R23/R134a一级分凝和二级分凝自复叠喷射制冷循环性能理论分析

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20161422

化工学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 67 ›› Issue (S2): 107-112.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20161422

R23/R134a一级分凝和二级分凝自复叠喷射制冷循环性能理论分析

谈莹莹^1,2, 王林¹, 白得坡¹, 闫晓娜¹

1. 河南科技大学热泵空调技术研究所, 河南洛阳 471003;
2. 湖南大学土木工程学院, 湖南长沙 410082

收稿日期:2016-10-09 修回日期:2016-10-19 出版日期:2016-12-30 发布日期:2016-12-30
通讯作者: 王林
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（U1204525，50906021，U1504524）；河南省高等学校重点科研项目计划项目（15A480001）。

Performance of R23/R134a auto-cascade refrigeration cycle with one-step dephlegmation and two-step dephlegmation

TAN Yingying^1,2, WANG Lin¹, BAI Depo¹, YAN Xiaona¹

1. Institute of Heat Pump, Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471023, Henan, China;
2. School of Civil Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, Hunan, China

Received:2016-10-09 Revised:2016-10-19 Online:2016-12-30 Published:2016-12-30
Supported by:
supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1204525,50906021,U1504524) and Henan Province Office of Education(15A480001).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

基于非共沸混合工质自复叠原理应用于喷射制冷循环的研究，对一级分凝和二级分凝自复叠喷射循环进行了理论分析，研究了使用R134a/R23非共沸混合工质时制冷剂的配比、冷凝温度和蒸发温度对两种循环性能的影响，结果表明：随着低沸点组分R23质量分数由0.10增至0.20，一级分凝循环喷射器压比在3.4附近变化，而二级分凝循环喷射器压比在1.8附近变化，两种循环COP均增大；随着冷凝温度由18℃升至23℃，一级分凝循环喷射器压比由3.242增至3.792，而二级分凝循环喷射器压比由1.860升至1.867，两种循环COP均降低；随着蒸发温度由-10℃降至-15℃，一级分凝循环喷射器压比由3.454降至2.832，而二级分凝循环喷射器压比由1.870降至1.840，两种循环COP均升高，并且在相同工况下，二级分凝循环COP远高于一级分凝循环；二级分凝循环在喷射器压比为1.8时，可获得-15℃温区的制冷温度。

关键词: R23/R134a, 喷射制冷, 自复叠制冷, 分凝

Abstract:

Theoretical analyses on auto-cascade ejector refrigeration cycle with one-step dephlegmation and two-step dephlegmation were performed to discuss the influence of mixed refrigerant composition, condensing temperature and refrigeration temperature on the cycle performance using zeotropic mixture refrigerant R23/R134a.The results show that when the mass fraction of the low boiling point component in the mixed refrigerant increases, the ejector pressure ratios decrease and the cycle COP increases, when condensing temperature increases, the ejector pressure ratios increase and COP decreases significantly, and when evaporating temperature increases, the ejector pressure ratios decrease, and the cycle COP increases.Under the same working conditions, COP of two-step dephlegmation cycle is greater than that of one-step dephlegmation cycle.Two-step dephlegmation cycle can obtain lower refrigeration temperature at -15℃ under the pressure ratio of ejector is about 1.8.

Key words: R23/R134a, ejector refrigeration, auto-cascade refrigeration, dephlegmation

中图分类号:

TB657.4

谈莹莹, 王林, 白得坡, 闫晓娜. R23/R134a一级分凝和二级分凝自复叠喷射制冷循环性能理论分析[J]. 化工学报, 2016, 67(S2): 107-112.

TAN Yingying, WANG Lin, BAI Depo, YAN Xiaona. Performance of R23/R134a auto-cascade refrigeration cycle with one-step dephlegmation and two-step dephlegmation[J]. CIESC Journal, 2016, 67(S2): 107-112.

参考文献 20

[1]	SUN D W.Comparative study of the performance of an ejector refrigeration cycle operating with various refrigerants[J].Energy Conversion and Management, 1999, 40(8): 873-884.
[2]	SELVARAJU A, MANI A.Experimental investigation on R134a vapour ejector refrigeration system[J].International Journal of Refrigeration, 2006, 29(7): 1160-1166.
[3]	ROMAN R, HEMANSEZ J I.Performance of ejector cooling systems using low ecological impact refrigerants[J]. International Journal of Refrigeration, 2011, 34(7): 1707-1716.
[4]	YAPLCL R, ERSOY H K, AKTOPRAKOGLU A, et al. Experimental determination of the optimum performance of ejector refrigeration system depending on ejector area ratio[J].International Journal of Refrigeration, 2008, 31(7):1183-1189.
[5]	CHEN J, HAVTUN H, PALM B.Investigation of ejectors in refrigeration system: optimum performance evaluation and ejector area ratios perspectives[J].Applied Thermal Engineering, 2014, 64(1/2): 182-191.
[6]	DU K, ZHANG S, XU W, et al.A study on the cycle characteristics of an auto-cascade refrigeration system[J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2009,33: 240-245.
[7]	ALEXIS G K,KARAYIANNIS E K.A solar ejector cooling system using refrigerant R134a in the Athens area[J]. Renewable Energy, 2005, 30(9):1457-1469.
[8]	HE S, LI Y,WANG R Z.Progress of mathematical modeling on ejectors[J].Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2009, 13(8):1760-1780.
[9]	QUZZANE M,AIDOUN Z.Model development and numerical procedure for detailed ejector analysis and design[J].Applied Thermal Engineering, 2003, 23(18): 2337-2351.
[10]	ZHU Y,LI Y.Novel ejector model for performance evaluation on both dry and wet vapors ejectors[J]. International Journal of Refrigeration, 2009, 32(1): 21-31.
[11]	CARDEMIL J M, COLLE S.A general model for evaluation of vapor ejectors performance for application in refrigeration[J].Energy Conversion and Management, 2012, 64:79-86.
[12]	CHEN W, LIU M, CHONG D, et al.A 1D model to predict ejector performance at critical and sub-critical operational regimes[J].International Journal of Refrigeration, 2013, 36(6): 1750-1761.
[13]	ZHANG B,SHEN S.A theoretical study on a novel bi-ejector refrigeration cycle[J].Applied Thermal Engineering, 2006, 26(5/6):622-626.
[14]	SELVARAJU A,MANI A.Analysis of a vapour ejector refrigeration system with environment friendly refrigerants[J].International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 2004, 43(9): 915-921.
[15]	YU J, CHEN H, REN Y, et al.A new ejector refrigeration system with an additional jet pump[J].Applied Thermal Engineering, 2006, 26(2/3): 312-319.
[16]	TAN Y, WANG L, REN X.Parametric analysis of a novel auto-cascade ejector refrigeration cycle driven by low grade thermal energy[C]//Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Efficiency, Cost, Optimization, Simulation and Environmental Impact of Energy Systems, ECOS 2013. Guilin, 2013.
[17]	TAN Y, WANG L, LIANG K.Thermodynamic performance of an auto-cascade ejector refrigeration cycle with mixed refrigerant R32+R236fa[J].Applied Thermal Engineering, 2015, 84: 268-275.
[18]	谈莹莹,王林,梁坤峰,等.中间温度对混合工质双级分离式喷射制冷循环特性影响研究[J].工程热物理学报,2015, 36(5):955-959. TAN Y Y, WANG L, LIANG K F, et al.Study on influences of intermediate temperature on performance of ejector refrigeration cycle with two-state mixed refrigerant vapor-liquid separation[J].Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2015, 36(5): 955-959.
[19]	KEENAN J H, NEUMANN E P,LUSTWERK F.An investigation of ejector design by analysis and experiment[J]. ASME J. Appl. Mech.Trans., 1950, 72: 299-309.
[20]	HUANG B J, CHANG J M, WANG C P, et al.A 1-D analysis of ejector performance[J].International Journal of Refrigeration, 1999, 22(5): 354-364.

R23/R134a一级分凝和二级分凝自复叠喷射制冷循环性能理论分析

Performance of R23/R134a auto-cascade refrigeration cycle with one-step dephlegmation and two-step dephlegmation

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 20

相关文章 10

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	谈莹莹, 刘晓庆, 王林, 黄鲤生, 李修真, 王占伟. R1150/R600a自复叠制冷循环开机动态特性实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 213-222.
[2]	耿利红, 刘华东, 魏新利, 王珍珍, 邵龙. 操作参数对双蒸发压缩/喷射制冷系统性能的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(3): 1146-1154.
[3]	白得坡, 王林, 谈莹莹, 梁坤峰, 闫晓娜. 改进型太阳能喷射制冷系统变工况特性[J]. 化工学报, 2016, 67(S2): 362-369.
[4]	芮胜军, 张华, 董彬, 梁坤峰. 自复叠制冷系统4种组分配比性能[J]. 化工学报, 2016, 67(5): 1830-1836.
[5]	王菲, 杨勇, 沈胜强. CO₂跨临界喷射制冷循环计算分析[J]. 化工学报, 2013, 64(7): 2400-2404.
[6]	芮胜军, 张华, 张庆钢, 黄理浩. 两级分凝自复叠制冷系统特性[J]. 化工学报, 2013, 64(6): 2029-2035.
[7]	卢苇, 陈洪杰, 杨林, 曹聪. 自然工质风冷太阳能双级喷射中低温空调制冷系统的设计及性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2012, 63(12): 3847-3854.
[8]	王菲, 沈胜强. 新型太阳能双喷射制冷系统的可用能效率分析 [J]. 化工学报, 2009, 60(3): 553-559.
[9]	费学宁，杜国银，王金方，刘晓平，韩文峰. 冷冻分凝原理处理溴氨酸水溶液方法初步研究 [J]. CIESC Journal, 2007, 26(8): 1182-.
[10]	卢允庄; 王如竹; 李春华; 姜周曙. 固体吸附-蒸汽喷射式联合制冷循环热力分析 [J]. CIESC Journal, 2002, 53(7): 695-699.