间接内重整板式固体氧化物燃料电池的温度分布特性及改进

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20250230

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

间接内重整固体氧化物燃料电池（IIR-SOFC）在紧邻电池片处增设重整多孔介质层，利用电池产生的热量对燃料气进行重整，为电池提供氢气。但受重整反应影响，电池内部温度分布不均匀，从而影响电池的发电性能和寿命。采用数值模拟方法得到板式间接内重整SOFC的燃料和空气的流动方向、运行温度、重整气流速对电池温度分布及发电特性的影响，并在重整流道内采用催化剂载量梯度分布方式改进温度分布。结果显示，阴、阳极流道内气体顺流情况下电池最大温差比逆流时小；随着工作温度的升高，电池内的最大温差逐渐增大；随着重整混合气入口流速的增加，温度梯度及功率密度先增大后减小。在改变重整流道内的催化剂载量分布后，电池内温度分布趋向均匀，温度梯度明显减小，最大温差减小约60%。

关键词: 间接内重整, 燃料电池, 梯度负载, 热力学, 数值模拟

Abstract:

The indirect internal reforming solid oxide fuel cell (IIR-SOFC) is equipped with a reforming porous medium layer adjacent to the cell, utilizing the heat generated by the cell to reform the fuel gas and provide hydrogen for the cell. However, the reforming reaction affects the temperature distribution within the cell, making it uneven, which in turn affects the cell's power generation performance and lifespan. In this paper, the numerical simulation method was used to obtain the effects of fuel and air flow directions, operating temperature, and reforming gas flow rate on the temperature distribution and power generation characteristics of planar indirect internal reforming SOFC. A gradient distribution of catalyst loading in the reforming channel was used to improve the temperature distribution. The results show that the maximum temperature difference in the cell is smaller when the gas in the anode and cathode channels flows in the same direction than when it flows in the opposite direction. As the operating temperature increases, the maximum temperature difference inside the cell gradually increases. As the flow rate of the reforming mixed gas at the inlet increases, the temperature gradient and power density first increase and then decrease. After changing the distribution of catalyst loading in the reforming channel, the temperature distribution in the battery tends to be uniform, the temperature gradient is significantly reduced, and the maximum temperature difference is reduced by about 60%.

Key words: indirect internal reforming, fuel cells, gradient load, thermodynamics, numerical simulation

中图分类号:

TM 911.4

王世学, 于在辉, 朱禹, 蹇季廷. 间接内重整板式固体氧化物燃料电池的温度分布特性及改进[J]. 化工学报, 2025, 76(10): 5322-5335.

Shixue WANG, Zaihui YU, Yu ZHU, Jiting JIAN. Temperature distribution characteristics and improvement of indirect internal reforming planar solid oxide fuel cells[J]. CIESC Journal, 2025, 76(10): 5322-5335.

图/表 20

图1 IIR-SOFC几何结构示意图

Fig.1 Schematic diagram of the IIR-SOFC geometric structure

图2 IIR-SOFC不同流动方式示意图

Fig.2 Schematic diagram of different flow configurations in IIR-SOFC

表1 几何模型参数

Table 1 Geometric model parameters

参数	数值
阴/阳极流道宽度(w₂)/mm	2
阴/阳极流道高度(h_cha,a/h_cha,c) /mm	1
流道长度(l) /mm	100
重整流道宽度(w₁) /mm	4
重整流道高度(h_ref) /mm	4
阳极厚度(h_a) /mm	0.15
电解质厚度(h_el) /mm	0.1
阴极厚度(h_c) /mm	0.1
阳极/电解质/阴极宽度(w₁) /mm	4
连接体宽度(w₁) /mm	4
连接体高度(h_con,a/h_con,c)/mm	2

表2 模型边界条件

Table 2 Model boundary condition intent

边界条件	数值
重整流道入口气体组分(x_fuel,in)(N₂∶CH₄∶H₂O∶H₂)	0.225∶0.25∶0.5∶0.025
重整流道入口气体流速(u_fuel,in) /(m/s)	u_x =0.05,u_y =u_z =0
阴极入口气体组分(x_air,in)(N₂∶O₂)	79∶21
阴极入口流速(u_air,in) /(m/s)	u_x =1.5,u_y =u_z =0
阳/阴极出口压力（p_out）/atm	1
重整气体与阴极气体入口温度(T)/K	1073

图3 求解流程

Fig.3 Flowchart of solution process

图4 模型合理性验证

Fig.4 Model validation

图5 计算结果二维云图及一维直线所取位置示意图

Fig.5 Two-dimensional cloud diagram of calculation results and schematic diagram of position of one-dimensional line taken

图6 不同流动方式下的电池内温度与温度梯度变化

Fig.6 Variations in temperature and temperature gradient within battery under different flow configurations （T=1073 K，ufuel=0.05 m/s, uair=1.5 m/s，VCell=0.7 V，p=1 atm）

图7 不同流动方式下电池功率密度曲线

Fig.7 Power density curves under different flow configurations

图8 不同初始运行温度下电池内温度和温度梯度沿直线c沿程变化(ufuel=0.05 m/s, uair=1.5 m/s,VCell=0.7 V, p=1 atm)

Fig.8 Variation of temperature and temperature gradient at different initial operating temperatures along Line c

图9 不同SOFC运行温度下功率密度曲线

Fig.9 Power density curves at different operating temperatures of SOFC

图10 不同流速下重整流道内温度、温度梯度沿直线c沿程变化(T=1073 K,uair=1.5 m/s,VCell=0.7 V, p=1 atm)

Fig.10 Evolution of temperature and temperature gradient in reforming channel under different flow rates along Line c

图11 不同重整气入口流速下功率密度曲线

Fig.11 Power density curves at different inlet flow velocities of reformed gas

图12 重整流道不同催化剂负载方式

Fig.12 Different catalyst loading methods in reforming channel

图13 重整流道不同催化剂负载方式下SOFC内温度分布（截面a）

Fig.13 Temperature distribution in SOFC under different loading methods of reforming channel (Cross-section a)

表3 重整流道催化剂不同负载方式下IIR-SOFC内最高温、最低温、最大温差和最大温度梯度统计

Table 3 Statistics of maximum temperature， minimum temperature， maximum temperature difference， and temperature gradient within IIR-SOFC under different loading methods of reforming channel

负载方式	最高温/K	最低温/K	最大温差/K	最大温度梯度/(K/cm)
均匀负载	1098.2	1073.15	25.0	12.16
两分区梯度负载	1091.1	1073.15	17.9	7.17
三分区梯度负载	1083.3	1073.15	10.1	5.12

图14 重整流道催化剂不同负载方式下温度和温度梯度沿直线c变化(T=1073 K, ufuel=0.05 m/s, uair=1.5 m/s, VCell=0.7 V, p=1 atm)

Fig.14 Variations in temperature and temperature gradient along Line c under different loading methods of reforming channel

图15 重整流道催化剂不同负载方式下功率密度曲线

Fig.15 Power density curves under different loading methods of reforming channel

图17 IIR-SOFC三分区负载方式时不同空气流速下功率密度曲线

Fig.17 Power density curves of IIR-SOFC with three tiered load mode at different air flow velocities

表4 三分区梯度负载方式IIR-SOFC模型不同空气流速下电池内最高温、最低温、最大温差和温度梯度统计

Table 4 Statistics of maximum temperature， minimum temperature， maximum temperature difference and temperature gradient within battery under different air flow velocities in three tiered gradient loading configuration

空气流速/(m/s)	最高温/K	最低温/K	最大温差/K	最大温度梯度/(K/cm)
1.1	1094.5	1073.15	21.35	10.63
1.2	1091.6	1073.15	18.45	9.08
1.3	1089.1	1073.15	15.9	7.48
1.4	1086.3	1073.15	13.15	6.50
1.5	1083.3	1073.15	10.1	5.12

参考文献 35

[1]	Bilal Hanif M, Motola M, Qayyum S, et al. Recent advancements, doping strategies and the future perspective of perovskite-based solid oxide fuel cells for energy conversion[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2022, 428: 132603.
[2]	de Arespacochaga N, Valderrama C, Mesa C, et al. Biogas deep clean-up based on adsorption technologies for solid oxide fuel cell applications[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2014, 255: 593-603.
[3]	Arteaga-Perez L E, Casas Y, Peralta L M, et al. An auto-sustainable solid oxide fuel cell system fueled by bio-ethanol. Process simulation and heat exchanger network synthesis[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2009, 150(1): 242-251.
[4]	Xie Y Y, Ding H P, Xue X J. Direct methane fueled solid oxide fuel cell model with detailed reforming reactions[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2013, 228: 917-924.
[5]	Zhang J G, Zhang D, Liu T, et al. An efficient and durable solid oxide fuel cell integrated with coal gasification system[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2023, 48(100): 40029-40036.
[6]	Wang J, Zhang D, Liu T, et al. Self-assembled FeRu bimetallic nanocatalysts for efficient and durable mutual CO-CO₂ conversion in a reversible solid oxide electrochemical cell[J]. Science China Materials, 2024, 67(5): 1471-1480.
[7]	Janardhanan V M, Heuveline V, Deutschmann O. Performance analysis of a SOFC under direct internal reforming conditions[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2007, 172(1): 296-307.
[8]	Sciazko A, Komatsu Y, Nakamura A, et al. 3D microstructures of solid oxide fuel cell Ni-YSZ anodes with carbon deposition[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2023, 460: 141680.
[9]	Tran D L, Tran Q T, Sakamoto M, et al. Modelling of CH₄ multiple-reforming within the Ni-YSZ anode of a solid oxide fuel cell[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2017, 359: 507-519.
[10]	Fu Q R, Li Z Y, Liu Z J, et al. Performance study of solid oxide fuel cell with Ni-foam indirect internal reformer: intrinsic reforming kinetics and temperature uniformity[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2023, 457: 141170.
[11]	Kim-Lohsoontorn P, Priyakorn F, Wetwatana U, et al. Modelling of a tubular solid oxide fuel cell with different designs of indirect internal reformer[J]. Journal of Energy Chemistry, 2014, 23(2): 251-263.
[12]	Dokmaingam P, Irvine J T S, Assabumrungrat S, et al. Modeling of IT-SOFC with indirect internal reforming operation fueled by methane: effect of oxygen adding as autothermal reforming[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2010, 35(24): 13271-13279.
[13]	Najafi Maharluie H, Rahmani M. Mathematical modeling of solid oxide fuel cell performance with indirect internal reforming and thermal interaction analysis[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2024, 316: 118842.
[14]	Nagata S, Momma A, Kato T, et al. Numerical analysis of output characteristics of tubular SOFC with internal reformer[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2001, 101(1): 60-71.
[15]	Nishino T, Szmyd J S. Numerical analysis of a cell-based indirect internal reforming tubular SOFC operating with biogas[J]. Journal of Fuel Cell Science and Technology, 2010, 7(5): 051004.
[16]	Xu J G, Froment G F. Methane steam reforming, methanation and water-gas shift(Ⅰ): Intrinsic kinetics[J]. AIChE Journal, 1989, 35(1): 88-96.
[17]	Akkaya A V. Electrochemical model for performance analysis of a tubular SOFC[J]. International Journal of Energy Research, 2007, 31(1): 79-98.
[18]	Wang J S, Wang S X, Zhu Y, et al. Numerical investigation of parameter distributions in high-temperature PEMFCs under various cooling surface temperature gradients[J]. Fuel, 2024, 367: 131554.
[19]	Yuan J L, Huang Y, Sundén B, et al. Analysis of parameter effects on chemical reaction coupled transport phenomena in SOFC anodes[J]. Heat and Mass Transfer, 2009, 45(4): 471-484.
[20]	Le Bars M, Worster M G. Interfacial conditions between a pure fluid and a porous medium: implications for binary alloy solidification[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2006, 550: 149.
[21]	Krishna R, Wesselingh J A. The Maxwell-Stefan approach to mass transfer[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 1997, 52(6): 861-911.
[22]	Butcher H, Quenzel C J E, Breziner L, et al. Design of an annular microchannel reactor (AMR) for hydrogen and/or syngas production via methane steam reforming[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39(31): 18046-18057.
[23]	Wilhite B A, Breziner L, Mettes J, et al. Radial microchannel reactors (RMRs) for efficient and compact steam reforming of methane: experimental demonstration and design simulations[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2013, 27(8): 4403-4410.
[24]	Haberman B A, Young J B. Three-dimensional simulation of chemically reacting gas flows in the porous support structure of an integrated-planar solid oxide fuel cell[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2004, 47(17/18): 3617-3629.
[25]	Ferguson J R, Fiard J M, Herbin R. Three-dimensional numerical simulation for various geometries of solid oxide fuel cells[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 1996, 58(2): 109-122.
[26]	Ahmad Hajimolana S, Hussain M A, Daud W M A W, et al. Mathematical modeling of solid oxide fuel cells: a review[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2011, 15(4): 1893-1917.
[27]	Khazaee I, Rava A. Numerical simulation of the performance of solid oxide fuel cell with different flow channel geometries[J]. Energy, 2017, 119: 235-244.
[28]	Newman J S, Balsara N P. Electrochemical Systems[M]. 4th ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2021.
[29]	Bove R, Ubertini S. Modeling Solid Oxide Fuel Cells: Methods, Procedures and Techniques[M]. Berlin: Springer, 2008.
[30]	Patcharavorachot Y, Arpornwichanop A, Chuachuensuk A. Electrochemical study of a planar solid oxide fuel cell: role of support structures[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2008, 177(2): 254-261.
[31]	Milewski J. Advanced Methods of Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Modeling[M]. London: Springer, 2011.
[32]	Todd B, Young J B. Thermodynamic and transport properties of gases for use in solid oxide fuel cell modelling[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2002, 110(1): 186-200.
[33]	Oliveira E L G, Grande C A, Rodrigues A E. Steam methane reforming in a Ni/Al₂O₃ catalyst: kinetics and diffusional limitations in extrudates[J]. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2009, 87(6): 945-956.
[34]	Singhal Subhash, Kendall Kevin. High Temperature Solid Oxide Fuel Cells: Fundamentals, Design, and Applicatons[M]. Oxford, UK: Elsevier, 2003.
[35]	Liese E A, Gemmen R S. Performance comparison of internal reforming against external reforming in a solid oxide fuel cell, gas turbine hybrid system[J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2005, 127(1): 86-90.