CIESC Journal ›› 2018, Vol. 69 ›› Issue (S2): 420-424.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20181301

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Alternative scheme and dehumidification and regeneration performance validation for economic multi-component solution

WANG Mu1, YIN Yonggao1, GUO Xiaoshuang2, CHEN Tingting1   

  1. 1 School of Energy and Environment, Key Laboratory of Energy Thermal Conversion and Control of Ministry of Education, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, Jiangsu, China;
    2 China Architectural Southwest Design and Research Institute Co., Ltd., Chengdu 610000, Sichuan, China
  • Received:2018-11-08 Revised:2018-11-18 Online:2018-12-31 Published:2018-12-31

经济型多元溶液的替代方案及除湿再生性能验证

王沐1, 殷勇高1, 郭枭爽2, 陈婷婷1   

  1. 1 东南大学能源与环境学院, 能源热转换及其过程测控教育部重点实验室, 江苏 南京 210096;
    2 中国建筑西南设计研究院有限公司, 四川 成都 610000

Abstract:

This paper aims to search for a more economical multi-component solution to replace single solution and validate its dehumidification and regeneration performance. A configuration scheme for multi-component solution is forecasted by simple mixing rule. Moisture content of outlet air is used as evaluation indexes. Experiments are carried out to verify the dehumidification capacity and regeneration capacity between single solution and multi-component solutions. 43%, 45% and 48% LiCl/CaCl2 multi-component solutions are substitutions for 39% LiCl solution. 51% LiBr/CaCl2 multi-component solution is substitution for 52% LiBr solution. Taking dehumidification performance, regeneration performance and economy into consideration, 48% LiCl/CaCl2 multi-component solution has 29.5% higher regeneration capacity than 39% LiCl solution and one third price of 39% LiCl solution. Since it has the best regeneration capacity, lowest price and slightly worse dehumidification capacity, it is the best substitute for dehumidifier. 51% LiBr/CaCl2 multi-component solution has 50.8% higher regeneration capacity than 52% LiBr solution. It also has similar dehumidification capacity to 52% LiBr solution and half price of 52% LiBr solution. It's a good substitute for dehumidifier.

摘要:

本研究旨在寻求更经济的替代单一溶液的多元溶液并验证其除湿再生性能。基于简单混合法则,预测多元溶液的配制方案。以空气出口含湿量作为除湿、再生性能的评价指标,搭建实验台进行实验验证。综合考虑除湿性能、再生性能和经济性,实验结果表明,43%、45%、48% LiCl/CaCl2多元溶液替代39% LiCl溶液作除湿剂,48% LiCl/CaCl2除湿性能略差,再生能力比39% LiCl提高了29.5%,再生能力最优,成本是39% LiCl的1/3,是最佳的替代除湿剂;51% LiBr/CaCl2多元溶液替代52% LiBr溶液作除湿剂,两者除湿能力相近,51% LiBr/CaCl2再生能力提高了50.8%,成本是52% LiBr的1/2,是很好的替代除湿剂。

CLC Number: