双仿生表面水下疏油协同机制的分子动力学模拟研究

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20250313

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

通过分子动力学(MD)模拟方法，考察了多巴胺接枝的三甲胺N-氧化物(DOPA-TMAO)新型两性离子化合物的水下疏油性能，并将其与多巴胺接枝的甲基丙烯酸磺基甜菜碱(DOPA-SBMA)两性离子化合物的水下疏油性能进行了对比，还考察了不同盐浓度环境下DOPA-TMAO体系的水下疏油性能变化。结果表明，与DOPA-SBMA体系相比，纯水环境中DOPA-TMAO体系的水下疏油接触角更大，且有着厚度更大的水化层，其疏油能力更强。DOPA-TMAO体系在含盐水溶液中展现出良好的抗盐特性，这与TMAO分子中正负基团的极短间距有关，这进一步拓宽了其应用潜力。进一步研究发现，DOPA的邻苯二酚基团通过范德华力与静电相互作用显著增强表面黏附性能，与TMAO的水合屏障功能形成“锚固-屏蔽”协同效应，从而使DOPA-TMAO体系保持稳定的疏油性能；同时，TMAO优异的水合作用与抗盐机制的协同作用保障了高盐环境下的稳定疏油性能。基于贻贝仿生策略，本研究成功提升了两性离子表面在水下疏油过程中的稳定性，并揭示了新型两性离子TMAO在疏油和抗盐性能方面的显著优势，为其在复杂环境中的应用提供了理论依据。

关键词: 水下疏油性, 界面接触角, 两性离子材料, 分子模拟, 仿生材料

Abstract:

Through molecular dynamics simulations, the underwater oleophobicity of dopamine-grafted zwitterionic trimethylamine N-oxide (DOPA-TMAO) was investigated and compared with that of dopamine-grafted sulfobetaine methacrylate (DOPA-SBMA) zwitterionic compound. The underwater oleophobicity of the DOPA-TMAO system was also explored under different salt concentrations. Simulation results show that, in terms of underwater oleophobic performance, the oil droplet contact angle of the DOPA-TMAO system is 20° higher than that of the DOPA-SBMA system, along with more hydrogen bonds. Compared with the DOPA-SBMA system, the DOPA-TMAO system exhibits superior salt-resistance, demonstrates stronger oleophobic performance under various NaCl concentrations. This could be attributed to the unique direct connection between the positive and negative groups in the TMAO molecule (without carbon chain spacing), which leads to significantly concentrated charge density at one end and stronger hydration capability compared with that of the SBMA molecule. Additionally, after grafting dopamine with zwitterions, the surface adhesion is significantly enhanced, with the surface adhesion performance improved by nearly 50% compared with that of the surface without DOPA grafting. Further investigation demonstrated that the catechol groups in DOPA significantly enhance surface adhesion performance through van der Waals forces and electrostatic interactions. This character combines with the hydration barrier function of TMAO to form an “anchoring-shielding” synergistic effect, ensuring stable oleophobic performance in the DOPA-TMAO system. Notably, the cooperative interplay between TMAO's superior hydration capability and salt-resistance mechanism guarantees consistent anti-oil properties even in high-salinity environments. Based on the mussel biomimetic strategy, this study successfully improved the stability of the zwitterionic surface in the underwater oleophobic process; and revealed the significant advantages of the new zwitterionic TMAO in oleophobic and salt resistance, providing a theoretical basis for its application in complex environments.

Key words: underwater oleophobicity, interface contact angle, zwitterionic material, molecular simulation, biomimetic material

中图分类号:

O 647.11

李相海, 赖德林, 孔纲, 周健. 双仿生表面水下疏油协同机制的分子动力学模拟研究[J]. 化工学报, 2025, 76(9): 4551-4562.

Xianghai LI, Delin LAI, Gang KONG, Jian ZHOU. Molecular dynamics simulations on synergistic underwater oleophobicity mechanism of dual-biomimic surfaces[J]. CIESC Journal, 2025, 76(9): 4551-4562.

图/表 13

图1 分子结构式

Fig.1 Molecular structures

图2 水-油-表面三相体系的初始构型

Fig.2 Initial configuration of the water-oil-surface three-phase system

图3 圆弧拟合求解接触角[50]

Fig.3 Contact angle determination via arc fitting[50]

图4 纯水环境中DCE在不同表面的OCA快照

Fig.4 OCA snapshots of DCE on different surfaces in a pure water environment

图5 关键基团和DCE分子数密度分布

Fig.5 Number density distribution of key functional groups and DCE molecules

图6 不同体系的关键基团周围水分子与DCE分子分布快照

Fig.6 Snapshots of water and DCE molecule distributions around key functional groups in different systems

图7 DOPA-SBMA体系与DOPA-TMAO体系水化能力分析

Fig.7 Hydration capability analysis of DOPA-SBMA and DOPA-TMAO systems

表1 纯水环境下不同体系的水分子配位数、水分子停留时间及氢键数目

Table 1 Residence time of water molecules and hydrogen bond counts in different systems under pure aqueous environment

体系	水分子配位数	停留时间τ/ps	氢键总数	平均氢键数
DOPA-SBMA	7.19	56.9±3.4	155	1.6
DOPA-TMAO	10.14	69.7±4.8	305	3.2

图8 纯水环境与不同盐溶液环境中的OCA快照对比

Fig.8 Snapshots of OCA in pure water and different saline solutions

图9 水分子中氧原子与TMAO分子的ON-的径向分布函数

Fig.9 Radial distribution functions of water molecules and ON- in TMAO molecules

图10 TMAO分子间N+- ON-径向分布函数

Fig.10 Radial distribution functions of N+- ON- interactions in TMAO molecules

图11 DOPA-TMAO体系盐溶液环境中ON--Na+与N+-Cl⁻的径向分布函数

Fig.11 Radial distribution functions of ON--Na+ and N+-Cl⁻ in the DOPA-TMAO system within a saline solution environment

图12 SMD模拟过程中牵引力的变化

Fig.12 Variation of pulling forces during steered molecular dynamics simulations

参考文献 64

[1]	国家统计局. 废水中主要污染物排放年度数据[DS/OL]. https://data.stats.gov.cn/easyquery.htm?cn=C01&zb=A0C04&sj=2024, 2024.
	National Bureau of Statistics. Annual data on the discharge of major pollutants in wastewater[DS/OL]. https://data.stats.gov.cn/easyquery.htm?cn=C01&zb=A0C04&sj=2024, 2024.
[2]	国家统计局. 工业污染治理投资年度数据[DS/OL]. https://data.stats.gov.cn/easyquery.htm?cn=C01&zb=A0C0I&sj=2024, 2024.
	National Bureau of Statistics. Annual investment data for industrial pollution control[DS/OL]. https://data.stats.gov.cn/easyquery.htm?cn=C01&zb=A0C0I&sj=2024, 2024.
[3]	Xie S R, Jiang W, Feng C M, et al. Coral skeletons reveal the impacts of oil pollution on seawater chemistry in the northern South China Sea[J]. Chemosphere, 2023, 338: 139632.
[4]	Dai X M, Sun N, Nielsen S O, et al. Hydrophilic directional slippery rough surfaces for water harvesting[J]. Science Advances, 2018, 4(3): eaaq0919.
[5]	Liu D P, Zhu J, Qiu M, et al. Antifouling performance of poly(lysine methacrylamide)-grafted PVDF microfiltration membrane for solute separation[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2016, 171: 1-10.
[6]	Yang Y L, Li M M, Zhu L J, et al. Zwitterionic polyvinylidene fluoride membranes with strong underwater superoleophobicity and oil-fouling resistance for oily water purification[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2022, 10(3): 107593.
[7]	Manabe K, Saikawa M, Sato I, et al. Biomimetic 3D-printed armored structures for durable superhydrophobic surfaces: integrating macroprotection and nanofunctionality[J]. ACS Applied Polymer Materials, 2024, 6(22): 13701-13709.
[8]	Meng F, Liu J L, Arai N. Investigating the nanostructure design mechanism behind the hydrophobicity of the biomimetic surface[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2025, 17(15): 23394-23404.
[9]	Sundaram H S, Han X, Nowinski A K, et al. One-step dip coating of zwitterionic sulfobetaine polymers on hydrophobic and hydrophilic surfaces[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2014, 6(9): 6664-6671.
[10]	Zhang Y, Yang J L, Zhao Y L, et al. Anti-fouling ternary zwitterionic coating membrane with strong surface hydration and salt resistant for efficient long-term emulsion separation in high salinity marine environment[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2024, 710: 123167.
[11]	Miao Z H, Zhou J. Multiscale modeling and simulation of zwitterionic anti-fouling materials[J]. Langmuir, 2025, 41(12): 7980-7995.
[12]	Liu H Y, Yang L, Dou B J, et al. Zwitterionic hydrogel-coated cotton fabrics with underwater superoleophobic, self-healing and anti-fouling performances for oil-water separation[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2021, 279: 119789.
[13]	Cheng G, Liao M R, Zhao D H, et al. Molecular understanding on the underwater oleophobicity of self-assembled monolayers: zwitterionic versus nonionic[J]. Langmuir, 2017, 33(7): 1732-1741.
[14]	Liao M R, Cheng G, Zhou J. Underwater superoleophobicity of pseudozwitterionic SAMs: effects of chain length and ionic strength[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2017, 121(32): 17390-17401.
[15]	Chen Z, Liao M R, Zhang L Z, et al. Molecular simulations on the hydration and underwater oleophobicity of zwitterionic self-assembled monolayers[J]. AIChE Journal, 2021, 67(2): e17103.
[16]	Niu J Q, Wang H H, Chen J, et al. Bio-inspired zwitterionic copolymers for antifouling surface and oil-water separation[J]. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2021, 626: 127016.
[17]	Song X Z, Man J, Zhang X K, et al. Atomistic insights into the ionic response and mechanism of antifouling zwitterionic polymer brushes[J]. Small, 2025, 21(6): 2570043.
[18]	Ohto T, Backus E H G, Mizukami W, et al. Unveiling the amphiphilic nature of TMAO by vibrational sum frequency generation spectroscopy[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2016, 120(31): 17435-17443.
[19]	Bruce E E, van der Vegt N F A. Molecular scale solvation in complex solutions[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2019, 141(33): 12948-12956.
[20]	Ganguly P, Boserman P, van der Vegt N F A, et al. Trimethylamine N-oxide counteracts urea denaturation by inhibiting protein-urea preferential interaction[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2018, 140(1): 483-492.
[21]	Li B W, Jain P, Ma J R, et al. Trimethylamine N-oxide-derived zwitterionic polymers: a new class of ultralow fouling bioinspired materials[J]. Science Advances, 2019, 5(6): eaaw9562.
[22]	Huang H, Zhang C C, Crisci R, et al. Strong surface hydration and salt resistant mechanism of a new nonfouling zwitterionic polymer based on protein stabilizer TMAO[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2021, 143(40): 16786-16795.
[23]	Yang J, Lin L G, Tang F L, et al. Superwetting membrane by co-deposition technique using a novel N-oxide zwitterionic polymer assisted by bioinspired dopamine for efficient oil-water separation[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2023, 318: 123965.
[24]	Jiang Y Z, Liu C Y, Li Y H, et al. Stainless-steel-net-supported superhydrophobic COF coating for oil/water separation[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2019, 587: 117177.
[25]	Noguchi A, Masuda T, Chen C Q, et al. Hydrophilic surfaces from simple dip-coating method: amphiphilic block copolymers with zwitterionic group form antifouling coatings under atmospheric conditions[J]. Materials Advances, 2020, 1(8): 2737-2744.
[26]	Zhai Y D, Chen X Q, Yuan Z B, et al. A mussel-inspired catecholic ABA triblock copolymer exhibits better antifouling properties compared to a diblock copolymer[J]. Polymer Chemistry, 2020, 11(28): 4622-4629.
[27]	Han X T, Gong X. In situ, one-pot method to prepare robust superamphiphobic cotton fabrics for high buoyancy and good antifouling[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2021, 13(26): 31298-31309.
[28]	Krüger J M, Börner P H G. Accessing the next generation of synthetic mussel-glue polymers via mussel-inspired polymerization[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2021, 60(12): 6408-6413.
[29]	Tao C, Jin M, Yao H, et al. Dopamine based adhesive nano-coatings on extracellular matrix (ECM) based grafts for enhanced host-graft interfacing affinity[J]. Nanoscale, 2021, 13(43): 18148-18159.
[30]	Zhang C, Zhou Y S, Han H J, et al. Dopamine-triggered hydrogels with high transparency, self-adhesion, and thermoresponse as skinlike sensors[J]. ACS Nano, 2021, 15(1): 1785-1794.
[31]	Asha A B, Chen Y J, Narain R. Bioinspired dopamine and zwitterionic polymers for non-fouling surface engineering[J]. Chemical Society Reviews, 2021, 50(20): 11668-11683.
[32]	Liu X X, Jia K L, Ning J H, et al. A dual-biomimetic N-oxide-based zwitterionic coating for constructing antifouling membrane with exceptional emulsion separation performance[J]. Surface and Coatings Technology, 2025, 497: 131738.
[33]	Zhou Z, Shi Q H. Bioinspired dopamine and N-oxide-based zwitterionic polymer brushes for fouling resistance surfaces[J]. Polymers, 2024, 16(12): 1634.
[34]	Wang Y C, Li Y, Zhang Q L, et al. Bio-inspired co-deposition of dopamine and N-oxide zwitterionic polyethyleneimine to fabricate anti-fouling loose nanofiltration membranes for dye desalination[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2024, 349: 127801.
[35]	Li Y T, Liao M R, Zhou J. Catechol and its derivatives adhesion on graphene: insights from molecular dynamics simulations[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2018, 122(40): 22965-22974.
[36]	徐威, 兰忠, 彭本利, 等. 微液滴在不同能量表面上润湿状态的分子动力学模拟[J]. 物理学报, 2015, 64(21): 374-381.
	Xu W, Lan Z, Peng B L, et al. Molecular dynamics simulation on the wetting characteristic of micro-droplet on surfaces with different free energies[J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(21): 374-381.
[37]	Wang Y X, Kiziltas A, Blanchard P, et al. Contact angle calculator: an automated, parametrized, and flexible code for contact angle estimation in visual molecular dynamics[J]. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 2022, 62(24): 6302-6308.
[38]	Jiménez-Ángeles F, Firoozabadi A. Contact angle, liquid film, and liquid-liquid and liquid-solid interfaces in model oil-brine-substrate systems[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2016, 120(22): 11910-11917.
[39]	Steylaerts T, Vos R, James Shirley F, et al. Use of a piezo-electric microarrayer for site-specific, high throughput contact angle measurements[J]. Surfaces and Interfaces, 2019, 17: 100389.
[40]	Grimme S. Semiempirical GGA-type density functional constructed with a long-range dispersion correction[J]. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 2006, 27(15): 1787-1799.
[41]	Lu T, Chen F W. Multiwfn: a multifunctional wavefunction analyzer[J]. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 2012, 33(5): 580-592.
[42]	Vanommeslaeghe K, Raman E P, Mackerell A D. Automation of the CHARMM General Force Field (CGenFF) Ⅱ: assignment of bonded parameters and partial atomic charges[J]. Journal of Chemical Information & Modeling, 2012, 52(12): 3155-3168.
[43]	Berendsen H J C, Grigera J R, Straatsma T P. The missing term in effective pair potentials[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1987, 91(24): 6269-6271.
[44]	Hess B, Kutzner C, van der Spoel D, et al. GROMACS 4: algorithms for highly efficient, load-balanced, and scalable molecular simulation[J]. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 2008, 4(3): 435-447.
[45]	Hoover W G. Canonical dynamics: equilibrium phase-space distributions[J]. Physical Review. A, General Physics, 1985, 31(3): 1695-1697.
[46]	Hess B, Bekker H, Berendsen H J C, et al. LINCS: a linear constraint solver for molecular simulations[J]. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 1997, 18(12): 1463-1472.
[47]	Essmann U, Perera L, Berkowitz M L, et al. A smooth particle mesh Ewald method[J]. Journal of Chemical Physics, 1995, 103(19): 8577-8593.
[48]	Yeh I C, Berkowitz M L. Ewald summation for systems with slab geometry[J]. Journal of Chemical Physics, 1999, 111(7): 3155-3162.
[49]	Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K. VMD: visual molecular dynamics[J]. Journal of Molecular Graphics, 1996, 14(1): 33-38.
[50]	Jiang H, Patel A J. Recent advances in estimating contact angles using molecular simulations and enhanced sampling methods[J]. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering, 2019, 23: 130-137.
[51]	郑直, 郭乃胜, 尤占平, 等. 废木油与石油沥青相容机制的分子动力学研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(10): 4037-4050.
	Zheng Z, Guo N S, You Z P, et al. Research on compatibility mechanisms between waste wood oil and petroleum asphalt through molecular dynamics[J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(10): 4037-4050.
[52]	Tsuchida E. Revisiting the minimum image locus method for calculating the radial distribution functions[J]. Computational and Theoretical Chemistry, 2023, 1227: 114256.
[53]	Hower J C, He Y, Bernards M T, et al. Understanding the nonfouling mechanism of surfaces through molecular simulations of sugar-based self-assembled monolayers[J]. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 2006, 125(21): 214704.
[54]	Zeng S, Su Q W, Zhang L Z. Molecular-level evaluation and manipulation of thermal conductivity, moisture diffusivity and hydrophobicity of a GO-PVP/PVDF composite membrane[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2020, 152: 119508.
[55]	Qi L B, Jiang T J, Liang R N, et al. Enhancing the oil-fouling resistance of polymeric membrane ion-selective electrodes by surface modification of a zwitterionic polymer-based oleophobic self-cleaning coating[J]. Analytical Chemistry, 2021, 93(18): 6932-6937.
[56]	Meena S K, Goldmann C, Nassoko D, et al. Nanophase segregation of self-assembled monolayers on gold nanoparticles[J]. ACS Nano, 2017, 11(7): 7371-7381.
[57]	Liu Y L, Zhang D, Ren B P, et al. Molecular simulations and understanding of antifouling zwitterionic polymer brushes[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry. B, 2020, 8(17): 3814-3828.
[58]	Betancourt-Ponce M, Morales-Guzmán C, Cruz-Tato P, et al. Probing the effect of amine N-oxide zwitterionic polymer additives in polysulfone forward osmosis membranes[J]. ACS Applied Polymer Materials, 2022, 4(11): 7966-7975.
[59]	Jung K H, Kim H J, Kim M H, et al. Ultrafiltration membranes coated by amphiphilic copolymers containing superhydrophilic zwitterionic and hydrophobic POSS moieties showing improved fouling resistance/release properties[J]. Macromolecular Materials and Engineering, 2020, 305(9): 2000348.
[60]	Cheng Y, Wang J L, Li M L, et al. Zwitterionic polymer-grafted superhydrophilic and superoleophobic silk fabrics for anti-oil applications[J]. Macromolecular Rapid Communications, 2020, 41(21): 2000162.
[61]	Carro P, Andreasen G, Vericat C, et al. New aspects of the surface chemistry of sulfur on Au(111): surface structures formed by gold-sulfur complexes[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2019, 487: 848-856.
[62]	Liao M R, Li Y T, Chen Z, et al. Computer simulations of underwater oil adhesion of self-assembled monolayers on Au(111)[J]. Molecular Simulation, 2020, 46(9): 713-720.
[63]	Li Y T, Liao M R, Zhou J. Catechol-cation adhesion on silica surfaces: molecular dynamics simulations[J]. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2017, 19(43): 29222-29231.
[64]	李映图, 李理波, 周健. 分子动力学模拟多巴在自组装膜上的黏附性[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2017, 38(5): 798-805.
	Li Y T, Li L B, Zhou J. Molecular dynamics simulations on the adhesion of DOPA to self-assembled monolayers[J]. Chemical Journal of Chinese Universities, 2017, 38(5): 798-805.