1.5 kW质子交换膜燃料电池堆动态工况响应特性

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2013.04.035

化工学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 64 ›› Issue (4): 1380-1386.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2013.04.035

1.5 kW质子交换膜燃料电池堆动态工况响应特性

汪飞杰^1,2, 杨代军^1,2, 张浩^1,2, 马建新^1,2

1. 同济大学汽车学院,上海201804;
2. 同济大学新能源汽车工程中心,上海 201804

收稿日期:2012-07-20 修回日期:2012-08-23 出版日期:2013-04-05 发布日期:2013-04-05
通讯作者: 杨代军
作者简介:汪飞杰(1989—),男,硕士研究生。
基金资助:
国家高技术研究发展计划项目(2012AA110501,2013BAG15B00);同济大学汉高教席资金。

Response features of a 1.5 kW proton exchange membrane fuel cell stack for dynamic cycle

WANG Feijie^1,2, YANG Daijun^1,2, ZHANG Hao^1,2, MA Jianxin^1,2

1. College of Automotive Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China;
2. Clean Energy Automotive Engineering Center, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China

Received:2012-07-20 Revised:2012-08-23 Online:2013-04-05 Published:2013-04-05
Supported by:
supported by the High-tech Research and Development Program of China(2012AA110501,2013BAG15B00).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 考察了自制1.5 kW质子交换膜燃料电池(PEMFC)电堆在动态工况下的性能。研究了PEMFC电堆电压、功率、反应参数随车载工况运行出现的响应情况。发现在大电流密度下,由于各单电池的差异,电堆电压和功率出现比较明显的波动现象。在选定两个工况周期中,电堆各单电池电压的差异系数C_V最大达到4.23%,最高单电池电压和最低单电池电压相差0.106 V。数据分析表明在该动态工况下,PEMFC电堆的动态响应特性受到反应物和电堆温度变化、空气局部流量过大或不足以及电堆内部阳极和阴极出现明显压降等因素的影响。该研究不仅为后续耐久性测试提供分析依据,还对PEMFC电堆实际车载运行参数与控制策略的优化具有指导意义。

关键词: 质子交换膜燃料电池, 动态工况, 动态响应特性

Abstract: The performance of a homemade 1.5 kW proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) stack was evaluated under dynamic drive cycle, and the variation features (response) of PEMFC stack voltage, power and reaction parameters were investigated at various onboard operation modes.It is found that there is more obvious fluctuation of stack power and voltage at high current densities due to difference between single cells.The highest variation coefficient (C_V) is 4.23% for two dynamic drive cycle periods; the difference value between the maximum and the minimum cell voltage is 0.106 V.Data analysis indicates that PEMFC stack performance could be affected by some factors such as temperature changes of reactants and cell stack, air overflow or starvation, obvious pressure drop between anode and cathode, etc.This research could not only provide a basis for measurement and analysis of durability, but also is of important significance for parameter optimization of PEMFC running onboard

Key words: PEMFC, drive cycle, dynamic response

中图分类号:

TM911.48

汪飞杰, 杨代军, 张浩, 马建新. 1.5 kW质子交换膜燃料电池堆动态工况响应特性[J]. 化工学报, 2013, 64(4): 1380-1386.

WANG Feijie, YANG Daijun, ZHANG Hao, MA Jianxin. Response features of a 1.5 kW proton exchange membrane fuel cell stack for dynamic cycle[J]. CIESC Journal, 2013, 64(4): 1380-1386.

参考文献 16

[1]	Wang Xiaoshan(汪小姗), Zhang Jinfang(张锦芳), Zhang Caizhi(张财智), Han Ming(韩明).Experiment of pulsation hydrogen passing into PEMFC[J].CIESC Journal(化工学报), 2012, 63(1):237-243
[2]	Miller M, Bazylak A.A review of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell stack testing[J].Journal of Power Sources, 2011, 196(2):601-613
[3]	Yang D J, Li B, Zhang H, Zheng J S, Lin R, Ma J X.The application of Ir-V/C catalyst as a durable anode catalyst for a 1.5 kW proton exchange membrane fuel cell stack[J].Journal of Power Sources, 2012, 199(1):68-74
[4]	Chen J X, Zhou B.Diagnosis of PEM fuel cell stack dynamic behaviors[J].Journal of Power Sources, 2008, 177(1):83-95
[5]	Amphlett J C, Mann R F, Peppley B A, Roberge P R, Rodrigues A.A model predicting transient responses of proton exchange membrane fuel cells[J].Journal of Power Sources, 1996, 61(1):183-188
[6]	Shimpalee S, Lee W, van Zee J W, Naseri Neshat H.Predicting the transient response of a serpentine flow-field PEMFC[J].Journal of Power Sources, 2006, 156 (2):355-368
[7]	Kim H I, Cho C Y, Nam J H, Shin D, Chung T Y.A simple dynamic model for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell(PEMFC)power modules:parameter estimation and model prediction[J].International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2010, 35(8):3656-3663
[8]	Philipps S P, Ziegler C.Computationally efficient modeling of the dynamic behavior of a portable PEM fuel cell stack[J].Journal of Power Sources, 2008, 180(1):309-321
[9]	Perez A, Abtahi A, Zilouchian A.Experimental analysis of pulsing techniques in a proton exchange fuel cell[J].Journal of Power Sources, 2011, 196 (3):1030-1035
[10]	Wang Cheng(王诚), Mao Zongqiang(毛宗强), Xie Xiaofeng(谢晓峰), Wang Lisheng(王利生), Wang Yaowu(王要武), Yang Lizhai(杨立寨).Dynamic characteristics of fuel cell stack[J].Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering(China)(化工学报), 2004, 55:234-237
[11]	Hamelin J, Agbossou K, Laperriere A, Laurencelle F, Bose T K.Dynamic behavior of a PEM fuel cell stack for stationary applications[J].International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2001, 26(6):625-629
[12]	Corbo P, Migliardini F, Veneri O.Dynamic behaviour of hydrogen fuel cells for automotive application[J].Renewable Energy, 2009, 34(8):1955-1961
[13]	Philipps P, Simons G, Schiefer K.Dynamic investigation of PEFC stacks in interaction with the air supply system[J].Journal of Power Sources, 2006, 154 (2):412-419
[14]	Alejandro J R, Arce A, Bordons C.Development and experimental validation of a PEM fuel cell dynamic model[J].Journal of Power Sources, 2007, 173(1):310-324
[15]	Jung G B, Lo K F, Su A, Weng F B, Tu C H, Yang T F, Chan S H.Experimental evaluation of an ambient forced-feed air-supply PEM fuel cell[J].International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2008, 33(12):2980- 2985
[16]	Corbo P, Migliardini F, Veneri O.Performance investigation of 2.4 kW PEM fuel cell stack in vehicles[J].International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2007, 32 (17):4340-4349

1.5 kW质子交换膜燃料电池堆动态工况响应特性

Response features of a 1.5 kW proton exchange membrane fuel cell stack for dynamic cycle

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 16

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李艺彤, 郭航, 陈浩, 叶芳. 催化剂非均匀分布的质子交换膜燃料电池操作条件研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3831-3840.
[2]	雍加望, 赵倩倩, 冯能莲. 基于非线性动态模型的质子交换膜燃料电池故障诊断[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 3983-3993.
[3]	王茹, 沈永超, 卫东, 郭倩. 基于直流内阻和交流阻抗特性的PEMFC水管理状态分析[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(7): 3247-3257.
[4]	朱晓兵, 张建辉, 李小松, 刘景林, 刘剑豪, 金灿. 空气源电化学连续分离制氧(Ⅰ):单池性能优化[J]. 化工学报, 2016, 67(5): 2022-2032.
[5]	聂瑶, 丁炜, 魏子栋. 质子交换膜燃料电池非铂电催化剂研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(9): 3305-3318.
[6]	彭跃进, 彭赟, 李伦, 刘志祥, 陈维荣. 质子交换膜燃料电池电源系统停机特性及控制策略[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(3): 1178-1184.
[7]	沈俊, 周兵, 邱子朝, 涂正凯, 刘志春, 刘伟. 质子交换膜燃料电池强化传质[J]. 化工学报, 2014, 65(S1): 421-425.
[8]	蔡光旭1，2，郭建伟2，王佳1. 交流阻抗技术在质子交换膜燃料电池上的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2014, 33(01): 56-63.
[9]	卜永东, 沈寅麒, 杜小泽, 杨立军, 杨勇平. 仿蜂巢微通道分叉结构的甲醇重整制氢[J]. 化工学报, 2013, 64(6): 2177-2185.
[10]	戴丽萍，熊俊俏，刘海英. 杂质气体对质子交换膜燃料电池性能影响的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2013, 32(09): 2068-2076.
[11]	刘靖1，万忠民1，4，万军华1，丁刚强2，涂正凯3，刘伟4. 中压氢-氧质子交换膜燃料电池的运行特性[J]. 化工学报, 2012, 63(S1): 204-207.
[12]	屈树国，李建隆. 高温质子交换膜燃料电池用离子液体聚合物电解质的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2012, 31(12): 2660-2665.
[13]	汪小姗1，张锦芳1，张财智2，韩明2. 质子交换膜燃料电池的脉动进氢实验[J]. 化工学报, 2012, 63(1): 237-243.
[14]	李微微1,2，尚玉明2，王树博2，谢晓峰2，吕亚非1. AB-PBI分子量对高温膜燃料电池膜电极性能的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2011, 62(S2): 131-134.
[15]	曹涛锋, 林鸿, 陶文铨. 质子交换膜燃料电池温度和电流分布同步测定 [J]. 化工学报, 2011, 62(S1): 174-178.