活性炭工艺去除水中典型药品的效能与机理

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2012.04.035

化工学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 63 ›› Issue (4): 1243-1248.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2012.04.035

活性炭工艺去除水中典型药品的效能与机理

乔铁军1,2，张锡辉1，Doris W.T.AU2

1清华大学深圳研究生院，广东深圳518055；2 香港城市大学生物与化学系，中国香港 999077

收稿日期:2011-09-11 修回日期:2011-12-05 出版日期:2012-04-05 发布日期:2012-04-05
通讯作者: 张锡辉

Performance and mechanism of typical pharmaceuticals removed by granular activated carbon from water

QIAO Tiejun1,2, ZHANG Xihui1, Doris W.T.AU2

1Graduate School at Shenzhen, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen 518055，Guangdong,China; 2Department of Biology and Chemistry, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077,China

Received:2011-09-11 Revised:2011-12-05 Online:2012-04-05 Published:2012-04-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 药品和个人护理品（PPCPs）因其潜在的环境和健康风险受到了广泛关注。实验选取8种典型药品为对象，采用中试规模的活性炭工艺研究了其去除效果和影响因素。结果表明，活性炭工艺对安替比林、达舒平、舒必利、磺胺甲口恶唑、泰妙菌素和氧苄胺嘧啶等的去除率为50%～90%，对林肯霉素和氨糖美辛的去除率均小于35%。典型药品的去除率受到滤速、有机物和pH等因素的影响，其中，氨糖美辛、林肯霉素和泰妙菌素等的去除率受滤速影响较大；磺胺甲口恶唑的去除率受pH影响较大。有机物对典型药品去除率的影响既有促进作用，又有抑制作用。典型药品的物化性质对其去除行为有重要影响，这有利于从分子水平上认识活性炭工艺对典型药品的去除机理。

关键词: 药品和个人护理品, 物化性质, 活性炭, 深度处理, 饮用水

Abstract: Pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) are received much attention due to potential adverse environmental & health impacts.The removal efficiencies of eight typical pharmaceuticals were studied in the pilot-scale granular activated carbon (GAC) process.The results showed that GAC removed Antipyrine, Disopramide, Sulpiride, Sulfamethoxazole, Tiamulin and Trimethoprim by approximately 50%—90%, and Indomethacin and Lincomycin by less than 35%.Typical pharmaceuticals removals were affected by filtration velocity, organic matters and pH.The removals of Indomethacin, Lincomycin and Tiamulin were affected mainly by filtration velocity while that of Sulfamethoxazole much by pH.Typical pharmaceuticals removals could be promoted or inhibited by organic matters.The physicochemical properties of typical pharmaceuticals had important influence on their removal efficiency by GAC, which is helpful to understand the removal mechanism of the pharmaceuticals by GAC at the molecular level.

Key words: pharmaceuticals and personal care products（PPCPs), physicochemical properties, activated carbon, advanced treatment process, drinking water

乔铁军1,2，张锡辉1，Doris W.T.AU2. 活性炭工艺去除水中典型药品的效能与机理[J]. 化工学报, 2012, 63(4): 1243-1248.

QIAO Tiejun1,2, ZHANG Xihui1, Doris W.T.AU2. Performance and mechanism of typical pharmaceuticals removed by granular activated carbon from water[J]. CIESC Journal, 2012, 63(4): 1243-1248.

[1]	吕龙义, 及文博, 韩沐达, 李伟光, 高文芳, 刘晓阳, 孙丽, 王鹏飞, 任芝军, 张光明. 铁基导电材料强化厌氧去除卤代有机污染物：研究进展及未来展望[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3193-3202.
[2]	屈园浩, 邓文义, 谢晓丹, 苏亚欣. 活性炭/石墨辅助污泥电渗脱水研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 3038-3050.
[3]	王刚, 车小平, 汪仕勇, 邱介山. 水溶性带电聚合物黏结剂修饰炭电极用于增强电容去离子性能[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(4): 1763-1771.
[4]	刘立, 蒋鹏, 王伟, 张同桓, 穆立文, 陆小华, 朱家华. 基于过程模拟和随机森林模型的生物质制氢过程因素分析与预测[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(11): 5230-5239.
[5]	张超, 陈健, 殷文华, 沈圆辉, 钮朝阳, 余秀鑫, 张东辉, 唐忠利. 变压吸附氢气纯化过程瞬态分析[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(1): 308-321.
[6]	演康, 杨颂, 刘守军, 杨超, 樊惠玲, 上官炬. 低阶煤原位制备ZnO基活性炭脱硫剂[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(9): 4921-4930.
[7]	王晶, 韩巧宁, 雷以廷, 唐曼, 陈丽红, 车俊达, 刘祖广. 一步法制备富氧木质素活性炭及其亚甲基蓝吸附性能[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(5): 2826-2836.
[8]	蒋雯雯, 聂鹏飞, 胡彬, 李菁菁, 刘建允. Al₂O₃/AC正极选择性电容吸附水中氟离子[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(5): 2817-2825.
[9]	焦帅, 杨磊, 武婷婷, 李宏强, 吕辉鸿, 何孝军. 混合盐模板法制备超级电容器用氮掺杂分级多孔碳纳米片[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(5): 2869-2877.
[10]	苏银海,张书平,刘凌沁,熊源泉. 活性炭催化热解纤维素协同制备酚类和合成气[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(10): 5206-5217.
[11]	周毅,王永洪,张新儒,李晋平. PEBA/氮硫共掺杂多孔碳球混合基质膜的制备及CO₂分离性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(10): 5237-5246.
[12]	张正义,张千,楼紫阳,刘伟,朱宇楠,袁春波,于潇,赵天涛. 催化臭氧氧化处理渗滤液RO浓液的氧化特性及光谱分析[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(10): 5362-5371.
[13]	李庆斯, 张雷. 血液灌流吸附剂材料的研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(S2): 12-23.
[14]	徐晓倩, 程俊霞, 朱亚明, 高丽娟, 赖仕全, 赵雪飞. 针状焦基电容器碳质电极材料的制备及电化学性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(6): 2830-2839.
[15]	毕宏晖, 焦帅, 魏风, 何孝军. 珊瑚状氮掺杂多孔碳的制备及其超电容性能[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(6): 2880-2888.

活性炭工艺去除水中典型药品的效能与机理

Performance and mechanism of typical pharmaceuticals removed by granular activated carbon from water

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价