Monte Carlo simulation of effect of MoO3 doping on Cu(Ⅱ) adsorption of silica

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20180968

CIESC Journal ›› 2019, Vol. 70 ›› Issue (1): 355-359.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20180968

• Material science and engineering, nanotechnology • Previous Articles Next Articles

Monte Carlo simulation of effect of MoO₃ doping on Cu(Ⅱ) adsorption of silica

Jiao WANG¹(),Zhejunyu JIN¹,Kaining DING³,Weiwei ZHAO¹,Xiaohua PU¹,Zongxiao LI^1,²()

1. College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Baoji University of Arts and Sciences, Baoji 721013, Shaanxi, China
2. Xi an Traffic Engineering Institute, Xi an 710300, Shaanxi, China
3. Department of Chemistry, Research Institute of Photocatalysis, State Key Laboratory of Photocatalysis on Energy and Environment, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350116, Fujian, China

Received:2018-08-30 Revised:2018-10-08 Online:2019-01-05 Published:2019-01-05
Contact: Zongxiao LI

MoO₃掺杂对二氧化硅吸附Cu(Ⅱ)影响的Monte Carlo模拟

王姣¹(),金哲珺雨¹,丁开宁³,赵微微¹,蒲小华¹,李宗孝^1,²()

1. 宝鸡文理学院化学化工学院，陕西宝鸡 721013
2. 西安交通工程学院，陕西西安 710300
3. 福州大学光化学研究所化学系，能源与环境光催化国家重点实验室，福建福州 350116

通讯作者: 李宗孝
作者简介:王姣（1992—），女，硕士研究生，<email>18791869412@163.com</email>|李宗孝（1954—），男，教授，<email>mingtian8001@163.com</email>
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(51702006);陕西省植物化学重点实验室项目(17JS009);陕西省科技计划项目(2018JQ2056);陕西省高校科协青年人才托举计划项目(20170707);宝鸡文理学院博士科研启动项目(ZK2017026);国家自然科学基金青年基金项目（51702006）；陕西省植物化学重点实验室项目（17JS009）；陕西省科技计划项目（2018JQ2056）；陕西省高校科协青年人才托举计划项目（20170707）；宝鸡文理学院博士科研启动项目（ZK2017026）

Abstract

Abstract:

The adsorption behavior of Cu(Ⅱ) on silica and molybdenum doped silica was simulated by Monte Carlo method. The results show that Cu(Ⅱ) is adsorbed on the surface of the nanomaterial and the interatomic space. It is found that adding a small amount of molybdenum oxide to silica does not significantly change the adsorption capacity of Cu(Ⅱ). At the same time, the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) density functional theory (DFT) was used to verify the process, and the adsorption behavior of Cu(Ⅱ) in water by silica and molybdenum doped silica was verified by microcalorimetry. It was found that the adsorption process had ΔH<0, ΔS<0, van der Waals force as the adsorption driving force, and the molecular simulation was consistent with the experimental results.

Key words: Monte Carlo simulation, Density Function theory, adsorption, Cu(Ⅱ), microcalorimetry

摘要：

利用Monte Carlo方法，分别模拟二氧化硅和钼掺杂二氧化硅对Cu(Ⅱ)的吸附行为。结果表明，Cu(Ⅱ)被吸附于该纳米材料的表面和原子间隙之中；模拟发现加入少量氧化钼于二氧化硅中不会显著改变对Cu(Ⅱ)的吸附能力。同时采用广义梯度近似(GGA)的密度泛函理论(DFT)对其过程进行验证，并通过微量热技术佐证了二氧化硅及钼掺杂二氧化硅对水中Cu(Ⅱ)的吸附行为，实验发现，吸附过程的ΔH<0，ΔS<0，范德华力为吸附驱动力，分子模拟与实验结果相吻合。

关键词: Monte Carlo模拟, 密度泛函理论, 吸附, Cu(Ⅱ), 微量热技术

CLC Number:

O 642.4

Jiao WANG, Zhejunyu JIN, Kaining DING, Weiwei ZHAO, Xiaohua PU, Zongxiao LI. Monte Carlo simulation of effect of MoO₃ doping on Cu(Ⅱ) adsorption of silica[J]. CIESC Journal, 2019, 70(1): 355-359.

王姣, 金哲珺雨, 丁开宁, 赵微微, 蒲小华, 李宗孝. MoO₃掺杂对二氧化硅吸附Cu(Ⅱ)影响的Monte Carlo模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(1): 355-359.

Figures/Tables 5

References 30

1	Amrute A P , Bordoloi A , Lucas N , et al . Gel synthesis of MoO₃/SiO₂ composite for catalytic application in condensation of anisole with paraformaldehyde[J]. Catalysis Letters. 2008, 126: 286-292.
2	张谊华, 徐奕德, 石映祯, 等 . MoO₃/γ-Al₂O₃催化剂的分子层特性表征[J]. 催化学报, 1987, 8(1): 27-32.
	Zhang Y H , Xu Y D , Shi Y Z , et al . Molecular layer characterization of MoO₃/γ-Al₂O₃ catalyst[J]. Journal of Catalysis, 1987, 8(1): 27-32.
3	Shani E , Ashosh D , Eric B , et al . Chemical insight into the adsorption of chromium(III) on iron oxide/mesoporous silica nanocomposites[J]. Langmuir, 2015, 31(27): 7553-7562.
4	孙书勇, 曹达鹏, 汪文川 . MCM-22 型分子筛中纯的和混合的轻烃的吸附行为的Monte Carlo 模拟研究[J]. 北京化工大学学报, 2003, 30(5): 1-5.
	Sun S Y , Cao D P , Wang W C . Monte carlo simulation study on adsorption behavior of pure and mixed light hydrocarbons in MCM-22 Zeolite[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Chemical Technology, 2003, 30(5): 1-5.
5	贾玉香, 郭向云 . 超临界流体的CO和H₂吸附过程的Monte Carlo模拟[J]. 物理化学学报, 2005, 21(3): 306-309.
	Jia Y X , Guo X Y . Monte carlo simulation of CO and H₂ adsorption processes in supercritical fluids[J]. Journal of Physical Chemistry, 2005, 21(3): 306-309.
6	何科荣, 李县法, 李华 . 活性炭吸附过程的巨正则系综Monte Carlo模拟[J]. 新疆大学学报, 2007, 24(2): 184–190.
	He K R , Li X F , Li H . Giant regular ensemble monte carlo simulation of activated carbon adsorption process[J]. Journal of Xinjiang University, 2007, 24(2): 184-190.
7	Cao D P , Wang W C , Shen Z G , et al . Determination of pore size distribution and adsorption of methane and CCl₄ on activated carbon by molecular simulation[J]. Carbon, 2002, 40(13): 2359-2365.
8	曹达鹏, 汪文川 . 巨正则系综Monte Carlo模拟方法确定活性炭的微孔尺寸[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2002, 23(5): 910-914.
	Cao D P , Wang W C . Determination of the pore size of activated carbon by the grand canonical ensemble monte carlo simulation method[J]. Chemical Journal of Chinese Universities, 2002, 23(5): 910-914.
9	曹达鹏, 高广图, 汪文川 . 巨正则系综Monte Carlo模拟方法模拟甲烷在活性炭孔中的吸附存储[J]. 化工学报, 2000, 51(1): 23-30.
	Cao D P , Gao G T , Wang W C . Giant regular ensemble monte carlo simulation method for simulating adsorption storage of methane in activated carbon pores[J]. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering, 2000, 51(1): 23-30.
10	Wang Q , Johnson J K . Molecular simulation of hydrogen adsorption in single-walled carbon nanotubes and idealized carbon slit pores[J]. Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1999, 110: 577-586.
11	Wang Q , Johnson J K . Optimization of carbon nanotube arrays for hydrogen adsorption[J]. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 1999, 103(23): 4809-4813.
12	Wang Q , Johnson J K . Adsorption of hydrogen in graphite slit pores[J]. International Journal of Thermophysics, 1998, 19(102): 835-844.
13	Wang Q , Johnson J K . Hydrogen adsorption on graphite and in carbon slit pores from path integral simulations[J]. Molecular Physics, 1998, 95(2): 299-309.
14	Petrova N V , Yakovkin I N , Ptushinskii Y G . Monte-Carlo simulations of hydrogen on W(110) and Mo(110) surfaces[J]. Eueopean Physical Journal B, 2004, 38(3): 525-531.
15	Hohenbeg P , Kohn W . Inhomogeneous equations gas[J]. Physical Review, 1964, 136(3): 864-871.
16	Kohn W , Sham L J . Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects[J]. Physical Review, 1965, 140(4A): 1133-1138.
17	Paul J F , Sautrt P . Comparison of the nature the hydrogen-metal bond on Pd(111) and Ni(111) by a periodic density functional method[J]. Surface Science Letter, 1996, 365(1/2): L403-L409.
18	Dong W , Hafner J . H₂ dissociative adsorption on Pd(111)[J]. Physical Review B, 1997, 56(23): 15396-15403.
19	Ledentu V , Dong W , Sautet P . Ab initio study of the dissociative adsorption of H₂ on the Pd(110) surface[J]. Surface Science, 1998, 412/413: 518-526.
20	Francesco F , Rd G W . Energetics of hydrogen coverage on group VIII transition metal surfaces and a kinetic model for adsorption/desorption[J]. Journal of Chemical Physics, 2005, 122(1): 014704-014721.
21	Montgomer R , Melaugh R , Lau C , et al . Determination of the energy equivalent of a water solution calorimeter with a standard substance[J]. The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics, 1977, 9(10): 915-936.
22	Zhou F B , Liu S Q , Pang Y Q , et al . Effects of coal functional groups on adsorption microheat of coal bed methane[J]. Energy Fuels, 2015, 29: 1550-1557.
23	Tan Y . Experimental methods designed for measuring corrosion in highly resistive and inhomogeneous media[J]. Corrosion Science, 2011, 53: 1145-1155.
24	Blochl E . Projector augmented-wave method[J]. Physical Review B, 1994, 50(24): 17953-17979.
25	Kresse G , Joubert D . From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method[J]. Physical Review B Condensed Matter, 1999, 59(3): 1758-1775.
26	Perdew J P , Burke K , Ernzerhof M . Generalized gradient approximation made simple[J]. Physical Review Letters, 1996, 77(18): 3865-3868.
27	Shen Y R , Jiang P P , Zhang J . Highly dispersed molybdenum incorporated hollow mesoporous silica spheres as an efficient catalyst on epoxidation of olefins[J]. Molecular Catalysis, 2017, 433: 212-223.
28	Can K , Ozmen M , Ersoz M . Immobilization of albumin on aminosilane modified superparamagnetic magnetite nanoparticles and its characterization[J]. Colloids &Surface B Bioterfaces, 2009, 71(1): 154-159.
29	Zhao W W , Cui B , Peng H , Et Al . Novel method to investigate the interaction force between etoposide and APTES-functionalized Fe₃O₄@nSiO₂@mSiO₂ nanocarrier for drug loading and release processes[J]. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2015, 119(8): 4379-4386.
30	Li Z X . Zhao W W , Pu X H . Study on the oscillation dissolved behavior of oxysophocarpine in water[J]. Thermochimca Acta, 2012, 537(11): 76-79.

Related Articles 15

[1]	Bingchun SHENG, Jianguo YU, Sen LIN. Study on lithium resource separation from underground brine with high concentration of sodium by aluminum-based lithium adsorbent [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(8): 3375-3385.
[2]	Ruihang ZHANG, Pan CAO, Feng YANG, Kun LI, Peng XIAO, Chun DENG, Bei LIU, Changyu SUN, Guangjin CHEN. Analysis of key parameters affecting product purity of natural gas ethane recovery process via ZIF-8 nanofluid [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(8): 3386-3393.
[3]	Yan GAO, Peng WU, Chao SHANG, Zejun HU, Xiaodong CHEN. Preparation of magnetic agarose microspheres based on a two-fluid nozzle and their protein adsorption properties [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(8): 3457-3471.
[4]	Ji CHEN, Ze HONG, Zhao LEI, Qiang LING, Zhigang ZHAO, Chenhui PENG, Ping CUI. Study on coke dissolution loss reaction and its mechanism based on molecular dynamics simulations [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(7): 2935-2946.
[5]	Jie WANG, Xiaolin QIU, Ye ZHAO, Xinyang LIU, Zhongqiang HAN, Yong XU, Wenhan JIANG. Preparation and properties of polyelectrolyte electrostatic deposition modified PHBV antioxidant films [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(7): 3068-3078.
[6]	Shaoyun CHEN, Dong XU, Long CHEN, Yu ZHANG, Yuanfang ZHANG, Qingliang YOU, Chenglong HU, Jian CHEN. Preparation and adsorption properties of monolayer polyaniline microsphere arrays [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(5): 2228-2238.
[7]	Caihong LIN, Li WANG, Yu WU, Peng LIU, Jiangfeng YANG, Jinping LI. Effect of alkali cations in zeolites on adsorption and separation of CO₂/N₂O [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(5): 2013-2021.
[8]	Chenxin LI, Yanqiu PAN, Liu HE, Yabin NIU, Lu YU. Carbon membrane model based on carbon microcrystal structure and its gas separation simulation [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(5): 2057-2066.
[9]	Yu PAN, Zihang WANG, Jiayun WANG, Ruzhu WANG, Hua ZHANG. Heat and moisture performance study of Cur-LiCl coated heat exchanger [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(3): 1352-1359.
[10]	Xuanjun WU, Chao WANG, Zijian CAO, Weiquan CAI. Deep learning model of fixed bed adsorption breakthrough curve hybrid-driven by data and physical information [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(3): 1145-1160.
[11]	Xiaowan PENG, Xiaonan GUO, Chun DENG, Bei LIU, Changyu SUN, Guangjin CHEN. Modeling and simulation of CH₄/N₂ separation process with two absorption-adsorption columns using ZIF-8 slurry [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(2): 784-795.
[12]	Jinlin MENG, Yu WANG, Qunfeng ZHANG, Guanghua YE, Xinggui ZHOU. Pore network model of low-temperature nitrogen adsorption-desorption in mesoporous materials [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(2): 893-903.
[13]	Wan XU, Zhenbin CHEN, Huijuan ZHANG, Fangfang NIU, Ting HUO, Xingsheng LIU. Study on synthesis, adsorption and desorption performance of linear temperature-sensitive segment polymer regulated intelligent $R e O_{4}^{-}$ ion-imprinted polymer [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(2): 941-952.
[14]	Jiahao JIANG, Xiaole HUANG, Jiyun REN, Zhengrong ZHU, Lei DENG, Defu CHE. Qualitative and quantitative study on Pb²⁺ adsorption by biochar in solution [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(2): 830-842.
[15]	Yingxi DANG, Peng TAN, Xiaoqin LIU, Linbing SUN. Temperature swing for CO₂ capture driven by radiative cooling and solar heating [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(1): 469-478.

C/(mol/L)	n/mol	?Q/mJ	ΔH/(kJ/mol)	ΔS/((J·mol)/K)
2.14×10^?3	0.32×10^?7	141.08	?44.09	?108.76
4.05×10^?3	0.61×10^?7	312.12	?48.77	?107.52
6.35×10^?3	0.95×10^?7	446.72	?44.23	?107.02
8.11×10^?3	1.22×10^?7	580.83	?47.61	?110.09
10.25×10^?3	1.39×10^?7	898.14	?64.61	?99.37
12.12×10^?3	1.54×10^?7	1281.13	-84.31	-101.78
14.41×10^-3	2.16×10^-7	1014.13	-54.23	-110.93

C/(mol/L)	n/mol	?Q/mJ	ΔH/(kJ/mol)	ΔS/((J·mol)/K)
2.14×10^?3	0.32×10^?7	141.08	?44.09	?108.76
4.05×10^?3	0.61×10^?7	312.12	?48.77	?107.52
6.35×10^?3	0.95×10^?7	446.72	?44.23	?107.02
8.11×10^?3	1.22×10^?7	580.83	?47.61	?110.09
10.25×10^?3	1.39×10^?7	898.14	?64.61	?99.37
12.12×10^?3	1.54×10^?7	1281.13	-84.31	-101.78
14.41×10^-3	2.16×10^-7	1014.13	-54.23	-110.93

C/(mol/L)	n/mol	-Q /mJ	ΔH/(kJ/mol)	ΔS/(J·mol/K)
2.06×10^-3	0.31×10^-7	77.16	-24.89	-102.03
4.12×10^-3	0.62×10^-7	169.87	?27.37	?104.44
6.03×10^?3	0.91×10^?7	269.64	?29.63	?102.86
8.14×10^?3	1.22×10^?7	379.82	?31.13	?101.12
10.08×10^?3	1.51×10^?7	686.14	?45.44	?110.01
12.03×10^?3	1.81×10^?7	761.87	?42.09	?111.67
14.11×10^?3	2.12×10^?7	736.99	?34.76	?121.32

C/(mol/L)	n/mol	-Q /mJ	ΔH/(kJ/mol)	ΔS/(J·mol/K)
2.06×10^-3	0.31×10^-7	77.16	-24.89	-102.03
4.12×10^-3	0.62×10^-7	169.87	?27.37	?104.44
6.03×10^?3	0.91×10^?7	269.64	?29.63	?102.86
8.14×10^?3	1.22×10^?7	379.82	?31.13	?101.12
10.08×10^?3	1.51×10^?7	686.14	?45.44	?110.01
12.03×10^?3	1.81×10^?7	761.87	?42.09	?111.67
14.11×10^?3	2.12×10^?7	736.99	?34.76	?121.32