不同循环比条件下水解酸化工艺处理厌氧发酵液

化工进展 ›› 2012, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (03): 687-692.

不同循环比条件下水解酸化工艺处理厌氧发酵液

霍守亮¹，曾凤¹，席北斗¹，昝逢宇^1，2，张靖天¹，李翔¹

（¹中国环境科学研究院，北京 100012；²安徽师范大学环境科学学院，安徽芜湖 241000）

出版日期:2012-03-05 发布日期:2012-03-25

Study on hydrolysis acidification process for treating anaerobic digested piggery wastewater under different cycle ratio conditions

HUO Shouliang¹，ZENG Feng¹，XI Beidou¹，ZAN Fengyu^1，2，ZHANG Jingtian¹，LI Xiang¹

（¹China Environmental Science Research Institute，Beijing 100012，China；²College of Environmental Science，
Anhui Normal University，Wuhu 241000，Anhui，China）

Online:2012-03-05 Published:2012-03-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用水解酸化工艺处理厌氧发酵液，研究了不同循环比条件下，水解过程挥发性脂肪酸和氮元素转化规律。结果表明：水解过程产生的挥发性脂肪酸主要有甲酸、乙酸和丙酸，仅有少量样品检测出甲酸，乙酸和丙酸占有机酸总量比例较大。在循环比为1/3条件下产生的有机酸的种类、总量比其它两个条件要多。处理后出水中COD浓度与有机酸总量、乙酸、丙酸浓度均呈线性关系。循环比1/3条件下，处理后出水中氨氮和硝态氮浓度最低（分别为3.57 mg/L和48.60 mg/L），脱氮效果最好。

关键词: 发酵液, 循环比, 有机酸, 水解酸化, 硝化反硝化

Abstract: In this study，a biological removal process using a combination recirculating system of hydrolyze–acidification was used to treat digested piggery wastewater. The transformation of volatile fatty acids（VFAs）and nitrogen under different cycle ratio conditions for this recirculating system were investigated. The results showed that formic acid，acetic acid and propionic acid give main contribution of VFAs in hydrolysis process. The concentration of formic acid was very low or undetected，and the proportion of acetic acid and propionic acid in organic acids were high. The species and concentrations of organic acids on 1/3 cycle ratio were higher than these under other two conditions. The relationship between COD and organic acids contents，COD and acetic acid，COD and propionic acid were linear. The good efficiency for nitrogen removal was obtained at 1/3 cycle ratio with the lowest NH₃-N and NO₃^--N concentrations in treated effluent of 3.57 mg/L and 48.60 mg/L，respectively.

Key words: digested piggery wastewater, cycle ratio, organic acids, hydrolysis acidification, nitrification and denitrification

霍守亮1，曾凤1，席北斗1，昝逢宇1，2，张靖天1，李翔1. 不同循环比条件下水解酸化工艺处理厌氧发酵液[J]. 化工进展, 2012, 31(03): 687-692.

HUO Shouliang1，ZENG Feng1，XI Beidou1，ZAN Fengyu1，2，ZHANG Jingtian1，LI Xiang1. Study on hydrolysis acidification process for treating anaerobic digested piggery wastewater under different cycle ratio conditions[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progree, 2012, 31(03): 687-692.

[1]	黄珊, 陆勇泽, 朱光灿, 孔赟. 耦合生物阴极SND的MLMB -MFC的构建与运行[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(4): 1772-1780.
[2]	巩有奎, 彭永臻. 运行方式对SBBR亚硝酸型同步脱氮及N₂O释放的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(6): 2289-2297.
[3]	巩有奎, 任丽芳, 彭永臻. 不同DO下SBBR亚硝酸型同步脱氮及N₂O释放特性[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(4): 1550-1558.
[4]	巩有奎, 赵强, 彭永臻. 不同C/N下SBBR脱氮过程N₂O释放及胞外多聚物变化[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(12): 4847-4855.
[5]	巩有奎, 彭永臻. 曝气强度对SBBR同步生物脱氮及N₂O释放影响[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(11): 4410-4419.
[6]	吕惠生, 张佳, 李永辉, 耿中峰, 王智, 吕春柳, 石兴方. 有机酸对甜高粱渣亚临界水解产物的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(9): 4058-4065.
[7]	陈凤桥, 崔畅, 齐立强. 碱失活SCR脱硝催化剂的有机酸回收[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(12): 4717-4722.
[8]	李忠明, 王淑莹, 苗蕾, 曹天昊, 张为堂, 刘文龙, 彭永臻. 单级SBR厌氧/好氧/缺氧处理中期垃圾渗滤液深度脱氮[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(2): 746-752.
[9]	胡家玮, 李军, 卞伟, 郑林雪, 王盟. 城市污水连续流A/O系统富氧条件下脱氮特征[J]. 化工学报, 2014, 65(10): 4071-4077.
[10]	刘娜1，2，谢学辉1，2，柳建设1，2 . 印染废水水解酸化作用及其调控研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2014, 33(10): 2758-2763.
[11]	王龙耀, 王岚. 头孢菌素C过滤过程中总过滤时间的优化与控制[J]. 化工学报, 2013, 64(9): 3256-3261.
[12]	王德武, 严超宇, 卢春喜, 张少峰. 提升管与气-固环流床层耦合反应器颗粒相循环比的模型及预测[J]. 化工学报, 2013, 64(6): 2065-2071.
[13]	刘鹏，陈银广. 污水脱氮除磷新工艺研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2013, 32(10): 2491-2496.
[14]	王永东，李广悦，丁德馨，胡南，邓钦文，周支香. 黑曲霉产有机酸浸出铀矿石的影响因素[J]. 化工学报, 2012, 63(5): 1584-1591.
[15]	李静1，2，刘景洋1，乔琦1，海热提2，孙晓明1. 反渗透膜处理含有机酸凝结水技术[J]. 化工进展, 2012, 31(12): 2648-2651.