1 Marshall, A.D., Munro, P.A., “The effect of protein foul-ing in microfiltration and ultrafiltration on permeate flux, protein retention and selectivity: A literature review”, Desalination, 91, 65—108(1993).
2 Fievet, P., Szymczyk, A., Aoubiza, B., Pagetti, J., “Evaluation of three methods for the characterisation of the membrane-solution interface: Streaming potential, membrane potential and electrolyte conductivity inside pores”, J. Membr. Sci., 168, 87—100(2000).
3 Kim, K.J., Fane, A.G., Nystrom, M., Pihlajamaki, A., Bowen, W.R., Mukhtar, H., “Evaluation of electroosmo-sis and streaming potential for measurement of electric charges of polymeric membranes”, J. Membr. Sci., 116, 149—159(1996).
4 Hunter, R.J., Zeta Potential in Colloid Science, Princi-ples and Applications, Academic Press, London (1981).
5 Lyklema, H., Fundamentals of Interface and Colloid Science: PartⅡSolid-Fluid Interfaces, Academic Press, London (1981).
6 Ariza, M.J., Benavente, J., “Electrokinetic and electro-chemical characterizations of porous membranes”, Col-loid. Surf., 189, 247—256(2001).
7 Nystrom, M., Pihlajamaki, A., Ehsami, N., “Characteri-zation of ultrafiltration membranes by simultaneous streaming potential and flux measurements”, J. Membr. Sci., 87, 245—256(1994).
8 Burns, D.B., Zydney, A.L., “Buffer effect on the zeta po-tential of ultrafiltration membranes”, J. Membr. Sci., 172, 39—48(2000).
9 Ricq, L., Pierre, A., Reggiani, J.C., “Use of electropho-retic mobility and streaming potential measurements to characterize electrokinetic properties of ultrafiltration and microfiltration membranes”, Colloid. Surf., 138, 301—308 (1998).
10 Chapman Wilbert, M., Delagah, S., Pellegrino, J., “Vari-ance of streaming potential measurements”, J. Membr. Sci., 161, 247—261(1999).
11 Zhao, Z.P., Wang, Z., Wang, S.C., “Formation, charged characteristic and BSA adsorption behavior of carboxy-methyl chitosan/PES composite MF membrane”, J. Membr. Sci., 217, 151—158(2003).
12 Combe, C., Molis, E., Lucas, P., Riley, R., Clark, M.M., “The effect of CA membrane properties on adsorptive fouling by humic acid”, J. Membr. Sci., 154, 73—87(1999).
13 Szymczyk, A., Fievet, P., Reggiani, J.C., Pagetti, J., “Characterisation of surface properties of ceramic mem-branes by streaming and membrane potentials”, J. Membr. Sci., 146, 277—284(1998).
14 Möckl, D., Staude, E., Dal-Cin, M., Darcovich, K., Guiver, M., “Tangential flow streaming potential meas-urements: Hydrodynamic cell characterization and zeta potentials of carboxylated polysulfone membranes”, J. Membr. Sci., 145, 211—222(1998).
15 Chidress, A.E., Elimelech, M., “Effect of solution chem-istry on the surface charge of polymeric reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes”, J. Membr. Sci., 119, 253—268(1996).
16 Peeters, J.M.M., Mulder, M.H.V., Strathmann, H., “Streaming potential measurements as a characterization method for nanofiltration membranes”, Colloid. Surfaces, 150, 247—259(1999).
17 Ariza, M.J., Benavente, J., “Streaming potential along the surface of polysulfone membranes: A comparative study between two different experimental systems and determination of electrokinetic and adsorption parame-ters”, J. Membr. Sci., 190, 119—132(2001).
18 Ye, N., Wang, Z., Zhao, Z.P., Wang, S.C., “Effects of membrane morphology, membrane fouling and concen-tration polarization on streaming potential”, J. Chem. Ind. Eng. (China), 53, 447—449(2002). (in Chinese)
19 Shannon, R.D., Prewitt, C.T., “Revised effective ionic radii and systematic studies of interatomic distances in halides and chalcogenides”, Acta Crystallogr., A32, 751 (1976).
|
