenhua Shanda Energy & Environment Co., Ltd., Jinan 250000, Shandong, China

Received:2016-02-03 Revised:2016-07-24 Online:2016-10-05 Published:2016-10-05
Supported by:
supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51206097, 51006063), the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2011EEQ019, 2014EEM040, 2014ZZCX05201) and the Fundamental Research Funds of Shandong University (2014QY001-04).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

火电厂大气污染物排放标准日趋严格，湿式静电除尘器作为终端治理设备逐渐得到广泛应用。以亲水改性刚性极板为研究对象，建立了卧式湿式静电除尘器中试实验台，开展了PM_2.5脱除特性的实验研究，研究了改性极板表面水膜增强颗粒物脱除效率的机制，考察了气体温度、停留时间、工作电压、初始浓度、冲洗水流量等主要运行参数对颗粒物脱除效率的影响规律。结果表明：改性刚性极板表面的纤维层可以减少反冲气流，减少颗粒的电迁移阻力；表面在小水量情况下亦可维持均匀稳定的水膜，水膜的存在抑制了反电晕和二次扬尘的发生，使得电晕电流高且水膜蒸发使烟气湿度提高，颗粒荷电量和电迁移速度提高，这两方面均提高了颗粒脱除效率。停留时间延长、工作电压提高均会引起颗粒脱除效率的增加，但颗粒物入口浓度、冲洗水流量对颗粒脱除效率影响不大。使用改性刚性极板的湿式静电除尘器可减少阳极冲洗水量，对粒径0.04～0.48 μm的颗粒有较高脱除效率，可在低电压下达到较高的颗粒物总脱除效率，具有较好的应用前景。

关键词: 湿式静电除尘, 改性刚性极板, PM_2.5, 脱除效率, 水膜

Abstract:

Fine particles with aerodynamic diameters of <2.5 μm (PM_2.5) are significant pollution sources. Dust emission is restricted to less than 10 mg·m^-3 under 6% oxygen in eastern China and wet electrostatic precipitators (ESPs) are encouraged for efficient removal of various fine particles in aerosol, especially in coal-fired power plant where strict air pollutant emission standards drive wide use of wet ESP as terminal control equipment. Previous studies showed wetting properties of a hydrophilically modified rigid collector and this study focused on fine particle collection performance of the modified collector at pilot scale. The characteristics of PM_2.5 collection, mechanism of uniform water film and effect of main operation parameters on enhancement of particle collection efficiency were investigated. The results showed that the surface fiber layer of the modified rigid collectors reduced flue gas recoiling and particle electro-transportation resistance. A uniform and stable water film was maintained on surfaces of the modified rigid collectors at low washing water flowrate, which inhibited back corona occurrence and a secondary entrainment of dust as well as increased discharge current and flue gas humidity by evaporation of water film. The increase of particle charge number and electro-transportation speed enhanced the particle collection efficiency. With the increase of flue gas temperature, both discharge current and thermophoresis force gradually increased which could improve the particle collection efficiency. However, the increase of gas viscosity reduced the particles collection efficiency. The extension of residence time and the increase of applied voltage improved particle collection, whereas the inlet concentration of particles and the flushing water flowrate had little influence on particle collection. The wet ESPs of modified rigid collectors exhibited reduction of circulating water consumption per square meter by 86 percent and significant increase of particle collection efficiency for ultrafine particles with size of 0.04-0.48 μm as well as overall collection efficiency of all particles at low electric voltage. Hence, the modified rigid collectors had good potentials for application.

Key words: wet ESPs, modified rigid collector, PM_2.5, particle collection efficiency, water film

中图分类号:

徐纯燕, 常景彩, 王翔, 张静, 崔琳, 张波, 马春元. 亲水改性碳钢极板用于PM_2.5脱除[J]. 化工学报, 2016, 67(10): 4446-4454.

XU Chunyan, CHANG Jingcai, WANG Xiang, ZHANG Jing, CUI Lin, ZHANG Bo, MA Chunyuan. PM_2.5 collection using surface-modified hydrophilic carbon steel collector[J]. CIESC Journal, 2016, 67(10): 4446-4454.

参考文献 28

[1]	刘建忠, 范海燕, 周俊虎, 等. 煤粉炉PM10/PM2.5排放规律的试验研究[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2003, 23(1):145-149. LIU J Z, FAN H Y, ZHOU J H, et al. Experimental studies on the emission of PM10 and PM2.5 from coal-fired boiler[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2003, 23(1):145-149.
[2]	UEDA Y, TOMIMATSU K, KAGAMI M, et al. Development of advanced gas cleaning system for sub-micron particle removal[C]//Eighth International Conference on Electrostatic Precipitation. Birmingham, Alabama, 2001.
[3]	ANDERLOHR C, BRACHERT L, MERTENS J, et al. Collection and generation of sulfuric acid aerosols in a wet electrostatic precipitator[J]. Aerosol Science and Technology, 2015, 49(3):144-151.
[4]	MERTENS J, ANDERLOHR C, ROGIERS P, et al. A wet electrostatic precipitator (WESP) as countermeasure to mist formation in amine based carbon capture[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2014, 31:175-181.
[5]	CÓRDOBA P, AYORA C, MORENO N, et al. Influence of an aluminium additive in aqueous and solid speciation of elements in flue gas desulphurisation (FGD) system[J]. Energy, 2013, 50:438-444.
[6]	张爱萍. 燃煤锅炉烟气氨法脱硫技术的应用[J]. 环境科学导刊, 2009, 28(2):58-61. ZHANG A P. The application of coal-fired boiler flue gas ammonia desulphurization technology[J]. Environmental Science Survey, 2009, 28(2):58-61.
[7]	申林艳. 氨吸收法脱硫技术物料平衡计算及除雾器性能优化[D]. 北京:华北电力大学, 2006. SHEN L Y. The computation of material balance for an advanced ammonia desulphurization technology and the performance optimization of the mist separator[D]. Beijing:North China Electric Power University, 2006.
[8]	蒋海涛, 田绍钢, 付玉玲, 等. 湿式静电除雾技术及在燃煤电厂的应用[J]. 发电设备, 2014, 28(1):61-64. JIANG H T, TIAN S G, FU Y L, et al. Application of wet electrostatic precipitator in coal-fired power plants[J]. Power Equipment, 2014, 28(1):61-64.
[9]	高军凯, 黄超, 齐旭东. 膜电除尘器——静电除尘新技术[J]. 江苏环境科技, 2007, 20(6):64-67. GAO J K, HUANG C, QI X D. Membrane electrostatic precipitator-a new technique of electrostatic precipitation[J].Jiangsu Environmental Science and Technology, 2007, 20(6):64-67.
[10]	CHANG J C, DONG Y, WANG Z Q, et al. Removal of sulfuric acid aerosol in wet electrostatic precipitator with single terylene or polypropylene collection electrode[J]. Journal of Aerosol Science, 2011, 42:544-554.
[11]	BAYLESS D J, ALAM M K, RADCLIFF R, et al. Membrane-based wet electrostatic precipitation[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2004, 85(6):781-798.
[12]	CHANG J C, DONG Y, YAN J, et al. Performance test of a new wet ESP with flexible collection electrodes[C]//4th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering. 2010.
[13]	BAYLESS D J, PASIC H, ALAM M K, et al. Use of membrane collectors in electrostatic precipitators[J]. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2001, 51(10):1401-1407.
[14]	薛建明, 纵宁生. 湿法电除尘器的特性及其发展方向[J]. 电力环境保护, 1997, 13(3):40-44. XUE J M, ZONG N S. Characteristics of the wet electrostatic precipitator and a direction of development[J]. Electric Power Environmental Protection, 1997, 13(3):40-44.
[15]	钟晨曦. 湿式静电除尘技术在燃煤电厂烟气深度净化处理中的应用[C]//中国电机工程学会清洁高效发电技术协作网年会. 2014. ZHONG C X. Application of wet electrostatic precipitator in deep purification treatment of coal-fired power plant flue gas[C]//Chinese Society of Electrical Engineering, Clean and Efficient Power Generation Technology. 2014.
[16]	徐纯燕, 常景彩, 马春元, 等. 单股流布水改性碳钢表面的润湿特性实验[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(2):669-677. XU C Y, CHANG J C, MA C Y, et al. Wetting characteristics experiment of modified carbon steel surface with single strand flow[J]. CIESC Journal, 2015, 66(2):669-677.
[17]	中华人民共和国国家环境保护局. 固定污染源排气中颗粒物测定与气态污染物采样方法:GB16157-1996[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社, 1996. Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People's Republic of China. Technical specifications of quality assurance and quality control for monitoring of stationary pollution source (on trial):GB16157-1996[S]. Beijing:Standards Press of China, 1996.
[18]	中华人民共和国国家环境保护局. 烟气采样器技术条件:HJ/T 47-1999[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社, 1999. Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People's Republic of China. Technical conditions of sampler for stack gas:HJ/T 47-1999[S]. Beijing:Standards Press of China, 1999.
[19]	严辉, 朱继保, 李晓颖, 等. 电除尘器伏安特性的实验研究[C]//第十二届中国电除尘学术会议论文集. 2007:10-19. YAN H, ZHU J B, LI X Y, et al. Experimental study on Ⅰ-Ⅴ characteristics of ESP[C]//Proceedings of 12th Conference of ESP. 2007:10-19.
[20]	熊桂龙, 李水清, 陈晟, 等. 增强PM2.5脱除的新型电除尘技术的发展[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2015, 35(9):2217-2223. XIONG G L, LI S Q, CHEN S, et al. Development of advanced electrostatic precipitation technologies for reducing PM2.5 emissions from coal-fired power plants[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2015, 35(9):2217-2223.
[21]	靳星. 静电除尘器内细颗粒物脱除特性的技术基础研究[D]. 北京:清华大学, 2013. JIN X. Research on the capture technology of fine particles in electrostatic precipitator[D]. Beijing:Tsinghua University, 2013.
[22]	NOLL C G. Temperature dependence of dc corona and charge-carrier entrainment in a gas flow channel[J]. Journal of Electrostatics, 2002, 54(3):245-270.
[23]	LIU R L, YOU C F, YANG R C, et al. Direct numerical simulation of kinematics and thermophoretic deposition of inhalable particles in turbulent duct flows[J]. Aerosol Science and Technology, 2010, 44(12):1146-1156.
[24]	WANG X H, YOU C F, LIU R L, et al. Particle deposition on the wall driven by turbulence, thermophoresis and particle agglomeration in channel flow[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2011, 33(2):2821-2828.
[25]	熊桂龙, 李水清, 张绪辉, 等.湿式电除尘器对燃煤电站PM2.5脱除的研究[C]//工程热物理年会. 2014. XIONG G L, LI S Q, ZHANG X H, et al. Removal research of PM2.5 from coal-fired power plant with wet electrostatic precipitators[C]//CSETCS. 2014.
[26]	万益. 湿式静电除尘水膜均布及细颗粒物强化脱除研究[D]. 杭州:浙江大学, 2014. WAN Y. Uniformity of water film and enhancement of fine particles removal in wet electrostatic precipitator[D]. Hangzhou:Zhejiang University, 2014.
[27]	胡满银, 赵毅, 刘忠.除尘技术[M]. 北京:化学工业出版社, 2006. HU M Y, ZHAO Y, LIU Z. Dust Technology[M]. Beijing:Chemical Industry Press, 2006.
[28]	王晓华. 静电场中水对颗粒物脱除增强机理与过程[D]. 北京:清华大学, 2013. WANG X H. Enhancement mechanism and process of water on particle removal in electrostatic filed[D]. Beijing:Tsinghua University, 2013.

亲水改性碳钢极板用于PM_2.5脱除

PM_2.5 collection using surface-modified hydrophilic carbon steel collector

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 28

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	邵苛苛, 宋孟杰, 江正勇, 张旋, 张龙, 高润淼, 甄泽康. 水平方向上冰中受陷气泡形成和分布实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 161-164.
[2]	张浩, 于君毅, 刘晓慧, 雷洪. 基于广义隐马尔可夫模型的PM_2.5浓度预测[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(3): 1215-1220.
[3]	赵志锋, 杜谦, 董鹤鸣, 苏利鹏, 赵广播, 吕东辉, 王敏, 高建民, 郭馨, 徐力, 赵来福. 湿法脱硫装置对燃煤锅炉PM_2.5排放特征的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(11): 4261-4271.
[4]	杨江峰, 欧阳坤, 陈杨, 杨成荫, 李晋平. 柔性MOFs材料Cu(BDC)的氨气吸附及可逆转化性能[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(1): 418-423.
[5]	胡斌, 刘勇, 杨春敏, 侯大伟, 袁竹林, 杨林军. 化学团聚促进电除尘脱除烟气中PM_2.5和SO₃[J]. 化工学报, 2016, 67(9): 3902-3909.
[6]	黄益平, 张春尧, 耿洪鑫, 徐义明, 王娟, 赵雅静, 李英栋, 李凭力. 聚丙烯中空纤维膜气体除尘性能[J]. 化工学报, 2016, 67(10): 4231-4239.
[7]	赵志锋, 杜谦, 赵广播, 高建民, 董鹤鸣, 曹阳, 韩强, 苏利鹏, 苑鹏飞. 燃煤电厂煤粉炉及CFB锅炉PM_2.5产生及排放特性的现场实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(3): 1163-1170.
[8]	徐纯燕, 常景彩, 孟镇, 王翔, 崔琳, 马春元. 单股流布水改性碳钢表面的润湿特性[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(2): 669-677.
[9]	刘勇, 赵汶, 刘瑞, 杨林军. 化学团聚促进电除尘脱除PM_2.5的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2014, 65(9): 3609-3616.
[10]	顾丛汇, 吕士武, 李瑞, 鲁端峰, 务文涛, 袁竹林. 纤维对PM_2.5过滤性能的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2014, 65(6): 2137-2147.
[11]	纪珺, 章学来, 刘小微, 吴云云, 韩中, 杨阳. 水膜闪蒸真空制冰的换热特性[J]. 化工学报, 2013, 64(4): 1236-1241.
[12]	朱家骅, 夏素兰, 魏文韫, 余徽, W. Höflinger. 湿法除尘技术进展及变温多相流脱除PM_2.5的新方法[J]. 化工学报, 2013, 64(1): 155-164.
[13]	陈治良1，魏文韫1，朱家骅1，夏小全2，夏素兰1，余徽1. 横掠液柱流的微粒运动机理及PM_2.5捕获(Ⅱ) 重型柴油机尾气PM_2.5捕获效率[J]. 化工学报, 2012, 63(7): 2010-2016.
[14]	陈治良1，魏文韫1，朱家骅1，郭沈2，夏素兰1，余徽1. 横掠液柱流的微粒运动机理及PM_2.5捕获(Ⅰ)附面运动轨迹与分离半径[J]. 化工学报, 2012, 63(7): 2001-2009.
[15]	高启君吴丹武春瑞陈华艳贾悦王暄吕晓龙. 膜鼓气/吸收法提溴连续吸收过程[J]. 化工学报, 2012, 63(6): 1757-1764.

亲水改性碳钢极板用于PM2.5脱除

PM2.5 collection using surface-modified hydrophilic carbon steel collector

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 28

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

亲水改性碳钢极板用于PM_2.5脱除

PM_2.5 collection using surface-modified hydrophilic carbon steel collector