城市污泥/褐煤共水热碳化产物的热化学转化特性及规律研究

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20191419

化工学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 71 ›› Issue (5): 2320-2332.DOI: 10.11949/0438-1157.20191419

城市污泥/褐煤共水热碳化产物的热化学转化特性及规律研究

宋艳培^1,³(),庄修政^1,³,詹昊²,徐彬^1,³,阴秀丽¹(),吴创之^1,³

^1.中国科学院广州能源研究所，中国科学院可再生能源重点实验室，广东省新能源和可再生能源重点实验室，广东广州 510640
^2.中国科学院广州地球化学研究所，有机地球化学国家重点实验室，广东省环境保护与资源利用重点实验室，广东广州 510640
^3.中国科学院大学，北京 100049

收稿日期:2019-11-25 修回日期:2020-01-16 出版日期:2020-05-05 发布日期:2020-05-05
通讯作者: 阴秀丽
作者简介:宋艳培（1994—），女，硕士研究生，songyp@ms.giec.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(51676195);广东省自然科学基金项目(2017B030308002);广州市科技计划项目(201904010098)

Investigation on thermochemical conversion characteristics and regularity of co-hydrothermal carbonization solid fuel from sewage sludge and lignite

Yanpei SONG^1,³(),Xiuzheng ZHUANG^1,³,Hao ZHAN²,Bin XU^1,³,Xiuli YIN¹(),Chuangzhi WU^1,³

^1.Key Laboratory of Renewable Energy, CAS, Guangdong Key Laboratory of New and Renewable Energy Research and Development, Guangzhou Institute of Energy Conversion, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, Guangdong, China
^2.State Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Environmental Protection and Resource Utilization, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, Guangdong, China
^3.University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received:2019-11-25 Revised:2020-01-16 Online:2020-05-05 Published:2020-05-05
Contact: Xiuli YIN

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

污泥和褐煤通过共水热碳化预处理以制备高品质固体燃料，为污泥和低阶煤的有效处理提供了一种可行方案。本研究主要考察了城市污泥（SS）和褐煤（LC）在不同温度下（120，180，240和300℃）进行共水热碳化制得的固相产物（水热炭）的热化学转化特性和规律，包括燃烧、热解和半焦CO₂气化过程，并分析了这些过程中的协同作用。结果表明，共水热碳化预处理对城市污泥和褐煤的热利用行为有显著影响。一方面，共水热碳化处理后的水热炭相对其计算值具有更高的产率、煤化程度、热值等，同时具有更低的灰分含量。另一方面，混合物水热炭在燃烧、热解和半焦CO₂气化过程均表现出一定的协同作用（促进燃烧和热解行为，降低气化活性），且水热温度在240℃附近时，这种作用最为明显。鉴于热解和气化过程的协同效果均低于燃烧过程，共水热碳化产物被认为更适合用于燃烧。这些发现表明，将共水热碳化改性提质处理与后续热化学工艺相结合，对于能源的产生和有机废弃物的利用都有一定的积极意义。

关键词: 城市污泥, 褐煤, 共水热碳化, 燃烧特性, 热解反应性, 半焦CO₂气化, 协同作用

Abstract:

The sludge and lignite are pretreated by co-hydrothermal carbonization to prepare high-quality solid fuel, which provides a feasible solution for the effective treatment of sludge and low-rank coal. This study mainly investigated the thermochemical conversion characteristics and regularity of solid phase products (hydrochars) prepared by Co-HTC of sewage sludge (SS) and lignite (LC) at different temperatures (120, 180, 240 and 300℃). Experiments included combustion, pyrolysis and char CO₂-gasification processes, and the synergistic effects in these processes were also analyzed. The results show that Co-HTC pretreatment has some significant effects on the thermal behavior of SS and LC. On the one hand, compared with the calculated value, the hydrochars after co-hydrothermal carbonization have higher yield, fuel rate, coalification degree, calorific value, etc., and they have lower ash content. On the other hand, all hydrochars have a certain synergistic effects in combustion, pyrolysis and char CO₂-gasification (promoting combustion and pyrolysis behavior, reducing gasification activity), and when the hydrothermal temperature is around 240℃, these synergistic effects are most obvious. Given that the synergistic effects of the pyrolysis and gasification processes are lower than the combustion process, co-hydrothermal carbonization products are considered to be more suitable for combustion. These findings indicate that the combination of the upgrading of Co-HTC with subsequent thermochemical processes has positive implications for the generation of energy and the utilization of organic wastes.

Key words: sewage sludge, lignite, co-hydrothermal carbonization, combustion characteristics, pyrolysis reactivity, CO₂-gasification, synergistic effect

中图分类号:

TK 6

宋艳培, 庄修政, 詹昊, 徐彬, 阴秀丽, 吴创之. 城市污泥/褐煤共水热碳化产物的热化学转化特性及规律研究[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(5): 2320-2332.

Yanpei SONG, Xiuzheng ZHUANG, Hao ZHAN, Bin XU, Xiuli YIN, Chuangzhi WU. Investigation on thermochemical conversion characteristics and regularity of co-hydrothermal carbonization solid fuel from sewage sludge and lignite[J]. CIESC Journal, 2020, 71(5): 2320-2332.

图/表 11

参考文献 38

1	Mun T Y, Tumsa T Z, Yang W, et al. Performance evaluation of co-firing various kinds of biomass with low rank coals in a 500 MWe coal-fired power plant[J]. Energy, 2016, 115: 954-962.
2	庄修政, 宋艳培, 詹昊, 等. 水热污泥与煤在混燃过程中的协同效应特性研究[J]. 燃料化学学报, 2018, 46(12): 1237-1446.
	Zhuang X Z, Song Y P, Zhan H, et al. Synergistic effects in co-combusting of hydrochar derived from sewage sludge with different-rank coals[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2018, 46(12): 1237-1446.
3	Xie C D, Liu J Y, Xie W M, et al. Quantifying thermal decomposition regimes of textile dyeing sludge, pomelo peel, and their blends[J]. Renewable Energy, 2018, 122: 55-64.
4	Parshetti G K, Liu Z G, Jain A, et al. Hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge for energy production with coal[J]. Fuel, 2013, 111: 201-210.
5	葛立超, 张彦威, 应芝, 等. 水热处理对我国典型褐煤气化特性的影响[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2013, 33(32): 14-20.
	Ge L C, Zhang Y W, Ying Z, et al. Influence of the hydrothermal dewatering on the gasification characteristics of typical chinese lignite[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2013, 33(32): 14-20.
6	Nonaka M, Hirajima T, Sasaki K. Upgrading of low rank coal and woody biomass mixture by hydrothermal treatment[J]. Fuel, 2011, 90(8): 2578-2584.
7	Zhuang X Z, Zhan H, Huang Y Q, et al. Conversion of industrial biowastes to clean solid fuels via hydrothermal carbonization (HTC): upgrading mechanism in relation to coalification process and combustion behavior[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2018, 267: 17-29.
8	Zhuang X Z, Huang Y Q, Liu H C, et al. Relationship between physicochemical properties and dewaterability of hydrothermal sludge derived from different source[J]. J. Environ. Sci. (China), 2018, 69: 261-270.
9	Liao J J, Fei Y, Marshall M, et al. Hydrothermal dewatering of a Chinese lignite and properties of the solid products[J]. Fuel, 2016, 180: 473-480.
10	Wu J, Wang J, Liu J, et al. Moisture removal mechanism of low-rank coal by hydrothermal dewatering: physicochemical property analysis and DFT calculation[J]. Fuel, 2017, 187: 242-249.
11	Saba A, Saha P, Reza M T. Co-hydrothermal carbonization of coal-biomass blend: influence of temperature on solid fuel properties[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2017, 167: 711-720.
12	He C, Wang K, Yang Y H, et al. Utilization of sewage-sludge-derived hydrochars toward efficient cocombustion with different-rank coals: effects of subcritical water conversion and blending scenarios[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2014, 28(9): 6140-6150.
13	Zhuang X Z, Song Y P, Zhan H, et al. Synergistic effects on the co-combustion of medicinal biowastes with coals of different ranks[J]. Renewable Energy, 2019, 140: 380-389.
14	Lin Y S, Ma X Q, Peng X W, et al. Combustion, pyrolysis and char CO₂-gasification characteristics of hydrothermal carbonization solid fuel from municipal solid wastes[J]. Fuel, 2016, 181: 905-915.
15	Zhang X J, Zhang L, Li A M. Hydrothermal co-carbonization of sewage sludge and pinewood sawdust for nutrient-rich hydrochar production: synergistic effects and products characterization[J]. J. Environ. Manage., 2017, 201: 52-62.
16	宋艳培, 庄修政, 詹昊, 等. 污泥与褐煤共水热碳化的协同特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(8): 3132-3141.
	Song Y P, Zhuang X Z, Zhan H, et al. Investigation on synergistic characteristics of sludge and lignite during co-hydrothermal carbonization[J]. CIESC Journal, 2019, 70(8): 3132-3141.
17	Li L W, Huang Y Q, Zhang D Y, et al. Uncovering structure-reactivity relationships in pyrolysis and gasification of biomass with varying severity of torrefaction[J]. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2018, 6(5): 6008-6017.
18	庄修政, 詹昊, 黄艳琴, 等. 两类药渣的水热提质效果及其燃烧特性研究[J]. 燃料化学学报, 2018, 46(8): 940-949.
	Zhuang X Z, Zhan H, Huang Y Q, et al. Influence of hydrothermal upgrading on the fuel characteristics and combustion behavior of herb wastes[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2018, 46(8): 940-949.
19	Ul Saqib N, Sarmah A K, Baroutian S. Effect of temperature on the fuel properties of food waste and coal blend treated under co-hydrothermal carbonization[J]. Waste Manag., 2019, 89: 236-246.
20	Otero M, Gomez X, Garcia A I, et al. Effects of sewage sludge blending on the coal combustion: a thermogravimetric assessment[J]. Chemosphere, 2007, 69(11): 1740-1750.
21	Xie C D, Liu J Y, Zhang X C, et al. Co-combustion thermal conversion characteristics of textile dyeing sludge and pomelo peel using TGA and artificial neural networks[J]. Applied Energy, 2018, 212: 786-795.
22	Yao Z L, Ma X Q. Characteristics of co-hydrothermal carbonization on polyvinyl chloride wastes with bamboo[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2018, 247: 302-309.
23	刁韩杰, 张进, 王敏艳, 等. 高温热解对污泥炭特性及其重金属形态变化的影响[J]. 环境工程, 2019, 37(3): 29-34.
	Diao H J, Zhang J, Wang M Y, et al. Effect of high temperature pyrolysis of sewage sludge on characteristics of residual biochar and speciation changes of heavy metals[J]. Environmental Engineering, 2019, 37(3): 29-34.
24	Xie Z Q, Ma X Q. The thermal behaviour of the co-combustion between paper sludge and rice straw[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2013, 146: 611-618.
25	Kambo H S, Dutta A. A comparative review of biochar and hydrochar in terms of production, physico-chemical properties and applications[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 45: 359-378.
26	Deb-Choudhury S, Haines S, Harland D, et al. Effect of cooking on meat proteins: mapping hydrothermal protein modification as a potential indicator of bioavailability[J]. J. Agric. Food Chem., 2014, 62(32): 8187-8196.
27	Basso D, Patuzzi F, Castello D, et al. Agro-industrial waste to solid biofuel through hydrothermal carbonization[J]. Waste Manag., 2016, 47(Pt A): 114-121.
28	冯钰. 煤热解半焦气化反应活性和燃烧特性研究[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2016.
	Feng Y. Gasification reactivity and combustion characteristic of chars from coal pyrolysis[D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2016.
29	李少华, 车德勇, 张学斌. 松木屑与褐煤共热解特性及动力学分析[J]. 华北电力大学学报, 2013, 40(4): 90-95.
	Li S H, Che D Y, Zhang X B. Co-pyrolysis characteristics and kinetics analysis of pine sawdust with lignite[J]. Journal of North China Electric Power University, 2013, 40(4): 90-95.
30	易霜, 何选明, 郑辉, 等. 甘蔗渣与褐煤共热解半焦的特性[J]. 化工进展, 2016, 35(10): 3149-3154.
	Yi S, He X M, Zheng H, et al. Characteristics of co-pyrolysis char of sugarcane bagasse and lignite[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2016, 35(10): 3149-3154.
31	Yuan S, Dai Z H, Zhou Z J, et al. Rapid co-pyrolysis of rice straw and a bituminous coal in a high-frequency furnace and gasification of the residual char[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2012, 109: 188-197.
32	Salema A A, Afzal M T, Motasemi F. Is there synergy between carbonaceous material and biomass during conventional pyrolysis? A TG-FTIR approach[J]. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2014, 105: 217-226.
33	Krerkkaiwan S, Fushimi C, Tsutsumi A, et al. Synergetic effect during co-pyrolysis/gasification of biomass and sub-bituminous coal[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2013, 115: 11-18.
34	Johannes I, Tiikma L, Luik H. Synergy in co-pyrolysis of oil shale and pine sawdust in autoclaves[J]. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2013, 104: 341-352.
35	Aboyade A O, Görgens J F, Carrier M, et al. Thermogravimetric study of the pyrolysis characteristics and kinetics of coal blends with corn and sugarcane residues[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2013, 106: 310-320.
36	Zhang L, Xu S P, Zhao W, et al. Co-pyrolysis of biomass and coal in a free fall reactor[J]. Fuel, 2007, 86(3): 353-359.
37	Lin Y S, Ma X Q, Yu Z S, et al. Investigation on thermochemical behavior of co-pyrolysis between oil-palm solid wastes and paper sludge[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2014, 166: 444-450.
38	Salavati S, Zhang C T, Zhang S, et al. Cross-interaction during co-gasification of wood, weed, plastic, tire and carton[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2019, 250: 109467.

Sample		Yield /%	Proximate analysis /%(mass, db)			Ultimate analysis /%(mass, daf)					HHV/ (MJ·kg^-1)
Sample		(mass, db)	A	VM	FC	C	H	O	N	S	HHV/ (MJ·kg^-1)
SS	SS-Raw	/	56.24	39.15	4.61	48.53	8.07	34.49	7.52	1.40	9.38
	SS-120	88.34	61.22	34.30	4.48	49.77	8.16	34.19	6.42	1.45	8.23
	SS-180	74.92	70.40	26.13	3.47	52.81	8.39	31.56	5.70	1.53	6.65
	SS-240	70.45	76.21	20.27	3.52	56.18	8.83	27.90	5.44	1.64	5.70
	SS-300	68.00	79.44	17.08	3.48	58.32	9.04	25.67	5.16	1.80	5.02
LC	LC-Raw	/	6.97	50.65	42.38	65.10	5.68	27.37	1.41	0.43	23.95
	LC-120	95.41	6.59	50.07	43.34	65.67	5.28	27.32	1.36	0.36	24.38
	LC-180	93.59	6.67	49.25	44.08	66.73	5.23	26.35	1.34	0.35	24.42
	LC-240	89.46	6.81	48.95	44.24	67.60	5.23	25.53	1.33	0.31	24.74
	LC-300	80.36	6.65	46.10	47.24	68.56	5.13	24.71	1.31	0.28	25.40
theoretical mixture	Mix-120(C)	91.88	33.91	42.18	23.91	57.72	6.72	30.76	3.89	0.91	16.31
	Mix-180(C)	84.26	38.53	37.69	23.77	59.77	6.81	28.95	3.52	0.94	15.55
	Mix-240(C)	79.95	41.51	34.61	23.88	61.89	7.03	26.72	3.38	0.98	15.22
	Mix-300(C)	74.18	43.05	31.59	25.36	63.44	7.09	25.19	3.24	1.04	15.21
mixture	Mix-120(E)	92.86	32.83	42.30	24.87	60.58	6.47	29.71	2.68	0.57	16.78
	Mix-180(E)	86.81	34.69	39.91	25.39	63.26	6.35	27.22	2.62	0.56	16.79
	Mix-240(E)	82.82	36.39	37.97	25.64	65.27	6.26	25.42	2.55	0.50	16.93
	Mix-300(E)	74.88	40.38	32.70	26.92	67.11	6.14	23.84	2.46	0.46	16.62

Sample		Yield /%	Proximate analysis /%(mass, db)			Ultimate analysis /%(mass, daf)					HHV/ (MJ·kg^-1)
Sample		(mass, db)	A	VM	FC	C	H	O	N	S	HHV/ (MJ·kg^-1)
SS	SS-Raw	/	56.24	39.15	4.61	48.53	8.07	34.49	7.52	1.40	9.38
	SS-120	88.34	61.22	34.30	4.48	49.77	8.16	34.19	6.42	1.45	8.23
	SS-180	74.92	70.40	26.13	3.47	52.81	8.39	31.56	5.70	1.53	6.65
	SS-240	70.45	76.21	20.27	3.52	56.18	8.83	27.90	5.44	1.64	5.70
	SS-300	68.00	79.44	17.08	3.48	58.32	9.04	25.67	5.16	1.80	5.02
LC	LC-Raw	/	6.97	50.65	42.38	65.10	5.68	27.37	1.41	0.43	23.95
	LC-120	95.41	6.59	50.07	43.34	65.67	5.28	27.32	1.36	0.36	24.38
	LC-180	93.59	6.67	49.25	44.08	66.73	5.23	26.35	1.34	0.35	24.42
	LC-240	89.46	6.81	48.95	44.24	67.60	5.23	25.53	1.33	0.31	24.74
	LC-300	80.36	6.65	46.10	47.24	68.56	5.13	24.71	1.31	0.28	25.40
theoretical mixture	Mix-120(C)	91.88	33.91	42.18	23.91	57.72	6.72	30.76	3.89	0.91	16.31
	Mix-180(C)	84.26	38.53	37.69	23.77	59.77	6.81	28.95	3.52	0.94	15.55
	Mix-240(C)	79.95	41.51	34.61	23.88	61.89	7.03	26.72	3.38	0.98	15.22
	Mix-300(C)	74.18	43.05	31.59	25.36	63.44	7.09	25.19	3.24	1.04	15.21
mixture	Mix-120(E)	92.86	32.83	42.30	24.87	60.58	6.47	29.71	2.68	0.57	16.78
	Mix-180(E)	86.81	34.69	39.91	25.39	63.26	6.35	27.22	2.62	0.56	16.79
	Mix-240(E)	82.82	36.39	37.97	25.64	65.27	6.26	25.42	2.55	0.50	16.93
	Mix-300(E)	74.88	40.38	32.70	26.92	67.11	6.14	23.84	2.46	0.46	16.62

Sample	Residue / % (mass)	Characteristic temperatures /℃			t_b / min	(dw/dt)_max / (%(mass)·min^-1)	(dw/dt)_mean / (%(mass)·min^-1)	S×10⁸
Sample	Residue / % (mass)	T_i	T_m	T_b	t_b / min	(dw/dt)_max / (%(mass)·min^-1)	(dw/dt)_mean / (%(mass)·min^-1)	S×10⁸
SS-Raw	57.95	215.43	318.46	708.24	49.28	1.80	0.48	2.65
SS-120	63.57	219.87	315.88	712.55	49.27	1.64	0.42	1.99
SS-180	70.61	223.59	318.47	715.35	49.18	1.57	0.34	1.48
SS-240	77.66	247.57	383.97	717.72	47.02	0.91	0.26	0.53
SS-300	78.83	262.92	389.35	730.65	46.77	0.95	0.24	0.46
LC-Raw	8.58	322.06	378.80	505.06	18.30	10.54	1.05	21.14
LC-120	3.82	325.18	373.62	505.70	18.05	11.09	1.11	22.93
LC-180	10.18	330.56	371.04	504.84	17.43	11.66	1.03	21.82
LC-240	9.36	335.79	363.28	502.90	16.71	14.12	1.04	25.94
LC-300	7.48	337.32	363.07	481.35	14.40	11.17	1.06	21.69
Mix-120(C)	34.63	312.78	368.37	520.88	20.81	6.42	0.75	9.47
Mix-180(C)	40.41	314.02	375.96	517.34	20.33	6.18	0.68	8.30
Mix-240(C)	43.47	319.56	363.42	510.33	19.08	7.54	0.65	9.40
Mix-300(C)	43.47	323.33	365.79	507.10	18.38	5.84	0.65	7.04
Mix-120(E)	30.44	312.78	370.74	520.97	20.82	6.09	0.80	9.55
Mix-180(E)	34.52	314.02	378.54	517.91	20.39	6.74	0.75	9.93
Mix-240(E)	33.84	324.17	378.93	514.65	19.05	7.74	0.76	10.88
Mix-300(E)	38.03	348.63	397.25	510.48	16.19	7.82	0.71	8.98

Sample	Residue / % (mass)	Characteristic temperatures /℃			t_b / min	(dw/dt)_max / (%(mass)·min^-1)	(dw/dt)_mean / (%(mass)·min^-1)	S×10⁸
Sample	Residue / % (mass)	T_i	T_m	T_b	t_b / min	(dw/dt)_max / (%(mass)·min^-1)	(dw/dt)_mean / (%(mass)·min^-1)	S×10⁸
SS-Raw	57.95	215.43	318.46	708.24	49.28	1.80	0.48	2.65
SS-120	63.57	219.87	315.88	712.55	49.27	1.64	0.42	1.99
SS-180	70.61	223.59	318.47	715.35	49.18	1.57	0.34	1.48
SS-240	77.66	247.57	383.97	717.72	47.02	0.91	0.26	0.53
SS-300	78.83	262.92	389.35	730.65	46.77	0.95	0.24	0.46
LC-Raw	8.58	322.06	378.80	505.06	18.30	10.54	1.05	21.14
LC-120	3.82	325.18	373.62	505.70	18.05	11.09	1.11	22.93
LC-180	10.18	330.56	371.04	504.84	17.43	11.66	1.03	21.82
LC-240	9.36	335.79	363.28	502.90	16.71	14.12	1.04	25.94
LC-300	7.48	337.32	363.07	481.35	14.40	11.17	1.06	21.69
Mix-120(C)	34.63	312.78	368.37	520.88	20.81	6.42	0.75	9.47
Mix-180(C)	40.41	314.02	375.96	517.34	20.33	6.18	0.68	8.30
Mix-240(C)	43.47	319.56	363.42	510.33	19.08	7.54	0.65	9.40
Mix-300(C)	43.47	323.33	365.79	507.10	18.38	5.84	0.65	7.04
Mix-120(E)	30.44	312.78	370.74	520.97	20.82	6.09	0.80	9.55
Mix-180(E)	34.52	314.02	378.54	517.91	20.39	6.74	0.75	9.93
Mix-240(E)	33.84	324.17	378.93	514.65	19.05	7.74	0.76	10.88
Mix-300(E)	38.03	348.63	397.25	510.48	16.19	7.82	0.71	8.98

Sample	Residue/ %(mass)	Characteristic temperatures /℃			t_b / min	(dw/dt)_max / (% (mass)·min^-1)	(dw/dt)_mean / (% (mass)·min^-1)	ΔT_1/2 / ℃	D×10⁷
Sample	Residue/ %(mass)	T_i	T_m	T_b	t_b / min	(dw/dt)_max / (% (mass)·min^-1)	(dw/dt)_mean / (% (mass)·min^-1)	ΔT_1/2 / ℃	D×10⁷
SS-Raw	56.35	216.83	280.48	1086.06	86.92	1.54	0.41	198.74	22.69
SS-120	58.95	234.46	331.94	1088.34	85.39	1.49	0.38	168.83	17.86
SS-180	67.89	246.66	345.37	1089.35	84.27	1.01	0.30	228.14	5.01
SS-240	73.90	253.98	454.12	1100.00	84.60	0.65	0.24	211.66	1.70
SS-300	76.74	283.81	456.65	1100.00	81.62	0.61	0.22	152.34	1.56
LC-Raw	48.66	283.81	421.67	946.89	66.31	1.59	0.48	191.89	17.06
LC-120	47.96	293.57	417.11	921.55	62.80	1.62	0.49	186.31	17.97
LC-180	49.23	296.01	423.95	919.26	62.33	1.54	0.47	184.79	16.00
LC-240	50.72	300.89	431.05	916.98	61.61	1.59	0.46	179.72	15.48
LC-300	54.18	315.53	440.18	914.70	59.92	1.45	0.43	188.35	10.88
Mix-120(C)	53.54	239.34	422.47	1085.81	84.65	1.19	0.43	253.42	9.37
Mix-180(C)	59.51	258.58	430.97	1089.36	83.08	1.08	0.38	223.77	6.64
Mix-240(C)	61.45	283.54	433.25	1100.00	81.65	1.09	0.36	179.17	6.88
Mix-300(C)	64.98	302.77	444.91	1100.00	79.72	1.03	0.33	152.36	5.75
Mix-120(E)	55.37	244.22	424.89	1076.87	83.27	1.16	0.42	261.78	7.95
Mix-180(E)	59.16	268.62	433.25	1080.99	81.24	1.18	0.38	210.85	7.50
Mix-240(E)	60.29	288.42	437.81	1085.81	79.74	1.25	0.37	167.77	8.70
Mix-300(E)	63.55	310.65	448.45	1090.37	77.97	1.15	0.34	141.15	7.26

城市污泥/褐煤共水热碳化产物的热化学转化特性及规律研究

Investigation on thermochemical conversion characteristics and regularity of co-hydrothermal carbonization solid fuel from sewage sludge and lignite

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 11

参考文献 38

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

Sample	Time X₅₀/min	R_max/min^-1	Sample	Time X₅₀/min	R_max/min^-1	Sample	Time X₅₀/min	R_max/min^-1	Sample	Time X₅₀/min	R_max/min^-1
SS-Raw	12.84	0.45	LC-Raw	0.66	1.13
SS-120	3.63	0.49	LC-120	0.65	1.15	Mix-120(C)	0.67	1.03	Mix-120(E)	0.85	0.94
SS-180	12.85	0.26	LC-180	0.70	1.05	Mix-180(C)	0.72	1.02	Mix-180(E)	0.93	0.81
SS-240	14.63	0.22	LC-240	0.68	1.08	Mix-240(C)	0.70	0.95	Mix-240(E)	0.93	0.83
SS-300	16.41	0.25	LC-300	0.69	1.06	Mix-300(C)	0.71	1.04	Mix-300(E)	1.13	0.71

[1]	程伟江, 汪何琦, 高翔, 李娜, 马赛男. 锂离子电池硅基负极电解液成膜添加剂的研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(2): 571-584.
[2]	郝泽光, 张乾, 高增林, 张宏文, 彭泽宇, 杨凯, 梁丽彤, 黄伟. 生物质与催化裂化油浆共热解协同作用研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 4070-4078.
[3]	杨晓阳, 王宝凤, 宋旭涛, 杨凤玲, 程芳琴. 污泥与高硫煤共水热碳化过程中硫氮形态转化规律[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(11): 5211-5219.
[4]	王润涛, 罗泽军, 王储, 朱锡锋. 生物油蒸馏残渣与废弃塑料催化共热解协同作用的研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(11): 5088-5097.
[5]	周烨, 肖慧霞, 王亦飞, 于广锁. 基于配煤和表面修饰改善褐煤成浆性的研究[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(4): 2233-2240.
[6]	朱新宇, 张光义, 张建伟, 温宏炎, 李运甲, 张建岭, 许光文. 醇提中药渣与废弃活性焦共燃特性及动力学分析[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(2): 1116-1124.
[7]	杨珍, 曹景沛, 朱陈, 刘天龙, 赵小燕. B-ZSM-5酸调控及催化褐煤热解挥发分制轻质芳烃研究[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(11): 5633-5642.
[8]	王博阳, 夏吉利, 董晓玲, 郭行, 李文翠. 不同变质程度煤衍生硬炭的储钠行为研究[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(11): 5738-5750.
[9]	温宏炎, 张玉明, 纪德馨, 张光义. 油泥焦与褐煤共燃特性及动力学[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(2): 755-765.
[10]	宋艳培, 庄修政, 詹昊, 王南涛, 阴秀丽, 吴创之. 污泥与褐煤共水热碳化的协同特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(8): 3132-3141.
[11]	辛善志, 黄芳, 刘晓烨, 许庆利, 米铁. 烘焙中药渣的热解与燃烧特性及其动力学分析[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(8): 3142-3150.
[12]	吴渊默, 张守玉, 张华, 慕晨, 李昊, 宋晓冰, 吕俊复. 高温干燥对褐煤孔隙结构及水分复吸的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(1): 199-206.
[13]	周新志, 邵伦, 崔岢, 杨阳, 周余, 张若彬. 褐煤微波干燥提质生产线的多级功率控制系统研究[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(S2): 274-282.
[14]	耿莉莉, 杨凯旭, 张诺伟, 陈秉辉. Ru和Cu协同催化湿式氧化处理氨氮废水[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(9): 3869-3878.
[15]	曲洋, 初茉, 朱书全, 张超, 郝成亮, 徐芳. 回转窑内利用液化残渣共热褐煤以抑制其粉化的影响因素分析[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(5): 2166-2174.