非共沸混合工质组分调控ORC系统热经济性分析和优化

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20191081

化工学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 71 ›› Issue (5): 2373-2381.DOI: 10.11949/0438-1157.20191081

非共沸混合工质组分调控ORC系统热经济性分析和优化

陈超男(),罗向龙(),杨智,黄仁龙,卢沛,陈健勇,陈颖

广东工业大学材料与能源学院，广东广州 510006

收稿日期:2019-10-07 修回日期:2020-03-05 出版日期:2020-05-05 发布日期:2020-05-05
通讯作者: 罗向龙
作者简介:陈超男（1993—），女，硕士研究生，15966651305@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金面上项目(51876043);国家自然科学基金重点项目(51736005)

Thermo-economic modelling and optimization of a zeotropic organic Rankine cycle with composition adjustment

Chaonan CHEN(),Xianglong LUO(),Zhi YANG,Renlong HUANG,Pei LU,Jianyong CHEN,Ying CHEN

Institute of Materials and Energy, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006，Guangdong，China

Received:2019-10-07 Revised:2020-03-05 Online:2020-05-05 Published:2020-05-05
Contact: Xianglong LUO

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

作为最具潜力的低品位热能发电技术之一，有机朗肯循环（ORC）近年来受到越来越多的关注。与传统的高品位能源发电技术相比，其运行性能对环境温度的变化极其敏感。提出一种新型非共沸混合工质ORC系统，利用分液冷凝器调节混合工质组分，以适应环境温度的变化，进而提高系统性能。根据环境温度的变化构建热力学优化模型获得最优组分；冷凝过程中利用分液冷凝器和组分调控系统改变混合工质组分。通过案例验证了新系统的热经济性能优势，研究结果表明：对于100℃热源，在定压运行工况下，新系统较传统系统的经济性可提高38.90%，而在滑压运行工况下，新系统较传统系统的经济性可提高15.35%，且使用不同非共沸混合工质时，系统性能有显著差异。

关键词: 有机朗肯循环, 非共沸混合工质, 组分调控, 分液冷凝器

Abstract:

As one of the most promising low-grade thermal power generation technologies, the organic Rankine cycle (ORC) has received increasing attention in recent years. Compared to the conventional high-grade fossil energy to power conversion technologies, ORC is much more sensible to the environmental temperature variation due to the low temperature nature of heat sources. This study proposes a novel zeotropic ORC in which the mixture composition can be tuned in response to the environmental temperature using liquid - separation condensation. A thermodynamic optimization model is formulated to optimize the mixture composition according to the environmental temperature. A superstructure of liquid-separation condensation based composition tuning system is constructed. The tuning process of the novel system is modelled and incorporated into the zeotropic ORC. Case study is elaborated to validate the thermo-economic effectiveness of the novel ORC. The results show that the thermo-economic effectiveness of the proposed ORC can be improved by up to 38.90%/15.35% for constant/sliding pressure regulation compare to the conventional ORC in terms of 100℃ heat source. Furthermore, the comparison of five zeotropic mixtures indicates that the performance improvement is significantly sensible to the mixtures.

Key words: organic Rankine cycle, zeotropic mixture, composition adjustment, liquid-separation

中图分类号:

TK 9

陈超男, 罗向龙, 杨智, 黄仁龙, 卢沛, 陈健勇, 陈颖. 非共沸混合工质组分调控ORC系统热经济性分析和优化[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(5): 2373-2381.

Chaonan CHEN, Xianglong LUO, Zhi YANG, Renlong HUANG, Pei LU, Jianyong CHEN, Ying CHEN. Thermo-economic modelling and optimization of a zeotropic organic Rankine cycle with composition adjustment[J]. CIESC Journal, 2020, 71(5): 2373-2381.

图/表 8

参考文献 33

1	Chen H, Goswami D Y, Stefanakos E K. A review of thermodynamic cycles and working fluids for the conversion of low-grade heat[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2010, 14(9): 3059-3067.
2	Tchanche B F, Lambrinos G, Frangoudakis A, et al. Low-grade heat conversion into power using organic Rankine cycles—a review of various applications[J]. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2011, 15(8): 3963-3979.
3	Franco A, Vaccaro M. Numerical simulation of geothermal reservoirs for the sustainable design of energy plants: a review[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014, 30: 987-1002.
4	Bina S M, Jalilinasrabady S, Fujii H. Thermo-economic evaluation of various bottoming ORSs for geothermal power plant, determination of optimum cycle for Sabalan power plant exhaust[J]. Gsothermics, 2017, 70: 181-191.
5	Baccioli A, Aatonelli M, Desideri U. Dynamic modeling of a solar ORC with compound parabolic collectors: annual production and comparison with steady-state simulation[J]. Energy Conversion & Management, 2017, 148: 708-723.
6	Patil V R, Biradar V I, Shreyas R, et al. Techno-economic comparison of solar organic Rankine cycle (ORC) photovoltaic (PV) systems with energystorage[J]. Renewable Energy, 2017, 113: 1250-1260.
7	Wang J L, Zhao L, Wang X D. A comparative study of pure and zeotropic mixtures in low-temperature solar Rankine cycle[J]. Applied Energy, 2010, 87(11): 3366-3373.
8	Lin D D, Zhu Q, Li X G. Thermodynamic comparative analyses between (organic) Rankine cycle and Kalina cycle[J]. Energy Procedia, 2015, 75: 1618-1623.
9	Wang Y F, Tang Q K, Wang M Y, et al. Thermodynamic performance comparison between ORC and Kalina cycles for multi-stream waste heat recovery[J]. Energy Conversion & Management, 2017, 143: 482-492.
10	Wang X D, Duan Y Y, Yan W M. Novel serpentine-baffle flow field design for proton exchange membrane fuel cells[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2007, 173(1): 210-221.
11	Sanchez C J N, Gosselin L, Silva A K. Designed binary mixtures for subcritical organic Rankine cycles based on multiobjective optimization[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2018, 156: 585-596.
12	Gomez J, Lamas J, Martín M, et al. A multi-objective optimization approach for the selection of working fluids of geothermal facilities: economic environmental and social aspects[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2017, 203: 962-972.
13	Song J, Gu C W. Analysis of ORC (organic Rankine cycle) systems with pure hydrocarbons and mixtures of hydrocarbon and retardant for engine waste heat recovery[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2015, 89: 693-702.
14	Li T L, Zhu J L, Hu K Y, et al. Implementation of PDORC (parallel double-evaporator organic Rankine cycle) to enhance power output in oilfield[J]. Energy, 2014, 68: 680-687.
15	Kazemi N, Samadi F. Thermodynamic, economic and thermo-economic optimization of a new proposed organic Rankine cycle for energy production from geothermal resources[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2016, 121: 391-401.
16	Luo X L, Liang Z H, Guo G Q, et al. Thermo-economic analysis and optimization of a zoetropic fluid organic Rankine cycle with liquid-vapor separation during condensation[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2017, 148: 517-532.
17	Collings P, Yu Z B, Wang E H. A dynamic organic Rankine cycle using a zeotropic mixture as the working fluid with composition tuning to match changing ambient conditions[J]. Applied Energy, 2016, 171: 581-591.
18	Kim I S, Kim T S, Lee J J. Off-design performance analysis of organic Rankine cycle using real operation data from a heat source plant[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2017, 133: 284-291.
19	Shu G Q, Wang X, Tian H, et al. Scan of working fluids based on dynamic response characters for organic Rankine cycle using for engine waste heat recovery[J]. Energy, 2017, 133(15): 609-620.
20	Wang X, Shu G Q, Tian H, et al. The effects of design parameters on the dynamic behavior of organic Rankine cycle for the engine waste heat recovery[J]. Energy, 2018, 147: 440-450.
21	Proctor M J, Yu W, Kirkpatrick R D, et al. Dynamic modelling and validation of a commercial scale geothermal organic Rankine cycle power plant[J]. Geothermics, 2016, 61: 63-74.
22	Bamgbopa M O, Uzgoren E. Numerical analysis of an organic Rankine cycle under steady and variable heat input[J]. Applied Energy, 2013, 107: 219-228.
23	Hu D S, Zheng Y, Wu Y, et al. Off-design performance comparison of an organic Rankine cycle under different control strategies[J]. Applied Energy, 2015, 156: 268-279.
24	Quoilin S, Aumann R, Grill A, et al. Dynamic modeling and optimal control strategy of waste heat recovery organic Rankine cycles[J]. Applied Energy, 2011, 88(6): 2183-2190.
25	Lu J L, Zhang J, Chen S L, et al. Analysis of organic Rankine cycles using zeotropic mixtures as working fluids under different restrictive conditions[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2016, 126: 704-716.
26	Wang E H, Yu Z B, Collings P. Dynamic control strategy of a distillation system for a composition-adjustable organic Rankine cycle[J]. Energy, 2017, 141: 1038-1051.
27	Zhong T M, Chen Y, Hua N, et al. In-tube performance evaluation of an air-cooled condenser with liquid-vapor separator[J]. Applied Energy, 2014, 136: 968-978.
28	Zhong T M, Chen Y, Yang Q C, et al. Experimental investigation on the thermodynamic performance of double-row liquid-vapor separation microchannel condenser[J]. International Journal of Refrigeration, 2016, 67: 373-382.
29	Luo X L, Yi Z T, Chen Z W, et al. Performance comparison of the liquid-vapor separation, parallel flow, and serpentine condensers in the organic Rankine cycle[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2016, 94: 435-448.
30	Luo X L, Yi Z T, Zhang B J, et al. Mathematical modelling and optimization of the liquid separation condenser used in organic Rankine cycle[J]. Applied Energy, 2017, 185: 1309-1323.
31	Li J, Liu Q, Duan Y Y, et al. Performance analysis of organic Rankine cycles using R600/R601a mixtures with liquid-separated condensation[J]. Applied Energy, 2017, 190: 376-389.
32	Luo X L, Huang R L, Yang Z, et al. Performance investigation of a novel zeotropic organic Rankine cycle coupling liquid separation condensation and multi-pressure evaporation[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2018, 161: 112-127.
33	Tian Q, Hou B. Historical Weather Forecast of Beijing[DS/OL]. [2018-05-21]. http: //.

[1]	张曼铮, 肖猛, 闫沛伟, 苗政, 徐进良, 纪献兵. 危废焚烧处理耦合有机朗肯循环系统工质筛选与热力学优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3502-3512.
[2]	党玉荣, 莫春兰, 史科锐, 方颖聪, 张子杨, 李作顺. 综合评价模型联合遗传算法的混合工质ORC系统性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 1884-1895.
[3]	李子航, 王占博, 苗政, 纪献兵. 亚临界有机朗肯循环系统工质筛选及热经济性分析[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(9): 4487-4495.
[4]	曹健, 冯新, 吉晓燕, 陆小华. 基于混合工质的多级蒸发ORC理论极限性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(7): 3780-3787.
[5]	荣杨一鸣, 吴巧仙, 周霞, 方松, 王凯, 邱利民, 植晓琴. 空分系统空气压缩余热自利用性能优化研究[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(3): 1654-1666.
[6]	明勇, 彭艳楠, 苏文, 魏国龙, 王强, 周乃君, 赵力. 闭式热源下混合工质与纯工质的ORC性能比较[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(4): 1570-1579.
[7]	王羽鹏, 梁俊伟, 罗向龙, 李逸帆, 陈健勇, 陈颖. 基于神经网络的有机朗肯循环过程及循环性能计算方法[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(9): 3256-3266.
[8]	侯中兰, 魏新利, 马新灵, 孟祥睿. 循环水流量对ORC余热发电系统性能影响的试验分析[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(9): 3283-3290.
[9]	陈玉婷, 徐燕燕, 王磊, 叶爽, 黄伟光. 蒸发器换热过程对ORC系统混合工质选择和运行工况的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(5): 1723-1733.
[10]	李鹏, 韩中合, 贾晓强, 梅中恺, 韩旭. 动态透平效率对有机朗肯循环系统性能的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(4): 1532-1541.
[11]	游怀亮, 韩吉田, 刘洋. 基于SOFC/MGT/ORC的微型冷热电联供系统性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(S2): 300-308.
[12]	潘权稳, 王如竹. 热驱动的双模式冷电联供系统的性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(S2): 373-378.
[13]	吴玉庭, 赵英昆, 雷标, 孟庆鹏, 陈如梦, 智瑞平, 马重芳. 冷却水流量对ORC系统性能影响的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(6): 2639-2645.
[14]	韩中合, 梅中恺, 李鹏. 变透平效率有机朗肯循环工质筛选及多目标优化[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(6): 2603-2611.
[15]	黄仁龙, 罗向龙, 梁志辉, 陈颖. 基于分液冷凝的R245fa/pentane混合工质朗肯循环多目标优化[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(5): 2040-2048.

非共沸混合工质组分调控ORC系统热经济性分析和优化

Thermo-economic modelling and optimization of a zeotropic organic Rankine cycle with composition adjustment

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 33

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价