CIESC Journal ›› 2019, Vol. 70 ›› Issue (1): 388-397.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20180501
• Process safety • Previous Articles Next Articles
Xiangkun MENG1(
),Guoming CHEN1(
),Chunliang ZHENG1,2,Xiangfei WU1,Gaogeng ZHU1
Received:2018-05-14
Revised:2018-06-21
Online:2019-01-05
Published:2019-01-05
Contact:
Guoming CHEN
孟祥坤1(
),陈国明1(
),郑纯亮1,2,吴翔飞1,朱高庚1
通讯作者:
陈国明
作者简介:孟祥坤(1988—),男,博士研究生,<email>wsdy1002@163.com</email>|陈国明(1962—),男,博士,教授,<email>offshore@126.com</email>
基金资助:CLC Number:
Xiangkun MENG, Guoming CHEN, Chunliang ZHENG, Xiangfei WU, Gaogeng ZHU. Risk evaluation model of deepwater drilling blowout accident based on risk entropy and complex network[J]. CIESC Journal, 2019, 70(1): 388-397.
孟祥坤, 陈国明, 郑纯亮, 吴翔飞, 朱高庚. 基于风险熵和复杂网络的深水钻井井喷事故风险演化评估[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(1): 388-397.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://hgxb.cip.com.cn/EN/10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20180501
| 编号 | 风险因素 | 编号 | 风险因素 | 编号 | 风险因素 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| v1 | 钻进操作因素 | v21 | 损坏固井质量 | v41 | 溢流进入隔水管 |
| v2 | 工艺因素 | v22 | 表层套管下沉 | v42 | 关闭环形BOP |
| v3 | 自然因素 | v23 | 地层压力高于井底压力 | v43 | 环形BOP密封失效 |
| v4 | 设备因素 | v24 | 井底压力过大 | v44 | 环形BOP机械故障 |
| v5 | 固井质量差 | v25 | 压裂地层 | v45 | 液压系统故障 |
| v6 | 起钻过快 | v26 | 溢流 | v46 | 环形BOP操作失误 |
| v7 | 循环漏失 | v27 | 溢流流体进入井筒环空 | v47 | 环形BOP关闭失败 |
| v8 | 抽汲压力过大 | v28 | 早期溢流监测失效 | v48 | 关闭闸板BOP |
| v9 | 钻井液密度过低 | v29 | 钻井液流量指示器失效 | v49 | 剪切闸板密封失效 |
| v10 | 气侵钻井液 | v30 | 气体流量传感器失效 | v50 | 闸板BOP机械故障 |
| v11 | 钻井液密度过大 | v31 | 随钻测压工具失效 | v51 | 闸板BOP操作失误 |
| v12 | 钻遇高渗地层 | v32 | 气体含量传感器失效 | v52 | 水合物阻塞BOP组 |
| v13 | 钻遇浅层气 | v33 | 控制电路失效 | v53 | 自动关断失效 |
| v14 | 钻遇浅层水流 | v34 | 钻井监督显示器故障 | v54 | RCD密封失效 |
| v15 | 套管破裂 | v35 | 录井工对泥浆池增量判断失误 | v55 | 分流系统机械故障 |
| v16 | 钻杆失效 | v36 | 司钻与录井工协作失误 | v56 | RCD操作失误 |
| v17 | 隔水管系统失效 | v37 | 误报警导致司钻判断失误 | v57 | 不压井起下作业装置失效 |
| v18 | 泥浆泵失效 | v38 | 未监测到井涌 | v58 | 分流失效 |
| v19 | 井口系统失效 | v39 | 井涌判断失误 | v59 | 井喷 |
| v20 | 动力故障 | v40 | 井涌后未停钻 | — | — |
Table 1 Risk factors of deepwater drilling blowout
| 编号 | 风险因素 | 编号 | 风险因素 | 编号 | 风险因素 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| v1 | 钻进操作因素 | v21 | 损坏固井质量 | v41 | 溢流进入隔水管 |
| v2 | 工艺因素 | v22 | 表层套管下沉 | v42 | 关闭环形BOP |
| v3 | 自然因素 | v23 | 地层压力高于井底压力 | v43 | 环形BOP密封失效 |
| v4 | 设备因素 | v24 | 井底压力过大 | v44 | 环形BOP机械故障 |
| v5 | 固井质量差 | v25 | 压裂地层 | v45 | 液压系统故障 |
| v6 | 起钻过快 | v26 | 溢流 | v46 | 环形BOP操作失误 |
| v7 | 循环漏失 | v27 | 溢流流体进入井筒环空 | v47 | 环形BOP关闭失败 |
| v8 | 抽汲压力过大 | v28 | 早期溢流监测失效 | v48 | 关闭闸板BOP |
| v9 | 钻井液密度过低 | v29 | 钻井液流量指示器失效 | v49 | 剪切闸板密封失效 |
| v10 | 气侵钻井液 | v30 | 气体流量传感器失效 | v50 | 闸板BOP机械故障 |
| v11 | 钻井液密度过大 | v31 | 随钻测压工具失效 | v51 | 闸板BOP操作失误 |
| v12 | 钻遇高渗地层 | v32 | 气体含量传感器失效 | v52 | 水合物阻塞BOP组 |
| v13 | 钻遇浅层气 | v33 | 控制电路失效 | v53 | 自动关断失效 |
| v14 | 钻遇浅层水流 | v34 | 钻井监督显示器故障 | v54 | RCD密封失效 |
| v15 | 套管破裂 | v35 | 录井工对泥浆池增量判断失误 | v55 | 分流系统机械故障 |
| v16 | 钻杆失效 | v36 | 司钻与录井工协作失误 | v56 | RCD操作失误 |
| v17 | 隔水管系统失效 | v37 | 误报警导致司钻判断失误 | v57 | 不压井起下作业装置失效 |
| v18 | 泥浆泵失效 | v38 | 未监测到井涌 | v58 | 分流失效 |
| v19 | 井口系统失效 | v39 | 井涌判断失误 | v59 | 井喷 |
| v20 | 动力故障 | v40 | 井涌后未停钻 | — | — |
| 语言变量 | 梯形模糊数 | 定性描述 | 概率表征 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 非常低(VL) | (0, 0, 0.1, 0.2) | 基本不可能发生 | (0, 10-6) |
| 低(L) | (0.1, 0.25, 0.25, 0.4) | 全寿命周期内可能发生 | (10-6, 10-3) |
| 中等(M) | (0.3, 0.5, 0.5, 0.7) | 全寿命周期内有时发生 | (10-3, 10-2) |
| 高(H) | (0.6, 0.75, 0.75, 0.9) | 全寿命周期内发生数次 | (10-2, 10-1) |
| 非常高(VH) | (0.8, 0.9, 1, 1) | 经常会发生 | (10-1, 1) |
Table 2 Level of fuzzy language and probability
| 语言变量 | 梯形模糊数 | 定性描述 | 概率表征 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 非常低(VL) | (0, 0, 0.1, 0.2) | 基本不可能发生 | (0, 10-6) |
| 低(L) | (0.1, 0.25, 0.25, 0.4) | 全寿命周期内可能发生 | (10-6, 10-3) |
| 中等(M) | (0.3, 0.5, 0.5, 0.7) | 全寿命周期内有时发生 | (10-3, 10-2) |
| 高(H) | (0.6, 0.75, 0.75, 0.9) | 全寿命周期内发生数次 | (10-2, 10-1) |
| 非常高(VH) | (0.8, 0.9, 1, 1) | 经常会发生 | (10-1, 1) |
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Sij(Ei, Ej) | (1, 0.825, 0.825) |
| AA(Ei) | (0.913, 0.913, 0.825) |
| RA(Ei) | (0.344,0.344, 0.311) |
| CC(Ei) | (0.402, 0.369, 0.229) |
| RAG | (0.646, 0.784, 0.807, 0.923) |
Table 3 Computation of expert opinions on path e2
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Sij(Ei, Ej) | (1, 0.825, 0.825) |
| AA(Ei) | (0.913, 0.913, 0.825) |
| RA(Ei) | (0.344,0.344, 0.311) |
| CC(Ei) | (0.402, 0.369, 0.229) |
| RAG | (0.646, 0.784, 0.807, 0.923) |
| Edge | Direction | Probability | Entropy | Edge | Direction | Probability | Entropy | Edge | Direction | Probability | Entropy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| e1 | v1~v5 | 1.00×10-3 | 6.91 | e35 | v21~v5 | 8.02×10-1 | 0.22 | e69 | v42~v44 | 1.00×10-3 | 6.91 |
| e2 | v1~v6 | 4.84×10-2 | 3.03 | e36 | v21~v7 | 2.07×10-1 | 1.58 | e70 | v42~v45 | 5.25×10-4 | 7.55 |
| e3 | v2~v9 | 5.00×10-2 | 3.00 | e37 | v22~v7 | 8.22×10-2 | 2.50 | e71 | v42~v46 | 4.35×10-3 | 3.14 |
| e4 | v2~v10 | 3.00×10-5 | 10.41 | e38 | v23~v26 | 0.99 | 0.01 | e72 | v43~v47 | 0.99 | 0.01 |
| e5 | v2~v11 | 5.00×10-2 | 3.00 | e39 | v24~v25 | 8.00×10-1 | 0.22 | e73 | v44~v43 | 2.12×10-2 | 3.85 |
| e6 | v3~v12 | 1.50×10-1 | 1.90 | e40 | v25~v23 | 7.35×10-1 | 0.31 | e74 | v44~v45 | 9.02×10-3 | 4.71 |
| e7 | v3~v13 | 2.69×10-1 | 1.31 | e41 | v25~v26 | 0.99 | 0.01 | e75 | v44~v47 | 0.99 | 0.01 |
| e8 | v3~v14 | 4.00×10-5 | 10.13 | e42 | v26~v27 | 0.99 | 0.01 | e76 | v45~v47 | 0.99 | 0.01 |
| e9 | v4~v15 | 6.40×10-4 | 7.35 | e43 | v27~v28 | 2.07×10-1 | 1.58 | e77 | v46~v45 | 1.00×10-3 | 6.91 |
| e10 | v4~v16 | 5.00×10-4 | 7.60 | e44 | v27~v29 | 1.10×10-4 | 9.12 | e78 | v46~v47 | 0.99 | 0.01 |
| e11 | v4~v17 | 5.10×10-4 | 7.58 | e45 | v27~v30 | 1.10×10-4 | 9.12 | e79 | v47~v48 | 0.99 | 0.01 |
| e12 | v4~v18 | 1.60×10-3 | 6.44 | e46 | v27~v31 | 3.00×10-3 | 5.81 | e80 | v48~v49 | 3.55×10-2 | 3.34 |
| e13 | v4~v19 | 2.00×10-3 | 6.21 | e47 | v27~v32 | 1.10×10-3 | 6.81 | e81 | v48~v50 | 1.00×10-3 | 6.91 |
| e14 | v4~v20 | 6.25×10-4 | 7.38 | e48 | v27~v33 | 1.00×10-4 | 9.21 | e82 | v48~v51 | 6.00×10-4 | 7.42 |
| e15 | v5~v7 | 2.70×10-2 | 3.61 | e49 | v27~v34 | 1.10×10-4 | 9.12 | e83 | v48~v52 | 4.22×10-3 | 5.47 |
| e16 | v6~v8 | 5.40×10-1 | 0.62 | e50 | v27~v35 | 1.00×10-3 | 6.91 | e84 | v49~v53 | 0.99 | 0.01 |
| e17 | v7~v23 | 9.00×10-1 | 0.11 | e51 | v27~v36 | 1.00×10-3 | 6.91 | e85 | v50~v49 | 2.85×10-2 | 3.56 |
| e18 | v8~v7 | 8.57×10-2 | 2.46 | e52 | v27~v37 | 1.00×10-3 | 6.91 | e86 | v50~v53 | 0.99 | 0.01 |
| e19 | v8~v23 | 9.20×10-1 | 0.08 | e53 | v28~v38 | 0.99 | 0.01 | e87 | v51~v50 | 1.25×10-1 | 2.08 |
| e20 | v9~v23 | 9.10×10-1 | 0.09 | e54 | v29~v38 | 0.99 | 0.01 | e88 | v51~v52 | 4.25×10-1 | 0.86 |
| e21 | v10~v9 | 6.70×10-1 | 0.40 | e55 | v30~v38 | 0.99 | 0.01 | e89 | v51~v53 | 0.99 | 0.01 |
| e22 | v10~v23 | 8.00×10-1 | 0.22 | e56 | v31~v38 | 0.99 | 0.01 | e90 | v52~v53 | 0.99 | 0.01 |
| e23 | v11~v24 | 8.90×10-1 | 0.12 | e57 | v32~v38 | 0.99 | 0.01 | e91 | v53~v54 | 1.00×10-3 | 6.91 |
| e24 | v12~v25 | 8.20×10-2 | 0.20 | e58 | v33~v38 | 0.99 | 0.01 | e92 | v53~v55 | 3.60×10-3 | 5.63 |
| e25 | v13~v26 | 0.99 | 0.01 | e59 | v34~v38 | 0.99 | 0.01 | e93 | v53~v56 | 4.30×10-3 | 5.45 |
| e26 | v14~v21 | 1.50×10-1 | 1.90 | e60 | v35~v36 | 8.56×10-2 | 2.46 | e94 | v53~v57 | 4.30×10-3 | 5.45 |
| e27 | v14~v22 | 2.00×10-1 | 1.61 | e61 | v35~v39 | 0.99 | 0.01 | e95 | v54~v58 | 0.99 | 0.01 |
| e28 | v15~v26 | 0.99 | 0.01 | e62 | v36~v39 | 0.99 | 0.01 | e96 | v55~v54 | 3.85×10-1 | 0.95 |
| e29 | v16~v26 | 0.99 | 0.01 | e63 | v37~v39 | 0.99 | 0.01 | e97 | v55~v58 | 0.99 | 0.01 |
| e30 | v17~v26 | 0.99 | 0.01 | e64 | v38~v40 | 7.00×10-1 | 0.36 | e98 | v56~v55 | 8.55×10-2 | 2.46 |
| e31 | v18~v26 | 0.99 | 0.01 | e65 | v39~v40 | 3.00×10-1 | 1.20 | e99 | v56~v57 | 3.40×10-2 | 3.38 |
| e32 | v19~v26 | 0.99 | 0.01 | e66 | v40~v41 | 0.99 | 0.01 | e100 | v56~v58 | 0.99 | 0.01 |
| e33 | v20~v18 | 2.15×10-1 | 1.54 | e67 | v41~v42 | 0.99 | 0.01 | e101 | v57~v58 | 0.99 | 0.01 |
| e34 | v20~v26 | 0.99 | 0.01 | e68 | v42~v43 | 7.00×10-2 | 2.66 | e102 | v58~v59 | 0.99 | 0.01 |
Table 4 Weights of edges
| Edge | Direction | Probability | Entropy | Edge | Direction | Probability | Entropy | Edge | Direction | Probability | Entropy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| e1 | v1~v5 | 1.00×10-3 | 6.91 | e35 | v21~v5 | 8.02×10-1 | 0.22 | e69 | v42~v44 | 1.00×10-3 | 6.91 |
| e2 | v1~v6 | 4.84×10-2 | 3.03 | e36 | v21~v7 | 2.07×10-1 | 1.58 | e70 | v42~v45 | 5.25×10-4 | 7.55 |
| e3 | v2~v9 | 5.00×10-2 | 3.00 | e37 | v22~v7 | 8.22×10-2 | 2.50 | e71 | v42~v46 | 4.35×10-3 | 3.14 |
| e4 | v2~v10 | 3.00×10-5 | 10.41 | e38 | v23~v26 | 0.99 | 0.01 | e72 | v43~v47 | 0.99 | 0.01 |
| e5 | v2~v11 | 5.00×10-2 | 3.00 | e39 | v24~v25 | 8.00×10-1 | 0.22 | e73 | v44~v43 | 2.12×10-2 | 3.85 |
| e6 | v3~v12 | 1.50×10-1 | 1.90 | e40 | v25~v23 | 7.35×10-1 | 0.31 | e74 | v44~v45 | 9.02×10-3 | 4.71 |
| e7 | v3~v13 | 2.69×10-1 | 1.31 | e41 | v25~v26 | 0.99 | 0.01 | e75 | v44~v47 | 0.99 | 0.01 |
| e8 | v3~v14 | 4.00×10-5 | 10.13 | e42 | v26~v27 | 0.99 | 0.01 | e76 | v45~v47 | 0.99 | 0.01 |
| e9 | v4~v15 | 6.40×10-4 | 7.35 | e43 | v27~v28 | 2.07×10-1 | 1.58 | e77 | v46~v45 | 1.00×10-3 | 6.91 |
| e10 | v4~v16 | 5.00×10-4 | 7.60 | e44 | v27~v29 | 1.10×10-4 | 9.12 | e78 | v46~v47 | 0.99 | 0.01 |
| e11 | v4~v17 | 5.10×10-4 | 7.58 | e45 | v27~v30 | 1.10×10-4 | 9.12 | e79 | v47~v48 | 0.99 | 0.01 |
| e12 | v4~v18 | 1.60×10-3 | 6.44 | e46 | v27~v31 | 3.00×10-3 | 5.81 | e80 | v48~v49 | 3.55×10-2 | 3.34 |
| e13 | v4~v19 | 2.00×10-3 | 6.21 | e47 | v27~v32 | 1.10×10-3 | 6.81 | e81 | v48~v50 | 1.00×10-3 | 6.91 |
| e14 | v4~v20 | 6.25×10-4 | 7.38 | e48 | v27~v33 | 1.00×10-4 | 9.21 | e82 | v48~v51 | 6.00×10-4 | 7.42 |
| e15 | v5~v7 | 2.70×10-2 | 3.61 | e49 | v27~v34 | 1.10×10-4 | 9.12 | e83 | v48~v52 | 4.22×10-3 | 5.47 |
| e16 | v6~v8 | 5.40×10-1 | 0.62 | e50 | v27~v35 | 1.00×10-3 | 6.91 | e84 | v49~v53 | 0.99 | 0.01 |
| e17 | v7~v23 | 9.00×10-1 | 0.11 | e51 | v27~v36 | 1.00×10-3 | 6.91 | e85 | v50~v49 | 2.85×10-2 | 3.56 |
| e18 | v8~v7 | 8.57×10-2 | 2.46 | e52 | v27~v37 | 1.00×10-3 | 6.91 | e86 | v50~v53 | 0.99 | 0.01 |
| e19 | v8~v23 | 9.20×10-1 | 0.08 | e53 | v28~v38 | 0.99 | 0.01 | e87 | v51~v50 | 1.25×10-1 | 2.08 |
| e20 | v9~v23 | 9.10×10-1 | 0.09 | e54 | v29~v38 | 0.99 | 0.01 | e88 | v51~v52 | 4.25×10-1 | 0.86 |
| e21 | v10~v9 | 6.70×10-1 | 0.40 | e55 | v30~v38 | 0.99 | 0.01 | e89 | v51~v53 | 0.99 | 0.01 |
| e22 | v10~v23 | 8.00×10-1 | 0.22 | e56 | v31~v38 | 0.99 | 0.01 | e90 | v52~v53 | 0.99 | 0.01 |
| e23 | v11~v24 | 8.90×10-1 | 0.12 | e57 | v32~v38 | 0.99 | 0.01 | e91 | v53~v54 | 1.00×10-3 | 6.91 |
| e24 | v12~v25 | 8.20×10-2 | 0.20 | e58 | v33~v38 | 0.99 | 0.01 | e92 | v53~v55 | 3.60×10-3 | 5.63 |
| e25 | v13~v26 | 0.99 | 0.01 | e59 | v34~v38 | 0.99 | 0.01 | e93 | v53~v56 | 4.30×10-3 | 5.45 |
| e26 | v14~v21 | 1.50×10-1 | 1.90 | e60 | v35~v36 | 8.56×10-2 | 2.46 | e94 | v53~v57 | 4.30×10-3 | 5.45 |
| e27 | v14~v22 | 2.00×10-1 | 1.61 | e61 | v35~v39 | 0.99 | 0.01 | e95 | v54~v58 | 0.99 | 0.01 |
| e28 | v15~v26 | 0.99 | 0.01 | e62 | v36~v39 | 0.99 | 0.01 | e96 | v55~v54 | 3.85×10-1 | 0.95 |
| e29 | v16~v26 | 0.99 | 0.01 | e63 | v37~v39 | 0.99 | 0.01 | e97 | v55~v58 | 0.99 | 0.01 |
| e30 | v17~v26 | 0.99 | 0.01 | e64 | v38~v40 | 7.00×10-1 | 0.36 | e98 | v56~v55 | 8.55×10-2 | 2.46 |
| e31 | v18~v26 | 0.99 | 0.01 | e65 | v39~v40 | 3.00×10-1 | 1.20 | e99 | v56~v57 | 3.40×10-2 | 3.38 |
| e32 | v19~v26 | 0.99 | 0.01 | e66 | v40~v41 | 0.99 | 0.01 | e100 | v56~v58 | 0.99 | 0.01 |
| e33 | v20~v18 | 2.15×10-1 | 1.54 | e67 | v41~v42 | 0.99 | 0.01 | e101 | v57~v58 | 0.99 | 0.01 |
| e34 | v20~v26 | 0.99 | 0.01 | e68 | v42~v43 | 7.00×10-2 | 2.66 | e102 | v58~v59 | 0.99 | 0.01 |
| Initial event | Shortest path | Risk entropy | Probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| v1 | v1→v6→v8→v23→v28→v43→v49→v56→v59 | 17.11 | 3.32×10-8 |
| v2 | v2→v9→v23→v28→v43→v49→v56→v59 | 16.58 | 6.30×10-8 |
| v3 | v3→v13→v28→v38→v43→v49→v56→v59 | 14.80 | 3.73×10-7 |
| v4 | v4→v19→v28→v38→v43→v49→v56→v59 | 19.70 | 2.78×10-9 |
| Initial event | Shortest path | Risk entropy | Probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| v1 | v1→v6→v8→v23→v28→v43→v49→v56→v59 | 17.11 | 3.32×10-8 |
| v2 | v2→v9→v23→v28→v43→v49→v56→v59 | 16.58 | 6.30×10-8 |
| v3 | v3→v13→v28→v38→v43→v49→v56→v59 | 14.80 | 3.73×10-7 |
| v4 | v4→v19→v28→v38→v43→v49→v56→v59 | 19.70 | 2.78×10-9 |
| 1 | TamimN, LaboureurD M, MentzerR A, et al. A framework for developing leading indicators for offshore drillwell blowout incidents[J]. Process Safety & Environmental Protection, 2017, 106: 256-262. |
| 2 | 孙宝江, 王志远, 公培斌, 等. 深水井控的七组分多相流动模型[J]. 石油学报, 2011, 32(6): 1042-1049. |
| SunB J, WangZ Y, GongP B, et al. Application of a seven-component multiphase flow model to deepwater well control[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2011, 32(6): 1042-1049. | |
| 3 | 褚道余. 深水井控工艺技术探讨[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2012, 40(1): 52-57. |
| ChuD Y. Well control technology in deepwater well[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2012, 40(1): 52-57. | |
| 4 | BhandariJ, AbbassiR, GaraniyaV, et al. Risk analysis of deepwater drilling operations using Bayesian network[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2015, 38: 11-23. |
| 5 | PraneshV, PalanichamyK, SaidatO, et al. Lack of dynamic leadership skills and human failure contribution analysis to manage risk in deep water horizon oil platform[J]. Safety Science, 2017, 92: 85-93. |
| 6 | SkogdalenJ E, UtneI B, VinnemJ E. Developing safety indicators for preventing offshore oil and gas deepwater drilling blowouts[J]. Safety Science, 2011, 49(8): 1187-1199. |
| 7 | LiW, ZhangL, LiangW. An accident causation analysis and taxonomy (ACAT) model of complex industrial system from both system safety and control theory perspectives[J]. Safety Science, 2017, 92: 94-103. |
| 8 | MengX, ChenG, ShiJ, et al. STAMP-based analysis of deepwater well control safety[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2018, 55(5): 41-52. |
| 9 | XueL, FanJ, RausandM, et al. A safety barrier-based accident model for offshore drilling blowouts[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2013, 26(1): 164-171. |
| 10 | VenkatasubramanianV. Systemic failures: challenges and opportunities in risk management in complex systems[J]. AIChE Journal, 2011, 57(1): 2-9. |
| 11 | DengY, LiQ, LuY. A research on subway physical vulnerability based on network theory and FMECA[J]. Safety Science, 2015, 80: 127-134. |
| 12 | 刘文颖, 王佳明, 谢昶, 等. 基于脆性风险熵的复杂电网连锁故障脆性源辨识模型[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2012, 32(31): 142-149. |
| LiuW Y, WangJ M, XieC, et al. Brittleness source identification model for cascading failure of complex power grid based on brittle risk entropy[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2012, 32(31): 142-149. | |
| 13 | 蔡晔, 曹一家, 谭玉东, 等. 基于标准化结构熵的电网结构对连锁故障的影响[J]. 电工技术学报, 2015, 30(3): 36-43. |
| CaiY, CaoY J, TanY D, et al. Influences of power grid structure on cascading failure based on standard structure entropy[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2015, 30(3): 36-43. | |
| 14 | 苟竞, 刘俊勇, 刘友波, 等. 基于能量熵测度的电力系统连锁故障风险辨识[J]. 电网技术, 2013, 37(10): 2754-2761. |
| GouJ, LiuJ Y, LiuY B, et al. Energy entropy measure based risk identification of power system cascading failures[J]. Power System Technology, 2013, 37(10): 2754-2761. | |
| 15 | 孟祥坤, 陈国明, 朱红卫. 海底管道泄漏风险演化复杂网络分析[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2017, 13(4): 26-31. |
| MengX K, ChenG M, ZhuH W. Complex network analysis on risk evolution of submarine pipeline leakage[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2017, 13(4): 26-31. | |
| 16 | 陈长坤, 纪道溪. 基于复杂网络的台风灾害演化系统风险分析与控制研究[J]. 灾害学, 2012, 27(1): 1-4. |
| ChenC K, JiD X. Risk analysis and control for the evolution disaster system of typhoon based on complex network[J]. Journal of Catastrophology, 2012, 27(1): 1-4. | |
| 17 | 付建民, 李成美, 东静波, 等. 数据不确定条件下安全仪表系统SIL等级验证方法研究[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 41(3): 129-135. |
| FuJ M, LiC M, DongJ B, et al. Study on method of SIL verification of safety instrumented systems under data uncertainty[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science), 2017, 41(3): 129-135. | |
| 18 | 魏心泉, 王坚. 基于熵的火灾场景介观人群疏散模型[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2015, 35(10): 2473-2483. |
| WeiX Q, WangJ. A mesoscopic evacuation model based on multi-agent and entropy with leading behavior under fire conditions[J]. System Engineering- Theory & Practice, 2015, 35(10): 2473-2483. | |
| 19 | 胡瑾秋, 郭家洁. 基于尺度效应的过程安全事故概率估计[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(12): 4848-4856. |
| HuJ Q, GuoJ J. Accident probability estimation of process safety based on scale effect[J]. CIESC Journal, 2017, 68(12): 4848-4856. | |
| 20 | 胡瑾秋, 张来斌, 王安琪. 炼化装置故障链式效应定量安全预警方法[J]. 化工学报, 2016, 67(7): 3091-3100. |
| HuJ Q, ZhangL B, WangA Q. Quantitative safety early warning method of fault propagation for petrochemical plants[J]. CIESC Journal, 2016, 67(7): 3091-3100. | |
| 21 | 胡瑞敏, 吕海涛, 陈军. 基于风险熵和Neyman-Pearson准则的安防网络风险评估研究[J]. 自动化学报, 2014, 40(12): 2737-2746. |
| HuR M, LüH T, ChenJ. Risk evaluation model of security and protection network based on risk entropy and Neyman- Pearson criterion[J]. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2014, 40(12): 2737-2746. | |
| 22 | LevesonN. A new accident model for engineering safer systems[J]. Safety Science, 2004, 42(4): 237-270. |
| 23 | LevesonN G, StephanopoulosG. A system-theoretic, control-inspired view and approach to process safety[J]. AIChE Journal, 2014, 60(1): 2-14. |
| 24 | AbimbolaM, KhanF, KhakzadN, et al. Safety and risk analysis of managed pressure drilling operation using Bayesian network[J]. Safety Science, 2015, 76(1): 133-144. |
| 25 | AbimbolaM, KhanF, KhakzadN. Dynamic safety risk analysis of offshore drilling[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2014, 30(3): 74-85. |
| 26 | KhakzadN, KhanF, AmyotteP. Quantitative risk analysis of offshore drilling operations: a Bayesian approach[J]. Safety Science, 2013, 57: 108-117. |
| 27 | ZareiE, AzadehA, KharzadN, et al. Dynamic safety assessment of natural gas stations using Bayesian network[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2017, 321: 830-840. |
| 28 | 董海波, 顾学康. 基于模糊故障树方法的钻井平台井喷概率计算[J]. 中国造船, 2013, 54(1): 155-165. |
| DongH B, GuX K. Probability calculation of blowout of drilling platform based on fuzzy fault tree method[J]. Shipbuilding of China, 2013, 54(1): 155-165. | |
| 29 | OnisawaT. An approach to human reliability in man-machine systems using error possibility[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1988, 27(2): 87-103. |
| 30 | LavasaniS M, ZendeganiA, CelikM. An extension to fuzzy fault tree analysis (FFTA) application in petrochemical process industry[J]. Process Safety & Environmental Protection, 2015, 93(2): 75-88. |
| [1] | Zhewen CHEN, Junjie WEI, Yuming ZHANG. System integration and energy conversion mechanism of the power technology with integrated supercritical water gasification of coal and SOFC [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(9): 3888-3902. |
| [2] | Yuyuan ZHENG, Zhiwei GE, Xiangyu HAN, Liang WANG, Haisheng CHEN. Progress and prospect of medium and high temperature thermochemical energy storage of calcium-based materials [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(8): 3171-3192. |
| [3] | Xiaoyang LIU, Jianliang YU, Yujie HOU, Xingqing YAN, Zhenhua ZHANG, Xianshu LYU. Effect of spiral microchannel on detonation propagation of hydrogen-doped methane [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(7): 3139-3148. |
| [4] | Guang WANG, Fashun SHAN, Yucheng QIAN, Jianfang JIAO. Incipient fault detection method for chemical process based on ensemble learning transfer entropy [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(7): 2967-2978. |
| [5] | Guixian LI, Abo CAO, Wenliang MENG, Dongliang WANG, Yong YANG, Huairong ZHOU. Process design and evaluation of CO2 to methanol coupled with SOEC [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(7): 2999-3009. |
| [6] | Zhongliang XIAO, Bilu YIN, Liubin SONG, Yinjie KUANG, Tingting ZHAO, Cheng LIU, Rongyao YUAN. Research progress of waste lithium-ion battery recycling process and its safety risk analysis [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(4): 1446-1456. |
| [7] | Cheng YUN, Qianlin WANG, Feng CHEN, Xin ZHANG, Zhan DOU, Tingjun YAN. Deep-mining risk evolution path of chemical processes based on community structure [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(4): 1639-1650. |
| [8] | Jianglong DU, Wenqi YANG, Kai HUANG, Cheng LIAN, Honglai LIU. Heat dissipation performance of the module combined CPCM with air cooling for lithium-ion batteries [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(2): 674-689. |
| [9] | Yalin WANG, Yuqing PAN, Chenliang LIU. Intermittent process monitoring based on GSA-LSTM dynamic structure feature extraction [J]. CIESC Journal, 2022, 73(9): 3994-4002. |
| [10] | Ke YANG, Chensheng WANG, Hong JI, Kai ZHENG, Zhixiang XING, Haipu BI, Juncheng JIANG. Experimental study on inhibition of methane explosion by polydopamine coated mixed powder [J]. CIESC Journal, 2022, 73(9): 4245-4254. |
| [11] | Shanshan LIAO, Shaogang ZHANG, Junjun TAO, Jiahao LIU, Jinhui WANG. Numerical simulation analysis of vertical jet fire impinging on the pipeline [J]. CIESC Journal, 2022, 73(9): 4226-4234. |
| [12] | Yan WANG, Jia HE, Jingjing YANG, Chendi LIN, Wentao JI. Inhibition of polyethylene dust explosion by oxalate and bicarbonate [J]. CIESC Journal, 2022, 73(9): 4207-4216. |
| [13] | Jinyu GUO, Zhe WANG, Yuan LI. Fault detection method based on kernel entropy independent component analysis [J]. CIESC Journal, 2022, 73(8): 3647-3658. |
| [14] | Jingwei ZHANG, Yiwei ZHOU, Zhuo CHEN, Jianhong XU. Advances in frontiers of organic synthesis in microreactor [J]. CIESC Journal, 2022, 73(8): 3472-3482. |
| [15] | Kun WANG, Hongbo SHI, Shuai TAN, Bing SONG, Yang TAO. Local time difference constrained neighborhood preserving embedding algorithm for fault detection [J]. CIESC Journal, 2022, 73(7): 3109-3119. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||