基于最小充分统计量模式分析的故障检测方法

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20171054

化工学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 69 ›› Issue (3): 1228-1237.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20171054

基于最小充分统计量模式分析的故障检测方法

孙栓柱¹, 董顺², 江叶峰³, 周挺³, 李益国²

1 江苏方天电力技术有限公司, 江苏南京 211102;
2 东南大学能源与环境学院, 江苏南京 210096;
3 江苏省电力公司, 江苏南京 210024

收稿日期:2017-08-03 修回日期:2017-10-09 出版日期:2018-03-05 发布日期:2018-03-05
通讯作者: 李益国
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（51476027）；江苏省自然科学基金项目（BK20141119）。

Fault detection method based on minimum sufficient statistics pattern analysis

SUN Shuanzhu¹, DONG Shun², JIANG Yefeng³, ZHOU Ting³, LI Yiguo²

1 Jiangsu Frontier Electric Technology Co. Ltd., Nanjing 211102, Jiangsu, China;
2 School of Energy and Environment, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, Jiangsu, China;
3 Jiangsu Electric Power Co. Ltd., Nanjing 210024, Jiangsu, China

Received:2017-08-03 Revised:2017-10-09 Online:2018-03-05 Published:2018-03-05
Supported by:
supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51476027) and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20141119).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

统计量模式分析（SPA）最近在故障检测领域取得了广泛应用，其实质是用数据的统计量矩阵来代替原始数据矩阵进行故障检测，然而其统计量的选取存在盲目性且各统计量之间存在复杂的非线性关联关系，难以满足后续应用主成分分析（PCA）完成故障检测所需的基本条件。为了解决这个问题，提出了基于最小充分统计量模式分析的故障检测方法（MSSPA）。该方法首先将原始数据矩阵进行正交变换以消除变量之间的关联性，然后估计出每个变量的概率密度函数或者多个变量的联合概率密度函数，进而求出原始数据的最小充分统计量，并用最小充分统计量来构造统计量矩阵。最小充分统计量的引入还能够有效应对数据的非高斯分布问题。最后，通过在TE过程上的仿真测试验证了该方法用于故障检测的可行性和有效性。

关键词: 主元分析, 算法, 过程系统, 统计量模式分析, 最小充分统计量, 故障检测

Abstract:

Recently, the statistic pattern analysis (SPA) has been used with widespread applications in the field of fault detection. Its essence is to use data statistics matrix for process monitoring instead of the original data matrix. However, SPA lacks reasonable method in choosing the statistics variables, also complex nonlinear interactions exist among these statistics variables. As a result, fault detection cannot be processed by using ordinary principal component analysis (PCA) algorithm. In order to solve these problems, a new minimum sufficient statistics pattern analysis (MSSPA) fault detection method is proposed. This method first eliminates the correlations among variables by performing an orthogonal transformation of the raw data matrix, and then estimates the probability density function of the single variables or joint probability density function of multiple variables, so as to acquire the minimum sufficient statistic of original data, and construct the statistic matrix with it. The introduction of minimum sufficient statistics is also beneficial to handle the problem of non-Gaussian distribution of the raw data. Finally, the feasibility and validity of this method for fault detection are verified by testing on the Tennessee Eastmann (TE) process.

Key words: principal component analysis, algorithm, process systems, statistics pattern analysis, minimum sufficient statistics, fault detection

中图分类号:

TP277

孙栓柱, 董顺, 江叶峰, 周挺, 李益国. 基于最小充分统计量模式分析的故障检测方法[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(3): 1228-1237.

SUN Shuanzhu, DONG Shun, JIANG Yefeng, ZHOU Ting, LI Yiguo. Fault detection method based on minimum sufficient statistics pattern analysis[J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(3): 1228-1237.

参考文献 30

[1]	GE Z, SONG Z, GAO F. Review of recent research on data-based process monitoring[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2013, 52(10):3543-3562.
[2]	RUSSELL E L, CHIANG L H, BRAATZ R D. Fault detection in industrial processes using canonical variate analysis and dynamic principal component analysis[J]. Chemometrics & Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2000, 51(1):81-93.
[3]	SANG W C, LEE C, LEE J M, et al. Fault detection and identification of nonlinear processes based on kernel PCA[J]. Chemometrics & Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2005, 75(1):55-67.
[4]	LI W, YUE H H, VALLE-CERVANTES S, et al. Recursive PCA for adaptive process monitoring[J]. Journal of Process Control, 2000, 10(5):471-486.
[5]	GE Z, ZHANG M, SONG Z. Nonlinear process monitoring based on linear subspace and Bayesian inference[J]. Journal of Process Control, 2010, 20(5):676-688.
[6]	HE Q P, WANG J. Statistics pattern analysis:a new process monitoring framework and its application to semiconductor batch processes[J]. AIChE Journal, 2015, 57 (1):107-121.
[7]	WANG J, HE Q P. Multivariate statistical process monitoring based on statistics pattern analysis[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2010, 49(17):7858-7869.
[8]	常鹏, 王普, 高学金,等. 基于统计量模式分析的MKPLS间歇过程监控与质量预报[J]. 仪器仪表学报, 2014, 35(6):1409-1416. CHANG P, WANG P, GAO X J, et al. Batch process monitoring and quality prediction based on statistics pattern analysis and MKPLS[J]. Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument, 2014, 35(6):1409-1416.
[9]	常鹏, 王普, 高学金. 基于统计量模式分析的T-KPLS间歇过程故障监控[J]. 化工学报, 2015,66(1):265-271. CHANG P, WANG P, GAO X J. Fault monitoring batch process based on statistics pattern analysis of T-KPLS[J]. CIESC Journal, 2015, 66(1):265-271.
[10]	张汉元, 田学民, 邓晓刚. 基于SPA相似系数的故障识别方法[J]. 化工学报, 2013, 64(12):4503-4508. ZHANG H Y, TIAN X M, DENG X G. Fault identification method based on SPA similarity factor[J]. CIESC Journal, 2013, 64(12):4503-4508.
[11]	SHEN Y, DING S X, HAGHANI A, et al. A comparison study of basic data-driven fault diagnosis and process monitoring methods on the benchmark Tennessee Eastman process[J]. Journal of Process Control, 2012, 22(9):1567-1581.
[12]	DOWNS J J, VOGEL E F. A plant-wide industrial process control problem[J]. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 1993, 17(3):245-255.
[13]	RAO C R. Sufficient statistics and minimum variance estimates[J]. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 1949, 45(2):213-218.
[14]	COVER T M, THOMAS J A. Elements of Information Theory[M]. 2nd ed. Hoboken:John Wiley & Sons, 2012:221
[15]	OLIVE D J. Statistical Theory and Inference[M]. New York:Springer International Publishing, 2014:101-122
[16]	AYECH N, CHAKOUR C, HARKAT M F. New adaptive moving window PCA for process monitoring[J]. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 2012, 45(20):606-611.
[17]	SHANG J, CHEN M, JI H, et al. Recursive transformed component statistical analysis for incipient fault detection[J]. Automatica, 2017, 80:313-327.
[18]	HAIMI H, MULAS M, CORONA F, et al. Adaptive data-derived anomaly detection in the activated sludge process of a large-scale wastewater treatment plant[J]. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2016, 52:65-80.
[19]	FISHER R A. Statistical methods for research workers[M]//Breakthroughs in Statistics. New York:Springer, 1992:66-70.
[20]	ŠKACH J, PUN?OCHÁ? I. Active fault detection:a comparison of probabilistic methods[C]//Journal of Physics:Conference Series. Bristol:IOP Publishing, 2015, 1742-6596.
[21]	SEVERSON K, CHAIWATANODOM P, BRAATZ R D. Perspectives on process monitoring of industrial systems[J]. Annual Reviews in Control, 2016, 42:190-200.
[22]	GE Z, SONG Z. Multivariate Statistical Process Control:Process Monitoring Methods and Applications[M]. New York:Springer Science & Business Media, 2012:18-20
[23]	CHIANG L H, RUSSELL E L, BRAATZ R D. Fault Detection and Diagnosis in Industrial Systems[M]. London:Springer London, 2001:103-109
[24]	LIU Y, ZHANG G, XU B. Compressive sparse principal component analysis for process supervisory monitoring and fault detection[J]. Journal of Process Control, 2017, 50:1-10.
[25]	ZHANG K, SHARDT Y A W, CHEN Z, et al. Using the expected detection delay to assess the performance of different multivariate statistical process monitoring methods for multiplicative and drift faults[J]. ISA Transactions, 2017, 67:56-66.
[26]	BAKDI A, KOUADRI A. A new adaptive PCA based thresholding scheme for fault detection in complex systems[J]. Chemometrics & Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2017, 162:83-93.
[27]	RUSSELL E L, CHIANG L H, BRAATZ R D. Data-driven Methods for Fault Detection and Diagnosis in Chemical Processes[M]. New York:Springer Science & Business Media, 2012:84-90
[28]	薄翠梅, 韩晓春, 易辉,等. 基于聚类选择k近邻的LLE算法及故障检测[J]. 化工学报, 2016, 67(3):925-930. BO C M, HAN X C, YI H, et al. Neighborhood selection of LLE based on cluster for fault detection[J]. CIESC Journal, 2016, 67(3):925-930.
[29]	ZHANG Y. Fault detection and diagnosis of nonlinear processes using improved kernel independent component analysis (KICA) and support vector machine (SVM)[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2008, 47(18):6961-6971.
[30]	BERNAL-DE-LÁZARO J M, LLANES-SANTIAGO O, PRIETO-MORENO A, et al. Enhanced dynamic approach to improve the detection of small-magnitude faults[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2016, 146:166-179

基于最小充分统计量模式分析的故障检测方法

Fault detection method based on minimum sufficient statistics pattern analysis

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 30

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张逸豪, 王振雷. 基于最大信息系数的分组支持向量数据描述故障检测[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3865-3878.
[2]	陈哲文, 魏俊杰, 张玉明. 超临界水煤气化耦合SOFC发电系统集成及其能量转化机制[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3888-3902.
[3]	曹跃, 余冲, 李智, 杨明磊. 工业数据驱动的加氢裂化装置多工况切换过渡状态检测[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3841-3854.
[4]	尹刚, 李伊惠, 何飞, 曹文琦, 王民, 颜非亚, 向禹, 卢剑, 罗斌, 卢润廷. 基于KPCA和SVM的铝电解槽漏槽事故预警方法[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3419-3428.
[5]	郑玉圆, 葛志伟, 韩翔宇, 王亮, 陈海生. 中高温钙基材料热化学储热的研究进展与展望[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3171-3192.
[6]	诸程瑛, 王振雷. 基于改进深度强化学习的乙烯裂解炉操作优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3429-3437.
[7]	李贵贤, 曹阿波, 孟文亮, 王东亮, 杨勇, 周怀荣. 耦合固体氧化物电解槽的CO₂制甲醇过程设计与评价研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2999-3009.
[8]	王光, 单发顺, 钱禹丞, 焦建芳. 基于集成学习传递熵的化工过程微小故障检测方法[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2967-2978.
[9]	邵远哲, 赵忠盖, 刘飞. 基于共同趋势模型的非平稳过程质量相关故障检测方法[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2522-2537.
[10]	高学金, 姚玉卓, 韩华云, 齐咏生. 基于注意力动态卷积自编码器的发酵过程故障监测[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2503-2521.
[11]	周继鹏, 何文军, 李涛. 异形催化剂上乙烯催化氧化失活动力学反应工程计算[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2416-2426.
[12]	贠程, 王倩琳, 陈锋, 张鑫, 窦站, 颜廷俊. 基于社团结构的化工过程风险演化路径深度挖掘[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1639-1650.
[13]	宋冰, 郑城风, 侍洪波, 陶阳, 谭帅. 基于VAE-OCCA的质量相关故障检测方法研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1630-1638.
[14]	郑书闽, 郭鹏程, 颜建国, 王帅, 李文博, 周淇. 微小通道内过冷流动沸腾阻力特性实验及预测研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1549-1560.
[15]	张生安, 刘桂莲. 高效太阳能电解水制氢系统及其性能的多目标优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1260-1274.