碳氢/有机硅/低碳醇三元系泡沫及抑制煤自燃的效果分析

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20211218

化工学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 73 ›› Issue (1): 470-479.DOI: 10.11949/0438-1157.20211218

• 过程安全 • 上一篇

碳氢/有机硅/低碳醇三元系泡沫及抑制煤自燃的效果分析

贾海林^1,²(),陈南^1,²,焦振营^1,³,程龙^1,³,赵万里^1,³,潘荣锟^1,²

^1.河南理工大学煤炭安全生产与清洁高效利用省部共建协同创新中心，河南焦作 454000
^2.河南理工大学安全科学与工程学院，河南焦作 454000
^3.中国平煤神马集团，炼焦煤资源开发及综合利用国家重点实验室，河南平顶山 467099

收稿日期:2021-08-23 修回日期:2021-09-09 出版日期:2022-01-05 发布日期:2022-01-18
通讯作者: 贾海林
作者简介:贾海林（1980—），男，博士，副教授，jiahailin@126.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFC0807900);国家自然科学基金项目(51304069);教育部创新团队发展支持计划(IRT_16R22)

Analysis of ternary foam of hydrocarbon/silicone/low carbon alcohol and the inhibition effect on coal spontaneous combustion

Hailin JIA^1,²(),Nan CHEN^1,²,Zhenying JIAO^1,³,Long CHENG^1,³,Wanli ZHAO^1,³,Rongkun PAN^1,²

^1.Collaborative Innovation Center of Coal Safety and Clean High Efficiency Utilization, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454000, Henan, China
^2.School of Safety Science and Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454000, Henan, China
^3.State Key Laboratory of Coking Coal Exploitation and Comprehensive Utilization, China Pingmei Shenma Group, Pingdingshan 467099, Henan, China

Received:2021-08-23 Revised:2021-09-09 Online:2022-01-05 Published:2022-01-18
Contact: Hailin JIA

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

泡沫灭火剂是常用的火灾扑救方法之一，但常规泡沫灭火剂存在半衰期短，析液、聚并迅速而影响灭火效能的问题，基于火灾化学和活性剂技术，提出碳氢表面活性剂SDS、有机硅表面活性剂LS-99和低碳醇的三元系泡沫体系，并系统探究碳氢/有机硅/低碳醇的复配配比。通过表面张力、发泡高度、稳泡系数的大量测试，发现LS-99的临界胶束浓度为0.0083%。LS-99和SDS二元系在降低表面张力、提升发泡高度和稳泡系数方面具有良好的协同增效作用。在此基础上引入适量浓度的能够延缓泡沫析液、聚并的异丁醇，设计出了性能优良的碳氢/有机硅/低碳醇泡沫灭火剂。LS-99、SDS和异丁醇的质量分数为0.1%时，测试结果表明SDS/LS-99/醇三元系泡沫的发泡倍数可达52.5倍，25%析液时间可达210 s，300 s时的稳泡系数高达0.958，半衰期远超常规泡沫。煤自燃的灭火抑制实验表明，SDS/LS-99/醇三元系泡沫作用下，煤自燃各反应阶段的活化能相较于空气氛围均增大，反应难度增强；最大失重速率下降，反应剧烈程度减弱。初期吸热阶段的吸热量为78.3 J/g，大于空气氛围下煤氧复合的吸热量，吸热增幅高达2.16倍。放热阶段的放热量为1765.4 J/g，相较于空气氛围放热降幅达到15.15%，表明SDS/LS-99/醇三元系泡沫对煤自燃具有良好的灭火效果。

关键词: 三元系泡沫, 表面活性剂, 低碳醇, 25%析液时间, 稳泡系数, 最大失重速率, 吸放热量

Abstract:

Foam extinguishing agent is one of the commonly used fire fighting methods, but conventional foam extinguishing agent has a short half-life, liquid separation and rapid accumulation, which affect the fire extinguishing efficiency. Based on fire chemistry and active agent technology, a ternary system of hydrocarbon surfactant SDS, silicone surfactant LS-99 and low carbon alcohol was proposed and the compounding ratio of hydrocarbon/silicone/low carbon alcohol was systematically investigated. The critical micelle concentration of LS-99 was found to be 0.0083% by extensive testing of surface tension, foaming height and foam stabilization coefficient. LS-99 and SDS binary systems have good synergistic effects in terms of reducing surface tension, increasing foam height and foam stabilization coefficient. Based on this foundation, a hydrocarbon/silicone/low carbon alcohol foam extinguishing agent has been designed by introducing an appropriate concentration of isobutanol, which retards foam precipitation and polyhydration. At 0.1% mass concentration of LS-99, SDS and isobutanol, the test results show that the SDS/LS-99/alcohol ternary foam has a foaming multiplier of 52.5 times, a 25% drainage time of 210 s and a stability coefficient of 0.958 at 300 s, with a half-life far exceeding that of conventional foams. Fire suppression experiments on coal spontaneous combustion show that the activation energy of all reaction stages of coal spontaneous combustion under the action of SDS/LS-99/alcohol ternary foam increases compared to the air atmosphere, and the difficulty of the reaction increases; the maximum mass loss rate decreases and the intensity of the reaction decreases. The heat absorption in the initial heat absorption phase is 78.3 J/g, which is greater than the heat absorption of the coal sample in the air atmosphere, with an increase in heat absorption of up to 2.16 times. The heat release in the exothermic phase was 1765.4 J/g, a reduction of 15.15% compared to the exothermic air atmosphere, which indicates that the SDS/LS-99/alcohol ternary foam has a good extinguishing effect on spontaneous coal combustion.

Key words: ternary foam systems, surfactant, low carbon alcohol, 25% drainage time, foam stabilization coefficient, maximum mass loss rate, heat absorption and discharge

中图分类号:

X 936

贾海林, 陈南, 焦振营, 程龙, 赵万里, 潘荣锟. 碳氢/有机硅/低碳醇三元系泡沫及抑制煤自燃的效果分析[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(1): 470-479.

Hailin JIA, Nan CHEN, Zhenying JIAO, Long CHENG, Wanli ZHAO, Rongkun PAN. Analysis of ternary foam of hydrocarbon/silicone/low carbon alcohol and the inhibition effect on coal spontaneous combustion[J]. CIESC Journal, 2022, 73(1): 470-479.

图/表 9

图1 SDS/LS-99体系下的表面张力变化趋势

Fig.1 Variation trend of surface tension under the system of SDS/LS-99

图2 SDS/LS-99体系下的发泡高度变化趋势

Fig.2 Variation trend of foam height under the system of SDS/LS-99

图3 SDS/LS-99体系下的稳泡系数变化趋势

Fig.3 Variation trend of foam stability coefficient under the system of SDS/LS-99

图4 SDS/LS-99/醇体系下发泡倍数的变化趋势

Fig.4 Variation trend of foam bubbling times under the system of SDS/LS-99/alcohol

图5 SDS/LS-99/醇体系下25%析液时间的变化趋势

Fig.5 Variation trend of 25% precipitation time under the system of SDS/LS-99/alcohol

图6 煤样在空气氛围、空气泡沫作用下的TG曲线

Fig.6 TG curves of coal sample under the action of air atmosphere and air foam

图7煤样在空气氛围、空气泡沫作用下TG-DTG曲线及阶段划分

Fig.7 TG-DTG curves and stage classification of coal samples under air atmosphere and air foam

表1 煤样各阶段活化能

Table 1 Activation energy of coal samples at each stage

实验工况	失水失重阶段		吸氧增重阶段		热解失重阶段		燃烧失重阶段
实验工况	E/（kJ/mol）	A	E/（kJ/mol）	A	E/（kJ/mol）	A	E/（kJ/mol）	A
空气氛围	31.2	0.30×10²	71.6	4.75×10²	120.7	1.22×10⁵	134.8	5.36×10⁴
空气泡沫	41.8	1.24×10³	83.2	3.02×10³	124.9	1.55×10⁵	149.5	1.87×10⁵

图8 煤样在空气氛围、空气泡沫作用下吸放热情况

Fig.8 Heat absorption and emission of coal samples under the action of air atmosphere and air foam

参考文献 30

1	Zdankus T, Gylys M, Paukstaitis L, et al. Experimental investigation of heat transfer from a horizontal flat surface to aqueous foam flow[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2018, 123: 489-499.
2	Hill C, Eastoe J. Foams: from nature to industry[J]. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 2017, 247: 496-513.
3	Gao H, Zhang M, Xia J J, et al. Time and surfactant types dependent model of foams based on the Herschel-Bulkley model[J]. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2016, 509: 203-213.
4	Magrabi S A, Dlugogorski B Z, Jameson G J. A comparative study of drainage characteristics in AFFF and FFFP compressed-air fire-fighting foams[J]. Fire Safety Journal, 2002, 37(1): 21-52.
5	Muin S R, Rabbani A, Bournival G, et al. Utilization of microcomputed tomography and pore network modeling to characterize foam dynamics[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2021, 230: 116174.
6	Langevin D. Aqueous foams and foam films stabilised by surfactants. Gravity-free studies[J]. Comptes Rendus Mécanique, 2017, 345(1): 47-55.
7	Lattimer B Y, Hanauska C P, Scheffey J L, et al. The use of small-scale test data to characterize some aspects of fire fighting foam for suppression modeling[J]. Fire Safety Journal, 2003, 38(2): 117-146.
8	Petkova B, Tcholakova S, Chenkova M, et al. Foamability of aqueous solutions: role of surfactant type and concentration[J]. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 2020, 276: 102084.
9	Yake A, Corder T, Moloy K, et al. Fluorinated pyridinium and ammonium cationic surfactants[J]. Journal of Fluorine Chemistry, 2016, 187: 46-55.
10	安娜, 乔建江. 高效抗溶型泡沫灭火剂的研究[J]. 华东理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 44(1): 75-81.
	An N, Qiao J J. Study of high performance alcohol-resistance foam extinguishing agent[J]. Journal of East China University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2018, 44(1): 75-81.
11	Lv Q, Li Z M, Li B F, et al. Synergistic mechanism of particulate matter (PM) from coal combustion and saponin from camellia seed pomace in stabilizing CO₂ foam[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2018, 32(3): 3733-3742.
12	Marinova K G, Naydenova K T, Basheva E S, et al. New surfactant mixtures for fine foams with slowed drainage[J]. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2017, 523: 54-61.
13	Vinogradov A V, Kuprin D S, Abduragimov I M, et al. Silica foams for fire prevention and firefighting[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2016, 8(1): 294-301.
14	王德明. 矿井防灭火新技术: 三相泡沫[J]. 煤矿安全, 2004, 35(7): 16-18.
	Wang D M. A novel technology of mine fire fighting—three‒phase foam [J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2004, 35(7): 16-18.
15	Zhou F B, Ren W X, Wang D M, et al. Application of three-phase foam to fight an extraordinarily serious coal mine fire[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2006, 67(1/2): 95-100.
16	张钧祥, 宋维宾, 孙玉宁, 等. 新型高分子泡沫堵漏材料试验研究及工程应用[J]. 煤炭学报, 2018, 43(S1): 158-166.
	Zhang J X, Song W B, Sun Y N, et al. Experimental study and application of new polymer foam plugging material[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2018, 43(S1): 158-166.
17	鲁义, 王涛, 田兆君, 等. 水泥基泡沫形成机理及抑制煤堆自燃试验研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2017, 13(7): 87-91.
	Lu Y, Wang T, Tian Z J, et al. Test study on formation mechanism of cement-based foam and inhibition for spontaneous combustion of coal pile[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2017, 13(7): 87-91.
18	蒋新生, 吕科宗, 魏树旺, 等. 基于响应曲面法的三相泡沫灭火剂基础配方优化设计[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(7): 2886-2895.
	Jiang X S, Lyu K Z, Wei S W, et al. Optimal design of three phase fire-fighting foam formulation based on response surface methodology[J]. CIESC Journal, 2017, 68(7): 2886-2895.
19	盛友杰. 碳氢和有机硅表面活性剂复配体系为基剂的泡沫灭火剂研究[D]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学, 2018.
	Sheng Y J. Investigation on fire-fighting foam based on mixture of hydrocarbon and silicone surfactants[D]. Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China, 2018.
20	王彦玲, 郑晶晶, 赵修太, 等. 低碳醇对氟碳与碳氢表面活性剂复配体系泡沫性能的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2010, 61(5): 1202-1207.
	Wang Y L, Zheng J J, Zhao X T, et al. Effect of low carbon alcohols on foaming properties of fluorocarbon and hydrocarbon surfactant mixed system[J]. CIESC Journal, 2010, 61(5): 1202-1207.
21	张华海, 王悦琳, 王铁峰. 全浓度范围下醇类表面活性剂对气泡聚并影响的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(9): 4161-4167.
	Zhang H H, Wang Y L, Wang T F. Experimental study on effect of alcohol surfactants on bubble coalescence in full range of concentrations[J]. CIESC Journal, 2020, 71(9): 4161-4167.
22	易欣, 白祖锦, 肖旸, 等. 咪唑类离子液体对煤自燃极限参数的影响[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2018, 18(5): 1805-1810.
	Yi X, Bai Z J, Xiao Y, et al. Impact of imidazole ionic liquid on the maximal limit parameters of the coal spontaneous combustion[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2018, 18(5): 1805-1810.
23	肖旸, 吕慧菲, 任帅京, 等. 咪唑类离子液体抑制煤自燃特性的研究[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2019, 48(1): 175-181.
	Xiao Y, Lyu H F, Ren S J, et al. Inhibition properties of imidazolium-based ionic liquids on coal spontaneous combustion[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2019, 48(1): 175-181.
24	Xi X, Shi Q L. Study of the preparation and extinguishment characteristic of the novel high-water-retaining foam for controlling spontaneous combustion of coal[J]. Fuel, 2021, 288: 119354.
25	娄和壮, 贾廷贵. TG-DSC联用研究瓦斯气氛对煤自燃热特性的影响[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(11): 77-82.
	Lou H Z, Jia T G. Study on thermal characteristics of coal spontaneous combustion in gas atmosphere by TG-DSC coupling techniques[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(11): 77-82.
26	尤飞, 皇甫文豪, 王振华, 等. 基于热重分析的煤升温氧化及煤氧复合特性分析[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2018, 18(4): 1312-1315.
	You F, Huangfu W H, Wang Z H, et al. Analytic investigation of the coal self-combustion and oxidation characteristic features based on the thermogravimetric analysis[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2018, 18(4): 1312-1315.
27	刘倩, 钟文琪, 苏伟, 等. 基于热重-质谱联用的煤粉富氧燃烧动力学及污染物生成特性[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(1): 523-530.
	Liu Q, Zhong W Q, Su W, et al. Oxy-coal combustion kinetics and formation characteristics of pollutants based on TG-MS analysis[J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(1): 523-530.
28	王婕, 张玉龙, 王俊峰, 等. 无机盐类阻化剂和自由基捕获剂对煤自燃的协同抑制作用[J]. 煤炭学报, 2020, 45(12): 4132-4143.
	Wang J, Zhang Y L, Wang J F, et al. Synergistic inhibition effect of inorganic salt inhibitor and free radical scavenger on coal spontaneous combustion[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2020, 45(12): 4132-4143.
29	莫春兰, 莫益涛, 陈俊红, 等. 柴油机SCR系统尿素的热分解过程研究[J]. 燃烧科学与技术, 2021, 27(1): 16-22.
	Mo C L, Mo Y T, Chen J H, et al. Thermal decomposition process of urea in SCR system for diesel engine[J]. Journal of Combustion Science and Technology, 2021, 27(1): 16-22.
30	Chen L Z, Qi X Y, Tang J, et al. Reaction pathways and cyclic chain model of free radicals during coal spontaneous combustion[J]. Fuel, 2021, 293: 120436.

[1]	杨欣, 彭啸, 薛凯茹, 苏梦威, 吴燕. 分子印迹-TiO₂光电催化降解增溶PHE废水性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3564-3571.
[2]	徐文超, 孙志高, 李翠敏, 李娟, 黄海峰. 静态条件下表面活性剂E-1310对HCFC-141b水合物生成的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2179-2185.
[3]	葛运通, 王玮, 李楷, 肖帆, 于志鹏, 宫敬. 多相分散体系中微油滴与改性二氧化硅表面间作用力的AFM研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1651-1659.
[4]	廖艺, 牛亚宾, 潘艳秋, 俞路. 复配表面活性剂对油水界面行为和性质影响的模拟研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 4003-4014.
[5]	贾海林, 崔博, 陈南, 杨永钦, 王庆银, 朱福敏. 低碳醇改性无氟泡沫的性能分析与扑灭油池火的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 4235-4244.
[6]	苏晓辉, 张弛, 徐志锋, 金辉, 王治国. 黏弹性表面活性剂溶液中颗粒沉降特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(5): 1974-1985.
[7]	常楚鑫, 徐黎婷, 殷嘉伦, 雒先, 贾洪伟. 浸没状态下的低压电润湿行为研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(4): 1673-1682.
[8]	徐一鸣, 袁华, 刘素丽, 李平, 严佩蓉, 赵曦, 卢俊华, 赵唯, 张学兰. 微通道反应器中工业混合直链烷基苯磺酸盐的连续合成工艺研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(3): 1184-1193.
[9]	张瑾渊, 徐娜, 贺文云, 吕耀东, 刘子璐, 张兴芳. 消防用PEO/OTAC/NaSal减阻体系的介观分子动力学分析[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(3): 1157-1165.
[10]	杨振, 姚元鹏, 李昀, 吴慧英. 表面活性剂对水过冷池沸腾特性影响实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(3): 1093-1101.
[11]	刘成治, 李春曦, 周静宜, 叶学民. 溶质Marangoni效应对降膜流动稳定性的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(12): 5405-5413.
[12]	张兰河, 汪露, 李梓萌, 唐宏, 郭静波, 贾艳萍, 张明爽. 电极超滤膜生物反应器处理阴离子表面活性剂废水[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(10): 4679-4691.
[13]	侯晓松, 刘晨星, 任爱玲, 郭斌, 郭渊明. 超声雾化/表面活性剂强化吸收耦合生物洗涤净化甲苯废气[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(10): 4692-4706.
[14]	程文静, 余林, 程高, 钟远红, 郑成, 毛桃嫣. 多羟基Bola有机硅季铵盐的合成、表征及其应用性能[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(5): 2837-2848.
[15]	刘浪宇, 朱春英, 马友光, 付涛涛. 微通道内表面活性剂与界面传递现象研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(2): 783-798.

碳氢/有机硅/低碳醇三元系泡沫及抑制煤自燃的效果分析

Analysis of ternary foam of hydrocarbon/silicone/low carbon alcohol and the inhibition effect on coal spontaneous combustion

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

参考文献 30

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价