一种石油焦与CO2高温气化原位反应特性

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20161264

化工学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 68 ›› Issue (4): 1622-1628.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20161264

一种石油焦与CO₂高温气化原位反应特性

柳明^1,2, 沈中杰^1,2, 韩冬^1,2, 梁钦锋^1,2, 许建良^1,2, 刘海峰^1,2

1 华东理工大学煤气化及能源化工教育部重点实验室, 上海 200237;
2 上海市煤气化工程技术研究中心, 上海 200237

收稿日期:2016-09-08 修回日期:2016-11-12 出版日期:2017-04-05 发布日期:2017-04-05
通讯作者: 刘海峰
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(21376082)；上海市科学技术委员会科委资助项目(14dz1200100)。

In-situ gasification characteristics of a petroleum coke with CO₂ at high temperature

LIU Ming^1,2, SHEN Zhongjie^1,2, HAN Dong^1,2, LIANG Qinfeng^1,2, XU Jianliang^1,2, LIU Haifeng^1,2

1 Key Laboratory of Coal Gasification and Energy Chemical Engineering of Ministry of Education, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China;
2 Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Coal Gasification, Shanghai 200237, China

Received:2016-09-08 Revised:2016-11-12 Online:2017-04-05 Published:2017-04-05
Supported by:
supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21376082) and the Foundation of Shanghai Science and Technology Committee(14dz1200100).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

采用高温热台显微镜原位研究了气化温度和颗粒粒度对石油焦气化反应的影响，并对比了神府烟煤和石油焦的反应特性。研究发现，石油焦在气化过程中颗粒收缩，表面结构发生变化，反应速率的改变由低温下逐渐减小，到高温下1300℃时先增大后减小。相同转化率下，反应时间随温度的升高而减少，随颗粒粒度的减小而减少。对比神府煤焦和石油焦的气化反应发现，石油焦反应活性低，为神府烟煤焦平均气化反应速率的1/6。

关键词: 原位研究, 石油焦, 高温气化, 颗粒收缩

Abstract:

In-situ heating stage microscope was applied to analyze the influence of temperature and particle size to the gasification characteristics of petroleum coke. The differences of reaction characteristics between bituminous char and petroleum coke were also analyzed. It was found that the particle shrank during the gasification process, and the surface structure of petroleum coke was changed. The reaction rate decreased with reaction time at the lower temperature (below 1300℃), while first increased and then decreased at 1300℃. Besides, under the same conversion rate, reaction time increased with the temperature and the decrease of particle size. The gasification reaction rate performed different characteristics at 1300℃, owing to the change of particle structure. The comparison of the gasification reaction between bituminous char and petroleum coke showed that the average gasification reaction rate of petroleum coke was 1/6 of bituminous char.

Key words: in-situ analysis, petroleum coke, high-temperature gasification, shrinking particle

中图分类号:

TQ546.2

柳明, 沈中杰, 韩冬, 梁钦锋, 许建良, 刘海峰. 一种石油焦与CO₂高温气化原位反应特性[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(4): 1622-1628.

LIU Ming, SHEN Zhongjie, HAN Dong, LIANG Qinfeng, XU Jianliang, LIU Haifeng. In-situ gasification characteristics of a petroleum coke with CO₂ at high temperature[J]. CIESC Journal, 2017, 68(4): 1622-1628.

参考文献 23

[1]	ZHANG Y M, YAO M Q, GAO S Q, et al. Reactivity and kinetics for steam gasification of petroleum coke blended with black liquor in a micro fluidized bed[J]. Applied Energy, 2015, 160(1):820-828.
[2]	DING L, ZHOU Z J, HUO W, et al. Comparison of steam-gasification characteristics of coal char and petroleum coke char in drop tube furnace[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2015, 23(7):1214-1224.
[3]	LI Y, YANG H P, HU J H, et al. Effect of catalysts on the reactivity and structure evolution of char in petroleum coke steam gasification[J]. Fuel, 2014, 117(1):1174-1180.
[4]	REVANKAR V S, GOKARN A N, DORAISWAMY L K. Studies in catalytic steam gasification of petroleum coke with special reference to the effect of particle size[J]. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 1987, 26(5):1018-1025.
[5]	李庆峰, 房倚天, 张建民, 等. 石油焦水蒸气气化反应特性[J]. 燃料化学学报, 2003, 31(3):204-209.LI Q F, FANG Y T, ZHANG J M, et al. Gasification characteristics of petroleum coke and steam[J]. J. Fuel Chem. Technol., 2003, 31(3):204-209.
[6]	李庆峰, 房倚天, 张建民, 等. 石油焦的气化反应特性[J]. 燃烧科学与技术, 2004, 10(3):254-259.LI Q F, FANG Y T, ZHANG J M, et al. Gasification characteristics of petroleum coke[J]. Journal of Combustion Science and Technology, 2004, 10(3):254-259.
[7]	MALEKSHAHIAN M, VISSCHER A D, HILL J M. A non-equimolar mass transfer model for carbon dioxide gasification studies by thermogravimetric analysis[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2014, 124(124):1-10.
[8]	YAMASHITA T, FUJⅡ Y, MOROZUMI Y, et al. Modeling of gasification and fragmentation behavior of char particles having complicated structures[J]. Combust. Flame, 2006, 146(1):85-94.
[9]	KIM Y T, SEO D K, HWANG J. Study of the effect of coal type and particle size on char-CO2 gasification via gas analysis[J]. Energy Fuels, 2011, 25(11):5044-5054.
[10]	BO F, BHATIA S K. Percolative fragmentation of char particles during gasification[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2000, 14(2):297-307.
[11]	盖希坤, 卢艺, 邢闯, 等. 石油焦水蒸气催化气化反应特性[J]. 石油学报(石油加工), 2015, 31(4):891-896.GAI X K, LU Y, XING C, et al. Characteristics of petroleum coke catalytic gasification with steam[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica(Petroleum Processing Section), 2015, 31(4):891-896.
[12]	杨海平, 王贤华, 张世红, 等. 石油焦水蒸气催化气化及焦拉曼结构特性[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2013, (12):2392-2395.YANG H P, WANG X H, ZHANG S H, et al. The reactivity properties in petroleum coke steam catalytic gasification[J]. J. Eng. Therm., 2013, (12):2392-2395.
[13]	胡启静, 周志杰, 刘鑫, 等. 氯化铁对高硫石油焦-CO2气化的催化作用[J]. 石油学报(石油加工), 2012, 28(3):463-469.HU Q J, ZHOU Z J, LIU X, et al. Catalytic activity of ferric chloride for high-sulfur petroleum coke-carbon dioxide gasification[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica(Petroleum Processing Section), 2012, 28(3):463-469.
[14]	WU S Y, HUANG S, WU Y Q, et al. A semi-empirical kinetic model for simulating the steam gasification of petroleum coke catalyzed by K2CO3[J]. Energy Sources, Part A:Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 2014, 36(11):1151-1157.
[15]	LIEW S C, HILL J M. Impacts of vanadium and coke deposits on the CO2 gasification of nickel catalysts supported on activated carbon from petroleum coke[J]. Applied Catalysis A:General, 2015, 504(5):420-428.
[16]	SHEN Z J, LIANG Q F, XU J L, et al. In situ experimental study on the combustion characteristics of captured chars on the molten slag surface[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2016, 166:333-342.
[17]	SHEN Z J, LIANG Q F, XU J L, et al. In-situ experimental study of CO2 gasification of char particles on molten slag surface[J]. Fuel, 2015, 160(19):560-567.
[18]	DING L, WEI J T, DAI Z H, et al. Study on rapid pyrolysis and in-situ char gasification characteristics of coal and petroleum coke[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(38):16823-16834.
[19]	唐黎华, 陈冬霞, 朱学栋, 等. 石油焦高温气化反应性[J]. 燃料化学学报, 2005, 33(6):687-691.TANG L H, CHEN D X, ZHU X D, et al. Gasification characteristics of petroleum coke at high temperature[J]. J. Fuel Chem. Technol., 2005, 33(6):687-691.
[20]	TAKARADA T, TAMAI Y, TOMITA A. Reactivities of 34 coals under steam gasification[J]. Fuel, 1985, 64(10):1438-1442.
[21]	刘鑫, 张保申, 周志杰, 等. 高温热处理对石油焦结构及气化活性的影响[J]. 石油学报(石油加工), 2011, 27(1):138-143.LIU X, ZHANG B S, ZHOU Z J, et al. Structure changes and gasification activity of petroleum coke after heat treatment[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica(Petroleum Processing Section), 2011, 27(1):138-143.
[22]	HIGMAN C, TAM S. Advances in coal gasification, hydrogenation, and gas treating for the production of chemicals and fuels[J]. Chemical Reviews, 2013, 114(3):1673-1708.
[23]	GOMEZ A, MAHINPEY N. A new model to estimate CO2, coal gasification kinetics based only on parent coal characterization properties[J]. Applied Energy, 2015, 137(1):126-133.

一种石油焦与CO₂高温气化原位反应特性

In-situ gasification characteristics of a petroleum coke with CO₂ at high temperature

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 23

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	周烨, 肖慧霞, 王亦飞, 于广锁. 基于配煤和表面修饰改善褐煤成浆性的研究[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(4): 2233-2240.
[2]	胥永辉, 陈道梁, 孙东科, 李金兵, 韩永生. 微观浓度场对银生长形貌的调控作用[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(S2): 281-288.
[3]	王璐璐, 宋涛, 张将, 段媛媛, 沈来宏. 10MW_th高硫石油焦化学链气化制合成气耦合硫磺回收新系统模拟研究[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(6): 2279-2288.
[4]	崔健, 段伦博, 赵长遂. 混燃石油焦循环流化床锅炉硫污染物排放特性[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(5): 2158-2165.
[5]	陆遥, 刁永发, 陈晨, 李晓诠, 陈珊珊. 溴化石油焦氧化烟气中Hg⁰的机理[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(10): 4394-4401.
[6]	王晨平, 段钰锋, 佘敏, 朱纯, 杨志忠. SO₂活化改性石油焦吸附剂的汞吸附特性[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(12): 4764-4773.
[7]	肖瑞瑞1，杨伟1，于广锁2. 生物质半焦的催化气化动力学特性[J]. 化工进展, 2013, 32(02): 460-465.
[8]	周志杰, 熊杰, 展秀丽, 于广锁. 造纸黑液对石油焦-CO₂气化的催化作用及动力学补偿效应 [J]. 化工学报, 2011, 62(4): 934-939.
[9]	方建辉，姚伯元，韩福顺. 氢氧化钾活化石油焦制备高比表面积活性炭[J]. CIESC Journal, 2011, 30(10): 2258-.
[10]	柳宇, 许桂英, 宋健斐, 吴桂英, 孙国刚. 石油焦对生物质气化中焦油裂解的影响 [J]. 化工学报, 2010, 61(9): 2494-2498.
[11]	高夫燕，刘建忠，王传成，虞育杰，程军，张彦威，周俊虎，岑可法. 石油焦的成浆性及水焦浆的流变性和稳定性 [J]. CIESC Journal, 2010, 61(11): 2912-2918.
[12]	段伦博, 陈晓平, 梁财, 李英杰, 李庆钊, 赵长遂. 以煤焦混合物为燃料的循环流化床锅炉SO₂排放特性 [J]. 化工学报, 2008, 59(3): 728-734.
[13]	袁贵成, 张春林, 刘德昌, 陈汉平, 张世红. 石油焦燃烧脱硫对NO_x排放的影响 [J]. 化工学报, 2003, 54(7): 1032-1034.
[14]	毕胜;徐春明;高金森. 石油焦烧碳动力学 [J]. CIESC Journal, 2003, 54(7): 989-994.
[15]	毕胜 , 徐春明 , 高金森. 高硫石油焦燃烧固硫特性 [J]. 化工学报, 2003, 54(6): 819-823.