生命周期评价的发展新方向:基于GIS的生命周期评价

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20151795

化工学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 67 ›› Issue (6): 2195-2201.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20151795

生命周期评价的发展新方向:基于GIS的生命周期评价

田亚峻¹, 邓业林², 张岳玲³, 谢克昌^4,5

1. 北京低碳清洁能源研究所, 北京 102209;
2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee 53211, USA;
3. 华北电力大学环境与化学工程学院, 北京 102206;
4. 太原理工大学煤科学与技术教育部和山西省重点实验室, 山西太原 030024;
5. 清华大学热能工程系, 北京 100084

收稿日期:2015-11-30 修回日期:2016-02-18 出版日期:2016-06-05 发布日期:2016-06-05
通讯作者: 田亚峻
基金资助:
中国工程院工程科技知识中心能源专业知识服务系统建设项目。

New direction of life cycle assessment: GIS-based life cycle assessment

TIAN Yajun¹, DENG Yelin², ZHANG Yueling³, XIE Kechang^4,5

1. National Institute of Clean-and-Low-Carbon Energy, Beijing 102209, China;
2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee 53211, USA;
3. School of Environment and Chemical Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China;
4. Laboratory of Coal Science and Technology, Ministry of Education and Shanxi Province, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, Shanxi, China;
5. Department of Thermal Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

Received:2015-11-30 Revised:2016-02-18 Online:2016-06-05 Published:2016-06-05
Supported by:
supported by theChina Knowledge Center for Engineering Science and Technology: Professional Knowledge Service System for Energy.

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

综述了生命周期评价(LCA)区域化研究的进展,论述了将空间信息数据引入LCA的必要性与可行性,以及GIS(geographical information system)在LCA地域化的重要作用。综述表明GIS能系统有效地组织和管理空间数据,能够管理LCA明细的地域信息、LCA影响的地域信息,从而实现GIS与LCA的结合。在此基础上,进一步提出了基于地理信息的LCA的架构,分析了基于GIS的LCA发展的机遇和挑战。基于地理信息的LCA将突破传统LCA缺乏空间信息的致命缺陷,其结果将更具准确性和科学性,基于地理信息的LCA的绿色设计和管理对企业以及政府将更具可操作性,是生命周期评价方法发展的新方向。

关键词: 生命周期评价, 地理信息, GIS, 数据库, 可持续性, 环境, 能源

Abstract:

The study presents an overview on the development of regionalization of life cycle assessment (LCA). The results of the paper indicate that incorporating spatial information into the process of the life cycle assessment is both necessary and feasible. The GIS (geographical information system), on the other hand, is an important platform to serve the purpose. The paper shows that GIS can effectively align and manage the spatial data in a flexible way, and thus promote the application of regionalized LCA study. The paper proposes a framework for the design of GIS based LCA. By integration GIS and LCA, the accuracy and representativeness of LCA results can be upgraded, which lays a solid foundation for policy making process.

Key words: life cycle assessment, geographic information, GIS, database, sustainability, environment, energy

中图分类号:

X823

田亚峻, 邓业林, 张岳玲, 谢克昌. 生命周期评价的发展新方向:基于GIS的生命周期评价[J]. 化工学报, 2016, 67(6): 2195-2201.

TIAN Yajun, DENG Yelin, ZHANG Yueling, XIE Kechang. New direction of life cycle assessment: GIS-based life cycle assessment[J]. CIESC Journal, 2016, 67(6): 2195-2201.

参考文献 35

[1]	环境保护部环境规划院. 区域煤炭消费总量控制技术、方法与政策体系研究[R]. 北京: 环境保护部, 2012. Chinese Academy for Environmental Planning. Study on technical methods and policy system for regional coal consumption cap[R]. Beijing:Ministry of Environmental Protection, 2012.
[2]	国务院. 大气污染防治行动计划[OL]. [2015/08/22]. http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2013-09/12/content_2486773.htm.State Council. Air pollution prevention and control action plan [OL]. [2015/08/22]. http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2013-09/12/content_2486773.htm.
[3]	国务院. 水污染防治行动计划[OL]. [2015/08/22]. http://zfs.mep. gov.cn/fg/gwyw/201504/t20150416_299146.htm.State Council. Action plan for prevention and control of water pollution[OL]. [2015/08/22]. http://zfs.mep.gov.cn/fg/gwyw/201504/t20150416_299146.htm.
[4]	外交部. 中美气候变化联合声明[OL]. [2015/08/22]. http://www.mfa.gov.cn/chn//pds/ziliao/1179/t1030848.htm.Ministry of Foreign Affairs. China-US joint announcement on climate change[OL]. [2015/08/22]. http://www.mfa.gov.cn/chn//pds/ziliao/1179/t1030848.htm.
[5]	International Organization for Standardization. Environmental management-life cycle assessment-requirements and guidelines:ISO 14044-2006 [S]. Geneva, 2006.
[6]	GUINÉE J. Handbook on life cycle assessment operational guide to the ISO standards [J]. Int. J. LCA, 2002, 7(5): 311-313.
[7]	韩明汉, 金涌. 绿色工程原理与应用[M]. 北京:清华大学出版社, 2005: 1-281. HAN M H, JIN Y. Principle and Application of Green Engineering[M]. Beijing:Tsinghua University Press, 2005: 1-281.
[8]	USGB Council. LEED V4 for building design and construction[S]. Washington DC:US Green Building Council, 2014.
[9]	OBAMA B. Federal leadership in environmental, energy, and economic performance[Z]. Executive Order (13514) of October, 2009.
[10]	BOY D, BRUGIDOU M, HALPERN C, et al. Le Grenelle de l'environnement:Acteurs, Discours, Effets[M]. Paris: Armand Colin, 2012.
[11]	FINKBEINER M. Product environmental footprint-breakthrough or breakdown for policy implementation of life cycle assessment? [J]. Int. J. LCA, 2013, 19(2): 266-271.
[12]	TILLMAN A, EKVALL T, BAUMANN H, et al. Choice of system boundaries in life cycle assessment [J]. J. Clean Prod.,1994, 2(1): 21-29.
[13]	REAP J, ROMAN F, DUNCAN S, et al. A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment [J]. Int. J. LCA, 2008, 13(5): 374-388.
[14]	HUO H, ZHANG Q, WANG M Q, et al. Environmental implication of electric vehicles in China[J]. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2010, 44(13): 4856-4861.
[15]	BOULAY A, MOTOSHITA M, PFISTER S, et al. Analysis of water use impact assessment methods (part A):Evaluation of modeling choices based on a quantitative comparison of scarcity and human health indicators [J]. Int. J. LCA, 2015, 20(13): 139-160.
[16]	ROY P, AZEVEDO L, MARGNI M, et al. Characterization factors for terrestrial acidification at the global scale:a systematic analysis of spatial variability and uncertainty[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2014, 500: 270-276.
[17]	ROSS S, EVANS D. Excluding site-specific data from the LCA inventory:how this affects life cycle impact assessment [J]. Int. J. LCA, 2002, 7(3): 141-150.
[18]	BJÖRKLUND A. Survey of approaches to improve reliability in LCA [J]. Int. J. LCA, 2002, 7(2): 64-72.
[19]	WEIDEMA B, BAUER C, HISCHIER R, et al. Overview and methodology:data quality guideline for the ecoinvent database version 3[R]. St. Gallen:Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, 2013.
[20]	DREYER L C, NIEMANN A L, HAUSCHILD M. Comparison of three different LCIA methods:EDIP97, CML2001 and Eco-indicator 99 [J]. Int. J. LCA, 2003, 8(4): 191-200.
[21]	GOEDKOOP M, HEIJUNGS R, HUIJBREGTS M, et al. ReCiPe 2008-a life cycle assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level[R]. Nederland:Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment, 2008.
[22]	JOLLIET O, MARGNI M, CHARLES R, et al. IMPACT 2002+:a new life cycle impact assessment methodology [J]. Int. J. LCA, 2003, 8(6): 324-330.
[23]	POTTING J, HAUSCHILD M. Predicted environmental impact and expected occurrence[J]. Int. J. LCA,1997, 2(3): 171-177.
[24]	POTTING J, SCHÖPP W, BLOK K, et al. Comparison of the acidifying impact from emissions with different regional origin in life-cycle assessment [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 1998, 61(1): 155-162.
[25]	HAUSCHILD M, POTTING J. Spatial differentiation in life cycle impact assessment-the EDIP2003 methodology[R]. Guidelines from the Danish EPA, Miljøstyrelsen, 2004.
[26]	HAUSCHILD M. Spatial differentiation in life cycle impact assessment:a decade of method development to increase the environmental realism of LCIA [J]. Int. J. LCA, 2006, 11: 11-13.
[27]	MUTEL L, PFISTER S, HELLWEG S. GIS-based regionalized life cycle assessment:how big is small enough? Methodology and case study of electricity generation [J]. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2011, 46(2): 1096-1103.
[28]	KEISUKE N, YUICHI M A, SUZUKI N. Site-dependent life-cycle analysis by the SAME approach: its concept, usefulness, and application to the calculation of embodied impact intensity by means of an input-output analysis [J]. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2005, 39(18): 7318-7328.
[29]	SAAD R, MARGNI M, KOELLNER T, et al. Assessment of land use impacts on soil ecological functions:development of spatially differentiated characterization factors within a Canadian context [J]. Int. J. LCA, 2011, 16(3): 198-211.
[30]	CIVIT B, ARENA A P, ALLENDE D. Determination of regional acidification factors for Argentina [J]. Int. J. LCA, 2014, 19(9): 1632-1642.
[31]	PENNINGTON D, MARGNI M, AMMANN A C, et al. Multimedia fate and human intake modeling: spatial versus nonspatial insights for chemical emissions in Western Europe [J]. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2005, 39(4): 1119-1128.
[32]	HUMBERT S, MANNEH R, SHAKED S, et al. Assessing regional intake fractions in North America [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2009, 407(17): 4812-4820.
[33]	PFISTER S, KOEHLER A, HELLWEG S. Assessing the environmental impacts of freshwater consumption in LCA [J]. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2009, 43(11): 4098-4104.
[34]	PFISTER S, BAYER P, KOEHLER A, et al. Environmental impacts of water use in global crop production:hotspots and trade-offs with land use [J]. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2011, 45(13): 5761-5768.
[35]	KAHRL F, LI Y, SU Y, et al. Greenhouse gas emissions from nitrogen fertilizer use in China [J]. Environmental Science & Policy, 2010, 13(8): 688-694.

生命周期评价的发展新方向:基于GIS的生命周期评价

New direction of life cycle assessment: GIS-based life cycle assessment

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 35

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	段重达, 姚小伟, 朱家华, 孙静, 胡南, 李广悦. 环境因素对克雷白氏杆菌诱导碳酸钙沉淀的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3543-3553.
[2]	吕龙义, 及文博, 韩沐达, 李伟光, 高文芳, 刘晓阳, 孙丽, 王鹏飞, 任芝军, 张光明. 铁基导电材料强化厌氧去除卤代有机污染物：研究进展及未来展望[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3193-3202.
[3]	卫雪岩, 钱勇. 微米级铁粉燃料中低温氧化反应特性及其动力学研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2624-2638.
[4]	陈瑞哲, 程磊磊, 顾菁, 袁浩然, 陈勇. 纤维增强树脂复合材料化学回收技术研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 981-994.
[5]	查坦捷, 杨涵, 秦荷杰, 关小红. 仿生材料的构建及其在水环境化学领域中的研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(2): 585-598.
[6]	黄宽, 马永德, 蔡镇平, 曹彦宁, 江莉龙. 油脂催化加氢转化制备第二代生物柴油研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(1): 380-396.
[7]	鲁文静, 李先锋. 液流电池多孔离子传导膜研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(1): 192-204.
[8]	葛旺鑫, 朱以华, 江宏亮, 李春忠. 二氧化碳电还原的电解质研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(8): 3433-3447.
[9]	李彬, 宋文明, 杨坤龙, 姜爽, 张天永. 水系有机液流电池活性材料的分子工程研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(7): 2806-2818.
[10]	张劢, 田瑶, 郭之旗, 王叶, 窦广进, 宋浩. 光催化-生物杂合系统设计优化用于燃料和化学品绿色合成[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(7): 2774-2789.
[11]	刘庆祎, 肖桐, 孙文杰, 张家豪, 刘昌会. 纳米二氧化钛强化的相变储能研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(5): 1863-1882.
[12]	许世佩, 王超, 李庆远, 张炳康, 许世伟, 张雪琴, 王诗颖, 丛梦晓. 氧化钙对油基钻屑热脱附产物影响的研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(4): 1724-1731.
[13]	王祺, 房阔, 贺聪慧, 王凯军. 流动电极电容去离子技术综述：研究进展与未来挑战[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(3): 975-989.
[14]	宋伟, 李万佳, 俞树荣, 马荣荣. 热力耦合下TC4合金微动磨损行为影响的研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(3): 1324-1334.
[15]	叶茂林, 谭烽华, 李宇萍, 廖玉河, 王晨光, 马隆龙. 农林废弃物气化合成混合醇生命周期环境影响分析[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(3): 1369-1378.