密闭容器内失控反应超压的数学建模及其在压力泄放中的应用

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20170403

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

安全泄放是在失控条件下降低反应体系风险最为经济有效的技术措施之一。研究压力的数学模型既可以为泄放计算提供必要的参数，又可以让工程师深入了解样品在容器内的压力变化情况，设计出更可靠的泄放系统，并且在减少实验量的同时，还可以计算不同装载率下的泄放面积。以20% DTBP（过氧化二叔丁基）的ARC（加速度量热仪）测试为标准，结合理论推导得到了绝热条件下密闭容器中失控反应超压的数学模型，并将绝热修正后的压力测试曲线与模型模拟的压力曲线对比，验证了模型的正确性。最后，将模型的压力模拟数据应用于20% DTBP的泄放计算中，结合Leung方法，得到了不同装载率下的泄放面积，发现在装载率为20%时，泄放面积达到最大为0.0035 m²。研究结果表明建立的压力数学模型是正确可靠的，并且该模型能较好地应用于压力泄放的计算中。

关键词: 泄放计算, 数学模型, 加速度量热仪, 过氧化二叔丁基, 模拟压力

Abstract:

Venting system that can reduce risks under runaway reactions was one of the most economical and effective measures. The study of pressure mathematical model provided necessary parameters for vent calculation, and helped engineers design more reliable venting system by understanding pressure tendency. Moreover, this model supported to calculate vent area in different filling ratios with less experiment. The ARC (accelerating rate calorimeter) test of 20%DTBP (di-tert-butyl peroxide) was chosen as the standard test. Combined with theory, the mathematical model of pressure in closed container was first deduced, which was suitable for adiabatic condition. Then, according to the comparison between adiabatic corrected test data and model simulated data, the correctness for this model was verified. Combined with Leung method, vent calculation was carried out with the model pressure simulation data. From the calculation, the vent area reached its maximum, while the filling ratio equaled 20%. The established closed container pressure model was correct and reliable. Furthermore, this model can be applied to the calculation of vent area.

Key words: vent calculation, mathematical model, accelerating rate calorimeter, di-tert-butyl peroxide, pressure simulation

中图分类号:

X933

董泽, 陈利平, 陈网桦, 马莹莹. 密闭容器内失控反应超压的数学建模及其在压力泄放中的应用[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(11): 4453-4460.

DONG Ze, CHEN Liping, CHEN Wanghua, MA Yingying. Mathematical model of runaway reaction pressure in closed container and its application in vent calculation[J]. CIESC Journal, 2017, 68(11): 4453-4460.

参考文献 25

[1]	弗朗西斯·施特塞尔. 化工工艺的热安全:风险评估与工艺设计[M]. 陈网桦, 彭金华, 陈利平, 译. 北京:科学出版社, 2009:241-278. STOESSEL F. Thermal Safety of Chemical Process:Risk Assessment and Process Design[M]. CHEN W H, PENG J H, CHEN L P, trans. Beijing:Science Press, 2009:241-278.
[2]	FISHER H G, FOREST H S, GROSSEL S S, et al. Emergency Relief System Design Using DIERS Technology:The Design Institute For Emergency Relief Systems (DIERS) Project Manual[M]. New York:AIChE/DIERS, 1992:285-393.
[3]	FAUSKE H K. Emergency relief system design for reactive and non-reactive systems:extension of the DIERS methodology[J]. Plant/Operations Progress, 1988, 7(3):153-158.
[4]	HUFF J E. Emergency venting requirements for gassy reactions from closed system tests[J]. Plant/Operations Progress, 1984, 3(1):50-59.
[5]	FISHER H G. An overview of emergency relief system design practice[J]. Plant/Operations Progress, 1991, 10(1):1-12.
[6]	周建东. 化学反应失控紧急泄放研究[D]. 大连:大连理工大学, 2000. ZHOU J D. Emergency relief of runaway reaction[D]. Dalian:Dalian University of Technology, 2000.
[7]	FAUSKE H K. Revisiting DIERS two-phase methodology for reactive systems twenty years later[J]. Process Safety Progress, 2006, 25(3):180-188.
[8]	VÉCHOT L, MINKO W, BIGOT J P, et al. Vent sizing:analysis of the blowdown of a hybrid non tempered system[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2011, 191(1):8-18.
[9]	MONCALVO D, FRIEDEL L. Single and two-phase flows of shear-thinning media in safety valves[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009, 168(2):1521-1526.
[10]	GUSTIN J L. Vent sizing for the phenol + formaldehyde reaction[J]. Organic Process Research & Development, 2006, 10(6):1263-1274.
[11]	WEI T T, JIANG H L. Venting design for di-tert-butyl peroxide runaway reaction based on accelerating rate calorimeter test[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2012, 20(4):710-714.
[12]	DENG J P, SUN X, CHEN W H, et al. Thermal runaway risk and vent sizing of dicumyl peroxide[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2013, 23(9):90-95.
[13]	JIANG J, ZHANG C, CHAI X W, et al. Thermal runaway and safety relief of vinyl acetate polymerization reactors[J]. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Chinese Universities, 2016, 30(5):1119-1126.
[14]	etcHELLS J, WILDAY J. Workbook for Chemical Reactor Relief System Sizing[M]. Norwich, UK:HSE Books, 1998:205-221.
[15]	LEUNG J C. Venting of runaway reactions with gas generation[J]. AIChE Journal, 1992, 38(5):723-732.
[16]	LEUNG J C, FAUSKE H K. Runaway system characterization and vent sizing based on DIERS methodology[J]. Plant/Operations Progress. 1987, 6(2):77-83.
[17]	TOWNSEND D I. Accelerating rate calorimetry[C]//I. Chem. E. Symposium Series, 1981, (68):3.
[18]	KAZAKOV A, MUZNY C D, CHIRICO R D, et al. Web Thermo Tables-an on-line version of the TRC Thermodynamic Tables[J]. Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology 2008, 113(4):209.
[19]	周鸿娟, 刘敬兰. 二叔丁基过氧化物分解产物的气相色谱法测定[J]. 色谱, 1997, 15(4):354-355. ZHOU H J, LIU J L. GC measurement for decomposition products of DTBP[J]. Chromatography, 1997, 15(4):354-355.
[20]	SINGH J. Vent sizing for gas-generating runaway reactions[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 1994, 7(6):481-491.
[21]	KOSSOY A A, JASBIR S, ELENA Y K. Mathematical methods for application of experimental adiabatic data -an update and extension[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2015, 33:88-100.
[22]	LEUNG J C. A generalized correlation for one-component homogeneous equilibrium flashing choked flow[J]. AIChE Journal, 1986, 32(10):1743-1746.
[23]	LEUNG J C. The omega method for discharge rate evolution[R]. New York:American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 1995.
[24]	WOODWARD J L. An amended method for calculating omega for a homogeneous equilibrium model of predicting discharge rates[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 1995, 8(5):253-259.
[25]	ⅡZUKA Y, SURIANARAYANAN M. Comprehensive kinetic model for adiabatic decomposition of di-tert-butyl peroxide using BatchCAD[J]. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 2003, 42(13):2987-2995.