低碳醇改性无氟泡沫的性能分析与扑灭油池火的实验研究

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20220639

化工学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 73 ›› Issue (9): 4235-4244.DOI: 10.11949/0438-1157.20220639

低碳醇改性无氟泡沫的性能分析与扑灭油池火的实验研究

贾海林¹^,²(), 崔博¹^,², 陈南¹^,², 杨永钦¹^,³, 王庆银³, 朱福敏³

^1.河南理工大学煤炭安全生产与清洁高效利用省部共建协同创新中心，河南焦作 454000
^2.河南理工大学瓦斯地质与瓦斯治理国家重点实验室培育基地，河南焦作 454000
^3.中国石油化工股份有限公司中原油田应急救援中心，河南濮阳 457001

收稿日期:2022-05-04 修回日期:2022-06-04 出版日期:2022-09-05 发布日期:2022-10-09
通讯作者: 贾海林
作者简介:贾海林（1980－）, 男, 博士, 副教授， jiahailin@126.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFC0807900);教育部创新团队发展支持计划项目(IRT_16R22)

Foam performance analysis of fluorine-free foam modified by low carbon alcohol and experimental study on extinguishing oil pool fire

Hailin JIA¹^,²(), Bo CUI¹^,², Nan CHEN¹^,², Yongqin YANG¹^,³, Qingyin WANG³, Fumin ZHU³

^1.Collaborative Innovation Center of Coal Work Safety and Clean High Efficiency Utilization, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454000, Henan，China
^2.State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base for Gas Geology and Gas Control, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454000, Henan，China
^3.Zhongyuan Oilfield Emergency Rescue Center, China Petroleum & Chemical Co. , Ltd. , Puyang 457001, Henan，China

Received:2022-05-04 Revised:2022-06-04 Online:2022-09-05 Published:2022-10-09
Contact: Hailin JIA

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对现有氟碳类泡沫灭火剂关键组分PFOS因国际环境公约出于环保和健康而限用，以及现有泡沫灭火剂还存在析液速度快而影响灭火能效等问题，在前人及团队探究无氟泡沫复配方案基础上，基于火灾化学理论与表面活性剂技术，遴选碳氢/有机硅表面活性剂(LS-99/SDS)为基剂，通过引入可改善气泡聚并的低碳醇(乙醇、正丙醇和异丁醇)调控泡沫的发泡倍数和25%析液时间等性能，开展含醇泡沫和无醇泡沫的灭火对比实验，考察低碳醇引入后的泡沫灭火能效。结果表明，引入适量浓度低碳醇可显著影响LS-99/SDS复配体系的发泡倍数和25%析液时间。相比乙醇和正丙醇，当异丁醇质量分数为0.1%时，可有效延缓含醇泡沫的析液进程和降低析液速率。通过灭火过程的火焰温度测定，发现含醇泡沫作用下10 cm和20 cm高度处的火焰最大降温速率为20.1℃·s^-1和11.2℃·s^-1，相较于无醇泡沫体系降温效果显著，降温增幅分别为39.58%和14.29%。含醇泡沫灭火剂相对于无醇泡沫灭火时间缩短了3.6 s，缩短幅度为37.5%。适量浓度的异丁醇引入到无氟泡沫体系中，可有效延缓泡沫析液进程，提高泡沫体系的发泡倍数及稳泡性能，为无氟泡沫的优化设计提供了一条新路径。建立了基于25%析液时间、平均析液速度、最大降温速率和灭火时间等综合指标的灭火效果考察方法，为泡沫灭火效能的实验室评价提供了参考依据。

关键词: 含醇无氟泡沫, 25%析液时间, 平均析液速度, 降温速率, 灭火时间

Abstract:

In response to the existing fluorocarbon foam extinguishing agent key component PFOS is restricted due to international environmental conventions for environmental protection and health reasons, and the existing foam extinguishing agent still has the problem that the rapid sedimentation rate affects the fire extinguishing energy efficiency, on the basis of previous research and team’s exploration of fluorine-free foam compounding scheme, based on the theory of fire chemistry and surfactant technology, hydrocarbon/silicone surfactant (LS-99/SDS) was selected as the basic agent of the foam composite system, and the foam foaming multiple and 25% drainage time were adjusted by introducing low-carbon alcohol (ethanol, n-propanol and isobutanol) which can improve foam aggregation. The comparative experiments of foam extinguishing with and without low-carbon alcohol were conducted to investigate the energy efficiency of foam extinguishing after introducing low-carbon alcohols. The results showed that the introduction of low-carbon alcohol could significantly increased the foaming multiple and 25% drainage time of LS-99/SDS binary composite foam system. Compared with ethanol and n-propanol, when the addition of isobutanol was 0.1%, the precipitation process of alcohol-containing foam system can be effectively delayed and the precipitation rate can be reduced. Through the flame temperature measurement in the fire extinguishing process, it was found that the flame cooling rate at the height of 10 cm and 20 cm under the action of foam extinguishing agent containing alcohol system was 20.1℃·s^-1 and 11.2℃·s^-1, and the cooling increase was 39.58% and 14.29% respectively compared with the alcohol-free system, with significant cooling effect. The fire extinguishing time of the foam containing alcohol system was shortened by 3.6 s compared with that of the alcohol-free system, with a reduction of 37.5%. It can effectively delay the process of foam liquid separation, improve the bubbling times and foam stability of the foam system with the introduction of appropriate concentration of isobutanol into the fluorine-free foam system. And this can provide a new path for the optimal design of fluorine-free foam. A fire extinguishing effect evaluation method based on comprehensive indicators such as 25% drainage time, average drainage speed, the maximum cooling rate and fire-extinguishing time was established, which provided a reference base for evaluation of foam extinguishing efficiency.

Key words: fluorine-free foam containing alcohol, 25% drainage time, average drainage velocity, cooling rate of flame, fire extinguishing time

中图分类号:

X 936

贾海林, 崔博, 陈南, 杨永钦, 王庆银, 朱福敏. 低碳醇改性无氟泡沫的性能分析与扑灭油池火的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 4235-4244.

Hailin JIA, Bo CUI, Nan CHEN, Yongqin YANG, Qingyin WANG, Fumin ZHU. Foam performance analysis of fluorine-free foam modified by low carbon alcohol and experimental study on extinguishing oil pool fire[J]. CIESC Journal, 2022, 73(9): 4235-4244.

图/表 11

图1 25%析液时间测定装置

Fig.1 Measuring device of 25% drainage time

图2 火焰图像及温度采集系统

Fig.2 Acquisition system of flame image and temperature

表1 LS-99/SDS二元泡沫灭火剂配方设计

Table 1 Formulation design of binary foam extinguishing agent of LS-99 /SDS

试剂名称	质量分数/%
表面活性剂SDS	0.04
表面活性剂LS-99	0.10
尿素	0.30
聚磷酸铵	0.15
乙二醇	0.30
乙二醇丁醚	0.03
黄原胶	0.03
水	99.05

表2 不同低碳醇添加量的泡沫液性能参数

Table 2 Performance parameters of foam liquid with different amount of low-carbon alcohol

质量分数/%	乙醇			正丙醇			异丁醇
质量分数/%	张力/(mN·m^-1)	高度/mm	稳泡系数	张力/(mN·m^-1)	高度/mm	稳泡系数	张力/(mN·m^-1)	高度/mm	稳泡系数
0.001	22.0	107	0.9439	22.0	108	0.9537	22.0	102	0.9706
0.01	22.1	105	0.9524	22.0	107	0.9720	22.0	109	0.9633
0.1	22.1	106	0.9623	22.1	108	0.9537	22.1	108	0.9630

图3 含醇泡沫体系发泡倍数与25%析液时间的变化曲线

Fig.3 Variation curves of foaming multiple and 25% drainage time of foam system containing alcohol

图4 含醇泡沫体系的析液曲线

Fig.4 Curves of drainage of foam system containing alcohol

图5 含醇泡沫体系析液的平均速度和最大速度

Fig.5 Average velocity and maximum velocity of drainage of foam system containing alcohol

图6 不同火焰高度的温度变化曲线

Fig.6 Variation curves of flame temperature at different height

图7 不同高度处的火焰降温速率曲线

Fig.7 Cooling rate curve of flame temperature at different height

图8 含醇泡沫灭火过程的火焰图像

Fig.8 Flame image during fire extinguishing process of foam containing alcohol

图9 无醇泡沫灭火过程的火焰图像

Fig.9 Flame image during fire extinguishing process of alcohol-free foam

参考文献 32

1	邓在军. 超高层建筑施工消防火灾安全风险评价[J]. 工程建设与设计, 2021(23): 206-208.
	Deng Z J. Fire safety risk assessment of super high-rise building construction[J]. Construction & Design for Engineering, 2021(23): 206-208.
2	Khan R M, Bhuiyan S A M, Haque F M, et al. Effects of unsafe workplace practices on the fire safety performance of ready-made garments (RMG) buildings[J]. Safety Science, 2021, 144: 105470.
3	赵媚. 洁净气体与氟蛋白泡沫复合灭火性能的实验研究[D]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学, 2015.
	Zhao M. Experimental research on the extinguishing performance of the conjunction of clean gas and fluorine protein foam[D]. Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China, 2015.
4	乔建江, 吴越美. D类干粉灭火剂的灭火机理研究[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2020, 20(4): 1347-1353.
	Qiao J J, Wu Y M. Probe into the fire-extinguishing mechanism and efficiency of D powder fire extinguishing media[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2020, 20(4): 1347-1353.
5	孙绪坤, 柯巍, 韩腾奔, 等. 适用于变压器油火的泡沫灭火剂评价指标体系与方法[J]. 安全与环境工程, 2021, 28(6): 46-51.
	Sun X K, Ke W, Han T B, et al. Evaluation index system and method of foam fire extinguishing agent suitable for transformer oil fire[J]. Safety and Environmental Engineering, 2021, 28(6): 46-51.
6	Rie D H, Lee J W, Kim S. Class B fire-extinguishing performance evaluation of a compressed air foam system at different air-to-aqueous foam solution mixing ratios[J]. Applied Sciences, 2016, 6(7): 191.
7	Zdankus T, Gylys M, Paukstaitis L, et al. Experimental investigation of heat transfer from a horizontal flat surface to aqueous foam flow[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2018, 123: 489-499.
8	贾海林, 陈南, 焦振营, 等. 碳氢/有机硅/低碳醇三元系泡沫及抑制煤自燃的效果分析[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(1): 470-479.
	Jia H L, Chen N, Jiao Z Y, et al. Analysis of ternary foam of hydrocarbon/silicone/low carbon alcohol and the inhibition effect on coal spontaneous combustion[J]. CIESC Journal, 2022, 73(1): 470-479.
9	Liley J R, Penfold J, Thomas R K, et al. The performance of surfactant mixtures at low temperatures[J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2019, 534: 64-71.
10	Kurnia I, Zhang G Y, Han X, et al. Zwitterionic-anionic surfactant mixture for chemical enhanced oil recovery without alkali[J]. Fuel, 2020, 259: 116236.
11	Li Y, Lai L, Mei P, et al. Surface properties and solubility enhancement of Gemini/conventional surfactant mixtures based on sulfonate Gemini surfactant[J]. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 2019, 276: 488-496.
12	Ferreira J, Mikhailovskaya A, Chenneviere A, et al. Interplay between bulk self-assembly, interfacial and foaming properties in a catanionic surfactant mixture of varying composition[J]. Soft Matter, 2017, 13(39): 7197-7206.
13	Wang C, Cao X L, Guo L L, et al. Effect of molecular structure of catanionic surfactant mixtures on their interfacial properties[J]. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2016, 509: 601-612.
14	段佳林, 黄寅生, 王志强, 等. 有机硅对碳氢表面活性剂泡沫性能的影响[J]. 消防科学与技术, 2019, 38(10): 1447-1450.
	Duan J L, Huang Y S, Wang Z Q, et al. Effect of organosilicon on the foam properties of hydrocarbon surfactant[J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2019, 38(10): 1447-1450.
15	Zhou Y T, Jin Y, Shen Y C, et al. Adjustable surface activity and wetting ability of anionic hydrocarbon and nonionic short-chain fluorocarbon surfactant mixtures: effects of Li⁺ and Mg²⁺ [J]. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 2022, 350: 118538.
16	Szymczyk K, Zdziennicka A, Jańczuk B. Properties of some nonionic fluorocarbon surfactants and their mixtures with hydrocarbon ones[J]. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 2021, 292: 102421.
17	Jiang N, Sheng Y J, Li C H, et al. Surface activity, foam properties and aggregation behavior of mixtures of short-chain fluorocarbon and hydrocarbon surfactants[J]. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 2018, 268: 249-255.
18	Hinnant K M, Giles S L, Smith E P, et al. Characterizing the role of fluorocarbon and hydrocarbon surfactants in firefighting-foam formulations for fire-suppression[J]. Fire Technology, 2020, 56(4): 1413-1441.
19	李远翔, 安娜, 乔建江. 氟碳-碳氢表面活性剂复配及其灭火性能[J]. 华东理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 41(4): 502-507.
	Li Y X, An N, Qiao J J. Mixed system of fluorocarbon-hydrocarbon surfactants and its fire extinguishing performance[J]. Journal of East China University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2015, 41(4): 502-507.
20	陆强. 当前我国泡沫灭火剂发展中的若干问题探讨[J]. 消防科学与技术, 2016, 35(9): 1280-1282.
	Lu Q. Problems of foam fire extinguishing agent development in China[J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2016, 35(9): 1280-1282.
21	肖进新, 雷蕾, 高展, 等. 水成膜泡沫灭火剂标准GB17427—1998的研究[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2007, 7(2): 126-129.
	Xiao J X, Lei L, Gao Z, et al. Discussion on the standard of aqueous film-forming foam extinguishing agent GB 17427—1998[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2007, 7(2): 126-129.
22	赵晓光, 袁治程, 蔡文嫱, 等. 水成膜泡沫灭火剂对土壤环境的影响[J]. 消防科学与技术, 2019, 38(10): 1444-1446.
	Zhao X G, Yuan Z C, Cai W Q, et al. Effect of aqueous film-forming foam fire extinguishing agent on soil environment[J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2019, 38(10): 1444-1446.
23	Dlugogorski B Z, Schaefer T H. Compatibility of aqueous film-forming foams (AFFF) with sea water[J]. Fire Safety Journal, 2021, 120: 103288.
24	吴楠, 曹青, 张连超. 有机硅/碳氢表面活性剂对水成膜灭火剂性能的影响[J]. 消防科学与技术, 2020, 39(7): 997-1000.
	Wu N, Cao Q, Zhang L C. Effects of organosilicone/hydrocarbon surfactant on the properties of water-forming film extinguishing agent[J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2020, 39(7): 997-1000.
25	段佳林. 碳氢和有机硅表面活性剂复配体系为基础的水系灭火剂研究[D]. 南京: 南京理工大学, 2020.
	Duan J L. Research on water-based fire-extinguishing agent based on hydrocarbon and silicone surfactant compounding system[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Science and Technology, 2020.
26	盛友杰. 碳氢和有机硅表面活性剂复配体系为基剂的泡沫灭火剂研究[D]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学, 2018.
	Sheng Y J. Investigation on fire-fighting foam based on mixture of hydrocarbon and silicone surfactants[D]. Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China, 2018.
27	张华海, 王悦琳, 王铁峰. 全浓度范围下醇类表面活性剂对气泡聚并影响的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(9): 4161-4167.
	Zhang H H, Wang Y L, Wang T F. Experimental study on effect of alcohol surfactants on bubble coalescence in full range of concentrations[J]. CIESC Journal, 2020, 71(9): 4161-4167.
28	蒋平, 郑玉飞, 陈文征, 等. 十二烷基硫酸钠-长链醇体系泡沫性能与表面参数关系研究[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 38(1): 143-147.
	Jiang P, Zheng Y F, Chen W Z, et al. Investigation of relationship between foam performance and surface dilatational rheology of sodium dodecyl sulfate/alcohol system[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science), 2014, 38(1): 143-147.
29	张丁涌, 胡伟毅, 许辉, 等. 低碳醇对十二烷基硫酸钠溶液泡沫性能的影响[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 30(6): 93-96, 11-12.
	Zhang D Y, Hu W Y, Xu H, et al. Influence of low carbon alcohols on the foaming property of lauryl sodium sulfate(SDS) solution[J]. Journal of Xi’an Shiyou University (Natural Science Edition), 2015, 30(6): 93-96, 11-12.
30	王彦玲, 郑晶晶, 赵修太, 等. 低碳醇对氟碳与碳氢表面活性剂复配体系泡沫性能的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2010, 61(5): 1202-1207.
	Wang Y L, Zheng J J, Zhao X T, et al. Effect of low carbon alcohols on foaming properties of fluorocarbon and hydrocarbon surfactant mixed system[J]. CIESC Journal, 2010, 61(5): 1202-1207.
31	Ding F X, Kang W D, Yan L, et al. Influence of gas-liquid ratio on the fire-extinguishing efficiency of compressed gas protein foam in diesel pool fire[J]. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 2021, 146(3): 1465-1472.
32	吕志涛. 高效环保型水系灭火剂研究[D]. 南京: 南京理工大学, 2013.
	Lyu Z T. Study on the efficient and environmental-friendlly water based extinguishing agent[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Science and Technology, 2013.

[1]	贾海林, 陈南, 焦振营, 程龙, 赵万里, 潘荣锟. 碳氢/有机硅/低碳醇三元系泡沫及抑制煤自燃的效果分析[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(1): 470-479.
[2]	田逢时, 董欣欣, 疏学明, 赵金龙. 蛭石粉末及离子溶液改性后膨胀率和灭火有效性分析[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(3): 1761-1768.
[3]	李维杰, 周新丽, 刘宝林, 吕福扣. 升降温速率对低温保护剂溶液结晶性质的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2013, 64(8): 2969-2974.

低碳醇改性无氟泡沫的性能分析与扑灭油池火的实验研究

Foam performance analysis of fluorine-free foam modified by low carbon alcohol and experimental study on extinguishing oil pool fire

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 11

参考文献 32

相关文章 3

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价