混燃石油焦循环流化床锅炉硫污染物排放特性

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20171180

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在3台配备了炉内脱硫+静电除尘器（ESP）/布袋除尘器（FF）+湿法脱硫装置（WFGD）的410 t·h^-1循环流化床（CFB）锅炉进行了硫污染物排放特性研究。在3个测点采用US EPA Method 8对烟气中不同形态硫污染物进行了平行取样，并同时采集了相应工况下入炉燃料、石灰石、底渣、飞灰、石膏和废水等，考察了污染物控制装置对硫污染物的影响以及硫在电厂的迁移和分布特性。结果表明，锅炉出口烟气中硫主要以颗粒态硫和SO₂的形式存在，占比分别为48.94%～55.05%和44.14%～49.07%。ESP和FF能高效脱除颗粒态硫，脱除效率均达95%以上；WFGD对SO₃/硫酸雾、颗粒态硫的脱除效率分别达62.66%～67.82%和53.06%～60.89%。燃料中硫经过燃烧和污染物控制装置脱除之后绝大部分迁移至灰渣（底渣+飞灰）和湿法脱硫产物（石膏+废水）中，分别占硫总输出的56.79%～70.12%和29.25%～41.70%，只有0.63%～1.51%的硫排放到大气环境中。

关键词: 硫污染物, 循环流化床, 石油焦, 分布, 排放特性

Abstract:

The emission characteristics and co-removal through air pollution control devices of sulfurous pollutant were conducted at three 410 t·h^-1 circulating fluidized bed boilers equipped with in-situ desulfurization + electrostatic precipitator (ESP)/fabric filter (FF) + wet flue gas desulfurization (WFGD). The US EPA Method 8 was used for the sampling of various forms of sulfurous pollutant in flue gas. Concurrent with flue gas sampling, the feed fuel, limestone, bottom ash, fly ash, gypsum and wastewater were sampled. The results showed that particulate-bound sulfur and SO₂ are the dominant species in the flue gas at the outlet of boilers, accounting for 48.94%-55.05% and 44.14%-49.07%, respectively. The removal efficiency of particulate-bound sulfur by ESP or FF is more than 95%. About 62.66%-67.82% of SO₃/sulfuric acid mist and 53.06%-60.89% of particulate-bound sulfur in flue gas was removed by WFGD, respectively. The majority of sulfur in fuel was migrated into fly ash + bottom ash and gypsum + wastewater, accounting for 56.79%-70.12% and 29.25%-41.70%, respectively. Only 0.63%-1.51% of total output sulfur was emitted into atmosphere.

Key words: sulfurous pollutant, circulating fluidized bed, petroleum coke, distribution, emission characteristics

中图分类号:

X773

崔健, 段伦博, 赵长遂. 混燃石油焦循环流化床锅炉硫污染物排放特性[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(5): 2158-2165.

CUI Jian, DUAN Lunbo, ZHAO Changsui. Emission characteristics of sulfurous pollutant from circulating fluidized bed boilers co-firing petroleum coke and coal[J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(5): 2158-2165.

参考文献 31

[1]	王树民, 张翼, 刘吉臻. 燃煤电厂细颗粒物控制技术集成应用及"近零排放"特性[J]. 环境科学研究, 2016, 29(9):1256-1263. WANG S M, ZHANG Y, LIU J Z. Integrated application of fine particulate matter control technologies and their "Near-Zero Emission" characteristics in coal-fired power plants[J]. Research of Environmental Science, 2016, 29(9):1256-1263.
[2]	王毓秀, 彭林, 王燕, 等. 电厂燃煤烟尘PM2.5中化学组分特征[J]. 环境科学, 2016, 37(1):60-65. WANG Y X, PENG L, WANG Y, et al. Characteristics of chemical components in PM2.5 from the coal dust of power plants[J]. Environmental Science, 2016, 37(1):60-65.
[3]	刘含笑, 姚宇平, 郦建国, 等. 燃煤电厂烟气中SO3生成、治理及测试技术研究[J]. 中国电力, 2015, 48(9):152-156. LIU H X, YAO Y P, LI J G, et al. Study on SO3 generation, control and testing technology for coal-fired power plants[J]. Electric Power, 2015, 48(9):152-156.
[4]	WEI Y, YU D, TONG S, et al. Effects of H2SO4 and O2 on Hg0 uptake capacity and reversibility of sulfur-impregnated activated carbon under dynamic conditions[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2015, 49(3):1706-1712.
[5]	CHEN J H, LU X F.Progress of petroleum coke combusting in circulating fluidized bed boilers a review and future perspectives[J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2007, 49(3):203-216.
[6]	马瑞进. SO2催化氧化生成SO3反应机理的量子化学研究[D]. 南宁:广西大学, 2008. MA R J. Quantum chemistry study on the reaction mechanism of SO2 and O2 in the catalyze reaction[D]. Nanning:Guangxi University, 2008.
[7]	赵东阳, 靳雅娜, 张世秋. 燃煤电厂污染减排成本有效性分析及超低排放政策讨论[J]. 中国环境科学, 2016, 36(9):2841-2848. ZHAO D Y, JIN Y N, ZHANG S Q. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pollution emission reductionmeasures and ultra-low emission policies for coal-fired power plants[J]. China Environmental Science, 2016, 36(9):2841-2848.
[8]	宦宣州, 何育东, 王少亮, 等. 湿法脱硫吸收塔协同除尘试验[J]. 热力发电, 2017, (7):97-102. HUAN X Z, HE Y D, WANG S L, et al. Experiments about synergistic dust removal by WFGD system[J].Thermal Power Generation, 2017, (7):97-102.
[9]	张磊. 中国燃煤大气汞排放特征与协同控制策略研究[D]. 北京:清华大学, 2012. ZHANG L. Study on atmospheric mercury emission and synergetic control strategies from coal combustion in China[D]. Beijing:Tsinghua University, 2012.
[10]	吴优福. 循环流化床锅炉SO2超低排放技术研究[J]. 洁净煤技术, 2017, 23(2):108-113. WU Y F. Study on SO2 ultra low emission technology on circulating fluidized bed boiler[J]. Clean Coal Technology, 2017, 23(2):108-113.
[11]	沈文锋, 向柏祥, 张海, 等. 煤粉炉SNCR对SO3生成影响的数值模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(8):3225-3231. SHEN W F, XIANG B X, ZHANG H, et al. Numerical simulation on formation of SO3 during SNCR process in pulverized coal-fired boiler[J]. CIESC Journal, 2017, 68(8):3225-3231.
[12]	陈鹏芳, 朱庚富, 张俊翔. 基于实测的燃煤电厂烟气协同控制技术对SO3去除效果的研究[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2017, 39(3):232-235. CHEN P F, ZHU G F, ZHANG J X. Research on SO3 removal efficiency by flue gas co-benefit control technique of coal-fired power plants based on field tests[J]. Environmental Pollution &Control, 2017, 39(3):232-235.
[13]	张军, 郑成航, 张涌新, 等. 某1000MW燃煤机组超低排放电厂烟气污染物排放测试及其特性分析[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2016, 36(5):1310-1314. ZHANG J, ZHENG C H, ZHANG Y X, et al. Experimental investigation of ultra-low pollutants emission characteristics from a 1000MW coal-fired power plant[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2016, 36(5):1310-1314.
[14]	向柏祥, 杨海瑞, 吕俊复. 燃煤锅炉烟气中SO3生成的化学动力学模型和实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(7):2896-2909. XIANG B X, YANG H R, LÜ J F. Kinetic modelling and experimental studies on SO3 generation in flue gas for a coal-fired boiler[J]. CIESC Journal, 2017, 68(7):2896-2909.
[15]	邓双, 张凡, 刘宇, 等. 燃煤电厂铅的迁移转化研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 2013, 33(7):1199-1206. DENG S, ZHANG F, LIU Y, et al. Lead emission and speciation of coal-fired power plants in China[J]. China Environmental Science, 2013, 33(7):1199-1206.
[16]	王文选. 循环流化床中石油焦与煤混烧特性研究[D]. 南京:东南大学, 2002. WANG W X. Study on combustion characteristics of the co-firing of petroleum coke and coal[D]. Nanjing:Southeast University, 2002.
[17]	SRIVASTAVA R K, MILLER C A, ERICKSON C, et al. Emissions of sulfur trioxide from coal-fired power plants[J]. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2004, 54(6):750.
[18]	吕晨, 刘小伟, 郭俊哲, 等. O2/H2O燃烧方式下石灰石的间接硫化反应特性[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(1):353-359. LÜ W, LIU X W, GUO J Z, et al. Indirect sulfation characteristics of limestone under O2/H2O combustion atmosphere[J]. CIESC Journal, 2017, 68(1):353-359.
[19]	WANG X, LIU X, LI D, et al. Effect of steam and sulfur dioxide on sulfur trioxide formation during oxy-fuel combustion[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2015, 43:1-9.
[20]	WANG J, WU Y, ANTHONY B. Reactivation of FBC ash as sulphur sorbent:hydration and sulphation studies[C]//International Conference on Fluidized Bed Combustion. 2005:385-390.
[21]	王曙光. 300 MW CFB锅炉高效脱硫技术的应用研究[D]. 太原:中北大学, 2015. WANG S G. Study on application of high efficiency desulfurization technology of 300MW CFB boiler[D]. Taiyuan:North University of China, 2015.
[22]	CHENG C M, HACK P, CHU P, et al. Partitioning of mercury, arsenic, selenium, boron, and chloride in a full-scale coal combustion process equipped with selective catalytic reduction, electrostatic precipitation, and flue gas desulfurization systems[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2009, 23(10):4805-4816.
[23]	史文峥, 杨萌萌, 张绪辉, 等. 燃煤电厂超低排放技术路线与协同脱除[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2016, 36(16):4308-4318. SHI W Z, YANG M M, ZHANG X H, et al. Ultra-low emission technical route of coal-fired power plants and the cooperative removal[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2016, 36(16):4308-4318.
[24]	滕农, 张运宇, 魏晗, 等. 石灰石/石膏湿法FGD装置除尘效率和SO3脱除率探讨[J]. 电力科技与环保, 2008, 24(4):27-28. TENG N, ZHANG Y Y, WEI H, et al. Discussion on ash removal efficiency and sulfur trioxide removal efficiency of WFGD system[J]. Electric Power Environmental Protection, 2008, 24(4):27-28.
[25]	潘丹萍, 吴昊, 黄荣廷, 等. 石灰石-石膏法烟气脱硫过程中SO3酸雾脱除特性[J]. 东南大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 46(2):311-316. PAN D P, WU H, HUANG R T, et al. Removal properties of sulfuric acid mist during limestone-gypsum flue gas desulfurization process[J]. Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition), 2016, 46(2):311-316.
[26]	王珲, 宋蔷, 姚强, 等. 电厂湿法脱硫系统对烟气中细颗粒物脱除作用的实验研究[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2008, 28(5):1-7. WANG H, SONG Q, YAO Q, et al. Experimental study on removal effect of wet flue gas desulfurization system on fine particles from a coal-fired power plant[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2008, 28(5):1-7.
[27]	李昊, 陈午凤, 王长安, 等. 急冷处理对CFB锅炉底渣脱硫特性的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2016, 67(9):3583-3589. LI H, CHEN W F, WANG C A, et al. Effect of rapid water-cooling process on desulfurization performance of CFB bottom ash[J]. CIESC Journal, 2016, 67(9):3583-3589.
[28]	马志斌, 常可可, 燕可洲, 等. 不同负荷下循环流化床锅炉粉煤灰的理化性质研究[J]. 洁净煤技术, 2016, 22(4):20-25. MA Z B, CHANG K K, YAN K Z, et al. Characteristics of fly ash and slag in circulating fluidized bed under different conditions[J]. Clean Coal Technology, 2016, 22(4):20-25.
[29]	杨娟. 固硫灰渣特性及其作水泥掺合料研究[D]. 重庆:重庆大学, 2006. YANG J. Study on properties and utilization in additive of cement of ashes from fluidized bed combustion[D]. Chongqing:Chongqing University, 2006.
[30]	杨蔚, 董发勤, 何平. 燃煤固硫灰渣的特性及其资源化利用现状[J]. 粉煤灰综合利用, 2013, (4):50-52. YANG W, DONG F Q, HE P. The characteristics and resource utilization status of coal-fired desulphurization ash residue[J]. Fly Ash Comprehensive Utilization, 2013, (4):50-52.
[31]	李树林. 循环流化床锅炉深度脱硫技术经济性研究[D]. 上海:上海交通大学, 2012. LI S L. Technology and economic research on CFB boiler deep desulfurization[D]. Shanghai:Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2012.