热解-重整-燃烧解耦的煤气化特性

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20190312

化工学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 70 ›› Issue (8): 3040-3049.DOI: 10.11949/0438-1157.20190312

热解-重整-燃烧解耦的煤气化特性

亚力昆江·吐尔逊null¹(),艾热提·阿不都艾尼null¹,潘岳¹,阿布力克木·阿布力孜null¹,迪丽努尔·塔力甫null¹,马凤云¹,徐绍平²

1. 新疆大学化学化工学院, 煤炭洁净转化与化工过程自治区重点实验室，新疆乌鲁木齐 830046
2. 大连理工大学化工学院，精细化工国家重点实验室，辽宁大连 116024

收稿日期:2019-04-01 修回日期:2019-07-03 出版日期:2019-08-05 发布日期:2019-08-05
通讯作者: 亚力昆江·吐尔逊null
作者简介:亚力昆江·吐尔逊（1984—），男，博士，讲师，<email>yalkunjan54@ aliyun.com</email>
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(21766037);新疆维吾尔自治区自然科学基金项目(2017D01C077)

Gasification characteristics of coal in decoupled triple bed

Tursun YALKUNJAN¹(),Abduhani HAIRAT¹,Yue PAN¹,Abulizi ABULIKEMU¹,Talifu DILINUER¹,Fengyun MA¹,Shaoping XU²

1. Key Laboratory of Coal Clean Conversion ＆ Chemical Engineering Process，College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, Xinjiang，China
2. State Key Laboratory of Fine Chemicals, Faculty of Chemical, Environmental and Biological Science and Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, Liaoning, China

Received:2019-04-01 Revised:2019-07-03 Online:2019-08-05 Published:2019-08-05
Contact: Tursun YALKUNJAN

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

采用热解、重整、燃烧解耦分离的解耦三床气化（decoupled triple bed gasification，DTBG）系统，以橄榄石为原位焦油裂解催化床料，进行了煤催化气化实验。研究了煤种、煤进料速率、重整器温度以及水碳比（S/C）对煤热解焦油裂解/重整反应的影响。结果显示：随着煤挥发分含量增加，气体产率、碳转化率、冷煤气效率以及产气中的H₂含量增加。由于半焦不参与气化反应，导致碳转化率和冷煤气效率偏低。煤和催化剂比例的改变会影响气体产率和产气组成，当煤的进料速率从0.12 kg/h增加到0.30 kg/h时，气体产率从0.28 m³/kg增加到0.46 m³/kg，H₂含量从28.4%增加到50.5%。重整器温度的升高有利于促进煤焦油裂解转化，从而增加气体产率。当重整器温度为850℃、S/C为1.0时，气体产率达到了0.60 m³/kg, 橄榄石催化剂有效地降低了焦油含量，焦油产率仅为2.11g/m³。S/C的升高增强了焦油水蒸气重整反应，但引入过量的水蒸气会导致反应器内气体的流速加快，缩短了反应物的停留时间和反应时长，减缓了焦油水蒸气重整反应的反应程度。

关键词: 煤气化, 解耦三床, 固体热载体, 橄榄石

Abstract:

Catalytic steam gasification of coal was carried out in a pyrolysis, reforming and combustion separated decoupled triple bed gasification system. The olivine was used as the in-situ tar cracking catalytic bed material, and the coal catalytic gasification experiment was carried out. The effects of coal types, coal feeding rate, reformer temperature and steam to carbon mass ratio (S/C) on gasification performance were investigated. The results showed that the gas yield, carbon conversion, cold gas efficiency and H₂ content in the gas increased with the increasing volatile content of coal. The carbon conversion and cold gas efficiency is relatively low due to the char is not involved in gasification reaction. The gas yield and gas composition influenced by coal to catalyst ratio. The gas yield increased from 0.28 m³/kg to 0.46 m³/kg and the H₂ content increased from 28.4% to 50.5% with increasing coal feeding rate from 0.12 kg/h to 0.30 kg/h. Increasing reforming temperature and S/C were beneficial to promote the tar cracking and conversion, and thus increased the gas yield. A gas yield of 0.6 m³/kg tar content as low as 2.11 g/m³ has been achieved at the reformer temperature was 850℃ and S/C of 1.0. The addition of steam enhanced the steam reforming reaction of tar, and increased the gas yield. However the excessive steamcause shorter residence time of tar in reformer that results reduction degree of tar steam reforming reaction.

Key words: coal gasification, decoupled triple bed, solid heat carrier, olivine

中图分类号:

TQ 546.2

亚力昆江·吐尔逊null, 艾热提·阿不都艾尼null, 潘岳, 阿布力克木·阿布力孜null, 迪丽努尔·塔力甫null, 马凤云, 徐绍平. 热解-重整-燃烧解耦的煤气化特性[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(8): 3040-3049.

Tursun YALKUNJAN, Abduhani HAIRAT, Yue PAN, Abulizi ABULIKEMU, Talifu DILINUER, Fengyun MA, Shaoping XU. Gasification characteristics of coal in decoupled triple bed[J]. CIESC Journal, 2019, 70(8): 3040-3049.

图/表 9

表1 煤的工业分析和元素分析结果

Table 1 Proximate and ultimate analysis of coal

原料	工业分析(ad)/%(mass)				元素分析(daf)/%(mass)
原料	水分	灰分	挥发分	固定碳	C	H	O	N	S
WCW	6.96	19.13	30.56	43.35	73.77	3.65	19.64	0.82	2.12
NMG	10.47	3.66	28.88	56.99	76.97	4.09	17.64	0.70	0.60
HEM	1.82	5.71	41.29	51.18	75.60	5.03	18.05	0.90	0.42

表2 橄榄石的XRF化学组成分析

Table 2 Chemical composition of olivine by XRF/%(mass)

MgO	TiO₂	Al₂O₃	Fe₂O₃	CaO	NiO	SiO₂	K₂O
42.95	0.06	1.00	9.57	1.09	0.38	44.77	0.05

图1 解耦三床气化反应装置

Fig.1 Schematic diagram of DTBG apparatus

表3 气化系统运行参数

Table 3 Operation parameters of gasification system

Parameter	Value
total bed material inventory /kg	5.0
circulating rate of bed material /(kg/h)	4.5
coal feeding rate/ (kg/h)	0.12－0.30
bed materials particle size /mm	0.45－0.90
coal particle size /mm	0.45－0.90
residence time of solid in reformer/min	30
residence time of solid in pyrolyzer /min	7
bed height in the pyrolyzer /mm	200
reformer temperature /℃	750－850
pyrolyzer temperature /℃	700
combustor temperature /℃	850
air flow rate of combustor/ (m³/h)	4.2－4.6
operation pressure/MPa	0.1

图2 产气组成随时间的变化

Fig.2 Composition of gas production varies with time

图3 三种煤原料气化效果比较

Fig.3 Gasification performance comparison of three type of coal

图4 煤进料速率对气体产量、焦油含量和气体组成的影响

Fig.4 Effect of coal feeding rate on gas yield, tar yield and gas composition

图5 重整器温度对气体产率、焦油含量、气体组成、碳转化率和冷煤气效率的影响

Fig.5 Effect of reformer temperature on gas yield, tar content, gas composition, carbon conversion and cold gas efficiency

图6 S/C对气体产率、焦油含量、气体组成、碳转化率和冷煤气效率的影响

Fig.6 Effect of S/C on gas yield, tar content, gas composition, carbon conversion and cold gas efficiency

参考文献 33

1	王亚雄, 杨景轩, 张忠林, 等. 低阶煤热解-气化-燃烧TBCFB系统模拟及优化[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(8): 3596-3604.
	WangY X, YangJ X, ZhangZ L, et al. TBCFB system simulation and optimization for pyrolysis-gasification-combustion of low rank coal [J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(8): 3596-3604.
2	ZhangJ, WangY, DongL, et al. Decoupling gasification: approach principle and technology justification [J]. Energy Fuels, 2010, 24(12): 6223-6232.
3	KoppatzS, PfeiferC, RauchR, et al. H₂ rich product gas by steam gasification of biomass with in situ CO₂ absorption in a dual fluidized bed system of 100MW fuel input[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2009, 90(7/8): 914-921.
4	RehlingB, HofbauerH, RauchR, et al. BioSNG—process simulation and comparison with first results from a 1-MW demonstration plant[J]. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 2011, 1(2): 111-119.
5	GuanG, FushimiC, TsutsumiA. Prediction of flow behavior of the riser in a novel high solids flux circulating fluidized bed for steam gasification of coal or biomass[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2010, 164(1): 221-229.
6	GuanG, FushimiC, TsutsumiA, et al. High-density circulating fluidized bed gasifier for advanced IGCC/IGFC—advantages and challenges [J]. Particuology, 2010, 8(6): 602-606.
7	XuG, MurakamiT, SudaT, et al. Two-stage dual fluidized bed gasification: its conception and application to biomass[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2009, 90(1): 137-144.
8	ZengX, ShaoR, WangF, et al. Industrial demonstration plant for the gasification of herb residue by fluidized bed two-stage process[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2016, 206: 93-98.
9	HenriksenU, AhrenfeldtJ, JensenT K, et al. The design, construction and operation of a 75 kW two-stage gasifier[J]. Energy, 2006, 31(10/11): 1542-1553.
10	张志远, 陈鸿伟, 赵争辉, 等. 钠盐对准东煤CO₂吸附能力及气化特性的影响 [J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(4): 1629-1636.
	ZhangZ Y, ChenH W, ZhaoZ H, et al. Effect of sodium salts on CO₂ adsorption capacity and gasification of Zhundong coal [J]. CIESC Journal, 2017, 68(4): 1629-1636.
11	MarinkovicJ, ThunmanH, KnutssonP, et al. Characteristics of olivine as a bed material in an indirect biomass gasifier[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2015, 279: 555-566.
12	ChristodoulouC, GrimekisD, PanopoulosK D, et al. Comparing calcined and un-treated olivine as bed materials for tar reduction in fluidized bed gasification [J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2014, 124(5): 275-285.
13	李兰兰, 郑安庆, 冯宜鹏, 等. 橄榄石对甲苯催化重整反应的影响[J]. 燃料化学学报, 2015, 43(7): 806-815.
	LiL L, ZhengA Q, FengY P, et al. Effects of olivine on catalytic reforming of toluene[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2015, 43(7): 806-815.
14	岳宝华, 卜宪昵, 汪学广, 等. 焙烧温度对橄榄石催化甲苯裂解性能的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2009, 60(2): 378-383.
	YueB H, BuX N, WangX G, et al. Effect of calcination temperature on catalytic performance of olivine for toluene cracking[J]. CIESC Journal, 2009, 60(2): 378-383.
15	ArandaG, DriftA V D, VreugdenhilB J, et al. Comparing direct and indirect fluidized bed gasification: effect of redox cycle on olivine activity (pages 711—720)[J]. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, 2014, 33(3): 711-720.
16	FredrikssonH O A, LanceeR J, ThüneP C, et al. Olivine as tar removal catalyst in biomass gasification: catalyst dynamics under model conditions[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2013, 130/131(complete): 168-177.
17	ŚwierczyńskiD, CoursonC, BedelL, et al. Oxidation reduction behavior of iron-bearing olivines (Fe_xMg_1-_x)₂SiO₄ used as catalysts for biomass gasification [J]. Chem. Mater., 2006, 18(4): 897-905.
18	DeviL, PtasinskiK J, JanssenF J. Pretreated olivine as tar removal catalyst for biomass gasifiers: investigation using naphthalene as model biomass tar [J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2005, 86(6): 707-730.
19	DeviL, PtasinskiK J, JanssenF J. Decomposition of naphthalene as a biomass tar over pretreated olivine: effect of gas composition, kinetic approach, and reaction scheme [J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2005, 44(24): 9096-9104.
20	杨小芹, 徐绍平, 胡冠, 等. 不同矿源橄榄石对催化苯水蒸气重整的影响 [J]. 催化学报, 2009, 30(6): 497-502.
	YangX Q, XuS P, HuG, et al. Effects of olivines from different quarries on the steam reforming of benzene[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2009, 30(6): 497-502.
21	StefanK, PfeiferC, HofbauerH. Comparison of the performance behaviour of silica sand and olivine in a dual fluidised bed reactor system for steam gasification of biomass at pilot plant scale[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2011, 175(22): 468-483.
22	宋洋博, 徐绍平, 李伶俐, 等. Cu-橄榄石载氧体煤焦化学链气化实验研究[J]. 燃料化学学报, 2017, 45(8): 916-923.
	SongY B, XuS P, LiL L, alet . Chemical looping gasification of coal char with Cu-olivine oxygen carriers[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2017, 45(8): 916-923.
23	邓靖, 李文英, 李晓红, 等. 橄榄石基固体热载体影响褐煤热解产物分布的分析[J]. 燃料化学学报, 2013, 41: 937-942.
	DengJ, LiW Y, LiX H, et al. Product distribution of lignite pyrolysis with olivine-based solid heat carrier[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2013, 41: 937-942.
24	亚力昆江·吐尔逊, 潘岳, 别尔德汗·瓦提汗, 等. 基于热解-重整-燃烧解耦三床气化系统的生物质催化制富氢气体[J]. 农业工程学报, 2018, (1): 222-228.
	YalkunjanT, PanY, BieerdehanW, et al. Catalytic biomass gasification for hydrogen rich gas production in decoupled-triple-bed gasification system[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2018, (1): 222-228.
25	TursunY, XuS, AbulikemuA, et al. Biomass gasification for hydrogen rich gas in a decoupled triple bed gasifier with olivine and NiO/olivine [J]. Bioresour. Technol., 2019, 272: 241-248.
26	TursunY, XuS, WangG, et al. Tar formation during co-gasification of biomass and coal under different gasification condition[J]. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2015, 111: 191-199.
27	XiaoY, XuS, TursunY, et al. Catalytic steam gasification of lignite for hydrogen-rich gas production in a decoupled triple bed reaction system [J]. Fuel, 2017, 189: 57-65.
28	魏立纲, 徐绍平, 刘长厚, 等. 预煅烧对橄榄石生物质气化催化性能的影响[J]. 燃料化学学报, 2008, 36: 426-430.
	WeiL G, XuS P, LiuC H, et al. Effects of precalcination on catalytic activity of olivine in biomass gasification[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2008, 36: 426-430.
29	崔银萍. 西部弱还原性煤在N₂气氛中的热转化特性研究[D]. 太原: 太原理工大学, 2007.
	CuiY P. The study on conversion character during pyrolysis of Chinese Western coals[D]. Taiyuan: Taiyuan University of Technology, 2007.
30	张志丰, 王亦飞, 朱龙雏, 等. 基于铁基载氧体的无烟煤化学链燃烧过程中硫分布特性[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(4): 1578-1585
	ZhangZ F, WangY F, ZhuL C, et al. Distribution of sulfur in chemical looping combustion of anthracite based on Fe-based oxygen carrier[J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(4): 1578-1585.
31	田斌, 杨芳芳, 庞亚恒, 等. 气化温度对型煤加压固定床气化反应特性的影响[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2013, 33(z1): 128-134.
	TianB, YangF F, PangY H, et al. Effect of temperature on the reactivity characteristics of briquette during high pressure fixed-bed gasification[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2013, 33(z1): 128-134.
32	乌晓江, 张忠孝, 朴桂林, 等. 煤粉加压气流床气化特性实验研究[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2008, 29(8): 1431-1434.
	WuX J, ZhangZ X, PuG L, et al. Experimental study on gasification characteristics of coal in lab-scale down flow gasifier[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2008, 29(8): 1431-1434.
33	王勤辉, 揭涛, 李小敏, 等. 反应气氛对不同煤灰烧结温度影响的研究[J]. 燃料化学学报, 2010, 38(1): 17-22.
	WangQ H, JieT, LiX M, et al. Experiments of the effects of reaction atmosphere on the coal ash sintering temperature[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2010, 38(1): 17-22.

[1]	陈哲文, 魏俊杰, 张玉明. 超临界水煤气化耦合SOFC发电系统集成及其能量转化机制[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3888-3902.
[2]	韩晨, 司徒友珉, 朱斌, 许建良, 郭晓镭, 刘海峰. 协同处理废液的多喷嘴粉煤气化炉内反应流动研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3266-3278.
[3]	李亚芾, 付亮亮, 白浩隆, 白丁荣, 许光文. 菱镁矿浮选尾矿直接合成同时制备镁橄榄石和镁砂研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(8): 3679-3687.
[4]	张利合, 张凡, 李昌伦, 许德平, 徐振刚, 王永刚. BGL煤气化动力学模型构建与验证[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(10): 4668-4678.
[5]	汪达, 王倩, 张建胜. 不同温度和冷却速率下高温灰渣的结晶行为[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(5): 2183-2190.
[6]	周雷皓, 刘桂莲. 复杂反应的代数分析建模方法[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(3): 1030-1037.
[7]	朱龙雏, 王亦飞, 陆志峰, 李季林, 王辅臣. 煤焦在气化合成气中高温气化反应特性[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(11): 4249-4260.
[8]	赖登国, 战金辉, 陈兆辉, 韩振南, 武荣成, 许光文. 内构件移动床固体热载体油页岩热解技术[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(10): 3647-3657.
[9]	李方舟, 李文英, 冯杰. 固体热载体法褐煤热解过程中的传质传热特性[J]. 化工学报, 2016, 67(4): 1136-1144.
[10]	张润楠, 范晓晨, 贺明睿, 苏延磊, 姜忠义. 煤气化废水深度处理与回用研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(9): 3341-3349.
[11]	钟伟民, 牛进伟, 梁毅, 孔祥东, 钱锋. 多策略果蝇优化算法及其应用[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(12): 4888-4894.
[12]	诸林，张政，范峻铭. 基于化学链制氧的煤气化集成系统工艺参数分析[J]. 化工进展, 2014, 33(08): 1997-2003.
[13]	桂霞1，王陈魏1，云志1，张玲1，汤志刚2. 燃烧前CO2捕集技术研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2014, 33(07): 1895-1901.
[14]	王灵萍, 王亦飞, 郭强强, 颜留成, 于广锁. 洗涤冷却管内垂直降膜流动特性[J]. 化工学报, 2013, 64(6): 1959-1968.
[15]	张宇, 鄢烈祥, 李国建, 史彬. 非支配排序进化策略求解煤气化多目标优化问题[J]. 化工学报, 2013, 64(12): 4628-4633.

热解-重整-燃烧解耦的煤气化特性

Gasification characteristics of coal in decoupled triple bed

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

参考文献 33

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价