化工学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 75 ›› Issue (4): 1616-1629.DOI: 10.11949/0438-1157.20231276
孟园1,2(), 倪善2(), 刘亚锋2,3, 王文杰2,3, 赵越2,3, 朱育丹1, 杨良嵘2,3()
收稿日期:
2023-12-04
修回日期:
2024-01-12
出版日期:
2024-04-25
发布日期:
2024-06-06
通讯作者:
倪善,杨良嵘
作者简介:
孟园(1998—),男,硕士研究生,mengy925@163.com
基金资助:
Yuan MENG1,2(), Shan NI2(), Yafeng LIU2,3, Wenjie WANG2,3, Yue ZHAO2,3, Yudan ZHU1, Liangrong YANG2,3()
Received:
2023-12-04
Revised:
2024-01-12
Online:
2024-04-25
Published:
2024-06-06
Contact:
Shan NI, Liangrong YANG
摘要:
从海水和废水中分离和富集铀对能源的可持续发展和保护环境具有重要意义。通过一步碱化和热缩聚三聚氰胺制备了一种富含氰基和羟基的多孔氮化碳吸附剂(d-g-CN),研究其对铀的吸附性能。吸附实验结果表明,在pH=6.0和298 K的条件下,d-g-CN对铀的吸附在3 h达到吸附平衡,饱和吸附容量为2476.23 mg∙g-1。吸附过程符合拟二级动力学模型和Freundlich等温模型。此外,d-g-CN具有优异的选择性和循环性,在溶液中存在多种竞争离子时,d-g-CN对铀的吸附分配系数达到1.48×104 ml∙g-1,并且6次循环后吸附效率仍保持在89.5%。由于d-g-CN较大的比表面积提供了更多的吸附位点,同时氰基和羟基等功能基团与铀存在配位作用,因此d-g-CN表现出优异的吸附性能,在低浓度铀的提取方面具有一定的应用潜力。
中图分类号:
孟园, 倪善, 刘亚锋, 王文杰, 赵越, 朱育丹, 杨良嵘. 功能化多孔氮化碳材料对铀的吸附性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(4): 1616-1629.
Yuan MENG, Shan NI, Yafeng LIU, Wenjie WANG, Yue ZHAO, Yudan ZHU, Liangrong YANG. Adsorption properties of functionalized porous carbon nitride materials for uranium[J]. CIESC Journal, 2024, 75(4): 1616-1629.
吸附剂 | 比表面积/(m2∙g-1) | 孔体积/(cm3∙g-1) |
---|---|---|
HD-CN | 52.270 | 0.1587 |
HR-CN | 120.783 | 0.5427 |
d-g-CN | 131.852 | 0.4302 |
表1 HD-CN、HR-CN、d-g-CN的比表面积和孔体积
Table 1 Specific surface area and pore volume of HD-CN, HR-CN and d-g-CN
吸附剂 | 比表面积/(m2∙g-1) | 孔体积/(cm3∙g-1) |
---|---|---|
HD-CN | 52.270 | 0.1587 |
HR-CN | 120.783 | 0.5427 |
d-g-CN | 131.852 | 0.4302 |
图7 吸附动力学数据,d-g-CN的拟一级、拟二级动力学模型和Weber-Morris颗粒内扩散模型
Fig.7 Adsorption kinetics data, pseudo-first-order, pseudo-second-order kinetic models and Weber-Morris intraparticle diffusion model of d-g-CN
拟一级动力学参数 | 拟二级动力学参数 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
k1/min-1 | qe/(mg∙g-1) | R2 | k2/(g∙mg-1∙min-1) | qe/(mg∙g-1) | R2 |
0.03471 | 1332.11 | 0.993 | 0.00041 | 1427.96 | 0.999 |
表2 d-g-CN的拟一级和拟二级动力学参数
Table 2 Pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order kinetic parameters of d-g-CN
拟一级动力学参数 | 拟二级动力学参数 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
k1/min-1 | qe/(mg∙g-1) | R2 | k2/(g∙mg-1∙min-1) | qe/(mg∙g-1) | R2 |
0.03471 | 1332.11 | 0.993 | 0.00041 | 1427.96 | 0.999 |
温度/K | Langmuir模型 | Freundlich模型 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
qm/(mg∙g-1) | KL/(L∙mg-1) | R2 | KF | 1/n | R2 | |
298 | 2476.23 | 0.155 | 0.911 | 685.893 | 0.298 | 0.992 |
308 | 2709.41 | 0.184 | 0.891 | 768.055 | 0.298 | 0.991 |
318 | 3108.57 | 0.157 | 0.778 | 1030.759 | 0.253 | 0.993 |
表3 Langmuir模型和Freundlich模型拟合参数
Table 3 Fitting parameters of Langmuir model and Freundlich model
温度/K | Langmuir模型 | Freundlich模型 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
qm/(mg∙g-1) | KL/(L∙mg-1) | R2 | KF | 1/n | R2 | |
298 | 2476.23 | 0.155 | 0.911 | 685.893 | 0.298 | 0.992 |
308 | 2709.41 | 0.184 | 0.891 | 768.055 | 0.298 | 0.991 |
318 | 3108.57 | 0.157 | 0.778 | 1030.759 | 0.253 | 0.993 |
吸附剂 | 实验条件 | 铀浓度/(mg∙L-1) | 最大吸附容量/(mg∙g-1) | 平衡时间/min | 文献 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
d-g-CN | pH=6.0, m/V= 0.025 g∙L-1, T=298 K | 50 | 2476.23 | 180 | 本文 |
g-C3N4-550 | pH=5.0, m/V = 0.2 g∙L-1, T=298 K | 10 | 149.7 | 120 | [ |
AO/g-C3N4 | pH=6.8, m/V = 0.1 g∙L-1, T=298 K | 50 | 312 | 10 | [ |
pH=8.0, m/V = 0.5 g∙L-1, T=298 K | 200 | 859.66 | 480 | [ | |
g-C3N4/FeS | pH=6.0, m/V = 0.05 g∙L-1, T=303 K | 100 | 917.1 | 60 | [ |
P-CS@CN | pH=5.0, m/V = 0.1 g∙L-1, T=298 K | 10 | 416.7 | 20 | [ |
ZIF-8-CN | pH=6.0, m/V = 0.083 g∙L-1, T=298 K | 200 | 1000 | 120 | [ |
COF-TpDb-AO | pH=6.0, m/V = 0.5 g∙L-1, T=298 K | 9.25 | 408 | 30 | [ |
MCP-5 | pH=6.0, m/V = 0.02 g∙L-1, T=298 K | 20 | 950.52 | 5 | [ |
表4 d-g-CN与已报道的吸附剂的性能比较
Table 4 Performance comparison between d-g-CN and reported adsorbents
吸附剂 | 实验条件 | 铀浓度/(mg∙L-1) | 最大吸附容量/(mg∙g-1) | 平衡时间/min | 文献 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
d-g-CN | pH=6.0, m/V= 0.025 g∙L-1, T=298 K | 50 | 2476.23 | 180 | 本文 |
g-C3N4-550 | pH=5.0, m/V = 0.2 g∙L-1, T=298 K | 10 | 149.7 | 120 | [ |
AO/g-C3N4 | pH=6.8, m/V = 0.1 g∙L-1, T=298 K | 50 | 312 | 10 | [ |
pH=8.0, m/V = 0.5 g∙L-1, T=298 K | 200 | 859.66 | 480 | [ | |
g-C3N4/FeS | pH=6.0, m/V = 0.05 g∙L-1, T=303 K | 100 | 917.1 | 60 | [ |
P-CS@CN | pH=5.0, m/V = 0.1 g∙L-1, T=298 K | 10 | 416.7 | 20 | [ |
ZIF-8-CN | pH=6.0, m/V = 0.083 g∙L-1, T=298 K | 200 | 1000 | 120 | [ |
COF-TpDb-AO | pH=6.0, m/V = 0.5 g∙L-1, T=298 K | 9.25 | 408 | 30 | [ |
MCP-5 | pH=6.0, m/V = 0.02 g∙L-1, T=298 K | 20 | 950.52 | 5 | [ |
T /K | ΔG /(kJ∙mol-1) | ΔH /(kJ∙mol-1) | ΔS /(J∙mol-1∙K-1) |
---|---|---|---|
298 | -25.75 | 10.8 | 122.66 |
308 | -26.98 | ||
318 | -28.21 |
表5 d-g-CN的吸附热力学参数
Table 5 Adsorption thermodynamic parameters of d-g-CN
T /K | ΔG /(kJ∙mol-1) | ΔH /(kJ∙mol-1) | ΔS /(J∙mol-1∙K-1) |
---|---|---|---|
298 | -25.75 | 10.8 | 122.66 |
308 | -26.98 | ||
318 | -28.21 |
19 | Hamza M F, Guibal E, Wei Y Z, et al. Magnetic amino-sulfonic dual sorbent for uranyl sorption from aqueous solutions—influence of light irradiation on sorption properties[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2023, 456: 141099. |
20 | Bart S C, Meyer K. Highlights in uranium coordination chemistry[M]//Structure and Bonding. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2008: 119-176. |
21 | Hu B W, Wang H F, Liu R R, et al. Highly efficient U(Ⅵ) capture by amidoxime/carbon nitride composites: evidence of EXAFS and modeling[J]. Chemosphere, 2021, 274: 129743. |
22 | Wang Y, Zhang Y, Liu X L, et al. Fabrication of phosphoric-crosslinked chitosan@g-C3N4 gel beads for uranium(Ⅵ) separation from aqueous solution[J]. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2023, 242(3): 124998. |
23 | Wu J K, Shi N, Li N, et al. Dual-ligand ZIF-8 bearing the cyano group for efficient and selective uranium capture from seawater[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2023, 15(40): 46952-46961. |
24 | Liu S, Wang Z, Lu Y X, et al. Sunlight-induced uranium extraction with triazine-based carbon nitride as both photocatalyst and adsorbent[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2021, 282: 119523. |
25 | Jiang N, Lyu L, Yu G F, et al. A dual-reaction-center Fenton-like process on —C N—Cu linkage between copper oxides and defect-containing g-C3N4 for efficient removal of organic pollutants[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2018, 6(36): 17819-17828. |
26 | Chen L, Chen C, Yang Z, et al. Simultaneously tuning band structure and oxygen reduction pathway toward high-efficient photocatalytic hydrogen peroxide production using cyano-rich graphitic carbon nitride[J]. Advanced Functional Materials, 2021, 31(46): 2105731. |
27 | Chen Q C, Lu C J, Ping B Y, et al. A hydroxyl-induced carbon nitride homojunction with functional surface for efficient photocatalytic production of H2O2 [J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2023, 324: 122216. |
28 | Xiao G, Wang Y Q, Xu S N, et al. Superior adsorption performance of graphitic carbon nitride nanosheets for both cationic and anionic heavy metals from wastewater[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2019, 27(2): 305-313. |
29 | Schwinghammer K, Tuffy B, Mesch M B, et al. Triazine-based carbon nitrides for visible-light-driven hydrogen evolution[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2013, 52(9): 2435-2439. |
30 | Lin L H, Ren W, Wang C, et al. Crystalline carbon nitride semiconductors prepared at different temperatures for photocatalytic hydrogen production[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2018, 231: 234-241. |
31 | Zhang G G, Li G S, Lan Z A, et al. Optimizing optical absorption, exciton dissociation, and charge transfer of a polymeric carbon nitride with ultrahigh solar hydrogen production activity[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2017, 56(43): 13445-13449. |
32 | Yang F, Liu D Z, Li Y X, et al. Salt-template-assisted construction of honeycomb-like structured g-C3N4 with tunable band structure for enhanced photocatalytic H2 production[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2019, 240: 64-71. |
33 | Zhou L, Lei J Y, Wang F C, et al. Carbon nitride nanotubes with in situ grafted hydroxyl groups for highly efficient spontaneous H2O2 production[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2021, 288: 119993. |
34 | Li Y X, Xu H, Ouyang S X, et al. In situ surface alkalinized g-C3N4 toward enhancement of photocatalytic H2 evolution under visible-light irradiation[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2016, 4(8): 2943-2950. |
35 | Yan B J, Ma C X, Gao J X, et al. An ion-crosslinked supramolecular hydrogel for ultrahigh and fast uranium recovery from seawater[J]. Advanced Materials, 2020, 32(10): e1906615. |
36 | Leng R, Sun Y C, Wang C Z, et al. Design and fabrication of hypercrosslinked covalent organic adsorbents for selective uranium extraction[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2023, 57(26): 9615-9626. |
37 | Liao J, He X S, Zhang Y, et al. The construction of magnetic hydroxyapatite-functionalized pig manure-derived biochar for the efficient uranium separation[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2023, 457: 141367. |
38 | He Y R, Li S C, Li X L, et al. Graphene (rGO) hydrogel: a promising material for facile removal of uranium from aqueous solution[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2018, 338: 333-340. |
39 | Li G, Huang Y, Lin J, et al. Effective capture and reversible storage of iodine using foam-like adsorbents consisting of porous boron nitride microfibers[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2020, 382: 122833. |
40 | Hao X, Chen R R, Liu Q, et al. A novel U(Ⅵ)-imprinted graphitic carbon nitride composite for the selective and efficient removal of U(Ⅵ) from simulated seawater[J]. Inorganic Chemistry Frontiers, 2018, 5(9): 2218-2226. |
41 | Xu L X, Li L, Fang P, et al. Removal of uranium (Ⅵ) ions from aqueous solution by graphitic carbon nitride stabilized FeS nanoparticles[J]. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 2022, 345: 117050. |
42 | Liu Y F, Ni S, Wang W J, et al. Functionalized hydrogen-bonded organic superstructures via molecular self-assembly for enhanced uranium extraction[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2024, 464: 133002. |
1 | Beltrami D, Cote G, Mokhtari H, et al. Recovery of uranium from wet phosphoric acid by solvent extraction processes[J]. Chemical Reviews, 2014, 114(24): 12002-12023. |
2 | Asif M, Muneer T. Energy supply, its demand and security issues for developed and emerging economies[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2007, 11(7): 1388-1413. |
3 | Lindner H, Schneider E. Review of cost estimates for uranium recovery from seawater[J]. Energy Economics, 2015, 49: 9-22. |
4 | Kim J, Tsouris C, Mayes R T, et al. Recovery of uranium from seawater: a review of current status and future research needs[J]. Separation Science and Technology, 2013, 48(3): 367-387. |
5 | Amphlett J T M, Choi S, Parry S A, et al. Insights on uranium uptake mechanisms by ion exchange resins with chelating functionalities: chelation vs. anion exchange[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2020, 392: 123712. |
6 | Boyarintsev A V, Perevalov S A, Stepanov S I, et al. Liquid–liquid extraction of neptunium(Ⅵ) and neptunium(Ⅴ) from carbonate solutions by methyltrioctylammonium carbonate in toluene[J]. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 2021, 327(1): 385-393. |
7 | Chu J, Huang Q G, Dong Y H, et al. Enrichment of uranium in seawater by glycine cross-linked graphene oxide membrane[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2022, 444: 136602. |
8 | Hernández J, Ruiz D. Removal of chloride ions from a copper leaching solution, using electrodialysis, to improve the uranium extraction through ion-exchange[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2021, 420: 126582. |
9 | Yu K F, Li Y, Cao X, et al. In-situ constructing amidoxime groups on metal-free g-C3N4 to enhance chemisorption, light absorption, and carrier separation for efficient photo-assisted uranium(Ⅵ) extraction[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2023, 460: 132356. |
10 | Zhao S L, Yuan Y H, Yu Q H, et al. A dual-surface amidoximated halloysite nanotube for high-efficiency economical uranium extraction from seawater[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2019, 58(42): 14979-14985. |
11 | Zou Y D, Cao X H, Luo X P, et al. Recycle of U(Ⅵ) from aqueous solution by situ phosphorylation mesoporous carbon[J]. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 2015, 306(2): 515-525. |
12 | Liu X, Sun J, Xu X T, et al. Adsorption and desorption of U(Ⅵ) on different-size graphene oxide[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2019, 360: 941-950. |
13 | 王莹, 李倩, 曹丽霞, 等. 生物质基铀吸附材料的研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(3): 1205-1216. |
Wang Y, Li Q, Cao L X, et al. Progress of biomass-based materials for uranium adsorption[J]. CIESC Journal, 2021, 72(3): 1205-1216. | |
14 | Yue Y F, Mayes R T, Kim J, et al. Seawater uranium sorbents: preparation from a mesoporous copolymer initiator by atom-transfer radical polymerization[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2013, 52(50): 13458-13462. |
15 | Cui A Q, Wu X Y, Ye J B, et al. “Two-in-one” dual-function luminescent MOF hydrogel for onsite ultra-sensitive detection and efficient enrichment of radioactive uranium in water[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2023, 448: 130864. |
16 | Sun Q, Aguila B, Earl L D, et al. Covalent organic frameworks as a decorating platform for utilization and affinity enhancement of chelating sites for radionuclide sequestration[J]. Advanced Materials, 2018, 30(20): e1705479. |
17 | Zheng Y, Jiao Y, Zhu Y H, et al. Molecule-level g-C3N4 coordinated transition metals as a new class of electrocatalysts for oxygen electrode reactions[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2017, 139(9): 3336-3339. |
18 | Zhang C L, Liu Y, Li X, et al. Highly uranium elimination by crab shells-derived porous graphitic carbon nitride: batch, EXAFS and theoretical calculations[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2018, 346: 406-415. |
43 | Gan J L, Zhang L Y, Wang Q L, et al. Synergistic action of multiple functional groups enhanced uranium extraction from seawater of porous phosphorylated chitosan/coal-based activated carbon composite sponge[J]. Desalination, 2023, 545: 116154. |
44 | Xiong X H, Yu Z W, Gong L L, et al. Ammoniating covalent organic framework (COF) for high-performance and selective extraction of toxic and radioactive uranium ions[J]. Advanced Science, 2019, 6(16): 1900547. |
45 | Zhu L E, Zhang C H, Ma F Q, et al. Hierarchical self-assembled polyimide microspheres functionalized with amidoxime groups for uranium-containing wastewater remediation[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2023, 15(4): 5577-5589. |
[1] | 李添翼, 武玉泰, 王永胜, 顾佳锐, 宋沂恒, 杨丰铖, 郝广平. 轻同位素分离纯化与催化标记研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(4): 1284-1301. |
[2] | 吕田田, 原敏, 王江, 高美珍, 杨佳辉, 徐红, 董晋湘, 石琪. ZTIF基疏水微介孔碳的制备及5-羟甲基糠醛吸附分离性能[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(4): 1642-1654. |
[3] | 文一如, 付佳, 刘大欢. 基于机器学习的MOFs材料研究进展:能源气体吸附分离[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(4): 1370-1381. |
[4] | 刘莹, 郑芳, 杨启炜, 张治国, 任其龙, 鲍宗必. 二甲苯异构体吸附分离研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(4): 1081-1095. |
[5] | 张凯博, 沈佳新, 李玉霞, 谈朋, 刘晓勤, 孙林兵. Y沸石中Cu(Ⅰ)的可控构筑及其乙烯/乙烷吸附分离性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(4): 1607-1615. |
[6] | 张天永, 张晶怡, 姜爽, 李彬, 吕东军, 陈都民, 陈雪. 弱酸性蓝AS染料排放的废盐制碳基吸附剂及利用[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(3): 890-899. |
[7] | 李琢宇, 金鹏, 陈孝彦, 赵泽玉, 王庆宏, 陈春茂, 詹亚力. 零价铁活化过氧乙酸降解水中双酚A的效果与机制[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(3): 987-999. |
[8] | 邓志诚, 许世峰, 王淇冬, 王家瑞, 王斯民. 浸没燃烧处理高盐高化学需氧量废水过程与能耗分析[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(3): 1000-1008. |
[9] | 王宝凤, 王术高, 程芳琴. 固废基硫掺杂多孔炭材料制备及其对CO2吸附性能研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(2): 395-411. |
[10] | 齐元帅, 彭文朝, 李阳, 张凤宝, 范晓彬. 电化学脱盐机理及相关研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(1): 171-189. |
[11] | 王尤佳, 赵亮, 高金森, 徐春明. 柴油烃类族组成分离技术研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(1): 20-32. |
[12] | 刘琦, 陈子康, 朴宇, 肖鹏, 葛亚粉, 巩雁军. 烃类催化裂解高选择性制低碳烯烃的分子筛催化剂[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(1): 120-137. |
[13] | 孟祥军, 花莹曦, 张长金, 张弛, 杨林睿, 杨若昔, 刘鉴漪, 许春建. 6N电子级氘气的制备与纯化技术研究[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(1): 377-390. |
[14] | 闫可欣, 姜洪涛, 高维群, 郭晓晖, 孙伟振, 赵玲. 电子级多晶硅原料中痕量硼磷杂质的脱除研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(1): 83-94. |
[15] | 晁京伟, 许嘉兴, 李廷贤. 基于无管束蒸发换热强化策略的吸附热池的供热性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 302-310. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||