多喷嘴对置式气化炉内颗粒挥发分火焰可视化研究

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20200718

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

基于实验室规模多喷嘴对置式水煤浆气化炉及其可视化装置，研究了气化炉喷嘴平面非射流区颗粒挥发分燃烧过程。结合图像处理技术，在气化条件下对粒径小于300 μm颗粒挥发分火焰尾迹形态及变化过程进行分析。研究结果表明，颗粒挥发分火焰非典型包络型火焰，而是形成挥发分火焰尾迹。颗粒挥发分尾迹形态受颗粒脱挥发分所处阶段和颗粒相对于气流的运动状态的影响，随时间不断变化。颗粒挥发分最大火焰尺寸随颗粒粒径增加而增加。气流床气化还原性气氛条件下颗粒挥发分燃烧时间较颗粒在富氧气氛中燃烧时间显著增加。

关键词: 水煤浆, 挥发分火焰, 撞击气流床气化炉, 可视化技术

Abstract:

Based on the bench-scale opposed multi-burner (OMB) coal-water slurry entrained-flow gasifier and its visualization device, the combustion process of particle volatiles in the plane non-jet zone of the gasifier nozzle is studied. Image processing technology was applied to analyze the change of particles' volatile flame trail shape under the gasification condition with the particles smaller than 300 μm. The results show that the particle volatile flames are not typical envelope flames, but a volatile flame trail is formed. The trail shape of particle volatile matter is affected by the phase of the particle devolatilization and the movement condition of the particle relative to the air flow, which changes continuously with time. The maximum flame size of particle volatiles increases as the particle size increases. The combustion time of the volatile matter of the particles under the condition of reducing atmosphere of entrained-flow gasification is significantly longer than that of the particles in the oxygen-rich atmosphere.

Key words: coal-water slurry, volatile flame, impinging entrained-flow gasifier, visualization technology

中图分类号:

刘洁妤, 龚岩, 吴晓翔, 郭庆华, 于广锁, 王辅臣. 多喷嘴对置式气化炉内颗粒挥发分火焰可视化研究[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(3): 1275-1282.

LIU Jieyu, GONG Yan, WU Xiaoxiang, GUO Qinghua, YU Guangsuo, WANG Fuchen. Visualization study on particle volatile flame opposed multi-burner impinging entrained-ﬂow gasiﬁer[J]. CIESC Journal, 2021, 72(3): 1275-1282.

参考文献 33

1	王辅臣, 于广锁, 龚欣, 等. 大型煤气化技术的研究与发展[J]. 化工进展, 2009, 28(2): 173-180.
	Wang F C, Yu G S, Gong X, et al. Research and development of large-scale coal gasification technology[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2009, 28(2): 173-180.
2	郭庆华, 卫俊涛, 龚岩, 等. 多喷嘴对置式气流床气化炉内热态行为的研究进展[J]. 煤炭学报, 2020, 45(1): 403-413.
	Guo Q H, Wei J T, Gong Y, et al. Research progress on hot-model behavior of opposed multi-burner entrained-flow gasification[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2020, 45(1): 403-413.
3	于遵宏, 王辅臣. 煤炭气化技术[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2010.
	Yu Z H, Wang F C. Coal Gasification Technology[M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2010.
4	Yuan Y, Li S, Zhao F, et al. Characterization on hetero-homogeneous ignition of pulverized coal particle streams using CH^* chemiluminescence and 3 color pyrometry[J]. Fuel, 2016, 184(15): 1000-1006.
5	吴晨月. 基于高速数字全息的燃烧煤粉颗粒场可视化测量研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2018.
	Wu C Y. Research of pulverized coal combustion visualization measurement based on high-speed digital holography[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2018.
6	Zeng Z, Zhang T, Zheng S, et al. Ignition and combustion characteristics of coal particles under high-temperature and low-oxygen environments mimicking MILD oxy-coal combustion conditions[J]. Fuel, 2019, 253: 1104-1113.
7	Köser J, Becker L G, Goßmann A K, et al. Investigation of ignition and volatile combustion of single coal particles within oxygen-enriched atmospheres using high-speed OH-PLIF[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2017, 36(2): 2103-2111.
8	Li L, Tahmasebi A, Dou J, et al. Influence of functional group structures on combustion behavior of pulverized coal particles[J]. Journal of the Energy Institute, 2020, 93(5): 2124-2132.
9	Marek E, Swiatkowski B. Experimental studies of single particle combustion in air and different oxy-fuel atmospheres[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2014, 66: 35-42.
10	Khatami R, Levendis Y A. An overview of coal rank influence on ignition and combustion phenomena at the particle level[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2016, 164: 22-34.
11	Khatami R, Stivers C, Joshi K, et al. Combustion behavior of single particles from three different coal ranks and from sugar cane bagasse in O₂/N₂ and O₂/CO₂ atmospheres[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2012, 159(3): 1253-1271.
12	Riaza J, Khatami R, Levendis Y A, et al. Single particle ignition and combustion of anthracite, semi-anthracite and bituminous coals in air and simulated oxy-fuel conditions[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2014, 161: 1096-1108.
13	Zhang L, Binner E, Qiao Y, et al. High-speed camera observation of coal combustion in air and O₂/CO₂ mixtures and measurement of burning coal particle velocity[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2010, 24: 29-37.
14	Lee H, Choi S. Volatile flame visualization of single pulverized fuel particles[J]. Powder Technology, 2018, 333: 353-363.
15	Lee H, Choi S. An observation of combustion behavior of a single coal particle entrained into hot gas flow[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2015, 162(6): 2610-2620.
16	Wu Y, Yao L, Wu X, et al. 3D imaging of individual burning char and volatile plume in a pulverized coal flame with digital inline holography[J]. Fuel, 2017, 206: 429-436.
17	Adeosun A, Xiao Z, Gopan A, et al. Pulverized coal particle ignition in a combustion environment with a reducing-to-oxidizing transition[J]. Journal of the Energy Institute, 2019, 92(3): 693-703.
18	Kreitzberg T, Phounglamcheik A, Haugen N E L, et al. A shortcut method to predict particle size changes during char combustion and gasification under regime Ⅱ conditions[J]. Combustion Science and Technology, 2019, DOI: 10.1080/00102202.2019.1678919. DOI
19	Tufano G L, Stein O T, Wang B, et al. Coal particle volatile combustion and flame interaction (Ⅰ): Characterization of transient and group effects[J]. Fuel, 2018, 229: 262-269.
20	Tufano G L, Stein O T, Wang B, et al. Coal particle volatile combustion and flame interaction (Ⅱ): Effects of particle Reynolds number and turbulence[J]. Fuel, 2018, 234: 723-731.
21	Toth P, Draper T, Palotas A B, et al. Three-dimensional combined pyrometric sizing and velocimetry of combusting coal particles(Ⅰ): Velocimetry[J]. Applied Optics, 2015, 54(13): 4049-4060.
22	Valiullin T R, Strizhak P A, Shevyrev S A, et al. Ignition of an organic water-coal fuel droplet floating in a heated-air flow[J]. Thermal Engineering, 2017, 64(1): 53-60.
23	Glushkov D O, Strizhak P A, Vershinina K Y. Minimum temperatures for sustainable ignition of coal water slurry containing petrochemicals[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2016, 96(5): 534-546.
24	Levendis Y A, Joshi K, Khatami R, et al. Combustion behavior in air of single particles from three different coal ranks and from sugarcane bagasse[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2011, 158(3): 452-465.
25	叶宏程, 甘云华, 江政纬, 等. 乙醇荷电喷雾对冲燃烧的火焰特性[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(12): 4787-4794.
	Ye H C, Gan Y H, Jiang Z W, et al. Flame characteristics of alcohol electro-spraying in counter-flow combustor[J]. CIESC Journal, 2019, 70(12): 4787-4794.
26	Gong Y, Yu G, Guo Q, et al. Experimental study on particle characteristics in an opposed multi-burner gasifier[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2014, 117: 93-106.
27	Zhang Q, Gong Y, Guo Q, et al. Experimental study of particle evolution characteristics in an opposed multi-burner gasifier[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2017, 162: 104-119.
28	龚岩. 多喷嘴对置式气化炉内火焰可视化研究[D]. 上海: 华东理工大学, 2013.
	Gong Y. Research on visualization of flame in the opposed multi-burner gasifier[D]. Shanghai: East China University of Science and Technology, 2013.
29	张庆. 多喷嘴对置式气化炉内火焰辐射发光及颗粒特性可视化研究[D]. 上海: 华东理工大学, 2017.
	Zhang Q. Research on visualization of flame chemiluminescence and particle characteristics in the opposed multi-burner gasifier[D]. Shanghai: East China University of Science and Technology, 2017.
30	Wu X, Gong Y, Guo Q, et al. Experimental study on the atomization and particle evolution characteristics in an impinging entrained-ﬂow gasifier[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2019, 207: 542-555.
31	程晨, 薛志村, 郭庆华, 等. 撞击气流床气化炉内雾化过程中颗粒运动特性[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(12): 4536-4545.
	Cheng C, Xue Z C, Guo Q H, et al. Particle motion characteristics of atomization process in impinging entrained-flow gasifier[J]. CIESC Journal, 2019, 70(12): 4536-4545.
32	Wu X, Guo Q, Gong Y, et al. Visualization study on particle flow behaviors during atomization in an impinging entrained-flow gasifier[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2020, 225: 115834.
33	郭庆华, 于广锁, 梁钦锋, 等. 多喷嘴对置式水煤浆气化炉内气体浓度分布的常压热态试验研究[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2009, 29(32): 19-23.
	Guo Q H, Yu G S, Liang Q F, et al. Atmospheric hot-test on gas concentration distribution in the opposed multi-burner coal water slurry gasifier[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2009, 29(32): 19-23.

[1]	王康, 张扬, 胡丽琳, 张海, 吕俊复, 岳光溪. 高分压水蒸气对石灰石脱硫过程的影响作用[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(8): 3188-3195.
[2]	程晨, 薛志村, 郭庆华, 龚岩, 于广锁. 撞击气流床气化炉内雾化过程中颗粒运动特性[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(12): 4536-4545.
[3]	朱军峰, 李元博, 张光华, 王睿. 聚羧酸盐侧链长度对水煤浆分散性能的影响及其作用机理[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(10): 4202-4210.
[4]	邵迪, 代正华, 于广锁, 龚欣, 王辅臣. 固定床气化与气流床水煤浆气化集成的能量与经济分析[J]. 化工学报, 2013, 64(6): 2186-2193.
[5]	王文坦, 张梦雪, 赵述芳, 刘喆, 金涌, 程易. 激光诱导荧光技术在液体混合可视化研究中的应用[J]. 化工学报, 2013, 64(3): 771-778.
[6]	华炜，凌俊. 220 t/h水煤浆锅炉烟气脱硝工艺技术[J]. 化工进展, 2013, 32(04): 955-958.
[7]	孙漾, 顾幸生. 水煤浆气化装置操作优化技术及其应用[J]. 化工学报, 2012, 63(9): 2799-2804.
[8]	金渭龙, 王亦飞, 彭康, 吴超琦, 许建良. 新型两段式气化炉的数值分析[J]. 化工学报, 2012, 63(12): 3747-3755.
[9]	钟伟民, 李杰, 程辉, 孔祥东, 钱锋. 基于FCM聚类的气化炉温度多模型软测量建模[J]. 化工学报, 2012, 63(12): 3951-3955.
[10]	彭新文. 灰分含量对GE水煤浆气化的物耗影响 [J]. CIESC Journal, 2011, 30(9): 1946-.
[11]	程维, 赵辉, 孟沁玮, 李伟锋, 许建良, 刘海峰. 水煤浆气流雾化的初次破裂特性 [J]. 化工学报, 2011, 62(1): 25-31.
[12]	赵卫东, 刘建忠, 周俊虎, 曹晓哲, 张光学, 岑可法. 低阶煤高温高压水热处理改性及其成浆特性 [J]. 化工学报, 2009, 60(6): 1560-1567.
[13]	陈良勇, 段钰锋, 刘猛, 赵长遂. 具有壁面滑移特性的水煤浆流经局部管件的阻力特性 [J]. 化工学报, 2009, 60(12): 2981-2989.
[14]	廖胡, 郭庆华, 梁钦锋, 张健, 廖敏, 于广锁. 多喷嘴对置式气化炉中飞灰性质 [J]. 化工学报, 2009, 60(11): 2918-2923.
[15]	陈良勇, 段钰锋, 赵国华, 刘猛. 温度和固相粒径与浓度对水煤浆管内流动壁面滑移的影响 [J]. 化工学报, 2008, 59(9): 2206-2213.