320MW燃煤电厂痕量元素的分布、脱除及排放特性

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20170141

化工学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 68 ›› Issue (7): 2910-2917.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20170141

320MW燃煤电厂痕量元素的分布、脱除及排放特性

赵士林¹, 段钰锋¹, 丁艳军², 谷小兵³, 杜明生³, 姚婷¹, 陈聪¹, 刘猛¹, 吕剑虹¹

1 东南大学能源与环境学院, 能源热转换及其过程测控教育部重点实验室, 江苏南京 210096;
2 清华大学热能工程系, 北京 100084;
3 大唐环境产业集团股份有限公司, 北京 100097

收稿日期:2017-02-14 修回日期:2017-03-23 出版日期:2017-07-05 发布日期:2017-07-05
通讯作者: 段钰锋
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目（2016YFB0600604-02）；国家自然科学基金项目（51376046，51576044）。

Distribution, co-removal and emission characteristic of trace elements in 320 MW coal-fired power plant

ZHAO Shilin¹, DUAN Yufeng¹, DING Yanjun², GU Xiaobing³, DU Mingsheng³, YAO Ting¹, CHEN Cong¹, LIU Meng¹, LÜ Jianhong¹

1 Key Laboratory of Energy Thermal Conversion and Control of Ministry of Education, School of Energy and Environment, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, Jiangsu, China;
2 Deptartmant of Thermal Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;
3 Datang Environment Industry Group Co., Ltd., Beijing 100097, China

Received:2017-02-14 Revised:2017-03-23 Online:2017-07-05 Published:2017-07-05
Contact: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20170141
Supported by:
supported by the National Key Research and Development Program (2016YFB0600604-02) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51376046, 51576044).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

燃煤电厂痕量元素的排放已经引起了世界的广泛关注。在一台配置选择性催化还原（SCR）+静电除尘器（ESP）+湿法脱硫装置（WFGD）的320MW燃煤电厂上进行了12种痕量元素（Cr、Mn、Co、Ni、Cu、Zn、As、Mo、Cd、Sb、Ba、Pb）排放特性的实验研究，使用了US EPA Method 29对4个测点烟气痕量元素进行同时取样，考察了痕量元素在电厂中的分布、协同脱除以及在烟囱中的排放。结果表明：锅炉、SCR、ESP、WFGD和整个系统的痕量元素质量平衡率均在可接受的范围内。这12种痕量元素主要分布在底渣和飞灰中，分别占据底渣、ESP灰、WFGD脱除及烟囱排放痕量元素总量的1.90%～27.6%和72.3%～98.0%，然而，它们在烟囱和被WFGD脱除的部分所占比例较少，两者之和仅占0.11%～0.66%。ESP和WFGD对烟气痕量元素的脱除率分别为99.39%～99.95%和40.39%～78.98%，SCR+ESP+WFGD对烟气痕量元素的总体脱除率为99.79%～99.99%。ESP对痕量元素较高的脱除效率是APCDs系统具有较高的协同脱除效率的主要原因。烟囱排放的痕量元素浓度及排放因子分别为0.01～12.88 μg·m^-3和（0.002～4.57）×10^-12 g·J^-1。应进行更多的燃煤电厂痕量元素排放的研究，以便为中国燃煤电厂痕量元素的排放预测模型的建立以及相关标准的制定提供参考。

关键词: 煤燃烧, 痕量元素, 分布, 协同脱除, 排放, 环境

Abstract:

The emission of trace elements in coal-fired power plant has caused widespread concern in the world. The experimental study on the distribution and co-removal through air pollutant control devices (APCDs) and emission of trace elements (Cr, Mn, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, As, Mo, Cd, Sb, Ba, Pb) was conducted on a 320 MW coal-fired power plant equipped with selective catalytic reduction (SCR), electrostatic precipitator (ESP) and wet desulfurization unit (WFGD) in this study. US EPA Method 29 was used for the sampling of trace elements in flue gas. The results showed that mass balance rate of trace elements across the boiler, SCR, ESP, WFGD and the whole system was in an acceptable range. The trace elements were mainly distributed in bottom ash and fly ash with the proportion of 1.90%-27.6% and 72.3%-98.0% accounting for the sum of trace elements in bottom ash, ESP ash, stack and that removed by WFGD, respectively. The trace elements in stack and removed by WFGD accounted for little with sum in the range of 0.11%-0.66%. Co-removal rate of trace elements in flue gas across ESP and WFGD was 99.39%-99.95% and 40.39%-78.98%, respectively. The overall removal rate through SCR + ESP + WFGD was 99.79%-99.99%. The great removal rate across ESP was the main reason for high synergistic removal efficiency of APCDs. The concentration of trace elements in the stack is 0.01-12.88 μg·m^-³, while the emission factor is (0.002-4.57)×10^-¹² g·J^-¹. More studies on the emission of trace elements in coal-fired power plant should be carried out, which was beneficial for the establishment of emission models of trace elements in China's coal-fired power plants and the development of relevant standards.

Key words: coal combustion, trace elements, distributions, co-removal, emission, environment

中图分类号:

X511

赵士林, 段钰锋, 丁艳军, 谷小兵, 杜明生, 姚婷, 陈聪, 刘猛, 吕剑虹. 320MW燃煤电厂痕量元素的分布、脱除及排放特性[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(7): 2910-2917.

ZHAO Shilin, DUAN Yufeng, DING Yanjun, GU Xiaobing, DU Mingsheng, YAO Ting, CHEN Cong, LIU Meng, LÜ Jianhong. Distribution, co-removal and emission characteristic of trace elements in 320 MW coal-fired power plant[J]. CIESC Journal, 2017, 68(7): 2910-2917.

参考文献 36

[1]	SWAINE D J. Why trace elements are important [J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2000, 65/66: 21-33.
[2]	SENESI G S, BALDASSARRE G, SENESI N, et al. Trace element inputs into soils by anthropogenic activities and implications for human health [J]. Chemosphere, 1999, 39 (2): 343-377.
[3]	U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA). Clean air act amendments of 1990 [R]. Washington, DC, 1990.
[4]	EMEP/EEA. Air pollutant emission inventory guidebook: technical report No. 9/2009 [R]. 2009. http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/emep-eea-emission-inventory-guidebook-2009.
[5]	CHENG K, WANG Y, TIAN H Z, et al. Atmospheric emission characteristics and control policies of five precedent-controlled toxic heavy metals from anthropogenic sources in China [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2015, 49: 1206-1214.
[6]	YOU C F, XU X C. Coal combustion and its pollution control in China [J]. Energy, 2010, 35 (11): 467-472.
[7]	WU Y, WANG S X, STREETS D G, et al. Trends in anthropogenic mercury emissions in China from 1995 to 2003 [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2006, 40 (17): 5312-5318.
[8]	STREETS D G, HAO J M, WU Y, et al. Anthropogenic mercury emissions in China [J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2005, 39 (40): 7789-7806.
[9]	GOODARZI F, HUGGINS F E, SANEI H. Assessment of elements, speciation of As, Cr, Ni and emitted Hg for a Canadian power plant burning bituminous coal [J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2008, 74: 1-12.
[10]	SWANSON S M, ENGLE M A, RUPPERT L F, et al. Partitioning of selected trace elements in coal combustion products from two coal-burning power plants in the United States [J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2013, 113: 116-126.
[11]	LOPEZ-ANTON M A, DIAZ-SOMOANO M, OCHOA-GONZALEZ R M, et al. Distribution of trace elements from a coal burned in two different Spanish power stations [J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2011, 50, 12208-12216.
[12]	BHANGARE R C, AJMAL P Y, SAHU S K, et al. Distribution of trace elements in coal and combustion residues from five thermal power plants in India [J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2011, 86: 349-356.
[13]	KLIKA Z, BARTONOVA L, SPEARS D A. Effect of boiler output on trace element partitioning during coal combustion in two fluidised-bed power stations [J]. Fuel, 2001, 80: 907-917.
[14]	TANG Q, LIU G J, YAN Z C, et al. Distribution and fate of environmentally sensitive elements (arsenic, mercury, stibium and selenium) in coal-fired power plants at Huainan, Anhui, China [J]. Fuel, 2012, 95: 334-339.
[15]	王超, 刘小伟, 吴建群, 等. 220 MW 热电联产锅炉中痕量元素的迁移及分布特性 [J]. 化工学报, 2014, 65 (9): 3604-3608.WANG C, LIU X W, WU J Q, et al. Migration and distribution characteristics of trace elements in 220 MW cogeneration boiler [J]. CIESC Journal, 2014, 65 (9): 3604-3608.
[16]	MYERS J, KELLY T, LAWRIE C, et al. Method M29 sampling and analysis: environmental technology verification report [R]. Battelle, Columbus, Ohio: United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 2002: 15-22.
[17]	ZHAO S L, DUAN Y F, TAN H Z, et al. Migration and emission characteristics of trace elements in a 660 MW coal-fired power plant of China [J]. Energy & Fuels, 2016, 30: 5937-5944.
[18]	WANG S X, ZHANG L, LI G H, et al. Mercury emission and speciation of coal-fired power plants in China [J]. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 2010, 10: 1183-1192.
[19]	QUICK W J, IRONS R M A. Trace element partitioning during the firing of washed and untreated power station coals [J]. Fuel, 2002, 81: 665-672.
[20]	HUANG Y J, JIN B S, ZHONG Z P, et al. Trace elements (Mn, Cr, Pb, Se, Zn, Cd and Hg) in emissions from a pulverized coal boiler [J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2004, 86 (1): 23-32.
[21]	MEIJ R. Trace element behavior in coal-fired power plants [J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 1994, 39: 199-217.
[22]	MEIJ R, WINKWL B H. Trace elements in world steam coal and their behavior in Dutch coal-fired power stations: a review [J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2009, 77: 289-293.
[23]	XU M, YAN R, ZHENG C, et al. Status of trace element emission in a coal combustion process: a review [J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2003, 85: 215-237.
[24]	TANG Q, LIU G J, ZHOU C C, et al. Distribution of trace elements in feed coal and combustion residues from two coal-fired power plants at Huainan, Anhui, China [J]. Fuel, 2013, 107: 315-322.
[25]	ZHOU C C, LIU G J, YAN Z C, et al. Transformation behavior of mineral composition and trace elements during coal gangue combustion [J]. Fuel, 2012, 97 (2): 644-650.
[26]	WU H, GLARBORG P, FRANDSEN F J, et al. Trace elements in co-combustion of solid recovered fuel and coal [J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2013, 105 (1): 212-221.
[27]	RYO Y, TAYA Y, TARO I, et al. Emissions of particles and trace elements from coal gasification [J]. Fuel, 2013, 108: 67-72.
[28]	SEKINE Y, SAKAJIRI K, KIKUCHI E, et al. Release behavior of trace elements from coal during high-temperature processing [J]. Powder Technology, 2008, 180 (1/2): 210-215.
[29]	YAN R, GAUTHIER D, FLAMANT G. Volatility and chemistry of trace elements in a coal combustor [J]. Fuel, 2001, 80 (15): 2217-2226.
[30]	ZHANG J, HAN C L, XU Y Q. The release of the hazardous elements from coal in the initial stage of combustion process [J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2003, 84 (1/2/3): 121-133.
[31]	ZHAO S L, DUAN Y F, TAN H Z, et al. Migration and emission characteristics of trace elements in a 660 MW coal-fired power plant of China [J]. Energy & Fuels, 2016, 30: 5937-5944.
[32]	中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中华人民共和国国家环境保护部. 火电厂大气污染物排放标准: GB 13223-2011 [S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2011.General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China, Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People's Republic of China. Emission standard of air pollutants for thermal power plants: GB 13223-2011 [S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2011.
[33]	中华人民共和国国家环境保护局. 大气污染物综合排放标准: GB 16297-1996 [S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 1996.Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People's Republic of China. Integrated emission standard of air pollutants: GB 16297-1996 [S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 1996.
[34]	European Commission. Air quality standards [S]. 2015, http://ec. europa.eu/environment/air/quality/standards.htm.
[35]	DENG S, SHI Y J, LIU Y, et al. Emission characteristics of Cd, Pb and Mn from coal combustion: field study at coal-fired power plants in China [J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2014, 126: 469-475.
[36]	WU H, QIU J R, TANG S L, et al. Mercury and halides emissions from 200 MW pulverized coal combustion boiler [J]. Asia-Pac. J. Chem. Eng., 2010, 5: 281-286.

320MW燃煤电厂痕量元素的分布、脱除及排放特性

Distribution, co-removal and emission characteristic of trace elements in 320 MW coal-fired power plant

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 36

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	邵苛苛, 宋孟杰, 江正勇, 张旋, 张龙, 高润淼, 甄泽康. 水平方向上冰中受陷气泡形成和分布实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 161-164.
[2]	连梦雅, 谈莹莹, 王林, 陈枫, 曹艺飞. 地下水预热新风一体化热泵空调系统制热性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 311-319.
[3]	李艺彤, 郭航, 陈浩, 叶芳. 催化剂非均匀分布的质子交换膜燃料电池操作条件研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3831-3840.
[4]	王浩, 王振雷. 基于自适应谱方法的裂解炉烧焦模型化简策略[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3855-3864.
[5]	杨越, 张丹, 郑巨淦, 涂茂萍, 杨庆忠. NaCl水溶液喷射闪蒸-掺混蒸发的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3279-3291.
[6]	段重达, 姚小伟, 朱家华, 孙静, 胡南, 李广悦. 环境因素对克雷白氏杆菌诱导碳酸钙沉淀的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3543-3553.
[7]	吕龙义, 及文博, 韩沐达, 李伟光, 高文芳, 刘晓阳, 孙丽, 王鹏飞, 任芝军, 张光明. 铁基导电材料强化厌氧去除卤代有机污染物：研究进展及未来展望[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3193-3202.
[8]	邵伟明, 韩文学, 宋伟, 杨勇, 陈灿, 赵东亚. 基于分布式贝叶斯隐马尔可夫回归的动态软测量建模方法[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2495-2502.
[9]	郑志航, 马郡男, 闫子涵, 卢春喜. 提升管射流影响区内压力脉动特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2335-2350.
[10]	刘庆超, 贾辉, 许逸飞, 路娜, 尹延梅, 王捷. 基于FBG力学传感的曝气生物滤池中剪切力分布研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1755-1763.
[11]	王瑞恒, 何品晶, 吕凡, 章骅. 垃圾焚烧飞灰水洗后三种固液分离方法参数比较及优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1712-1723.
[12]	陈瑞哲, 程磊磊, 顾菁, 袁浩然, 陈勇. 纤维增强树脂复合材料化学回收技术研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 981-994.
[13]	孟金琳, 汪宇, 张群锋, 叶光华, 周兴贵. 介孔材料低温氮气吸脱附的孔道网络模型[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(2): 893-903.
[14]	查坦捷, 杨涵, 秦荷杰, 关小红. 仿生材料的构建及其在水环境化学领域中的研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(2): 585-598.
[15]	何仁初, 张朝晖, 杨明磊, 王聪, 奚桢浩. 考虑碳排放因素的汽油调合在线优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(2): 818-829.