大尺度密集场景高危氯气非均匀湍流扩散特性三维CFD模拟

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20250402

化工学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 76 ›› Issue (9): 4630-4643.DOI: 10.11949/0438-1157.20250402

• 专栏：过程模拟与仿真 • 上一篇下一篇

大尺度密集场景高危氯气非均匀湍流扩散特性三维CFD模拟

陈昇¹(), 李子争¹^,², 苗超³, 白学刚¹, 李飞⁴, 刘家璇¹, 李天天¹^,², 杨爽¹, 吕蓉蓉¹(), 王江云²

^1.中国特种设备检测研究院，国家市场监督管理总局技术创新中心（炼油与化工装备风险防控），北京 100029
^2.中国石油大学（北京）克拉玛依校区，新疆克拉玛依 834000
^3.中国石油西南油气田分公司天然气研究院，四川成都 610213
^4.中国科学院过程工程研究所介科学与工程全国重点实验室，北京 100190

收稿日期:2025-04-16 修回日期:2025-06-11 出版日期:2025-09-25 发布日期:2025-10-23
通讯作者: 陈昇,吕蓉蓉
作者简介:陈昇（1987—），男，正高级工程师，chensheng_csei@163.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目(2022YFC3004504);国家市场监管总局科技计划项目(2023MK203);国家自然科学基金项目(22208379);国家自然科学基金项目(U23A20374)

Three-dimensional CFD simulation of non-uniform diffusion characteristic of high-risk chlorine gas in large-scale dense scene

Sheng CHEN¹(), Zizheng LI¹^,², Chao MIAO³, Xuegang BAI¹, Fei LI⁴, Jiaxuan LIU¹, Tiantian LI¹^,², Shuang YANG¹, Rongrong LYU¹(), Jiangyun WANG²

^1.Technology Innovation Center of Risk Prevention and Control of Refining and Chemical Equipment, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Special Equipment Inspection and Research Institute, Beijing 100029, China
^2.China University of Petroleum-Beijing at Karamay, Karamay 834000, Xinjiang, China
^3.Research Institute of Natural Gas Technology, PetroChina Southwest Oil and Gasfield Company, Chengdu 610213, Sichuan, China
^4.State Key Laboratory of Mesoscience and Engineering, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

Received:2025-04-16 Revised:2025-06-11 Online:2025-09-25 Published:2025-10-23
Contact: Sheng CHEN, Rongrong LYU

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

氯气剧毒且泄漏后常沿地面扩散，非均匀湍流涡团结构常导致扩散预测不准、相关避险措施设置不合理、引发人员中毒等事故。为指导现场快速风险评估、安全标志布置、应急处置及救援，有必要精准预知大尺度密集场景下氯气非均匀扩散规律。采用单相欧拉和组分输运方程，建立了基于能量最小多尺度（EMMS）湍流模型的高危氯气非均匀湍流扩散模拟预测方法。以美国陆军Jack Rabbit液氯泄放实验为对象，验证模拟准确性并考察了不同风速、风向、泄漏量条件下氯气非均匀扩散特性。结果表明：提出的模拟方法能较好地预测大尺度密集场景氯气非均匀扩散，误差在8%以内；风速增大会加速开阔区域氯气扩散，但对集装箱密集区浓度分布影响有限；风向偏离建筑对称轴引发“狭管效应”，会使局部浓度瞬间上升；泄漏量增大后，高浓度区域扩大形成“屏障效应”，氯气体积分数为0.045以上的面积占比增加36.6%。

关键词: 氯气, 扩散, Jack Rabbit, 数值模拟, 计算流体力学, 障碍物

Abstract:

Chlorine gas is highly toxic and tends to diffuse along the ground after leakage. The non-uniform turbulent vortex structures often lead to inaccurate diffusion predictions, causing improperly designed safety measures and accidents such as personnel poisoning. In order to guide on-site rapid risk assessment, safety sign layout, emergency response and rescue, it is necessary to accurately predict the law of non-uniform diffusion of chlorine in large-scale dense scenes. This paper adopts the single-phase Eulerian and species transport equations, establishing a simulation and prediction method for non-uniform turbulent dispersion of high-risk chlorine gas based on the energy minimization multi-scale (EMMS) turbulence model. Taking the liquid chlorine release experiment of Jack Rabbit as the object, the simulation accuracy was verified and the non-uniform diffusion characteristics of chlorine gas under varying wind speeds, wind directions and leakage rates were investigated. The results show that the proposed simulation method effectively predict the non-uniform diffusion of chlorine gas in large-scale and high-density scenarios, with errors within 8%. Increased wind speed accelerates the diffusion of chlorine gas in open areas but has limited effect on the concentration distribution in the container-intensive areas. The wind direction deviating from the symmetry axis of the building causes the narrow tube effect, causing the local concentration to rise instantaneously. After the leakage increases, the high concentration area expands to form a barrier effect, and the area with a chlorine volume fraction of more than 0.045 increases by 36.6 %.

Key words: chlorine, diffusion, Jack Rabbit, numerical simulation, computational fluid dynamics (CFD), obstacle

中图分类号:

X 937

陈昇, 李子争, 苗超, 白学刚, 李飞, 刘家璇, 李天天, 杨爽, 吕蓉蓉, 王江云. 大尺度密集场景高危氯气非均匀湍流扩散特性三维CFD模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2025, 76(9): 4630-4643.

Sheng CHEN, Zizheng LI, Chao MIAO, Xuegang BAI, Fei LI, Jiaxuan LIU, Tiantian LI, Shuang YANG, Rongrong LYU, Jiangyun WANG. Three-dimensional CFD simulation of non-uniform diffusion characteristic of high-risk chlorine gas in large-scale dense scene[J]. CIESC Journal, 2025, 76(9): 4630-4643.

图/表 18

图1 Jack Rabbit实际实验场景与CFD模拟场景对比图

Fig.1 Comparison of Jack Rabbit’s actual experimental scene and CFD simulation scene

图2 Jack Rabbit试验场地空间布置图

Fig.2 Jack Rabbit test site space layout diagram

图3 网格划分图

Fig.3 Grid division diagram

图4 不同网格尺寸下流场氯气浓度分布特征

Fig.4 Distribution characteristics of chlorine concentration in flow field under various grid sizes

表1 实验工况

Table 1 Test conditions

编号	风速/(m/s)	风向/(°)	泄漏时间/s	泄漏量/t	泄漏速度/(m/s)
Trial-1	2.47	95	16	4.97	0.1971
Trial-2	4.06	85	25	8.98	0.2280
Trial-6	2.88	90	25	9.2	0.2336

表2 模拟设置

Table 2 Simulation settings

类别	边界类型	参数	Trial-1	Trial-2	Trial-6
环境风入口	velocity-inlet	速度/(m/s)	2.47	4.06	2.88
		风向/(°)	95	85	90
		温度/℃	26.7	26.7	26.7
		各组分浓度/%	air：100	air：100	air：100
泄漏入口	velocity-inlet	速度/(m/s)	0.1971	0.2280	0.2236
		各组分浓度/%	Cl₂： 100	Cl₂： 100	Cl₂： 100
		温度/℃	26.7	26.7	26.7
流体域侧面1、2	symmetry	温度/℃	26.7	26.7	26.7
地面	wall	粗糙度	0.5	0.5	0.5
地面	wall	温度/℃	26.7	26.7	26.7
集装箱集群	wall	粗糙度	0.5	0.5	0.5
集装箱集群	wall	温度/℃	26.7	26.7	26.7
环境风出口	outflow	温度/℃	26.7	26.7	26.7

图5 各边界对应位置及监测点位置

Fig.5 The corresponding position of each boundary and the position of monitoring points

图6 不同扩散模型下氯气浓度分布

Fig.6 The distribution of chlorine concentration under different diffusion models

图7 Trial-2模拟结果及报告数据

Fig.7 Trial-2 simulation results and report data

图8 Trial-6模拟结果及报告数据

Fig.8 Trial-6 simulation results and report data

表3 不同参量下模拟设置

Table 3 Simulation settings under different parameters

编号	风速/(m/s)	风向/(°)	泄漏时间/s	泄漏量/t	泄漏速度/(m/s)
1	2.5	90	20	5	3
2	4.0	90	20	5	3
3	3.0	70	20	5	3
4	3.0	90	20	5	3
5	2.5	90	20	5	3
6	2.5	90	20	10	3

图9 不同风速和不同时刻下XZ截面氯气扩散浓度分布

Fig.9 Time evolution of concentration distributions for chlorine gas in XZ section at different wind speeds

图10 不同风速和不同时刻下XY截面氯气扩散浓度分布

Fig.10 The distribution of chlorine diffusion concentration in XY section at different wind speeds and different times

图11 不同风速、不同位置监测点处氯气浓度随时间的变化

Fig.11 The variation of chlorine concentration with time at different wind speeds and different monitoring points

图12 不同风向下氯气扩散速度流线图及浓度分布图

Fig.12 Diffusion velocity streamline and concentration distribution diagram of chlorine under different wind directions

图13 不同风向、不同位置监测点处氯气浓度随时间的变化

Fig.13 Time evolution of chlorine concentration at different wind directions and monitoring points

图14 不同泄漏量条件下氯气浓度空间分布特征

Fig.14 Concentration distribution characteristics of chlorine gas under different leakage mass

图15 不同泄漏量、不同位置监测点处氯气浓度随时间的变化

Fig.15 Time evolution of chlorine concentration for different leakage mass at various positions

参考文献 31

[1]	王立新, 高金瑜. 急性氯气中毒呼吸道损伤后的随访观察[J]. 中国职业医学, 2009, 36(5): 379-381.
	Wang L X, Gao J Y. Longitudinal monitoring of lung injury after acute chlorine exposure[J]. China Occupational Medicine, 2009, 36(5): 379-381.
[2]	张晓燕. 氯气泄漏环境风险评价与防控措施[J]. 化学工程与装备, 2021(11): 265-267.
	Zhang X Y. Environmental risk assessment and prevention measures of chlorine leakage[J]. Chemical Engineering & Equipment, 2021(11): 265-267.
[3]	赵红玲, 赵娟, 王素萍. 211例氯气中毒患者的临床分型与急救[J]. 吉林大学学报(医学版), 2009, 35(4): 638.
	Zhao H L, Zhao J, Wang S P. Clinical classification and first aid of 211 patients with chlorine poisoning[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Medicine Edition), 2009, 35(4): 638.
[4]	郑国静. 关于氯气泄漏事故的洗消及救援处置对策研究[C]//2022年度灭火与应急救援技术学术研讨会论文集. 2022: 153-156.
	Zheng G J. Research on decontamination and rescue countermeasures for chlorine leakage accidents[C]//2022 Symposium on Fire Extinguishing and Emergency Rescue Technology. 2022: 153-156.
[5]	Travis K, Schnatter R, Swaen G, et al. A proposed framework for the integration of human and animal data in chemical risk assessment[J]. Toxicology Letters, 2008, 180: S19-S20.
[6]	熊杰, 武雅珍, 韩佳昊, 等. 基于模糊控制方法的加气站甲烷扩散模型选择[J]. 能源与环保, 2019, 41(7): 57-62.
	Xiong J, Wu Y Z, Han J H, et al. Selection of methane diffusion model in gas station based on fuzzy control method[J]. China Energy and Environmental Protection, 2019, 41(7): 57-62.
[7]	黄煌, 字春霞. SLAB模型在重质气体泄漏事故环境风险评价中的应用研究[J]. 环境科学与管理, 2022, 47(1): 180-184.
	Huang H, Zi C X. Application of SLAB model in environmental risk assessment of phosgene leakage accident[J]. Environmental Science and Management, 2022, 47(1): 180-184.
[8]	Hankin R K, Britter R E. TWODEE: the health and safety laboratory's shallow layer model for heavy gas dispersion(part 3): Experimental validation (thorney island)[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 1999, 66(3): 239-261.
[9]	楚志勇, 张孝春, 蒋君豪, 等. 考虑多米诺效应的化工园区应急资源调配问题研究[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2024, 24(5): 1658-1671.
	Chu Z Y, Zhang X C, Jiang J H, et al. Study on emergency resource allocation in chemical industry park considering domino effect[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2024, 24(5): 1658-1671.
[10]	沈艳涛, 于建国. 有毒有害气体泄漏的CFD数值模拟(Ⅰ)模型建立与校验[J]. 化工学报, 2007, 58(3): 745-749.
	Shen Y T, Yu J G. Numerical simulation of hazardous gas release with CFD model(Ⅰ): Establishment and verification of model[J]. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering (China), 2007, 58(3): 745-749.
[11]	冷朋波, 王群利, 王爱红, 等. 高斯烟羽扩散模型在化工装置突发煤气泄漏的环境健康风险评估中的应用[J]. 环境卫生学杂志, 2013, 3(3): 186-190.
	Leng P B, Wang Q L, Wang A H, et al. The application of Gaussian plume air dispersion model in the environmental risk assessment for accidental leakage of coal gas at one chemical apparatus[J]. Journal of Environmental Hygiene, 2013, 3(3): 186-190.
[12]	马健, 房春花. 环境温度对储油罐气体泄漏扩散影响的研究[J]. 炼油技术与工程, 2013, 43(1): 58-61.
	Ma J, Fang C H. Study on impact of ambient temperature on leaked gas diffusion of oil storage tanks[J]. Petroleum Refinery Engineering, 2013, 43(1): 58-61.
[13]	冯崧, 曾祥进, 黄瑜豪. 改进高斯烟团模型的多气体源泄露扩散模型[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2023, 23(31): 13619-13625.
	Feng S, Zeng X J, Huang Y H. Multi-gas source leakage diffusion model based on improved Gaussian puff model[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2023, 23(31): 13619-13625.
[14]	郑延丰, 阮佳龙, 苏伊扬, 等. 基于有限质点法和光滑粒子流体动力学的流固耦合计算方法研究[J]. 工程力学, DOI:10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2024.09.0729 .
	Zheng Y F, Ruan J L, Su Y Y, et al. Study on fluid-solid coupling calculation method based on finite particle method and smoothed particle hydrodynamics[J]. Engineering Mechanics, DOI:10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2024.09.0729 .
[15]	江攀, 杨俊佳, 张琼, 等. CFD瞬态模拟楼宇布局对城镇燃气管道泄漏的影响[J]. 油气储运, 2019, 38(12): 1383-1390.
	Jiang P, Yang J J, Zhang Q, et al. The application of CFD transient simulation to investigate the influence of building layout on the leakage of city gas pipeline[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2019, 38(12): 1383-1390.
[16]	曾稳稳, 邓付洁, 蔡静波, 等. 环氧乙烷反应器泄漏实时监测预警模型构建方法及应用[J]. 化工进展, 2019, 38(11): 5200-5209.
	Zeng W W, Deng F J, Cai J B, et al. Construction method and application of real-time monitoring and warning model of ethylene oxide reactor leakage[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2019, 38(11): 5200-5209.
[17]	张亿韵, 陈恒志, 李洋, 等. 湍流对双组分颗粒流化床气体径向扩散的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2025, 76(6): 2559-2568.
	Zhang Y Y, Chen H Z, Li Y, et al. Effects of turbulence on gas radial diffusion in a two-component fluidized bed[J]. CIESC Journal, 2025, 76(6): 2559-2568.
[18]	Tominaga Y, Stathopoulos T. CFD simulation of near-field pollutant dispersion in the urban environment: a review of current modeling techniques[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2013, 79: 716-730.
[19]	Zhang H H, Wang L M. Dynamic energy-minimization multi-scale heterogeneous continuum evolution model for gas-solid fluidization[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2024, 480: 148343.
[20]	Montiel H, Vı́lchez J A, Casal J, et al. Mathematical modelling of accidental gas releases[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 1998, 59(2/3): 211-233.
[21]	Wang L M, Qiu X P, Zhang L, et al. Turbulence originating from the compromise-in-competition between viscosity and inertia[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2016, 300: 83-97.
[22]	Qiu X P, Wang L M, Yang N, et al. A simplified two-fluid model coupled with EMMS drag for gas-solid flows[J]. Powder Technology, 2017, 314: 299-314.
[23]	Zhang L, Qiu X P, Wang L M, et al. A stability condition for turbulence model: from EMMS model to EMMS-based turbulence model[J]. Particuology, 2014, 16: 142-154.
[24]	Luo J W, Wang J W, Zhao B D. A simple EMMS drag model for the simulation of bubbling fluidized beds using mesoscience-based structural model[J]. Powder Technology, 2024, 448: 120272.
[25]	郭舒宇. 基于EMMS原理的双涡介尺度湍流模型及应用[D]. 北京: 中国科学院过程工程研究所, 2021.
	Guo S Y. Double vortex mesoscale turbulence model based on EMMS principle and its application[D]. Beijing: Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2021.
[26]	Lopes P V D F, Spicer T O, Smith C T. Wind tunnel model of the Jack Rabbit Ⅱ field experiments in the mock urban array (part 2): Approach wind conditions and particle image velocimetry measurements of simulated chlorine releases[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2025, 353: 121179.
[27]	Lopes P V D F, Spicer T, Smith C T. Laser Doppler velocimetry and particle image velocimetry measurements in a wind tunnel model of the Jack Rabbit Ⅱ special sonic anemometer study[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2024, 333: 120657.
[28]	郑英光. 各向异性砂土-接触面亚塑性本构模型及数值模拟[D]. 北京: 北京科技大学, 2023.
	Zheng Y G. Subplastic constitutive model and numerical simulation of anisotropic sand-contact surface[D]. Beijing: University of Science and Technology Beijing, 2023.
[29]	王萌萌. 氯气无线传感网监测的数据挖掘与融合研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨理工大学, 2014.
	Wang M M. Research on data mining and fusion of chlorine wireless sensor network monitoring[D]. Harbin: Harbin University of Science and Technology, 2014.
[30]	罗凯文, 杨易, 谢壮宁. 基于k-ε模型模拟平衡态大气边界层的比较研究[J]. 工程力学, 2018, 35(2): 21-29.
	Luo K W, Yang Y, Xie Z N. A comparative study on the simulation of neutral atmospheric boundary layer based on the k-ε turbulence model[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2018, 35(2): 21-29.
[31]	林钟毓, 李明, 张海程, 等. 不同风攻角下风屏障对桥面车辆气动力的影响[J]. 东南大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 55(1): 154-160.
	Lin Z Y, Li M, Zhang H C, et al. Influence of wind barriers on aerodynamic forces of vehicles on bridge decks at different wind attack angles[J]. Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition), 2025, 55(1): 154-160.

大尺度密集场景高危氯气非均匀湍流扩散特性三维CFD模拟

Three-dimensional CFD simulation of non-uniform diffusion characteristic of high-risk chlorine gas in large-scale dense scene

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 18

参考文献 31

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

编号	风速/(m/s)	风向/(°)	泄漏时间/s	泄漏量/t	泄漏速度/(m/s)
1	2.5	90	20	5	3
2	4.0	90	20	5	3
3	3.0	70	20	5	3
4	3.0	90	20	5	3
5	2.5	90	20	5	3
6	2.5	90	20	10	3

编号	风速/(m/s)	风向/(°)	泄漏时间/s	泄漏量/t	泄漏速度/(m/s)
1	2.5	90	20	5	3
2	4.0	90	20	5	3
3	3.0	70	20	5	3
4	3.0	90	20	5	3
5	2.5	90	20	5	3
6	2.5	90	20	10	3

[1]	赵子祥, 段钟弟, 孙浩然, 薛鸿祥. 大温差两相流动诱导水锤冲击的数值模型[J]. 化工学报, 2025, 76(S1): 170-180.
[2]	黄灏, 王文, 贺隆坤. LNG船薄膜型液货舱预冷过程模拟与分析[J]. 化工学报, 2025, 76(S1): 187-194.
[3]	汪思远, 刘国强, 熊通, 晏刚. 窗式空调器轴流风机的风速非均匀分布特性及其对冷凝器流路优化设计的影响规律[J]. 化工学报, 2025, 76(S1): 205-216.
[4]	曹庆泰, 郭松源, 李建强, 蒋赞, 汪彬, 耑锐, 吴静怡, 杨光. 负过载下多孔隔板对液氧贮箱蓄液性能的影响研究[J]. 化工学报, 2025, 76(S1): 217-229.
[5]	孙九春, 桑运龙, 王海涛, 贾浩, 朱艳. 泥水盾构仓体内射流对泥浆输送特性影响研究[J]. 化工学报, 2025, 76(S1): 246-257.
[6]	何婷, 黄舒阳, 黄坤, 陈利琼. 基于余热利用的天然气化学吸收脱碳-高温热泵耦合流程研究[J]. 化工学报, 2025, 76(S1): 297-308.
[7]	彭建斌, 李明, 谢军龙, 陈建业. 液氢接收终端液氢泄漏扩散及爆炸超压研究[J]. 化工学报, 2025, 76(S1): 453-461.
[8]	段浩磊, 陈浩远, 梁坤峰, 王林, 陈彬, 曹勇, 张晨光, 李硕鹏, 朱登宇, 何亚茹, 杨大鹏. 纯电动车热管理系统低GWP工质替代方案性能分析与综合评价[J]. 化工学报, 2025, 76(S1): 54-61.
[9]	郭松源, 周晓庆, 缪五兵, 汪彬, 耑锐, 曹庆泰, 陈成成, 杨光, 吴静怡. 火箭上升段含多孔板液氧贮箱增压输运数值研究[J]. 化工学报, 2025, 76(S1): 62-74.
[10]	王俊鹏, 冯佳琪, 张恩搏, 白博峰. 曲折式与阵列式迷宫阀芯结构内流动与空化特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2025, 76(S1): 93-105.
[11]	杨开源, 陈锡忠. 颗粒破碎的离散元及有限离散元模拟方法比较[J]. 化工学报, 2025, 76(9): 4398-4411.
[12]	刘奕扬, 邢志祥, 刘烨铖, 彭明, 李玉洋, 李云浩, 沈宁舟. 加氢站液氢泄漏扩散特性与安全监测数值模拟研究[J]. 化工学报, 2025, 76(9): 4694-4708.
[13]	黄正宗, 刘科成, 李泽方, 曾平生, 刘永富, 闫红杰, 刘柳. 锌精馏炉砖砌式换热室数值模拟与场协同优化[J]. 化工学报, 2025, 76(9): 4425-4439.
[14]	王一飞, 李玉星, 欧阳欣, 赵雪峰, 孟岚, 胡其会, 殷布泽, 郭雅琦. 基于裂尖减压特性的CO₂管道断裂扩展数值计算[J]. 化工学报, 2025, 76(9): 4683-4693.
[15]	解勤勤, 翁俊旗, 林振利, 叶光华, 周兴贵. 固定床反应器中甲醇制芳烃工业催化剂结构影响的研究[J]. 化工学报, 2025, 76(9): 4487-4498.

编号	风速/(m/s)	风向/(°)	泄漏时间/s	泄漏量/t	泄漏速度/(m/s)
1	2.5	90	20	5	3
2	4.0	90	20	5	3
3	3.0	70	20	5	3
4	3.0	90	20	5	3
5	2.5	90	20	5	3
6	2.5	90	20	10	3

编号	风速/(m/s)	风向/(°)	泄漏时间/s	泄漏量/t	泄漏速度/(m/s)
1	2.5	90	20	5	3
2	4.0	90	20	5	3
3	3.0	70	20	5	3
4	3.0	90	20	5	3
5	2.5	90	20	5	3
6	2.5	90	20	10	3

编号	风速/(m/s)	风向/(°)	泄漏时间/s	泄漏量/t	泄漏速度/(m/s)
1	2.5	90	20	5	3
2	4.0	90	20	5	3
3	3.0	70	20	5	3
4	3.0	90	20	5	3
5	2.5	90	20	5	3
6	2.5	90	20	10	3

编号	风速/(m/s)	风向/(°)	泄漏时间/s	泄漏量/t	泄漏速度/(m/s)
1	2.5	90	20	5	3
2	4.0	90	20	5	3
3	3.0	70	20	5	3
4	3.0	90	20	5	3
5	2.5	90	20	5	3
6	2.5	90	20	10	3