Improved intelligent warning method based on MWSPCA-CBR and its application in petrochemical industries

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20181340

Abstract

Abstract:

The petroleum drilling project is a high-risk and costly system project. To effectively scan for potential problems of drilling, reduce non-productive time and lower related risks, this paper proposes an improved intelligent warning method based on moving window sparse principal component analysis (MWSPCA) integrating case-based reasoning (CBR) (MWSPCA-CBR). First, the MWSPCA is used to analyze the real-time data in the drilling process, and the time of occurrence of the anomaly is quickly located. Then the abnormal data is analyzed by using the CBR method to give possible exception types, and the associated handling methods are provided for monitoring experts. Finally, the proposed method is applied to intelligent warn abnormal problems of the petroleum drilling, the experimental results verify the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method and provide new ideas for reducing risks and costs during the petroleum drilling process.

Key words: principal component analysis, case-based reasoning, intelligent warning method, petroleum drilling process, process control, model-predictive control

摘要：

石油钻井是一项高风险性、耗资巨大的系统工程。为了智能预警石油钻井过程中的异常，缩短非生产时间，降低相关风险，提出一种基于移动窗稀疏主元分析法（MWSPCA）的案例推理（CBR）异常智能预警方法（MWSPCA-CBR）。首先利用MWSPCA算法分析钻井过程中的实时数据，快速定位出异常可能发生的时间，然后使用基于案例推理方法分析异常数据，确定可能的异常类型，并为实时监控专家提供相关异常的处理方法。所提方法应用到石油钻井过程异常预警中，实验结果验证了所提方法的可行性和有效性，为钻井过程降低风险成本提供了新思路。

关键词: 主元分析, 基于案例推理, 智能预警方法, 石油钻井过程, 过程控制, 模型预测控制

CLC Number:

TP 29

Zhiqiang GENG, Shaoxing JING, Ju BAI, Zhongkai WANG, Qunxiong ZHU, Yongming HAN. Improved intelligent warning method based on MWSPCA-CBR and its application in petrochemical industries[J]. CIESC Journal, 2019, 70(2): 572-580.

耿志强, 景邵星, 白菊, 王仲凯, 朱群雄, 韩永明. 基于MWSPCA-CBR的智能预警方法研究及其在石化工业中的应用[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(2): 572-580.

Figures/Tables 9

References 33

1	张正选, 梅大成, 高杰, 等. 钻井工程异常预警方法研究[J]. 计算机光盘软件与应用, 2014, 17(4): 152-152.
	ZhangZ X, MeiD C, GaoJ, et al. Research on abnormity warning method in drilling engineering [J]. Computer CD Software and Applications, 2014, 17(4): 152-152.
2	GaoF, ZhaoX H, LiuH S, et al. The study of drilling safe monitoring system based on multi agent group [C]// Advanced Materials Research. Trans. Tech. Publications, 2012, 512: 2565-2569.
3	王林. 钻井故障诊断专家系统的研究与实现[D]. 成都: 电子科技大学, 2013.
	WangL. The research and implementation of drilling fault diagnosis expert system [D]. Chengdu: University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 2013.
4	胡睿. 钻井复杂情况与事故诊断专家系统研究[D]. 青岛: 中国石油大学(华东), 2010.
	HuR. Research on drilling complex incidents and accident diagnosis based on expert system [D].Qingdao: China University of Petroleum, 2010.
5	张学洪, 李黔. 基于案例推理的井漏风险预警方法[J]. 断块油气田, 2017, 24(2): 255-258, 263.
	ZhangX H, LiQ. Risk pre-warning method of well leakage based on case reasoning [J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2017, 24(2): 255-258, 263.
6	徐术国. 基于录井数据的钻井事故预警专家系统[D].北京: 中国石油大学(北京), 2011.
	XuS G. Drilling accident warning expert system based on logging data [D]. Beijing: China University of Petroleum, 2011.
7	马鹏鹏, 周英操, 蒋宏伟, 等. 钻井风险控制系统关键技术[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2014, 42(3): 16-21.
	MaP P, ZhouY C, JiangH W, et al. Key technology for drilling risk control system [J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2014, 42(3): 16-21.
8	FerreiroS, SierraB, IrigoienI, et al. Data mining for quality control: Burr detection in the drilling process[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2011, 60(4): 801-810.
9	袁俊和. 钻井过程中的故障诊断方法研究[D]. 青岛: 中国石油大学(华东), 2008.
	YuanJ H. Study of fault diagnosis methods in well drilling process [D]. Qingdao: China University of Petroleum, 2008.
10	张东海, 席继强. 国外钻井技术发展现状[J]. 断块油气田, 2000, 7(5): 64-68.
	ZhangD H, XiJ Q. Development status of foreign drilling technology [J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2000, 7(5): 64-68.
11	RamamurthiK, ShaverD P, AgoginoA M. Real time expert system for predictive diagnostics and control of drilling operation[C]//Artificial Intelligence Applications, 1990. Sixth Conference on. IEEE, 1990: 62-69.
12	LaiZ, LengY. Weak-signal detection based on the stochastic resonance of bistable Duffing oscillator and its application in incipient fault diagnosis[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2016, 81: 60-74.
13	KedadoucheM, ThomasM, TahanA. A comparative study between empirical wavelet transforms and empirical mode decomposition methods: application to bearing defect diagnosis [J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2016, 81: 88-107.
14	连晓圆. 钻井过程中故障检测与诊断方法的研究[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2013.
	LianX Y. Fault detection and diagnosis method in drilling process[D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2013.
15	孙正义, 高兴坤. 钻井卡钻事故预测及诊断专家系统模型的建立与实现[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 1996, 18(1): 20-23.
	SunZ Y, GaoX K. The establishment and implementation of drilling accident prediction and the model of diagnosis expert system [J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 1996, 18(1): 20-23.
16	王宝毅, 张宝生, 费沿光, 等. 基于案例推理的钻井复杂情况专家系统[J]. 石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 29(6): 123-126.
	WangB Y, ZhangB S, FeiY G, et al. A drilling troubles expert system based on case-based reasoning [J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science), 2005, 29(6): 123- 126.
17	郭建明, 李琪, 徐英卓. 基于实例和规则集成推理的钻井事故诊断处理系统[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2007, 35(3): 15-18.
	GuoJ M, LiQ, XuY Z. Drilling accident diagnosis and treatment system based on case and rule integration reasoning [J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2007, 35(3): 15-18.
18	高晓荣, 徐英卓, 李琪. 基于CBR的井下复杂情况与事故智能诊断和处理系统[J]. 计算机应用研究, 2008, (5): 1446-1449.
	GaoX R, XuY Z, LiQ. Intelligent diagnosis and processing system of complex situation in well and accident based on CBR [J]. Computer Application and Research, 2008, (5): 1446-1449.
19	郭伟伟. 基于故障树技术的远程故障诊断专家系统的研究[D]. 西安: 西北工业大学, 2007.
	GuoW W. Research on remote fault diagnosis expert system based on fault tree technology [D]. Xi an: Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2007.
20	倪绍徐, 张裕芳, 易宏, 等. 基于故障树的智能故障诊断方法[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2008, 42(8): 1372-1375.
	NiS X, ZhangY F, YiH, et al. Intelligent fault diagnosis method based on fault tree [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2008, 42(8): 1372-1375.
21	郭建明, 王彦平. 基于钻井工艺过程的事故诊断智能分析模型研究[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 27(3): 50-53.
	GuoJ M, WangY P. Research on accident diagnosis intelligent analysis model based on drilling process [J]. Journal of Xi an Petroleum University, 2012, 27(3): 50-53.
22	JolliffeI T. Principal component analysis and factor analysis [M]//Principal Component Analysis. New York: Springer, 1986: 115-128.
23	董顺, 李益国, 孙栓柱, 等. 基于状态空间主成分分析网络的故障检测方法[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(8): 3528-3536.
	DongS, LiY G, SunS Z, et al. Fault detection method based on state space-PCANet [J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(8): 3528-3536.
24	CuiK, GaoQ, ZhangH, et al. Merging model-based two-dimensional principal component analysis[J]. Neurocomputing, 2015, 168: 1198-1206.
25	张媛媛, 韩少廷, 耿志强, 等. 自适应移动窗递推 PCA 过程监测方法研究[J]. 计算机与应用化学, 2011, (8): 1022-1026.
	ZhangY Y, HanS T, GengZ Q, et al. Study on adaptive moving window recursive principal component analysis for process monitoring [J]. Computers and Applied Chemistry, 2011, (8): 1022-1026.
26	胡云鹏. 基于主元分析的传感器故障检测盲区预测[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(4): 1510-1515.
	HuY P. Blind zone prediction for PCA-based sensor fault detection [J].CIESC Journal, 2017, 68(4): 1510-1515.
27	彭必灿, 张正道. 基于稀疏主元分析的过程监控研究[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2014, (18): 240-245.
	PengB C, ZhangZ D. Process monitoring research based on sparse principal component analysis [J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2014, (18): 240-245.
28	赵忠盖, 刘飞. 基于稀疏核主元分析的在线非线性过程监控[J]. 化工学报, 2008, 59(7): 1773-1777.
	ZhaoZ G, LiuF. Online nonlinear process monitoring based on sparse kernel principal component analysis [J]. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering(China), 2008, 59(7): 1773-1777.
29	ZassR, ShashuaA. Nonnegative sparse PCA [C]// Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 2006.
30	阮跃. 基于案例, 规则和模型推理的电站智能诊断系统[J]. 电站系统工程, 1998, 14(3): 45-47.
	RuanY. Intelligent diagnosis system of power plant based on case, rule and inferential model [J]. Power System Engineering, 1998, 14(3): 45-47.
31	张琦, 孙劭文, 李文鸿, 等. 基于案例推理的机械故障诊断方法探讨[J]. 解放军理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 5(5): 42-45.
	ZhangQ, SunS W, LiW H, et al. Case-based reasoning for mechanical fault diagnosis [J]. Journal of PLA University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2004, 5(5): 42-45.
32	李亚宁, 王学雷, 谭杰. 基于 PCR-多案例融合的焦化烟气脱硝过程指标优化设定[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(3): 998-1007.
	LiY N, WangX L, TanJ. PCR-multi-case fusion method for setting optimal process indices of coking flue gas denitration [J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(3): 998-1007.
33	柳玉, 贲可荣. 案例推理的故障诊断技术研究综述[J].计算机科学与探索, 2011, 5(10): 865-879.
	LiuY, BenK R. Survey of fault diagnosis based on case reasoning [J]. Journal of Frontiers of Computer Science and Technology, 2011, 5(10): 865-879.

名称	内容
案例时间	2014/01/10 19:25
异常名称	悬重参数异常
异常类型	工程异常
异常地层	馆陶组
异常井深	1489.21 m
异常描述	2014年1月10日19:25时正常钻进至井深1489.21 m，迟深1489.00 m。测斜后下钻过程中钻头位置到达1479.65 m时，大钩下放时悬重由正常的480 kN下降至260 kN，大钩上提时悬重由正常的480 kN上升至660 kN，出现粘卡现象。当班人员立即通知井队当班干部及工程监督。
关键词	钻进，下钻，大钩下放，大钩负荷下降，大钩上提，大钩负荷上升
异常结论	粘卡（属卡钻中的一种）

名称	内容
案例时间	2014/01/10 19:25
异常名称	悬重参数异常
异常类型	工程异常
异常地层	馆陶组
异常井深	1489.21 m
异常描述	2014年1月10日19:25时正常钻进至井深1489.21 m，迟深1489.00 m。测斜后下钻过程中钻头位置到达1479.65 m时，大钩下放时悬重由正常的480 kN下降至260 kN，大钩上提时悬重由正常的480 kN上升至660 kN，出现粘卡现象。当班人员立即通知井队当班干部及工程监督。
关键词	钻进，下钻，大钩下放，大钩负荷下降，大钩上提，大钩负荷上升
异常结论	粘卡（属卡钻中的一种）

关键词相似度	井深相似度	数据相似度	总相似度	案例名
0.82	0.76	0.86	0.49	案例1
0.82	0.51	0.85	0.45	案例9
0.77	0.55	0.85	0.44	案例8
0.82	0.45	0.87	0.44	案例4
0.82	0.45	0.86	0.44	案例5
0.77	0.46	0.87	0.43	案例2
0.77	0.57	0.75	0.42	案例7
0.77	0.46	0.75	0.40	案例3
0.82	0.45	0.69	0.40	案例6

关键词相似度	井深相似度	数据相似度	总相似度	案例名
0.82	0.76	0.86	0.49	案例1
0.82	0.51	0.85	0.45	案例9
0.77	0.55	0.85	0.44	案例8
0.82	0.45	0.87	0.44	案例4
0.82	0.45	0.86	0.44	案例5
0.77	0.46	0.87	0.43	案例2
0.77	0.57	0.75	0.42	案例7
0.77	0.46	0.75	0.40	案例3
0.82	0.45	0.69	0.40	案例6

[1]	Yue CAO, Chong YU, Zhi LI, Minglei YANG. Industrial data driven transition state detection with multi-mode switching of a hydrocracking unit [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(9): 3841-3854.
[2]	Fei KANG, Weiguang LYU, Feng JU, Zhi SUN. Research on discharge path and evaluation of spent lithium-ion batteries [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(9): 3903-3911.
[3]	Guang WANG, Fashun SHAN, Yucheng QIAN, Jianfang JIAO. Incipient fault detection method for chemical process based on ensemble learning transfer entropy [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(7): 2967-2978.
[4]	Xiaodan SU, Ganyu ZHU, Huiquan LI, Guangming ZHENG, Ziheng MENG, Fang LI, Yunrui YANG, Benjun XI, Yu CUI. Optimization of wet process phosphoric acid hemihydrate process and crystallization of gypsum [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(4): 1805-1817.
[5]	Zhongqiu ZHANG, Hongguang LI, Yilin SHI. A multi-task learning approach for complex chemical processes based on manual predictive manipulating strategies [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(3): 1195-1204.
[6]	Jianghuai ZHANG, Zhong ZHAO. Robust minimum covariance constrained control for C₃ hydrogenation process and application [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(3): 1216-1227.
[7]	Weiyi SU, Jiahui DING, Chunli LI, Honghai WANG, Yanjun JIANG. Research progress of enzymatic reactive crystallization [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(2): 617-629.
[8]	Taoyan ZHAO, Jiangtao CAO, Ping LI, Lin FENG, Yu SHANG. Application of interval type-2 fuzzy immune PID controller to temperature control system for uncatalysed oxidation of cyclohexane [J]. CIESC Journal, 2022, 73(7): 3166-3173.
[9]	Le ZHOU, Chengkai SHEN, Chao WU, Beiping HOU, Zhihuan SONG. Deep fusion feature extraction network and its application in chemical process soft sensing [J]. CIESC Journal, 2022, 73(7): 3156-3165.
[10]	Kun WANG, Hongbo SHI, Shuai TAN, Bing SONG, Yang TAO. Local time difference constrained neighborhood preserving embedding algorithm for fault detection [J]. CIESC Journal, 2022, 73(7): 3109-3119.
[11]	Jiansong WANG, Feng XU, Xionglin LUO. Controller parameter self-tuning when control loop mode switching for multi-loop PID control system of chemical process [J]. CIESC Journal, 2022, 73(4): 1647-1657.
[12]	Libang LIU, Song YANG, Zhijian WANG, Xinxin HE, Wenlei ZHAO, Shoujun LIU, Wenguang DU, Jie MI. Prediction of coke quality based on improved WOA-LSTM [J]. CIESC Journal, 2022, 73(3): 1291-1299.
[13]	Cheng ZHANG, Lizhi PAN, Yuan LI. Fault detection and diagnosis method based on weighted statistical feature KICA [J]. CIESC Journal, 2022, 73(2): 827-837.
[14]	Xingshuo ZHANG, Xionglin LUO, Feng XU. Simulation closer to commercial process and prior process analysis based control loop configuration of FCCU reactor-regenerator system [J]. CIESC Journal, 2022, 73(2): 747-758.
[15]	Daoming LU, Zhaoting TANG, Yiping FAN, Chunxi LU. Performance of large-difference-particle air classifier [J]. CIESC Journal, 2021, 72(8): 4184-4195.