磁絮凝膜过滤工艺中附加磁场强化清洗

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2014.12.047

化工学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (12): 4997-5003.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2014.12.047

磁絮凝膜过滤工艺中附加磁场强化清洗

王捷^1,2, 杨军², 贾辉^1,2, 张宏伟^1,2

1. 天津工业大学中空纤维膜材料与膜过程省部共建国家重点实验室, 天津 300387;
2. 天津工业大学环境与化学工程学院, 天津 300387

收稿日期:2014-05-26 修回日期:2014-08-21 出版日期:2014-12-05 发布日期:2014-12-05
通讯作者: 王捷
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(51378349,51108314);天津市科技兴海项目(KJXH2012-5).

Enhanced magnetic cleaning in magnetic enhanced flocculation membrane filtration process

WANG Jie^1,2, YANG Jun², JIA Hui^1,2, ZHANG Hongwei^1,2

1. State Key Laboratory of Hollow Fiber Membrane Materials and Processes, Tianjin Polytechnic University, Tianjin 300387, China;
2. School of Material Science and Chemical Engineering, Tianjin Polytechnic University, Tianjin 300387, China

Received:2014-05-26 Revised:2014-08-21 Online:2014-12-05 Published:2014-12-05
Supported by:
supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51378349, 51108314) and Tianjin Municipal Marine Science and Technology Project(KJXH2012-5).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于磁强化絮凝膜过滤(MEFMF)工艺中磁絮体和含磁滤饼层的特性,设计了在线(on-line)和离线(off-line)磁强化清洗(MEC)工艺.在磁场和曝气剪切的协同作用下,含磁滤饼层脱离膜纤维表面,膜通量恢复率较常规物理清洗(RC)明显提高.在离线磁强化清洗时,设计反洗装置中心的磁感应强度为6 mT,曝气强度为500 L·m^-2·min^-1,控制清洗时间为5 min,维持反洗压力0.04 MPa,可达到最佳的膜清洗效果,通量恢复率达97%以上.在外加磁场强化清洗过程中,滤饼层中的磁种发生磁化作用,滤饼层表现出微弱的宏观磁性,在磁场的作用下向磁极运动,使得膜通量恢复率明显提高.此外,在MEFMF工艺中采用间歇磁强化清洗,可以更加有效地去除引起不可逆膜污染的胶体和有机物,降低膜污染速率,减缓膜污染.

关键词: 磁絮凝, 膜清洗, 附加磁场, 膜污染

Abstract: On the basis of the characteristics of magnetic flocs and cake layer in the magnetic enhanced flocculation membrane filtration (MEFMF) process, processes of on-line and off-line magnetic enhanced cleaning (MEC) were designed. Magnetic cake layer was separated from fiber surface under the synergistic effect of magnetic field force and aeration shear force, in which way the goal of optimization of membrane cleaning was achieved. The magnetic enhanced cleaning process was added to magnetic enhanced flocculation membrane filtration for off-line cleaning of fouled membrane module in MEFMF process. In the magnetic cleaning process with device's magnetic induction 6 mT, aeration intensity 500 L·m^-2·min^-1, washing time to 5 min, backwash pressure 0.04 MPa, optimum cleaning effect could be achieved for flux recovery rate over 97%. In the enhanced cleaning process with magnetic field the magnetic seeding in the cake layer was magnetized, rendering the cake layer weak macro magnetism. Under the effect of the attached magnetic field the magnetized cake layer moved to the pole, therefore, membrane flux recovery rate was increased significantly. Furthermore, on-line intermittent magnetic cleaning could be more effective in removing colloidal and organic pollutants on membrane surface in the MEFMF process. The colloidal and organic pollutants were the major pollutants blocking membrane pores and causing irreversible fouling. As a result, membrane fouling was mitigated during the entire process.

Key words: magnetic flocculation, membrane cleaning, attached magnetic field, membrane fouling

中图分类号:

王捷, 杨军, 贾辉, 张宏伟. 磁絮凝膜过滤工艺中附加磁场强化清洗[J]. 化工学报, 2014, 65(12): 4997-5003.

WANG Jie, YANG Jun, JIA Hui, ZHANG Hongwei. Enhanced magnetic cleaning in magnetic enhanced flocculation membrane filtration process[J]. CIESC Journal, 2014, 65(12): 4997-5003.

参考文献 19

[1]	Listiarini K, Chun W, Sun D D, Leckie J O. Fouling mechanism and resistance analyses of systems containing sodium alginate, calcium, alum and their combination in dead-end fouling of nanofiltration membranes [J]. J. Membr. Sci., 2009, 344(1/2):244-251
[2]	Xing Weihong(邢卫红), Zhong Zhaoxiang(仲兆祥), Jing Wenheng(景文珩), Fan Yiqun(范益群). Controlling of membrane fouling based on membrane interface interactions [J]. CIESC Journal (化工学报), 2013, 64(1):173-181
[3]	Xiao P, Xiao F, Wang D S, Qin T, He S P. Investigation of organic foulants behavior on hollow-fiber UF membranes in a drinking water treatment plant [J]. Sep. Purif. Technol., 2012, 95(1):109-117
[4]	Xiao F, Xiao P, Zhang W J, Wang D S. Identification of key factors affecting the organic fouling on low-pressure ultrafiltration membranes [J]. J. Membr. Sci., 2013, 447(1):144-152
[5]	Ye Y, Chen V, Le-Clech P. Evolution of fouling deposition and removal on hollow fibre membrane during filtration with periodical backwash [J]. Desalination, 2011, 283:198-205
[6]	Wolff S H, Zydney A L. Effect of bleach on the transport characteristics of polysulfone hemodialyzers [J]. J. Membr. Sci., 2004, 243:389-399
[7]	Tian J Y, Chen Z L, Yang Y L, Liang H, Nan J, Li G B. Consecutive chemical cleaning of fouled PVC membrane using NaOH and ethanol during ultrafiltration of river water [J]. Water Res., 2010, 44:59-68
[8]	Kuzmenko D, Arkhangelsky E, Belfer S, Freger V, Gitis V. Chemical cleaning of UF membranes fouled by BSA [J]. Desalination, 2005, 179:323-333
[9]	Bergamasco R, Konradt-Moraes L C, Vieira M F, Fagundes-Klen M R, Vieira A M S. Performance of a coagulation-ultrafiltration hybrid process for water supply treatment [J]. Chem. Eng. J., 2011, 166(2):483-489
[10]	Li J X, Hallbauer-Zadorozhnaya V Y, Hallbauer D K, Sanderson R D. Cake-layer deposition, growth, and compressibility during microfiltration measured and modeled using a noninvasive ultrasonic technique [J]. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2002, 41(16):4106-4115
[11]	Wan M W, Morales Futalan C, Chang C H, Kan C C. Effect of coagulation mechanisms on the fouling and ultrasonic cleaning of PTFE membrane [J]. Water Sci. Technol., 2012, 66(11):2291-2298
[12]	Akhondi E, Wicaksana F, Krantz W B, Fane A G. Influence of dissolved air on the effectiveness of cyclic backwashing in submerged membrane systems [J]. J. Membr. Sci., 2014, 456(1):77-84
[13]	Zhu Anna(朱安娜), Zhu Wanpeng(祝万鹏), Wang Xiaolin(王晓琳). Influence of magnetic field on membrane flux and CaCO3 crystallization in the unstirred dead-end NF process [J]. Environmental Science(环境科学), 2004, 25(5):70-74
[14]	Yang J, Spanjers H, van Lier J B. Non-feasibility of magnetic adsorbents for fouling control in anaerobic membrane bioreactors [J]. Desalination, 2012, 292:124-128
[15]	Stolarski M, Fuchs B, Bogale Kassa S, Eichholz C, Nirschl H. Magnetic field enhanced press-filtration [J]. Chem. Eng. Sci., 2006, 61(19):6395-6403
[16]	Wang Jie(王捷), Yin Yanmei(尹延梅), Jia Hui(贾辉), Zhang Hongwei(张宏伟). Analysis of the influence factors of magnetic enhanced flocculation mitigating membrane fouling [J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae(环境科学学报), 2013, 33(3):664-670
[17]	Wang Jie(王捷). Study on optimization in submerged membrane bioreactor operating conditions and system design[D]. Tianjin: Tianjin University, 2007
[18]	Dai Ting(代婷), Wu Chunrui(武春瑞), Lü Xiaolong(吕晓龙). Effect of aggregated humic acid on membrane fouling in direct contact membrane distillation [J]. CIESC Journal(化工学报), 2012, 63(5): 1574-1583
[19]	Bach L G, Islam M R, Kim J T, Seo S, Lim K T. Encapsulation of Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles with poly(methyl methacrylate) via surface functionalized thiol-lactam initiated radical polymerization [J]. Appl. Surf. Sci., 2012, 258(7):2959-2966

磁絮凝膜过滤工艺中附加磁场强化清洗

Enhanced magnetic cleaning in magnetic enhanced flocculation membrane filtration process

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 19

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王思琪, 顾天宇, 陈献富, 王通, 李佳, 柯威, 李小锋, 范益群. 陶瓷膜用于杜仲叶提取液澄清的分离特性与膜污染机制研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1113-1125.
[2]	张兰河, 汪露, 李梓萌, 唐宏, 郭静波, 贾艳萍, 张明爽. 电极超滤膜生物反应器处理阴离子表面活性剂废水[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(10): 4679-4691.
[3]	唐和礼, 张冰, 黄冬梅, 申渝, 高旭, 时文歆. XDLVO理论在膜污染解析中的应用研究[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(3): 1230-1241.
[4]	滕达, 李铁林, 李昂, 安连锁, 沈国清, 张世平. 单通道陶瓷膜管低压透水性能实验分析[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(S1): 261-271.
[5]	赵学辉, 李晓乐, 刘洋, 胡岩, 许青, 张宏伟. KMnO₄溶液pH调控对PVDF膜物化性能和污染行为影响[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(5): 2401-2412.
[6]	方乘, 杨盛, 吴云, 张宏伟, 王捷, 王鲁天, 郝松泽. 絮体表面形态对膜污染预测的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(2): 715-723.
[7]	袁子怡, 樊华, 侯得印, 王凯, 王军. 十二烷基硫酸钠对膜蒸馏过程影响[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(4): 1455-1463.
[8]	吴降麟, 张朝晖, 王亮, 赵斌, 李腾飞, 陈萌萌. 宽流道反渗透膜元件抗污染性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(4): 1446-1454.
[9]	郝松泽, 张宏伟, 吴云, 王捷. 双金属催化滤料生物滤池处理效果及对膜污染影响研究[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(11): 4377-4386.
[10]	杜蛟, 孙宗英, 官月平, 张智, 李涛, 徐郭莉, 范青乾. 磁絮凝法和高梯度磁流体萃取法集成处理含铬废水[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(8): 3509-3516.
[11]	董畅, 高启君, 吕晓龙, 贾巍. 直接接触式膜蒸馏过程的膜曝气强化[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(5): 1913-1920.
[12]	杨云, 顾平, 刘阳, 张光辉. 沉淀-微滤组合工艺处理模拟含碘放射性废水[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(3): 1211-1217.
[13]	赵传起, 杨悦锁, 徐晓晨, 杨凤林. 纳米氧化石墨烯改性PVDF微滤膜在MBR中的抗污染性能[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(1): 375-384.
[14]	柴俪洪, 肖长发, 权全, 刘海亮, 陈明星, 赵斌. 同质增强型PMIA中空纤维膜污染及其MBR工艺处理城市生活污水[J]. 化工学报, 2016, 67(9): 3954-3964.
[15]	曾庆楠, 吴云, 张宏伟, 张楠. 膜材料对膜曝气生物膜反应器性能影响的比较[J]. 化工学报, 2016, 67(4): 1483-1489.