ZSM-5分子筛对典型涂装VOCs的吸附性能及机理研究

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20240042

化工学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 75 ›› Issue (6): 2332-2343.DOI: 10.11949/0438-1157.20240042

ZSM-5分子筛对典型涂装VOCs的吸附性能及机理研究

冀钟¹^,²(), 赵彦玲²^,³, 陈雨濛¹^,², 高林霞¹, 王翼鹏⁴, 刘欢²^,³()

^1.湖北工业大学土木建筑与环境学院，湖北武汉 430068
^2.深圳华中科技大学研究院，广东深圳 518063
^3.华中科技大学能源与动力工程学院，湖北武汉 430074
^4.宇星科技发展（深圳）有限公司，广东深圳 518057

收稿日期:2024-01-09 修回日期:2024-03-29 出版日期:2024-06-25 发布日期:2024-07-03
通讯作者: 刘欢
作者简介:冀钟（1998—），男，硕士研究生，102110852@hbut.edu.cn
基金资助:
深圳市技术攻关面上项目(JSGG20210802154804013)

Adsorption performance and mechanism of ZSM-5 molecular sieves on typical coating VOCs

Zhong JI¹^,²(), Yanling ZHAO²^,³, Yumeng CHEN¹^,², Linxia GAO¹, Yipeng WANG⁴, Huan LIU²^,³()

^1.School of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Environment, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430068, Hubei, China
^2.Research Institute of Huazhong University of Science and Technology in Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518063, Guangdong, China
^3.School of Energy and Power Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, China
^4.Universtar Science & Technology (Shenzhen) Company Limited, Shenzhen 518057, Guangdong, China

Received:2024-01-09 Revised:2024-03-29 Online:2024-06-25 Published:2024-07-03
Contact: Huan LIU

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

通过水热法成功合成了一系列宽硅铝比（50、100、150、300、500、800、1500、3000）的ZSM-5分子筛，旨在研究其对涂装行业典型挥发性有机物（volatile organic compounds，VOCs）的吸附规律。同时，结合分子筛表面的酸性位点，以解析硅铝比对分子筛吸附性能的影响机制。实验结果表明，丙酮的吸附能力主要受自身极性、支链结构和分子筛表面酸位点的影响。而乙酸丁酯、苯乙烯、对二甲苯、苯、甲苯的吸附性能会同时受到自身的分子量、分子直径、极性、分子结构和官能团的影响，分子量和分子直径大、极性强且具有支链结构的VOCs更容易被ZSM-5分子筛吸附。这6种VOCs中，ZSM-5分子筛对丙酮的吸附效果最好，硅铝比对其吸附性能的影响也最大。这是因为丙酮比其他VOCs更容易吸附在Lewis酸位点上，硅铝比的改变会影响酸位点的数量。低硅铝比的分子筛由于具有较多的酸位点，更适用于丙酮的吸附。

关键词: ZSM-5分子筛, 吸附剂, 硅铝比, 吸附, 涂装挥发性有机物, Lewis酸位点

Abstract:

A series of ZSM-5 molecular sieves with wide silica-to-aluminium ratios (50, 100, 150, 300, 500, 800, 1500, 3000) were successfully synthesized by hydrothermal method, aiming to study their effects on typical volatile organic compounds (volatile organic compounds, VOCs) in the coating industry. Meanwhile, the acidic sites on the surface of the molecular sieves were combined in order to resolve the mechanism of the influence of the silica-aluminium ratio on the adsorption performance of the molecular sieves. The experimental results showed that the adsorption capacity of acetone was mainly affected by its own polarity, branched structure and acid sites on the surface of molecular sieves. The adsorption performance of butyl acetate, styrene, p-xylene, benzene and toluene would be affected by their own molecular weight, molecular diameter, polarity, molecular structure and functional groups at the same time, and VOCs with large molecular weights and molecular diameters, high polarity and branched structures were more likely to be adsorbed by ZSM-5 molecular sieves. Among these six VOCs, ZSM-5 molecular sieve showed the best adsorption effect on acetone, the silica-aluminium ratio had the greatest effect on its adsorption performance, because acetone is more easily adsorbed on Lewis acid sites than the others, the change of silica-aluminium ratio will affect the number of acid sites. The molecular sieves with low silica-aluminium ratio are suitable for acetone adsorption due to their higher number of acid sites.

Key words: ZSM-5 molecular sieves, adsorbents, silicon-aluminum ratio, adsorption, volatile organic compounds in coatings, Lewis acid sites

中图分类号:

TQ 630.9

冀钟, 赵彦玲, 陈雨濛, 高林霞, 王翼鹏, 刘欢. ZSM-5分子筛对典型涂装VOCs的吸附性能及机理研究[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(6): 2332-2343.

Zhong JI, Yanling ZHAO, Yumeng CHEN, Linxia GAO, Yipeng WANG, Huan LIU. Adsorption performance and mechanism of ZSM-5 molecular sieves on typical coating VOCs[J]. CIESC Journal, 2024, 75(6): 2332-2343.

图/表 13

图1 华中地区某汽车涂装厂VOCs检测结果

Fig.1 VOCs test results of an automobile coating plant in central China

图2 不同硅铝比ZSM-5分子筛的合成

Fig.2 Synthesis of ZSM-5 molecular sieves with different silicon-aluminum ratios

图3 吸附性能测试装置

Fig.3 Diagram of adsorption performance test device

图4 不同硅铝比分子筛的XRD谱图

Fig.4 XRD patterns of molecular sieves with different silicon-aluminum ratios

图5 不同硅铝比分子筛的氮气脱附曲线（a）和孔径分布（b）

Fig.5 Nitrogen desorption curves （a） and pore size distribution （b） of molecular sieves with different silicon-aluminum ratios

表1 合成不同硅铝比分子筛的基本参数

Table 1 Basic parameters for the synthesis of molecular sieves with different Si/Al ratios

样品	理论Si/Al	实际Si/Al	总比表面积/(m²/g)^①	微孔表面积/(m²/g)^②	外比表面积/(m²/g)	总孔容/(m³/g)^③	平均孔径/nm^④
1	50	48.49	420.59	360.74	59.85	0.36	3.47
2	100	91.84	471.92	396.42	75.50	0.54	4.54
3	150	129.88	468.11	407.82	60.29	0.62	5.32
4	300	245.05	402.45	335.09	67.36	0.24	2.43
5	500	350.98	416.94	369.04	47.90	0.26	2.46
6	800	547.63	438.67	391.86	46.81	0.24	2.42
7	1500	730.17	465.56	373.01	92.43	0.38	3.23
8	3000	933.74	437.19	372.81	64.37	0.33	3.01

图6 不同分子量VOCs在ZSM-5分子筛上吸附的饱和吸附量（a）和穿透时间（b）

Fig.6 Saturation adsorption （a） and penetration time （b） of different molecular weight VOCs adsorbed on ZSM-5 molecular sieves

图7 不同分子直径VOCs在ZSM-5分子筛上吸附的饱和吸附量(a)和穿透时间(b)

Fig.7 Saturation adsorption (a) and penetration time (b) of VOCs with different molecular diameters adsorbed on ZSM-5 molecular sieves

图8 不同结构VOCs在ZSM-5分子筛上吸附的饱和吸附量(a)和穿透时间(b)

Fig.8 Saturation adsorption (a) and penetration time (b) of VOCs with different structures adsorbed on ZSM-5 molecular sieves

图9 不同偶极矩VOCs在ZSM-5分子筛上吸附的饱和吸附量(a)和穿透时间(b)（1 D=3.33564×10-30 C·m）

Fig.9 Saturation adsorption (a) and penetration time (b) of VOCs with different dipole moments adsorbed on ZSM-5 molecular sieves

图10 不同硅铝比ZSM-5分子筛吸附丙酮和乙酸丁酯的饱和吸附量(a)和穿透时间(b)

Fig.10 Saturation adsorption (a) and penetration time (b) of acetone and butyl acetate adsorbed on ZSM-5 molecular sieves with different silica-to-aluminum ratios

图11 硅铝比100、500分子筛原样NH3-TPD测试图

Fig.11 Silica-aluminum ratio of 100, 500 molecular sieves samples NH3-TPD test charts

图12 硅铝比100、500分子筛对丙酮、乙酸丁酯吸附前后NH3-TPD测试图和质谱测试图（Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ分别为分子筛吸附VOCs前后弱、中、强酸变化量）

Fig.12 NH3-TPD test graphs and mass spectrometry test graphs before and after adsorption of acetone and butyl acetate on silica-aluminium ratios of 100 and 500 molecular sieves（Ⅰ,Ⅱ,Ⅲ indicate the change of weak, medium and strong acids before and after VOCs adsorption)

参考文献 30

1	Ou R, Chang C, Zeng Y, et al. Emission characteristics and ozone formation potentials of VOCs from ultra-low-emission waterborne automotive painting[J]. Chemosphere, 2022, 305: 135469.
2	Yu B, Yuan Z, Yu Z, et al. Btex in the environment: an update on sources, fate, distribution, pretreatment, analysis, and removal techniques[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2022, 435: 134825.
3	汪林正, 陆俞冰, 张睿智, 等. 基于分子动力学模拟的VOCs热氧化特性分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74 (8): 3242-3255.
	Wang L Z, Lu Y B, Zhang R Z, et al. Analysis on thermal oxidation characteristics of VOCs based on molecular dynamics simulation[J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(8): 3242-3255.
4	冯勇超, 于庆君, 易红宏, 等. MFI型分子筛在VOCs去除领域的研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2020, 34(17): 17089-17098.
	Fong Y C, Yu Q J, Yi H H, et al. Research progress of MFI-type zeolites in the field of VOCs removal[J]. Materials Review, 2020, 34(17): 17089-17098.
5	Tada S, Li D, Okazaki M, et al. Influence of Si/Al ratio of MOR type zeolites for bifunctional catalysts specific to the one-pass synthesis of lower olefins via CO₂ hydrogenation[J]. Catalysis Today, 2023, 411/412: 113828.
6	Jindal M, Palla V C S, Thallada B. Effect of zeolite structure and Si/Al ratio on cotton stalks hydropyrolysis[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2023, 376: 128933.
7	Li X F, Wang J, Guo Y Y, et al. Adsorption and desorption characteristics of hydrophobic hierarchical zeolites for the removal of volatile organic compounds[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2021, 411: 128558.
8	Shu Q, Sun Z, Zhu G, et al. Highly efficient synthesis of ZSM-5 zeolite by one-step microwave using desilication solution of coal gasification coarse slag and its application to VOCs adsorption[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2022, 167: 173-183.
9	Kang S Y, Ma J Z, Wu Q M, et al. Adsorptive removal of dichloromethane vapor on FAU and MFI zeolites: Si/Al ratio effect and mechanism[J]. Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data, 2018, 63(6): 2211-2218.
10	Zhang P. The adsorption of VOCs by honeycomb ceramics loaded with molecular sieves[J]. Journal of Chemistry, 2022(24): 1-7.
11	Dai J, Zhou X, Chen Z, et al. Synthesis of zeolite nanocrystals with intercrystal mesopores using an organosilane as the structure directing agent[J]. RSC Advances, 2016, 6(111): 109897-109901.
12	Yu Q J, Zhuang R J, Yi H H, et al. Application of MCM-48 with large specific surface area for VOCs elimination: synthesis and hydrophobic functionalization for highly efficient adsorption[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29: 33595-33608.
13	Gao L, Kong X, Meng D, et al. Preparation of a novel zeolite Y-stainless-steel wire mesh honeycomb for VOC capture[J]. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 2021, 328: 111438.
14	高君安, 王伟, 张傑, 等. 用于高湿度废气中甲苯吸附净化的疏水型ZSM-5分子筛的合成及其吸附性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(1): 337-343.
	Gao J A, Wang W, Zhang J, et al. Study on synthesis and adsorption performance of hydrophobic ZSM-5 zeolites for removal of toluene in high-humidity exhaust gas[J]. CIESC Journal, 2020, 71(1): 337-343.
15	Tang K, Hong X. Preparation and characterization of co-MCM-41 and its adsorption removing basic nitrogen compounds from fluidized catalytic cracking diesel oil[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2016, 30(6): 4619-4624.
16	Thommes M, Kaneko K, Neimark A V, et al. Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC technical report)[J]. Pure & Applied Chemistry, 2015, 87(9/10): 1051-1069.
17	Kruk M, Jaroniec M. Gas adsorption characterization of ordered organic-inorganic nanocomposite materials[J]. Chemistry of Materials, 2001, 13(10): 3169-3183.
18	Yin T, Meng X, Jin L, et al. Prepared hydrophobic Y zeolite for adsorbing toluene in humid environment[J]. 2020, 305: 110327.
19	Soltan W B, Ammar S, Olivier C, et al. Influence of zinc doping on the photocatalytic activity of nanocrystalline SnO₂ particles synthesized by the polyol method for enhanced degradation of organic dyes[J]. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2017, 729: 638-647.
20	Batur E, Kutluay S. Dynamic adsorption behavior of benzene, toluene, and xylene vocs in single- and multi-component systems by activated carbon derived from defatted black cumin (Nigella sativa L.) biowaste[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2022, 10(3): 107565.
21	Choi H J, Hong S B. Effect of framework Si/Al ratio on the mechanism of CO₂ adsorption on the small-pore zeolite gismondine[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2022, 433: 133800.
22	Han Y, Larmier K, Rivallan M, et al. Generation of mesoporosity in H-Y zeolites by basic or acid/basic treatments: towards a guideline of optimal Si/Al ratio and basic reagent[J]. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 2024, 365: 112906.
23	Wang Y, Yokoi T, Tatsumi T. Selective production of light olefins over zeolite catalysts: impacts of topology, acidity, and particle size[J]. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 2023, 358: 112353.
24	Shan J, Li Z, Chen Z, et al. Enhancement in catalytic performance of HZSM-5 zeolite for glycerol dehydration after acidity regulation[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2023, 460: 141741.
25	Kim J, Kwon E E, Lee J E, et al. Effect of zeolite acidity and structure on ozone oxidation of toluene using Ru-Mn loaded zeolites at ambient temperature[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2021, 403: 123934.
26	Chen L, Janssens T V W, Skoglundh M, et al. Interpretation of NH₃-TPD profiles from Cu-CHA using first-principles calculations[J]. Topics in Catalysis, 2019, 62(1): 93-99.
27	Li D, Wang L, Lu Y, et al. New insights into the catalytic mechanism of VOCs abatement over Pt/Beta with active sites regulated by zeolite acidity[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2023, 334: 122811.
28	Hu M, Wang C, Chu Y, et al. Unravelling the reactivity of framework lewis acid sites towards methanol activation on H‐ZSM‐5 zeolite with solid‐state NMR spectroscopy[J]. Angewandte Chemie, 2022, 134(42): 1-6.
29	Ravi M, Sushkevich V L, van Bokhoven J A. On the location of lewis acidic aluminum in zeolite mordenite and the role of framework-associated aluminum in mediating the switch between Brønsted and Lewis acidity[J]. Chemical Science, 2021, 12(11): 4094-4103.
30	Emdadi L, Tran D T, Wu Y, et al. Bea nanosponge/ultra-thin lamellar MFI prepared in one-step: integration of 3D and 2D zeolites into a composite for efficient alkylation reactions[J]. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2017, 530: 56-65.

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

345

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	16	0	0	329

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	93	252
比例	27%	73%

摘要

240

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	240

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	40	200
比例	17%	83%

[1]	陈彦伶, 袁炳志, 王丽伟, 张宸, 朱涵玉. 非平衡条件下金属氯化物-氨工质对的吸附动力学研究[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(6): 2252-2261.
[2]	王岩, 周佳文, 孙培亮, 陈勇, 齐元红, 彭冲. 磁性聚氨基噻唑吸附剂脱除水体Hg²⁺性能[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(6): 2283-2298.
[3]	秦晗淞, 李国梁, 闫昊, 冯翔, 刘熠斌, 陈小博, 杨朝合. 多级孔ZSM-5分子筛中油酸甲酯催化裂解吸附和扩散行为模拟研究[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(5): 1870-1881.
[4]	李添翼, 武玉泰, 王永胜, 顾佳锐, 宋沂恒, 杨丰铖, 郝广平. 轻同位素分离纯化与催化标记研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(4): 1284-1301.
[5]	吕田田, 原敏, 王江, 高美珍, 杨佳辉, 徐红, 董晋湘, 石琪. ZTIF基疏水微介孔碳的制备及5-羟甲基糠醛吸附分离性能[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(4): 1642-1654.
[6]	张凯博, 沈佳新, 李玉霞, 谈朋, 刘晓勤, 孙林兵. Y沸石中Cu（Ⅰ）的可控构筑及其乙烯/乙烷吸附分离性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(4): 1607-1615.
[7]	文一如, 付佳, 刘大欢. 基于机器学习的MOFs材料研究进展：能源气体吸附分离[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(4): 1370-1381.
[8]	刘莹, 郑芳, 杨启炜, 张治国, 任其龙, 鲍宗必. 二甲苯异构体吸附分离研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(4): 1081-1095.
[9]	孟园, 倪善, 刘亚锋, 王文杰, 赵越, 朱育丹, 杨良嵘. 功能化多孔氮化碳材料对铀的吸附性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(4): 1616-1629.
[10]	张天永, 张晶怡, 姜爽, 李彬, 吕东军, 陈都民, 陈雪. 弱酸性蓝AS染料排放的废盐制碳基吸附剂及利用[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(3): 890-899.
[11]	王宝凤, 王术高, 程芳琴. 固废基硫掺杂多孔炭材料制备及其对CO₂吸附性能研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(2): 395-411.
[12]	王尤佳, 赵亮, 高金森, 徐春明. 柴油烃类族组成分离技术研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(1): 20-32.
[13]	孟祥军, 花莹曦, 张长金, 张弛, 杨林睿, 杨若昔, 刘鉴漪, 许春建. 6N电子级氘气的制备与纯化技术研究[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(1): 377-390.
[14]	闫可欣, 姜洪涛, 高维群, 郭晓晖, 孙伟振, 赵玲. 电子级多晶硅原料中痕量硼磷杂质的脱除研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(1): 83-94.
[15]	齐元帅, 彭文朝, 李阳, 张凤宝, 范晓彬. 电化学脱盐机理及相关研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(1): 171-189.

ZSM-5分子筛对典型涂装VOCs的吸附性能及机理研究

Adsorption performance and mechanism of ZSM-5 molecular sieves on typical coating VOCs

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 13

参考文献 30

相关文章 15

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

本文评价