CIESC Journal ›› 2012, Vol. 63 ›› Issue (6): 1723-1728.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2012.06.010
Previous Articles Next Articles
SUN Dongliang1,XU Jinliang2,TAO Wenquan3
Received:
Revised:
Online:
Published:
孙东亮1,徐进良2,陶文铨3
通讯作者:
Abstract: For unsteady two-phase flows, the widely-used numerical approaches for solving continuity and momentum equations are fractional-step method and SIMPLE-family algorithms. The advantage of the fractional-step method is that the convergence rate is fast and the disadvantage is that the initial value problem is conditional stability. The SIMPLE-family algorithms are absolute stability for the initial value problem; however, their convergence rates are slow. For overcoming the disadvantage of the traditional SIMPLE-family algorithms, IDEAL algorithm is introduced in this paper. The convergence rates of SIMPLER and IDEAL are compared by two unsteady two-phase flow problems. It is found that IDEAL can enhance the convergence rate greatly, about 5~87 times over SIMPLER. Therefore, it can be concluded that IDEAL overcomes the disadvantages and combines the advantages of the fractional-step method and the SIMPLE-family algorithms.
Key words: two-phase flows, fractionalstep method, SIMPLEfamily algorithms, IDEALIDEAL
摘要: 对于非稳态两相流问题,联立求解连续性方程和动量方程最为广泛使用的方法为:分步方法和SIMPLE系列算法。分步方法的优点是:收敛速度快,缺点是:初值问题条件稳定。SIMPLE系列算法优点是:初值问题绝对稳定,缺点是:收敛速度慢。为了克服传统的SIMPLE系列算法收敛速度慢这一缺点,本文引入了IDEAL算法。本文通过2个非稳态的两相流问题对SIMPLER和IDEAL两种不同算法在收敛速度方面进行了比较。通过比较可以看出IDEAL算法的收敛速度较SIMPLER算法得到了大幅提高,提高了约6~87倍,克服了传统SIMPLE系列算法收敛速度较慢的缺点,同时具有了初值问题绝对稳定和收敛速度快这两个优点。
关键词: 两相流, 分步方法, SIMPLE系列算法, IDEAL算法
CLC Number:
TK124
SUN Dongliang,XU Jinliang,TAO Wenquan. Performance analysis of IDEAL algorithm on unsteady two-phase flows[J]. CIESC Journal, 2012, 63(6): 1723-1728.
孙东亮,徐进良,陶文铨. IDEAL算法在非稳态两相流问题中的性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2012, 63(6): 1723-1728.
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://hgxb.cip.com.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2012.06.010
https://hgxb.cip.com.cn/EN/Y2012/V63/I6/1723