相变套管式储热系统放冷性能实验研究

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20190886

化工学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 71 ›› Issue (4): 1580-1587.DOI: 10.11949/0438-1157.20190886

相变套管式储热系统放冷性能实验研究

白志蕊¹(),徐洪涛¹(),屈治国²,张剑飞²,苗玉波¹

^1.上海理工大学能源与动力工程学院, 上海市动力工程多相流动与传热重点实验室，上海 200093
^2.西安交通大学能源与动力工程学院, 热流科学与工程教育部重点实验室，陕西西安 710049

收稿日期:2019-08-05 修回日期:2019-12-24 出版日期:2020-04-05 发布日期:2020-04-05
通讯作者: 徐洪涛
作者简介:白志蕊（1995—），女，硕士研究生， baizr210@163.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFF0216003);上海市国际科技合作基金项目(18160743600)

Experimental study of phase change sleeve tube thermal storage system performance during charging

Zhirui BAI¹(),Hongtao XU¹(),Zhiguo QU²,Jianfei ZHANG²,Yubo MIAO¹

^1.Shanghai Key Laboratory of Multiphase Flow and Heat Transfer in Power Engineering, School of Energy and Power Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China
^2.Key Laboratory of Thermo-Fluid Science and Engineering, Ministry of Education, School of Energy and Power Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, Shaanxi, China

Received:2019-08-05 Revised:2019-12-24 Online:2020-04-05 Published:2020-04-05
Contact: Hongtao XU

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

搭建了套管式相变储热实验系统，分别填充不同质量分数膨胀石墨与正十五烷制备而成的复合相变材料，对系统进行重复充放冷循环实验。采用有效储热比E_st和储能效率ε来表征系统性能，研究了复合相变材料中换热增强对套管式潜热储能系统放冷性能的影响。结果表明：同Re数下，相变材料热导率为0.14 W·m^-1·K^-1（工况A）放冷结束时间为1770 s，相同Re条件下热导率提升至7.10 W·m^-1·K^-1（工况B）和11.60 W·m^-1·K^-1（工况C）的结束时间分别可缩短77.3%、78.9%；热导率的增加可显著提高系统有效储热比E_st和储能效率ε，热导率从0.14 W·m^-1·K^-1增加到11.60 W·m^-1·K^-1，E_st在层流区、过渡区和湍流区分别可提升33.3%、350.0%及129.6%，ε分别可提升26.8%、52.9%及14.6%；Re的增加使得工况A和工况B中E_st和ε呈现下降趋势，工况C中E_st在Re=4298出现峰值1.62。

关键词: 相变套管式储热系统, 复合材料, 相变, 热传导, 有效储热比

Abstract:

In this paper, a casing type phase change heat storage experiment system is set up, which is filled with composite phase change materials made of expanded graphite and n-pentadecane with different mass fractions, and the system is charged and discharged repeatedly . The heat transfer enhancement of the sleeve tube thermal storage system was characterized by effective heat storage ratio E_st and energy storage efficiency ε. The results show that the discharging process was completed by 1770 s (Condition A, k_p =0.14 W·m^-1·K^-1). The completed time for Condition B (k_p =7.10 W·m^-1·K^-1) and Condition C (k_p =11.60 W·m^-1·K^-1) were shortened by 77.3% and 78.9% under the same Reynolds number. E_st and ε of the system increase significantly with the increasing thermal conductivity. As the thermal conductivity increases from 0.14 W·m^-1·K^-1 to 11.60 W·m^-1·K^-1, E_st increased by 33.3%, 350.0% and 129.6% in the laminar region, transition region and turbulent region, and ε increased by 26.8%, 52.9% and 14.6% respectively. However, E_st and ε decrease as Re increases in Condition B and Condition C. E_st in Condition C shows a peak of 1.62 at Re = 4298.

Key words: phase change sleeve tube thermal storage system, composites, phase change, heat Conduction, effective heat storage ratio

中图分类号:

TK 123

白志蕊, 徐洪涛, 屈治国, 张剑飞, 苗玉波. 相变套管式储热系统放冷性能实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(4): 1580-1587.

Zhirui BAI, Hongtao XU, Zhiguo QU, Jianfei ZHANG, Yubo MIAO. Experimental study of phase change sleeve tube thermal storage system performance during charging[J]. CIESC Journal, 2020, 71(4): 1580-1587.

图/表 6

图 1 相变材料强化储热实验系统图

Fig.1 Schematic of PCM enhanced heat storage experimental system

图 2 实验LHTES系统布置图

Fig.2 Arrangement plan of experimental LHTES system

表 1 复合PCM物性参数

Table 1 Physical parameters of composite PCM

样品编号

EG质量分数

ω/%

相变温度

T_p/℃

密度ρ_p/

(kg·m^-3)

比热容（固/液）

c_p,_p/(kJ·kg^-1·℃^-1)

热导率

k_p /(W·m^-1·K^-1)

相变潜热

L/(kJ·kg^-1)

图3 放冷过程中PCM温度Tpi及HTF温度Thi随时间变化的曲线

Fig.3 PCM temperature Tpi and HTF temperature Thi change with time during discharging process

图4 Re=4298时工况 C中Est、ε及Qeff与出口温度之间的关系

Fig.4 Relationship between Est, ε and Qeffand outlet temperature under working Condition C under Re=4298

图5 不同工况下系统的性能指标分布

Fig.5 Performance of LHTES system under different working conditions

参考文献 31

1	Sharma A, Tyagi V V, Chen C R, et al. Review on thermal energy storage with phase change materials and applications[J]. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 2009, 13(2): 318-345.
2	Mahdi J M, Lohrasbi S, Nsofor E C. Hybrid heat transfer enhancement for latent-heat thermal energy storage systems: a review[J]. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 2019, 137: 630-649.
3	Ding W, Bonk A, Gussone J, et al. Electrochemical measurement of corrosive impurities in molten chlorides for thermal energy storage[J]. J. Energy Storage, 2018, 15: 408-414.
4	胡康, 徐飞, 陈磊, 等. 利用相变储热提升电力系统可再生能源消纳[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2018, 39(1): 1-7.
	Hu K, Xu F, Chen L, et al. Improve the integration of renewable energy sources into power system by the usage of phase-change heat storage[J]. J. Eng. Thermophys., 2018, 39(1): 1-7.
5	Rahman A, Smith A D, Fumo N. Performance modeling and parametric study of a stratified water thermal storage tank[J]. Appl. Therm. Eng., 2016, 100: 668-679.
6	Tang J L, Ouyang Z R, Shi Y Y. Experimental analysis and FLUENT simulation of a stratified chilled water storage system[J]. Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 2019, 134(3): 118-126.
7	Nazir H, Batool M, Bolivar O F J, et al. Recent developments in phase change materials for energy storage applications: a review[J]. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 2019, 129: 491-523.
8	Agyenim F, Hewitt N, Eames P, et al. A review of materials, heat transfer and phase change problem formulation for latent heat thermal energy storage systems (LHTESS)[J]. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 2010, 14(2): 615-628.
9	Kalnæs S E, Jelle B P. Phase change materials and products for building applications: a state-of-the-art review and future research opportunities[J]. Energ. Buildings, 2015, 94: 150-176.
10	Su D, Jia Y, Alva G, et al. Comparative analyses on dynamic performances of photovoltaic-thermal solar collectors integrated with phase change materials[J]. Energy Convers. Manage., 2017, 131: 79-89.
11	Yau Y H, Rismanchi B. A review on cool thermal storage technologies and operating strategies[J]. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 2012, 16(1): 787-797.
12	Bejarano G, Vargas M, Ortega M G, et al. Efficient simulation strategy for PCM-based cold-energy storage systems[J]. Appl. Therm. Eng., 2018, 139: 419-431.
13	Ibrahim N I, Al-Sulaiman F A, Rahman S, et al. Heat transfer enhancement of phase change materials for thermal energy storage applications: a critical review[J]. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 2017, 74: 26-50.
14	Huang X, Alva G, Jia Y, et al. Morphological characterization and applications of phase change materials in thermal energy storage: a review[J]. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 2017, 72: 128-145.
15	Mahdi J M, Nsofor E C. Solidification enhancement of PCM in a triplex-tube thermal energy storage system with nanoparticles and fins[J]. Appl. Energ., 2018, 211: 975-986.
16	Yagci O K, Avci M, Aydin O. Melting and solidification of PCM in a tube-in-shell unit: effect of fin edge lengths ratio[J]. J. Energy Storage, 2019, 24: 100802.
17	Xu H T, Miao Y B, Wang N, et al. Experimental investigations of heat transfer characteristics of MPCM during charging[J]. Appl. Therm. Eng., 2018, 144: 721-725.
18	Qiu Z, Ma X, Li P, et al. Micro-encapsulated phase change material (MPCM) slurries: characterization and building applications[J]. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 2017, 77: 246-262.
19	Elbahjaoui R, El Qarnia H. Transient behavior analysis of the melting of nanoparticle-enhanced phase change material inside a rectangular latent heat storage unit[J]. Appl. Therm. Eng., 2017, 112: 720-738.
20	陈华, 柳秀丽, 杨亚星, 等. 泡沫金属铜/石蜡相变蓄热过程的数值模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70: 86-92.
	Chen H, Liu X Y, Yang Y X, et al. Numerical simulation of foam metal copper/paraffin phase change thermal storage process[J]. CIESC Journal, 2019, 70: 86-92.
21	周孙希, 章学来, 刘升, 等. 癸醇-棕榈酸/膨胀石墨低温复合相变材料的制备与性能[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(1): 290-297.
	Zhou S X, Zhang X L, Liu S, et al. Preparation and properties of decyl alcohol-palmitic acid/expanded graphite low temperature composite phase change material[J]. CIESC Journal, 2019, 70(1): 290-297.
22	Yang X, Lu Z, Bai Q, et al. Thermal performance of a shell-and-tube latent heat thermal energy storage unit: role of annular fins[J]. Appl. Energ., 2017, 202: 558-570.
23	Zhao J, Rao Z, Liu C, et al. Experiment study of oscillating heat pipe and phase change materials coupled for thermal energy storage and thermal management[J]. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 2016, 99: 252-260.
24	Esapour M, Hamzehnezhad A, Rabienataj D A A, et al. Melting and solidification of PCM embedded in porous metal foam in horizontal multi-tube heat storage system[J]. Energy Convers. Manage., 2018, 171: 398-410.
25	Chen C, Zhang H, Gao X, et al. Numerical and experimental investigation on latent thermal energy storage system with spiral coil tube and paraffin/expanded graphite composite PCM[J]. Energy Convers. Manage., 2016, 126: 889-897.
26	Tay N H S, Belusko M, Bruno F. An effectiveness-NTU technique for characterising tube-in-tank phase change thermal energy storage systems[J]. Appl. Energ., 2012, 91(1): 309-319.
27	Belusko M, Halawa E, Bruno F. Characterising PCM thermal storage systems using the effectiveness-NTU approach[J]. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 2012, 55(13/14): 3359-3365.
28	Zhao D, Tan G. Numerical analysis of a shell-and-tube latent heat storage unit with fins for air-conditioning application[J]. Appl. Energ., 2015, 138: 381-392.
29	Fang Y, Niu J, Deng S. Numerical analysis for maximizing effective energy storage capacity of thermal energy storage systems by enhancing heat transfer in PCM[J]. Energ. Buildings, 2018, 160: 10-18.
30	Angelini G, Lucchini A, Manzolini G. Comparison of thermocline molten salt storage performances to commercial two-tank configuration[J]. Energ. Procedia, 2014, 49: 694-704.
31	Fang Y, Niu J, Deng S. An analytical technique for the optimal designs of tube-in-tank thermal energy storage systems using PCM[J]. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 2019, 128: 849-859.

[1]	张双星, 刘舫辰, 张义飞, 杜文静. R-134a脉动热管相变蓄放热实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 165-171.
[2]	江河, 袁俊飞, 王林, 邢谷雨. 均流腔结构对微细通道内相变流动特性影响的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 235-244.
[3]	吴延鹏, 刘乾隆, 田东民, 陈凤君. 相变材料与热管耦合的电子器件热管理研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 25-31.
[4]	宋嘉豪, 王文. 斯特林发动机与高温热管耦合运行特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 287-294.
[5]	刘远超, 关斌, 钟建斌, 徐一帆, 蒋旭浩, 李耑. 单层XSe₂（X=Zr/Hf）的热电输运特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3968-3978.
[6]	胡兴枝, 张皓焱, 庄境坤, 范雨晴, 张开银, 向军. 嵌有超小CeO₂纳米粒子的碳纳米纤维的制备及其吸波性能[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3584-3596.
[7]	张贲, 王松柏, 魏子亚, 郝婷婷, 马学虎, 温荣福. 超亲水多孔金属结构驱动的毛细液膜冷凝及传热强化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2824-2835.
[8]	张澳, 罗英武. 低模量、高弹性、高剥离强度丙烯酸酯压敏胶[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 3079-3092.
[9]	王杰, 丘晓琳, 赵烨, 刘鑫洋, 韩忠强, 许雍, 蒋文瀚. 聚电解质静电沉积改性PHBV抗氧化膜的制备与性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 3068-3078.
[10]	史昊鹏, 钟达文, 廉学新, 张君峰. 朝下多尺度沟槽翅片结构表面沸腾换热实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2880-2888.
[11]	史方哲, 甘云华. 超薄热管启动特性和传热性能数值模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2814-2823.
[12]	邢美波, 张中天, 景栋梁, 张洪发. 磁调控水基碳纳米管协同多孔材料强化相变储/释能特性[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 3093-3102.
[13]	蔡斌, 张效林, 罗倩, 党江涛, 左栗源, 刘欣梅. 导电薄膜材料的研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2308-2321.
[14]	崔张宁, 胡紫璇, 吴雷, 周军, 叶干, 刘田田, 张秋利, 宋永辉. 可降解纤维素基材料的耐水性能研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2296-2307.
[15]	刘远超, 蒋旭浩, 邵钶, 徐一帆, 钟建斌, 李耑. 几何尺寸及缺陷对石墨炔纳米带热输运特性的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2708-2716.

相变套管式储热系统放冷性能实验研究

Experimental study of phase change sleeve tube thermal storage system performance during charging

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 31

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价