一种鲁棒半监督建模方法及其在化工过程故障检测中的应用

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20161205

化工学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 68 ›› Issue (3): 1109-1115.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20161205

一种鲁棒半监督建模方法及其在化工过程故障检测中的应用

周乐¹, 宋执环², 侯北平¹, 费正顺¹

1 浙江科技学院自动化与电气工程学院, 浙江杭州 310024;
2 浙江大学控制科学与工程学院, 浙江杭州 310027

收稿日期:2016-08-30 修回日期:2016-12-03 出版日期:2017-03-05 发布日期:2017-03-05
通讯作者: 周乐,zhoule@zust.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（61603342）；浙江省自然科学基金项目（LQ15F030006）；浙江省教育厅项目（Y201636867）。

Robust semi-supervised modelling method and its application to fault detection in chemical processes

ZHOU Le¹, SONG Zhihuan², HOU Beiping¹, FEI Zhengshun¹

1 School of Automation and Electrical Engineering, Zhejiang University of Science and Technology, Hangzhou 310024, Zhejiang, China;
2 College of Control Science and Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, Zhejiang, China

Received:2016-08-30 Revised:2016-12-03 Online:2017-03-05 Published:2017-03-05
Contact: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20161205
Supported by:
supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61603342),the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (LQ15F030006) and the Educational Commission Research Program of Zhejiang Province (Y201636867).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

复杂化工过程的观测样本往往包含着测量噪声与少量的离群点数据，而这些受污染的数据会影响数据驱动的过程建模与故障检测方法的准确性。本文考虑了化工过程测量样本的这一实际情况，提出了一种鲁棒半监督PLVR模型（RSSPLVR），并利用核方法将其扩展为非线性的形式（K-RSSPLVR）。此类算法利用基于样本相似度的加权系数作为概率模型的先验参数，能有效消除离群点对建模的影响。利用加权后的建模样本，本文通过EM算法训练了RSSPLVR和K-RSSPLVR的模型参数，并提出了相应的故障检测算法。最后，通过TE过程仿真实验验证了所提出方法的有效性。

关键词: 故障检测, 鲁棒模型, 半监督, 过程控制, 过程系统, 主元分析

Abstract:

In most complex chemical processes, measurements are often collected with noises and some outliers. These contaminated data would have negative effect on the accuracy of data-based process modelling and fault detection. A new robust semi-supervised PLVR model (RSSPLVR) was proposed by consideration of the real measuring environment in chemical processes and extended to a nonlinear model K-RSSPLVR with a kernel methodology. In both RSSPLVR and K-RSSPLVR, a weighted coefficient based on sample similarity among all observations was used as prior checking parameter of probability model to effectively eliminate influence of outliers on modelling. Model parameter training was accomplished by analysis of the weighted dataset with EM algorithm and a fault detection scheme was developed. Finally, TE process simulation demonstrated effectiveness of the proposed modelling methods.

Key words: fault detection, robust model, semi-supervised learning, process control, process systems, principal component analysis

中图分类号:

TP277

周乐, 宋执环, 侯北平, 费正顺. 一种鲁棒半监督建模方法及其在化工过程故障检测中的应用[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(3): 1109-1115.

ZHOU Le, SONG Zhihuan, HOU Beiping, FEI Zhengshun. Robust semi-supervised modelling method and its application to fault detection in chemical processes[J]. CIESC Journal, 2017, 68(3): 1109-1115.

参考文献 31

[1]	QIN S J. Survey on data-driven industrial process monitoring and diagnosis[J]. Annual Reviews in Control, 2012, 36(2):220-234.
[2]	刘强, 柴天佑, 秦泗钊,等. 基于数据和知识的工业过程监视及故障诊断综述[J]. 控制与决策, 2010, 25(6):801-807. LIU Q, CHAI T Y, QIN S J, et al. Progress of data-driven and knowledge-driven process monitoring and fault diagnosis for industry process[J]. Control and Decision, 2010, 25(6):801-807.
[3]	GE Z, SONG Z,GAO F R. Review of recent research on data-based process monitoring[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2013, 52(10):3543-3562.
[4]	YIN S, DING S X, XIE X, et al. A review on basic data-driven approaches for industrial process monitoring[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2014, 61(11):6418-6428.
[5]	LI W, YUE H H, VALLE-CERVANTES S, et al. Recursive PCA for adaptive process monitoring[J]. Journal of Process Control, 2000, 10(5):471-486.
[6]	YIN S, DING S X, HAGHANI A, et al. A comparison study of basic data-driven fault diagnosis and process monitoring methods on the benchmark Tennessee Eastman process[J]. Journal of Process Control, 2012, 22(9):1567-1581.
[7]	WOODALL W H, MONTGOMERY D C. Some current directions in the theory and application of statistical process monitoring[J]. Journal of Quality Technology, 2014, 46(1):78.
[8]	QIN S J. Statistical process monitoring:basics and beyond[J]. Journal of Chemometrics, 2003, 17(8/9):480-502.
[9]	MACGREGOR J F, JAECKLE C, KIPARISSIDES C, et al. Process monitoring and diagnosis by multiblock PLS methods[J]. AIChE Journal, 1994, 40(5):826-838.
[10]	CHEN J, LIU K C. On-line batch process monitoring using dynamic PCA and dynamic PLS models[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2002, 57(1):63-75.
[11]	LI G, QIN S J, ZHOU D. Geometric properties of partial least squares for process monitoring[J]. Automatica, 2010, 46(1):204-210.
[12]	ZHOU D, LI G, QIN S J. Total projection to latent structures for process monitoring[J]. AIChE Journal, 2010, 56(1):168-178.
[13]	FACCO P, DOPLICHER F, BEZZO F, et al. Moving average PLS soft sensor for online product quality estimation in an industrial batch polymerization process[J]. Journal of Process Control, 2009, 19(3):520-529.
[14]	MARJANOVIC O, LENNOX B, SANDOZ D, et al. Real-time monitoring of an industrial batch process[J]. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 2006, 30(10/11/12):1476-1481.
[15]	ZHU X, GHAHRAMANI Z, LAFFERTY J. Semi-Supervised Learning Using Gaussian Fields and Harmonic Functions[M]. ICML, 2003.
[16]	MURPHY K P. Machine Learning:A Probabilistic Perspective[M]. The MIT Press, 2012.
[17]	ZHOU L, CHEN J, SONG Z, et al. Semi-supervised PLVR models for process monitoring with unequal sample sizes of process variables and quality variables[J]. Journal of Process Control, 2015, 26:1-16.
[18]	ZHU J, GE Z, SONG Z. Robust semi-supervised mixture probabilistic principal component regression model development and application to soft sensors[J]. Journal of Process Control, 2015, 32:25-37.
[19]	STANIMIROVA I, DASZYKOWSKI M, WALCZAK B. Dealing with missing values and outliers in principal component analysis[J]. Talanta, 2007, 72(1):172-178.
[20]	CHEN T, MARTIN E, MONTAGUE G. Robust probabilistic PCA with missing data and contribution analysis for outlier detection[J]. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 2009, 53(10):3706-3716.
[21]	ZHU J, GE Z, SONG Z. Robust modeling of mixture probabilistic principal component analysis and process monitoring application[J]. AIChE Journal, 2014, 60(6):2143-2157.
[22]	LEE J M, YOO C, CHOI S W, et al. Nonlinear process monitoring using kernel principal component analysis[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2004, 59(1):223-23
[23]	CHO J H, LEE J M, CHOI S W, et al. Fault identification for process monitoring using kernel principal component analysis[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2005, 60(1):279-288.
[24]	HU Y, MA H, SHI H. Enhanced batch process monitoring using just-in-time-learning based kernel partial least squares[J]. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2013, 123:15-27.
[25]	YUAN X, YE L, BAO L, et al. Nonlinear feature extraction for soft sensor modeling based on weighted probabilistic PCA[J]. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2015, 147:167-175.
[26]	BOX G E. Some theorems on quadratic forms applied in the study of analysis of variance problems(Ⅰ):Effect of inequality of variance in the one-way classification[J]. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1954, 25(2):290-302.
[27]	KANO M, NAGAO K, HASEBE S, et al. Comparison of multivariate statistical process monitoring methods with applications to the Eastman challenge problem[J]. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 2002, 26(2):161-174.
[28]	KU W, STORER R H, GEORGAKIS C. Disturbance detection and isolation by dynamic principal component analysis[J]. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 1995, 30(1):179-196.
[29]	LYMAN P R, GEORGAKIS C. Plant-wide control of the Tennessee Eastman problem[J]. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 1995, 19(3):321-331.
[30]	DOWNS J J, VOGEL E F. A plant-wide industrial process control problem[J]. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 1993, 17(3):245-255.
[31]	CHIANG L H, BRAATZ R D, RUSSELL E L. Fault Detection and Diagnosis in Industrial Systems[M]. Springer, 2001.

一种鲁棒半监督建模方法及其在化工过程故障检测中的应用

Robust semi-supervised modelling method and its application to fault detection in chemical processes

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 31

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	康飞, 吕伟光, 巨锋, 孙峙. 废锂离子电池放电路径与评价研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3903-3911.
[2]	张逸豪, 王振雷. 基于最大信息系数的分组支持向量数据描述故障检测[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3865-3878.
[3]	陈哲文, 魏俊杰, 张玉明. 超临界水煤气化耦合SOFC发电系统集成及其能量转化机制[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3888-3902.
[4]	曹跃, 余冲, 李智, 杨明磊. 工业数据驱动的加氢裂化装置多工况切换过渡状态检测[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3841-3854.
[5]	郑玉圆, 葛志伟, 韩翔宇, 王亮, 陈海生. 中高温钙基材料热化学储热的研究进展与展望[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3171-3192.
[6]	王光, 单发顺, 钱禹丞, 焦建芳. 基于集成学习传递熵的化工过程微小故障检测方法[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2967-2978.
[7]	李贵贤, 曹阿波, 孟文亮, 王东亮, 杨勇, 周怀荣. 耦合固体氧化物电解槽的CO₂制甲醇过程设计与评价研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2999-3009.
[8]	邵远哲, 赵忠盖, 刘飞. 基于共同趋势模型的非平稳过程质量相关故障检测方法[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2522-2537.
[9]	苏晓丹, 朱干宇, 李会泉, 郑光明, 孟子衡, 李防, 杨云瑞, 习本军, 崔玉. 湿法磷酸半水工艺考察与石膏结晶过程研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1805-1817.
[10]	贠程, 王倩琳, 陈锋, 张鑫, 窦站, 颜廷俊. 基于社团结构的化工过程风险演化路径深度挖掘[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1639-1650.
[11]	宋冰, 郑城风, 侍洪波, 陶阳, 谭帅. 基于VAE-OCCA的质量相关故障检测方法研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1630-1638.
[12]	张中秋, 李宏光, 石逸林. 基于人工预测调控策略的复杂化工过程多任务学习方法[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1195-1204.
[13]	张江淮, 赵众. 碳三加氢装置鲁棒最小协方差约束控制及应用[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1216-1227.
[14]	王子宗, 索寒生, 赵学良. 数字孪生智能乙烯工厂研究与构建[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1175-1186.
[15]	杨明辉, 刘晓月, 邓晓刚, 廖明燕, 侯春望. 基于加权概率CVDA的动态化工系统微小故障检测[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 3963-3972.