非支配排序进化策略求解煤气化多目标优化问题

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2013.12.053

化工学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 64 ›› Issue (12): 4628-4633.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2013.12.053

非支配排序进化策略求解煤气化多目标优化问题

张宇¹, 鄢烈祥¹, 李国建², 史彬¹

1. 武汉理工大学化学工程学院, 湖北武汉 430070;
2. 湖北省电力勘测设计院, 湖北武汉 430040

收稿日期:2013-06-28 修回日期:2013-07-05 出版日期:2013-12-05 发布日期:2013-12-05
通讯作者: 鄢烈祥
作者简介:张宇（1988- ），男，硕士研究生。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（20976142）；国家高技术研究发展计划项目（2011AA02A206）。

Multi-objective optimization of coal gasifier using NSES

ZHANG Yu¹, YAN Liexiang¹, LI Guojian², SHI Bin¹

1. College of Chemical Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, Hubei, China;
2. Hubei Electric Power Survey & Design Institute, Wuhan 430040, Hubei, China

Received:2013-06-28 Revised:2013-07-05 Online:2013-12-05 Published:2013-12-05
Supported by:
supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (20976142) and the High-tech Research and Development Program of China (2011AA02A206).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 应用非支配排序进化策略（non-dominated sorting evolution strategy，NSES）对煤气化多目标优化问题进行求解。通过解两个经典测试函数，并与NSGA-2算法进行比较，表明了非支配排序进化策略的有效性和优势。应用Aspen Plus流程模拟软件对煤气化过程进行了模拟计算。在此基础上，以氧煤比、水煤比、气化炉的压力为操作变量，分别对冷煤气效率和有效气产出率两个目标进行灵敏度分析。分析结果表明，3个变量对气化结果评价指标均有不同程度的影响。将非支配进化策略用于煤气化过程的多目标优化模型的求解，得到了Pareto最优前沿面，为确定冷煤气效率和有效气产出率两个目标的协调提供了依据。

关键词: 算法, 煤气化, 计算机模拟, 多目标, 优化设计

Abstract: Non-dominated sorting evolution strategy (NSES) is used to solve the multi-objective optimization problem of coal gasifier.The solving of the two classical test function with NSES indicates that NSES is effective comparing to NSGA-2.Aspen Plus is applied to the simulation of the coal gasifier process.On this basis,with the ratio of oxygen to coal,ratio of water to coal and gasification pressure as optimization variables,and taking the yield of effective gases and cold gas efficiency as goals,the sensitivity analysis is completed.The results show that the three variables have more or less influence on gasification indexes.NSES is used to solve that multi-objective optimization model.The two goals' compromise solution including the cold gas efficiency and yield of effective gases can be achieved based on the Pareto front.

Key words: algorithm, coal gasifier, computer simulation, multi-objective, optimization design

中图分类号:

TQ021.8

张宇, 鄢烈祥, 李国建, 史彬. 非支配排序进化策略求解煤气化多目标优化问题[J]. 化工学报, 2013, 64(12): 4628-4633.

ZHANG Yu, YAN Liexiang, LI Guojian, SHI Bin. Multi-objective optimization of coal gasifier using NSES[J]. CIESC Journal, 2013, 64(12): 4628-4633.

参考文献 17

[1]	Yu Zunhong (于遵宏), Wang Fuchen (王辅臣).Coal Gasification Technology (煤炭气化技术 )[M].Beijing:Chemical Industry Press, 2010
[2]	Emun F, Gadalla M, Majozi T, Boer D.Integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) process simulation and optimization[J].Computers and Chemical Engineering, 2010 (34):331-332
[3]	Zhang Zongfei (张宗飞), Yang Lianying (杨连英).Pulverized coal gasification simulation based on Aspen Plus software[J].Chemical Fertilizer Design (化肥设计), 2008, 46 (3):14
[4]	Wang Yang (汪洋), Dai Zhenghua (戴正华).Simulation of entrained-flow bed coal gasifier by the method of Gibbs free energy minimization[J].Coal Conversion (煤炭转化), 2004, 27 (4):27-33
[5]	Huang Xueli (黄雪莉), Liu Na (刘娜).Simulation and optimization for coal gasifying process in Xinjiang Zhudong[J].Coal Conversion (煤炭转化), 2012, 35 (3):23-27
[6]	Li Y B, Xiao R, Jin B S.Thermodynamic equilibrium calculations for the reforming of coke oven gas with gasification gas[J].Chemical Engineering & Technology, 2007, 30 (1):91-98
[7]	Maria Sudiro, Manuel Pellizzaro, Fabrizio Bezzo.Simulated moving bed technology applied to coal gasification[J].Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2010, 88:465-475
[8]	Wayne Doherty, Anthony Reynolds, David Kennedy.The effect of air preheating in a biomass CFB gasifier using ASPEN Plus simulation[J].Biomass and Bioenergy, 2009, 33:1158-1167
[9]	Hron J, Nafpliotis N, Goldberg D E.A niched Pareto genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization// Proceeding of the 1st IEEE Conference on Evolutionary Computation[C].Piscataway:IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence, 1994
[10]	Srinivas N, Deb K.Multi-objective optimization using nondominated sorting in genetic algorithm[J].Evolutionary Computation, 1994, 3 (2):221-248
[11]	Deb K, Pratab A, Agrawal S.A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm:NSGA-Ⅱ[J].IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2002, 6 (2):182-197
[12]	Zitzler E, Thiele L.Multi-objective evolutionary algorithm:a comparative case study and the strength Pareto approach[J].Evolutionary Computation, 1999, 8 (1):257-271
[13]	Gilberto Alejandro Ortiz Garcia.Multi-objective Optimization using Evolution Strategies (ES) as Evolutionary Algorithm (EA)[CP].Mathworks.File exchange.2012.5.23
[14]	Schwefel H P, Back T.Evolution strategies Ⅰ:tariants and their computational implementation//Proceedings of the Genetic Algorithms in Engineering and Computer Science[C].New York:Wiley, 1995:111-126
[15]	Feng Ping (冯萍), Gu Wenxiang (谷文祥), Qu Shuang (曲爽).An analysis of genetic algorithm and evolution strategy[J].Journal of Changchun University (长春大学学报), 2005, 4 (15):26-27
[16]	Zitzler E, Deb K, Thiele L.Comparison of multi-objective evolutionary algorithm:empirical results[J].Evolutionary Computation, 2000, 8 (2):173-195
[17]	Hoffman Z.Simulation and economic evaluation of coal gasification with SETS reforming process for power production[D].Baton Rouge:Louisiana State University, 2005

非支配排序进化策略求解煤气化多目标优化问题

Multi-objective optimization of coal gasifier using NSES

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 17

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	陈哲文, 魏俊杰, 张玉明. 超临界水煤气化耦合SOFC发电系统集成及其能量转化机制[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3888-3902.
[2]	曹跃, 余冲, 李智, 杨明磊. 工业数据驱动的加氢裂化装置多工况切换过渡状态检测[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3841-3854.
[3]	齐聪, 丁子, 余杰, 汤茂清, 梁林. 基于选择吸收纳米薄膜的太阳能温差发电特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3921-3930.
[4]	刘远超, 关斌, 钟建斌, 徐一帆, 蒋旭浩, 李耑. 单层XSe₂（X=Zr/Hf）的热电输运特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3968-3978.
[5]	韩晨, 司徒友珉, 朱斌, 许建良, 郭晓镭, 刘海峰. 协同处理废液的多喷嘴粉煤气化炉内反应流动研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3266-3278.
[6]	尹刚, 李伊惠, 何飞, 曹文琦, 王民, 颜非亚, 向禹, 卢剑, 罗斌, 卢润廷. 基于KPCA和SVM的铝电解槽漏槽事故预警方法[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3419-3428.
[7]	诸程瑛, 王振雷. 基于改进深度强化学习的乙烯裂解炉操作优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3429-3437.
[8]	文兆伦, 李沛睿, 张忠林, 杜晓, 侯起旺, 刘叶刚, 郝晓刚, 官国清. 基于自热再生的隔壁塔深冷空分工艺设计及优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2988-2998.
[9]	江锦波, 彭新, 许文烜, 门日秀, 刘畅, 彭旭东. 泵出型螺旋槽油气密封泄漏特性及参数影响研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2538-2554.
[10]	周继鹏, 何文军, 李涛. 异形催化剂上乙烯催化氧化失活动力学反应工程计算[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2416-2426.
[11]	邵远哲, 赵忠盖, 刘飞. 基于共同趋势模型的非平稳过程质量相关故障检测方法[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2522-2537.
[12]	高学金, 姚玉卓, 韩华云, 齐咏生. 基于注意力动态卷积自编码器的发酵过程故障监测[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2503-2521.
[13]	孙永尧, 高秋英, 曾文广, 王佳铭, 陈艺飞, 周永哲, 贺高红, 阮雪华. 面向含氮油田伴生气提质利用的膜耦合分离工艺设计优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2034-2045.
[14]	刘尚豪, 贾胜坤, 罗祎青, 袁希钢. 基于梯度提升决策树的三组元精馏流程结构最优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2075-2087.
[15]	周必茂, 许世森, 王肖肖, 刘刚, 李小宇, 任永强, 谭厚章. 烧嘴偏转角度对气化炉渣层分布特性的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 1939-1949.