CIESC Journal ›› 2019, Vol. 70 ›› Issue (3): 1006-1015.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20180820
• Surface and interface engineering • Previous Articles Next Articles
Qiong HU1(),Yan WANG1(),Rong DAI1,Jianjun SUN2,Xiaoqing ZHENG3
Received:
2018-07-18
Revised:
2018-11-26
Online:
2019-03-05
Published:
2019-03-05
Contact:
Yan WANG
通讯作者:
王衍
作者简介:
<named-content content-type="corresp-name">胡琼</named-content>(1989—),女,博士,讲师,<email>njfuhuqiong@163.com</email>|王衍(1989—),男,博士,副教授,<email>qqwangyan2006@163.com</email>
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Qiong HU, Yan WANG, Rong DAI, Jianjun SUN, Xiaoqing ZHENG. Performance study of arc groove dry gas seal based on orderly micro-structure[J]. CIESC Journal, 2019, 70(3): 1006-1015.
胡琼, 王衍, 戴嵘, 孙见君, 郑小清. 基于有序微造型的圆弧线槽干气密封性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(3): 1006-1015.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://hgxb.cip.com.cn/EN/10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20180820
Film thickness δ/μm | Opening force Fo/kN | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ref.[26] | Ref.[27] | Calculation | Error 1/% | Error 2/% | |
2.03 | 40.71 | 35.17 | 37.09 | 8.89 | 5.46 |
3.05 | 33.17 | 31.50 | 33.02 | 0.45 | 4.83 |
5.08 | 29.57 | 29.37 | 30.16 | 2.60 | 2.69 |
Table 1 Comparison of opening performance
Film thickness δ/μm | Opening force Fo/kN | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ref.[26] | Ref.[27] | Calculation | Error 1/% | Error 2/% | |
2.03 | 40.71 | 35.17 | 37.09 | 8.89 | 5.46 |
3.05 | 33.17 | 31.50 | 33.02 | 0.45 | 4.83 |
5.08 | 29.57 | 29.37 | 30.16 | 2.60 | 2.69 |
Parameter | Value |
---|---|
ro/mm | 80 |
rg/mm | 70 |
rm/mm | 75 |
ri/mm | 60 |
λ | 1 |
hg/μm | 2—10取整数 |
δ/μm | 2—10取整数 |
medium | air |
po/MPa | 0.1/0.5/1/2/3/4 |
pi/MPa | 0.1013 |
N/(r·min-1) | 3000/6000/10000/15000/20000/30000 |
Ng | 10 |
Table 2 Parameters of simulation
Parameter | Value |
---|---|
ro/mm | 80 |
rg/mm | 70 |
rm/mm | 75 |
ri/mm | 60 |
λ | 1 |
hg/μm | 2—10取整数 |
δ/μm | 2—10取整数 |
medium | air |
po/MPa | 0.1/0.5/1/2/3/4 |
pi/MPa | 0.1013 |
N/(r·min-1) | 3000/6000/10000/15000/20000/30000 |
Ng | 10 |
Geometric parameter | Range of preferred value |
---|---|
Bm/mm | 0.1/0.2/0.3/0.4/0.5/0.6/0.7/0.8 |
ε/μm | 0.5/0.6/0.7/0.8/0.9/1.0/1.1/1.2/1.3 |
Cm/mm | 0.1/0.2/0.3/0.4/0.5/0.6/0.7/0.8 |
γ | 1 |
Table 3 Preferred values of micro structure
Geometric parameter | Range of preferred value |
---|---|
Bm/mm | 0.1/0.2/0.3/0.4/0.5/0.6/0.7/0.8 |
ε/μm | 0.5/0.6/0.7/0.8/0.9/1.0/1.1/1.2/1.3 |
Cm/mm | 0.1/0.2/0.3/0.4/0.5/0.6/0.7/0.8 |
γ | 1 |
Rotation speed, N/(r·min-1) | Opening force, Fo/kN | Leakage rate,Q/(m3·h-1) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Windward | Leeward | Windward | Leeward | |
3000 | 13.58 | 13.57 | 0.0102 | 0.0102 |
6000 | 14.38 | 14.36 | 0.0112 | 0.0111 |
10000 | 15.45 | 15.42 | 0.0124 | 0.0124 |
15000 | 16.79 | 16.75 | 0.0140 | 0.0139 |
20000 | 18.13 | 18.08 | 0.0155 | 0.0155 |
30000 | 20.81 | 20.74 | 0.0186 | 0.0186 |
40000 | 23.49 | 23.41 | 0.0217 | 0.0217 |
Table 4 Performance comparisons of different micro structures(po=2 MPa, δ=2 μm, hg=4 μm)
Rotation speed, N/(r·min-1) | Opening force, Fo/kN | Leakage rate,Q/(m3·h-1) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Windward | Leeward | Windward | Leeward | |
3000 | 13.58 | 13.57 | 0.0102 | 0.0102 |
6000 | 14.38 | 14.36 | 0.0112 | 0.0111 |
10000 | 15.45 | 15.42 | 0.0124 | 0.0124 |
15000 | 16.79 | 16.75 | 0.0140 | 0.0139 |
20000 | 18.13 | 18.08 | 0.0155 | 0.0155 |
30000 | 20.81 | 20.74 | 0.0186 | 0.0186 |
40000 | 23.49 | 23.41 | 0.0217 | 0.0217 |
δ/μm | Fo/kN | Q/(m3·h-1) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A-DGS | MA-DGS | Deviation/% | A-DGS | MA-DGS | Deviation/% | |
2 | 15.53 | 15.57 | 0.26 | 0.0122 | 0.0124 | 1.64 |
3 | 13.6 | 13.71 | 0.81 | 0.0337 | 0.035 | 3.86 |
5 | 12.06 | 12.27 | 1.74 | 0.128 | 0.1339 | 4.61 |
Table 5 Performance parameters for comparison(po=2 MPa, hg=4 μm)
δ/μm | Fo/kN | Q/(m3·h-1) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A-DGS | MA-DGS | Deviation/% | A-DGS | MA-DGS | Deviation/% | |
2 | 15.53 | 15.57 | 0.26 | 0.0122 | 0.0124 | 1.64 |
3 | 13.6 | 13.71 | 0.81 | 0.0337 | 0.035 | 3.86 |
5 | 12.06 | 12.27 | 1.74 | 0.128 | 0.1339 | 4.61 |
Level | Pressure po | Rotation N | Film thickness δ | Groove depth hg |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 4.39 | 13.15 | 14.40 | 12.52 |
2 | 8.41 | 13.71 | 12.60 | 14.84 |
3 | 10.86 | 12.89 | 13.44 | 12.66 |
4 | 17.59 | 12.24 | 13.10 | 12.51 |
5 | 25.15 | 14.41 | 12.86 | 13.87 |
delta | 20.76 | 2.17 | 1.80 | 2.33 |
rank | 1 | 3 | 4 | 2 |
Table 6 Influence of parameters on A-DGS opening force/kN
Level | Pressure po | Rotation N | Film thickness δ | Groove depth hg |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 4.39 | 13.15 | 14.40 | 12.52 |
2 | 8.41 | 13.71 | 12.60 | 14.84 |
3 | 10.86 | 12.89 | 13.44 | 12.66 |
4 | 17.59 | 12.24 | 13.10 | 12.51 |
5 | 25.15 | 14.41 | 12.86 | 13.87 |
delta | 20.76 | 2.17 | 1.80 | 2.33 |
rank | 1 | 3 | 4 | 2 |
Level | Pressure po | Rotation N | Film thickness δ | Groove depth hg | Micro depth ε | Micro ratio Bm/Cm |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 4.35 | 13.17 | 14.06 | 11.70 | 12.18 | 12.65 |
2 | 8.33 | 13.14 | 12.14 | 14.07 | 12.73 | 12.19 |
3 | 10.97 | 12.36 | 12.51 | 12.18 | 14.50 | 12.53 |
4 | 17.15 | 11.93 | 12.62 | 12.57 | 12.61 | 14.20 |
5 | 23.20 | 13.41 | 12.67 | 13.48 | 11.98 | 12.44 |
delta | 18.85 | 1.47 | 1.91 | 2.37 | 2.53 | 2.01 |
rank | 1 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 4 |
Table 7 Influence of parameters on MA-DGS opening force/kN
Level | Pressure po | Rotation N | Film thickness δ | Groove depth hg | Micro depth ε | Micro ratio Bm/Cm |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 4.35 | 13.17 | 14.06 | 11.70 | 12.18 | 12.65 |
2 | 8.33 | 13.14 | 12.14 | 14.07 | 12.73 | 12.19 |
3 | 10.97 | 12.36 | 12.51 | 12.18 | 14.50 | 12.53 |
4 | 17.15 | 11.93 | 12.62 | 12.57 | 12.61 | 14.20 |
5 | 23.20 | 13.41 | 12.67 | 13.48 | 11.98 | 12.44 |
delta | 18.85 | 1.47 | 1.91 | 2.37 | 2.53 | 2.01 |
rank | 1 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 4 |
1 | 徐奇超, 江锦波, 陈源, 等.经典曲线型槽干气密封稳动态密封特性数值分析[J]. 摩擦学学报, 2018, 38(5): 584-594. |
XuQ C, JiangJ B, ChenY, et al. Numerical analysis of steady-state and dynamic characteristics of typical molded line groove dry gas seals[J]. Tribology, 2018, 38(5): 584-594. | |
2 | PatirN, ChengH S. An average flow model for determining effects of three-dimensional roughness on partial hydrodynamic lubrication[J]. Journal of Lubrication Technology, Transactions of ASME, 1978, 100(1): 12-17. |
3 | PatirN, ChengH S. Application of average flow model to lubrication between rough sliding surfaces[J]. ASME Journal of Lubrication Technology, 1979, 101: 220-230. |
4 | JB/T11289-2012. 干气密封技术条件[S]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2012. |
JB/T11289-2012. Specification for dry gas seal[S]. Beijing: Mechanical Industry Press, 2012. | |
5 | 冯向忠, 彭旭东. 表面粗糙度对螺旋槽干式气体密封性能的影响[J]. 润滑与密封, 2006, (1): 20-22. |
MaX Z, PengX D. Effect of surface roughness on performance of a spiral groove gas seal[J]. Lubrication Engineering, 2006, (1): 20-22. | |
6 | GlienickeJ, LuanertA, SchlumsH. Non-contacting gas lubricated face seals for high PV-values[C]//NASA. Lewis Research Center, Seals Flow Code Development. US, 1993: 367-378 |
7 | WangY M, WangJ L, YangH X, et al. Development of shaft sealing technology of high-speed turbo-compressors in process industries[C]//8th Asian International Conference on Fluid Machinery. Yichang, China, 2005. |
8 | 彭旭东, 李纪云, 白少先, 等. 三维似羽毛织构底面型槽气体端面密封结构: 200910102184.1[P]. 2009-08-20. |
PengX D, LiJ Y, BaiS X, et al. Three-dimensional gas end face seal with feather-like texture on the groove bottom: 200910102184.1[P]. 2009-08-20. | |
9 | 彭旭东, 李纪云, 白少先, 等. 三维似鱼鳞织构底面型槽流体动压型液体机械密封结构: 200910101512.6[P]. 2009-08-06. |
PengX D, LiJ Y, BaiS X, et al. Three-dimensional fluid dynamic liquid mechanical seal with ichthyoid-like texture on the groove bottom: 200910101512.6[P]. 2009-08-06. | |
10 | 毛文元, 宋鹏云, 邓国强, 等. 螺旋槽底表面粗糙度对干气密封性能的影响[J]. 润滑与密封, 2017, 42(1): 27-33. |
MaoW Y, SongP Y, DengG Q, et al. Influence of surface roughness of dpiral groove bottom on dry gas seal performance[J].Lubrication Engineering, 2017, 42(1): 27-33. | |
11 | SlawomirB, AndriyV Z. A parametric and dynamic analysis of non-contacting gas face seals with modified surfaces[J]. Tribology International, 2016, 94: 126-137. |
12 | MaC B, GuW F, TuQ A, et al. Experimental investigation on frictional property of mechanical seals with varying dimple diameter along the radial face[J]. Advances in Mechanical Engineering. 2016, 8 (8): 1-9. |
13 | MaC B, SunJ J, WangY, et al. On the optimum dimple depth-over-diameter ratio for textured surfaces[J]. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 2017, 9 (9): 1-8. |
14 | SuH, RahmaniR, RahnejatH. Performance evaluation of bidirectional dry gas seals with special groove geometry[J].Tribology Transactions, 2017, 60(1): 58-69. |
15 | WangY, SunJ J, HuQ, et al. Orientation effect of orderly roughness micro structure on spiral groove dry gas seal[J]. Tribology International, 2018, 126: 97-105. |
16 | 戴伟. 一种用高能激光加工干气密封螺旋槽的方法[J]. 石油化工设备, 2013, 42(4): 45-48. |
DaiW. A split lip seal method by high energy laser[J]. Perto-Chemical Equipment, 2013, 42(4): 45-48. | |
17 | 毛文元, 宋鹏云, 邓强国, 等. 干气密封螺旋槽的激光加工工艺研究[J]. 工程科学与技术, 2018, 50(5): 253-262. |
MaoW Y, SongP Y, DengQ G, et al. Research on laser processing technology of spiral groove for dry gas seal[J]. Advanced Engineering Sciences, 2018, 50(5): 253-262. | |
18 | 任晓, 吴承伟, 周平. 粗糙表面的气体密封性能研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2010, 46(16): 176-181. |
RenX, WuC W, ZhouP. Dry gas seal technology conditions[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2010, 46(16): 176-181. | |
19 | 马晨波, 朱华, 孙见君. 考虑粗糙度影响的表面织构最优参数设计模型[J]. 华中科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 39(8): 14-18(35).Ma C B, Zhu H, Sun J J. Optimal design model of surface texture with surface roughness considered[J].J. Huazhong Univ. of Sci. &Tech. (Natural Science Edition), 2011, 39(8): 14-18(35). |
20 | ChenC Y, ChungC J, WuB H, et al. Microstructure and lubricating property of ultra-fast laser pulse textured silicon carbide seals[J]. Applied Physics A: Materials Science & Processing, 2012, 107(2): 345-350. |
21 | 王建荣, 顾永泉, 陈弘. 圆弧槽气体润滑非接触式机械封密的特性[J]. 流体机械, 1991, (3): 1-6. |
WangJ R, GuY Q, ChenH. Characteristics of arc-groove non-contact mechanical seal with gas lubrication[J]. Fluid Machinery, 1991, (3): 1-6. | |
22 | 王福军. 计算流体动力学分析——CFD软件原理与应用[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2004. |
WangF J. Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis—Theory and Application of CFD Software[M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2005. | |
23 | BoR. Finite element analysis of the spiral groove gas face seal at the slow speed and the low pressure conditions slip flow consideration [J]. Tribology Transactions, 2000, 43 (3): 411-418. |
24 | 王衍, 孙见君, 马晨波, 等. 改良圆弧线槽干气密封多参数CFD数值分析[J]. 中南大学学报, 2014, 45(6): 1834-1840. |
WangY, SunJ J, MaC B, et al. Multi parameter CFD numerical analysis of improved T-groove dry gas seal[J]. Tribology, 2014, 45(6): 1834-1840. | |
25 | 王衍, 孙见君, 陶凯, 等. 圆弧线槽干气密封数值分析及槽型优化[J]. 摩擦学学报, 2014, 34(4): 420-427. |
WangY, SunJ J, TaoK, et al. Numerical analysis of T-groove dry gas seal and groove optimization[J]. Tribology, 2014, 34(4): 420-427. | |
26 | GabrielR P. Fundamentals of spiral groove non-contacting face seals[J]. Lubrication Engineering, 1994, 50(3): 215–224. |
27 | WangB, ZhangH Q, CaoH J. Flow dynamics of a spiral groove dry gas seal[J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2013, 26(1) : 78-84. |
28 | MalequeM A, BelloK A, AdebisiA A, et al. Optimization of tribological performance of SiC embedded composite coating via Taguchi analysis approach[C]// International Conference on Mechanical, Automotive and Aerospace Engineering. Malaysia: IOP Publishing, 2017, 184: 1-8. |
29 | PulivartiS R, BirruA K, DepartmentM E . Optimization of green sand mould system using Taguchi based grey relational analysis[J]. China Foundry, 2018, 15(2): 152-159. |
30 | 彭旭东, 李纪云, 盛颂恩, 等. 表面粗糙度对螺旋槽干式气体端面密封性能预测与结构优化的影响[J]. 摩擦学学报, 2007, 27(6): 567-572. |
PengX D, LiJ Y, ShengS E, et al. Effect of surface roughness on performance prediction and geometric optimization of a spiral-groove face seal[J]. Tribology, 2007, 27(6): 567-572. |
[1] | Junhua DING, Shurong YU, Shipeng WANG, Xianzhi HONG, Xin BAO, Xuexing DING. Flow simulation and sealing performance test of ultra-high speed dry gas seal under multiple effects [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(5): 2088-2099. |
[2] | Ruqi YAN, Xuexing DING, Jie XU, Xianzhi HONG, Xin BAO. Flow field and steady performance of supercritical carbon dioxide dry gas seal based on turbulence model [J]. CIESC Journal, 2021, 72(8): 4292-4303. |
[3] | Peng JIANG, Jinbo JIANG, Xudong PENG, Xiangkai MENG, Yi MA. Influence of heat transfer model on temperature and pressure distribution and steady state performance of CO2 dry gas seal under near critical condition [J]. CIESC Journal, 2021, 72(8): 4239-4254. |
[4] | Xuejian SUN, Pengyun SONG, Wenyuan MAO, Qiangguo DENG, Hengjie XU, Wei CHEN. Dynamic contact analysis of dry gas seal during start-stop process considering material properties and surface topography of seal rings [J]. CIESC Journal, 2021, 72(8): 4279-4291. |
[5] | SHANG Hao, CHEN Yuan, LI Xiaolu, WANG Bingqing, LI Yuntang, PENG Xudong. Study on the influence of nonlinear effect on performance of dry gas seal under film thickness disturbance [J]. CIESC Journal, 2021, 72(4): 2213-2222. |
[6] | JIANG Jinbo, TENG Liming, MENG Xiangkai, LI Jiyun, PENG Xudong. Dynamic characteristics of supercritical CO2 dry gas seal based on multi variables perturbation [J]. CIESC Journal, 2021, 72(4): 2190-2202. |
[7] | Chen YU,Jinbo JIANG,Wenjing ZHAO,Jiyun LI,Xudong PENG,Yuming WANG. Geometrical model of surface groove based on micro-segment combination for dry gas seal and its parameter influence [J]. CIESC Journal, 2021, 72(10): 5294-5309. |
[8] | Ruqi YAN, Xianzhi HONG, Xin BAO, Jie XU, Xuexing DING. Phase-distribution regularity and sealing performance of supercritical carbon dioxide dry gas seal [J]. CIESC Journal, 2020, 71(8): 3681-3690. |
[9] | Yu FAN, Pengyun SONG, Hengjie XU. Study on startup operation of dry gas seal with steam lubrication [J]. CIESC Journal, 2020, 71(8): 3671-3680. |
[10] | Wei CHEN, Pengyun SONG, Hengjie XU, Xuejian SUN. Effects of the real-gas characteristics of carbon dioxide with impurities on the dry gas seal performance [J]. CIESC Journal, 2020, 71(5): 2215-2229. |
[11] | Jian CHE, Jinbo JIANG, Jiyun LI, Xudong PENG, Yi MA, Yuming WANG. Effect of orifice exhaust mode on steady performance of hydrostatic dry gas seal [J]. CIESC Journal, 2020, 71(4): 1734-1743. |
[12] | Wei SHEN, Xudong PENG, Jinbo JIANG, Jiyun LI. Analysis on real effect of supercritical carbon dioxide dry gas seal at high speed [J]. CIESC Journal, 2019, 70(7): 2645-2659. |
[13] | Qichao XU, Jinbo JIANG, Xudong PENG, Jiyun LI, Yuming WANG. Unified model and geometrical optimization of bi-directional groove of dry gas seal based on genetic algorithm [J]. CIESC Journal, 2019, 70(3): 995-1005. |
[14] | JIANG Jinbo, CHEN Yuan, ZHAO Wenjing, LI Jiyun, PENG Xudong. Interaction effect of optimized value of geometric parameters of spiral groove of dry gas seal [J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(4): 1518-1527. |
[15] | XU Hengjie, SONG Pengyun, MAO Wenyuan, DENG Qiangguo, SUN Xuejian. Analysis on inertia effect of carbon dioxide dry gas seal at high speed and pressure under laminar condition [J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(10): 4311-4323. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||