高温干燥对褐煤孔隙结构及水分复吸的影响

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20180822

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

利用卧式固定床实验炉制得不同温度下干燥处理的煤样，采用低温氮吸附法测试煤样的比表面积、孔体积和孔径分布等孔隙特征参数，使用复吸实验装置测定不同干燥程度褐煤煤样的平衡含水量，探索了高温干燥处理后褐煤孔隙结构的演变与其复吸特性之间的关联规律。结果表明：褐煤原煤及不同干燥温度(600~800℃)下半焦的等温吸附曲线均属于第Ⅱ类吸附等温线，褐煤原煤、600℃和700℃干燥半焦的吸附回线均属于L1型，800℃干燥半焦的吸附回线有从L1型转变为L2型的趋势；随着干燥温度的增加，干燥半焦的比表面积先增大后减小，介孔峰值的孔径微分同样先增大后减小，而大孔孔径微分基本保持不变；分形维数D₁和D₂呈相反的变化趋势，且D₂>D₁；不同干燥程度半焦的复吸曲线变化趋势相同，且平衡含水量随着干燥温度的升高而减小；半焦复吸特性与孔隙结构有关，平衡含水率与其孔容积之间呈较好的线性关系。

关键词: 褐煤, 干燥, 吸附, 孔隙结构, 分形, 复吸

Abstract:

The coal samples dried at different temperatures were prepared by horizontal fixed bed experimental furnace. The specific surface area, pore volume and pore diameter distribution of the coal samples were determined using nitrogen adsorption isotherm (-196℃). The relationship between the pore structure and moisture reabsorption behavior of the lignite samples was investigated using a self-designed reabsorption device. The experimental results show that the N₂ adsorption behavior of the semi-coke dried under different temperatures followed the type II adsorption isotherm, and the adsorption loops of the (raw coal and the semi-coke prepared under 600 and 700℃) belonged to type L1, while the adsorption loop of the semi-coke dried at 800℃ showed a transformation tendency from type L1 to type L2. With the increasing of drying temperature, the specific surface area of the dried semi-coke first increased slowly and then decreased and the pore diameter differential corresponded to the mesopore peak showed the same trend. Meanwhile, the pore diameter differential of the macropores remained unchanged. As the drying temperature increased, the fractal dimensions D₁ and D₂ changed in the opposite trends, and the value of D₂ was higher than D₁. The moisture reabsorption behaviors of the semi-coke followed the same trend, and the equilibrium moisture content decreased with the increasing drying temperature. The moisture reabsorption characteristics of the semi-coke were closely related to the pore structure, and the equilibrium moisture content had a good linear relationship with the pore volume.

Key words: lignite, drying, adsorption, pore structure, fractals, reabsorption

中图分类号:

TQ 536.1

吴渊默, 张守玉, 张华, 慕晨, 李昊, 宋晓冰, 吕俊复. 高温干燥对褐煤孔隙结构及水分复吸的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(1): 199-206.

Yuanmo WU, Shouyu ZHANG, Hua ZHANG, Chen MU, Hao LI, Xiaobing SONG, Junfu LYU. Relationship between pore structure and moisture reabsorption of lignite dewatered by high temperature drying process[J]. CIESC Journal, 2019, 70(1): 199-206.

图/表 8

表1 原料煤的工业分析和元素分析

Table 1 Proximate and ultimate analyses of raw material

Sample	Proximate analysis/%(mass)					Ultimate analysis/%(mass)
Sample	M_ar	M_ad	A_ad	V_ad	FC_ad	C_ad	H_ad	N_ad	S_t,ad	O_ad
YM	36.70	7.08	13.50	36.19	43.23	56.96	3.61	0.95	0.59	17.31

图1 干燥前后原煤及半焦的低温氮吸附等温线

Fig.1 Low temperature nitrogen sorption isotherms of coal samples before and after drying process

表2 原煤和干燥半焦的孔结构测试结果

Table 2 Pore structure tests of raw coal and dried semi-coke

Samples	Surface area/ (m²/g)	Pore volume/ (cm³/g)	Average pore diameter/nm
YM	2.13173	0.006769	3.40078
YM-600℃	2.20542	0.006695	3.40177
YM-700℃	2.20848	0.006561	3.39702
YM-800℃	1.71702	0.006455	4.29893

图2 原煤及干燥半焦的孔径分布变化

Fig.2 Change of pore size distribution of samples before and after drying process

图3 原煤及干燥半焦的FHH函数图

Fig.3 FHH function diagram of samples before and after drying process

表3 原煤和干燥半焦的分形维数计算结果

Table 3 Fractal dimension calculation result of samples before and after drying process

Samples	Fractal dimension D₁	Fractal dimension D₂
YM	2.3935	2.5258
YM-600℃	2.3464	2.5413
YM-700℃	2.3833	2.5481
YM-800℃	2.3974	2.4951

图4 不同干燥温度下半焦的复吸曲线

Fig.4 Moisture reabsorption curves of samples dried under different temperatures

图5 孔体积与半焦平衡含水量的相关性检验

Fig.5 Correlation test between pore volume and equilibrium moisture content of coal samples

参考文献 32

1	尹立群. 我国褐煤资源及其利用前景[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2004, 32(8): 12-14．
	YinL Q. Lignite resources and utilization outlook in China[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2004, 32(8): 12-14.
2	李恩利, 高建国, 崔红梅, 等. 我国褐煤提质项目风险分析[J]. 煤炭经济研究, 2009, (12): 25-26.
	LiE L, GaoJ G, CuiH M, et al. Risk analysis of lignite upgrading project in China[J]. Journal of Coal Economic Research, 2009, (12): 25-26.
3	李昊, 张守玉, 李尤, 等. 低阶煤干燥过程水分析出动力学行为分析[J]. 煤炭学报, 2017, 42(11): 3014-3020.
	LiH, ZhangS Y, LiY, et al. Analysis of kinetic behavior of water analysis in low rank coal drying process[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2017, 42(11): 3014-3020.
4	赵洪宇, 任善普, 贾晋炜, 等. 褐煤经四氢化萘处理后的结构及热解-气化特性分析[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(10): 4193-4201.
	ZhaoH Y, RenS P, JiaJ W, et al. Structure and pyrolysis-gasification characteristics of lignite treated with tetralin[J]. CIESC Journal, 2015, 66(10): 4193-4201.
5	郭熙, 张守玉, 董爱霞, 等. 高温烟气中单颗粒褐煤干燥特性实验研究[J]. 上海理工大学学报, 2014, 36(6): 516-521.
	GuoX, ZhangS Y, DongA X, et al. Experimental study on drying characteristics of single particle lignite in high temperature flue gas[J]. Journal of University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, 2014, 36(6): 516-521.
6	EvansD G. The brown-coal/water system(Part 4): Shrinkage on drying[J]. Fuel, 1973, 52(3): 186-190.
7	DeeviS C, SuubergE M. Physical changes accompanying drying of western US lignites[J]. Fuel, 1987, 66(4): 454-460.
8	景晓霞, 杨云龙, 李志强, 等. 褐煤物化结构对水分复吸的影响[J]. 洁净煤技术, 2014, 20(1): 29-33.
	JingX X, YangY L, LiZ Q, et al. Influence of lignite physical and chemical structure on moisture re-absorption[J]. Clean Coal Technology, 2014, 20(1): 29-33.
9	MrawS C, O'RourkeD F. Water in coal pores: the enthalpy of fusion reflects pore size distribution[J]. Journal of Colloid & Interface Science, 1982, 89(1): 268-271.
10	赵孟浩, 张守玉, 郑红俊, 等. 低阶煤中含氧官能团干燥前后的演变规律[J]. 煤炭学报, 2016, 41(2): 483-489.
	ZhaoM H, ZhangS Y, ZhengH J, et al. Evolution of oxygen-containing functional groups before and after drying in low-rank coals[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2016, 41(2): 483-489.
11	李尤, 张守玉, 茆青, 等. 干燥温度对褐煤干燥后复吸特性的影响[J]. 煤炭学报, 2016, 41(10): 2454-2459.
	LiY, ZhangS Y, MaoQ, et al. Effects of drying temperature on re-suction properties of lignite after drying[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2016, 41(10): 2454-2459.
12	杨云龙. 蒙东褐煤的干燥特性及其对水分复吸的影响[D]. 太原: 太原理工大学, 2013: 23-27.
	YangY L. Drying characteristics of Mengdong brown coal and its effect on water resorption [D]. Taiyuan: Taiyuan University of Technology, 2013: 23-27.
13	李开志, 杨海平, 陈应泉, 等. 棉杆热解过程中焦孔隙结构演变及分形特征[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2012, 32(s1): 115-120.
	LiK Z, YangH P, ChenY Q, et al. Evolution and fractal characteristics of coke pore structure during the pyrolysis of cotton stalks[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2012, 32(s1): 115-120.
14	刘业凤, 王如竹. 新型复合吸附干燥剂的吸附动力学特性研究[J]. 上海理工大学学报, 2006, (2): 107-110.
	LiuY F, WangR Z. Study on adsorption kinetics of novel composite adsorption desiccant[J]. Journal of University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, 2006, (2): 107-110.
15	周游, 孙莉云, 郑国强, 等. 乳状液超声凝聚破乳[J]. 化工学报, 2009, 60(8): 1997-2002.
	ZhouY, SunL Y, ZhengG Q, et al. Ultrasonic coagulation and demulsification of emulsion[J]. CIESC Journal, 2009, 60(8): 1997-2002.
16	胡松, 孙路石, 向军, 等. 高速热解条件下谷壳颗粒物理结构的演化[J]. 化工学报, 2007, 58(11): 2889-2894.
	HuS, SunL S, XiangJ, et al. Evolution of physical structure of chaff particles under high-speed pyrolysis conditions[J]. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering(China), 2007, 58(11): 2889-2894.
17	陈萍, 唐修义. 低温氮吸附法与煤中微孔隙特征的研究[J]. 煤炭学报, 2001, 26(5): 552-556.
	ChenP, TangX Y. Low-temperature nitrogen adsorption and micro-pore characteristics in coal[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2001, 26(5): 552-556.
18	黄少萌. 褐煤孔隙特性及水分脱除的迁移研究[D]. 北京: 中国矿业大学, 2016: 32-34.
	HuangS M. Study on pore characteristics and removal of water from lignite[D]. Beijing: China University of Mining and Technology, 2016: 32-34.
19	GeL, ZhangY, WangZ, et al. Effects of microwave irradiation treatment on physicochemical characteristics of Chinese low-rank coals[J]. Energy Conversion & Management, 2013, 71(71): 84-91.
20	张艳丽. 提质褐煤复吸水分主要影响因素的解析及其动力学分析[D]. 太原: 太原理工大学, 2015: 17-19.
	ZhangY L. Analysis of the main influencing factors of reabsorption of upgraded lignite and its dynamics analysis[D]. Taiyuan: Taiyuan University of Technology, 2015: 17-19.
21	HaulR. Adsorption, surface area and porosity[J]. Zeitschrift Für Physikalische Chemie, 1969, 63(1/2/3/4): 220-221.
22	ZhangZ, YangZ. Theoretical and practical discussion of measurement accuracy for physisorption with micro- and mesoporous materials[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2013, 34(10): 1797-1810.
23	PfeiferP, WuY J, ColeM W, et al. Multilayer adsorption on a fractally rough surface[J]. Physical Review Letters, 1989, 62(17): 1997.
24	ZhangS, TangS, TangD, et al. Determining fractal dimensions of coal pores by FHH model: problems and effects[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering, 2014, 21: 929-939.
25	XuS, ZhouZ, YuG, et al. Effects of pyrolysis on the pore structure of four Chinese coals[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2010, 24(2): 1114-1123.
26	SongX X, TangY G, LiW, et al. Fractal characteristics of adsorption pores of tectonic coal from Zhongliangshan southern coalmine[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2013, 38(1): 134-139.
27	YaoY, LiuD, TangD, et al. Fractal characterization of adsorption-pores of coals from North China: an investigation on CH₄ adsorption capacity of coals[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2008, 73(1): 27-42.
28	HuS, LiM, XiangJ, et al. Fractal characteristic of three Chinese coals[J]. Fuel, 2004, 83(10): 1307-1313.
29	LiuJ Z, ZhuJ F, ChengJ, et al. Pore structure and fractal analysis of Ximeng lignite under microwave irradiation[J]. Fuel, 2015, 146: 41-50.
30	TakanohashiT, YoshidaT, IinoM, et al. Mixed solvent extraction yield and structural changes of heat-treated coals and their relation to coal fluidity[J]. Tetsu- to- Hagane, 1996, 82(5): 366-371.
31	孙晓林, 郭晓镭, 陆海峰, 等. 呼伦贝尔褐煤等温干燥过程[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(7): 2628-2635.
	SunX L, GuoX L, LuH F, et al. Isothermal drying process of Hulunbeier lignite[J]. CIESC Journal, 2015, 66(7): 2628-2635.
32	平传娟, 周俊虎, 程军, 等. 混煤热解过程中的表面形态[J]. 化工学报, 2007, 58(7): 1798-1804.
	PingC J, ZhouJ H, ChengJ, et al. Surface morphology during coal pyrolysis process[J]. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering(China), 2007, 58(7): 1798-1804.

[1]	晁京伟, 许嘉兴, 李廷贤. 基于无管束蒸发换热强化策略的吸附热池的供热性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 302-310.
[2]	杨学金, 杨金涛, 宁平, 王访, 宋晓双, 贾丽娟, 冯嘉予. 剧毒气体PH₃的干法净化技术研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3742-3755.
[3]	盛冰纯, 于建国, 林森. 铝基锂吸附剂分离高钠型地下卤水锂资源过程研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3375-3385.
[4]	张瑞航, 曹潘, 杨锋, 李昆, 肖朋, 邓春, 刘蓓, 孙长宇, 陈光进. ZIF-8纳米流体天然气乙烷回收工艺的产品纯度关键影响因素分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3386-3393.
[5]	高燕, 伍鹏, 尚超, 胡泽君, 陈晓东. 基于双流体喷嘴的磁性琼脂糖微球的制备及其蛋白吸附性能探究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3457-3471.
[6]	陈吉, 洪泽, 雷昭, 凌强, 赵志刚, 彭陈辉, 崔平. 基于分子动力学的焦炭溶损反应及其机理研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2935-2946.
[7]	刘春雨, 周桓宇, 马跃, 岳长涛. CaO调质含油污泥干燥特性及数学模型[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 3018-3027.
[8]	王杰, 丘晓琳, 赵烨, 刘鑫洋, 韩忠强, 许雍, 蒋文瀚. 聚电解质静电沉积改性PHBV抗氧化膜的制备与性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 3068-3078.
[9]	王光宇, 张锴, 张凯华, 张东柯. 微波加热干燥煤泥热质传递及其能耗特性分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2382-2390.
[10]	王新悦, 王俊杰, 曹思贤, 王翠, 李灵坤, 吴宏宇, 韩静, 吴昊. 玻璃内包材界面修饰对机械应力诱导的单克隆抗体聚集体形成的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2580-2588.
[11]	刘道银, 陈柄岐, 张祖扬, 吴琰. 颗粒聚团结构对曳力特性影响的数值模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2351-2362.
[12]	王蕾, 王磊, 白云龙, 何柳柳. SA膜状锂离子筛的制备及其锂吸附性能[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2046-2056.
[13]	蔺彩虹, 王丽, 吴瑜, 刘鹏, 杨江峰, 李晋平. 沸石中碱金属阳离子对CO₂/N₂O吸附分离性能的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2013-2021.
[14]	李辰鑫, 潘艳秋, 何流, 牛亚宾, 俞路. 基于碳微晶结构的炭膜模型及其气体分离模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2057-2066.
[15]	陈韶云, 徐东, 陈龙, 张禹, 张远方, 尤庆亮, 胡成龙, 陈建. 单层聚苯胺微球阵列结构的制备及其吸附性能[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2228-2238.