Adsorption characteristics of CH4 and CO2 on Silurian shale in Sichuan Basin

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20170488

Abstract

Abstract:

The basic reservoir physical parameters of Silurian shale samples in Sichuan Basin including total organic carbon,clay mineral content and vitrinite reflectance were represented.Pore structure was characterized by field emission scanning electron microscope and low temperature nitrogen adsorption methods.Based on these characterizations,shale samples have well-developed pore structure,with micropores predominantly comprising the pore structure.It is also found that the micropore is the major contributor to the overall specific surface area,whereas most of the pore volume is occupied by mesopores.The adsorption capacity of pure methane and carbon dioxide were performed using a setup of the manometric method.The factors affecting the adsorption capacity of shale gas were investigated,and the selectivity of CO₂/CH₄ adsorption on shale samples was studied.The results show that the adsorption capacity of CO₂ on shale is higher than that of CH₄.TOC and pore structure have a great influence on shale adsorption,which is positively correlated.Meantime,a high temperature is unfavorable to shale gas adsorption and the influence of unit pressure on the adsorption decreases with the increase of pressure.In the study of competitive adsorption,shale has higher selectivity to CO₂.

Key words: adsorption, methane, carbon dioxide, equation of state

摘要：

页岩气是一种非常具有开发潜力的非常规天然气能源。选取四川宜宾地区志留系龙马溪组页岩，对总有机碳、黏土矿物含量和镜质体反射率等储层性质进行表征，通过场发射扫描电子显微镜和低温氮气吸附-解吸方法对页岩的孔隙结构进行分析。从孔隙结构表征发现，页岩中有大量的孔隙发育，并且大多数孔隙的尺寸在100 nm以下，微孔对总比表面积的贡献最大，中孔对孔体积做出了较大贡献。对页岩样品分别进行了CH₄和CO₂单组分气体的等温吸附实验，分析了影响页岩吸附气体能力的因素，考察了页岩样品CO₂/CH₄的选择性。结果表明，页岩对CO₂的吸附量要远大于对CH₄的吸附量；有机质含量TOC和孔隙结构对页岩的吸附有很大影响，呈正相关；温度越高，页岩对气体的吸附能力越差；单位压力变化对吸附的影响随着压力的增高而下降，逐渐趋于平缓；在竞争吸附中，页岩对CO₂有更高的选择性。

关键词: 吸附, 甲烷, 二氧化碳, 状态方程

CLC Number:

YANG Fei, YUE Changtao, LI Shuyuan, MA Yue, XU Xinyi. Adsorption characteristics of CH₄ and CO₂ on Silurian shale in Sichuan Basin[J]. CIESC Journal, 2017, 68(10): 3851-3859.

杨飞, 岳长涛, 李术元, 马跃, 许心怡. 四川盆地志留系页岩CH₄和CO₂吸附特征[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(10): 3851-3859.

References 31

[1]	徐国盛, 徐志星, 段亮, 等. 页岩气研究现状及发展趋势[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自科版), 2011, 38(6):603-610. XU G S, XU Z X, DUAN L, et al. Status and development tendency of shale gas research[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology, 2011, 38(6):603-610.
[2]	王飞宇, 贺志勇, 孟晓辉, 等. 页岩气赋存形式和初始原地气量(OGIP)预测技术[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2011, 22(3):501-510. WANG F Y, HE Z Y, MENG X H. Occurrence of shale gas and prediction of original gas in-place (OGIP)[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2011, 22(3):501-510.
[3]	CURTIS J B. Fractured shale-gas systems[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2002, 86(11):1921-1938.
[4]	GRIESER W V, SHELLEY R F, SOLIMAN M Y. Predicting production outcome from multistage, horizontal Barnett Completions[C]//SPE Production & Operations Symposium. Okahoma, USA, 2009.
[5]	赵天逸, 宁正福, 曾彦. 页岩与煤岩等温吸附模型对比分析[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2014, 35(3):319-323. ZHAO T Y, NING Z F, ZENG Y. Comparative analysis of isothermal adsorption models for shales and coals[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2014, 35(3):319-323.
[6]	CHALMERS G R, BUSTIN R M, POWER I M. Characterization of gas shale pore systems by porosimetry, pycnometry, surface area, and field emission scanning electron microscopy/transmission electron microscopy image analyses:examples from the Barnett, Woodford, Haynesville, Marcellus, and Doig unit[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2012, 96(6):1099-1119.
[7]	GASPARIK M, BERTIER P, GENSTERBLUM Y, et al. Geological controls on the methane storage capacity in organic-rich shales[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2014, 123(2):34-51.
[8]	AMBROSE R J, HARTMAN R C, CAMPOS M D, et al. New pore-scale considerations for shale gas in place calculations[C]//SPE Unconventional Gas Conference. Pittsburgh, USA, 2010:219-229.
[9]	CURTIS M, AMBROSE R, SONDERGELD C. Structural characterization of gas shales on the micro and nano-scales[C]//SPE Unconventional Gas Conference. Pittsburgh, USA, 2010.
[10]	LOUCKS R G, REED R M, RUPPEL S C, et al. Morphology, genesis, and distribution of nanometer-scale pores in siliceous mudstones of the Mississippian Barnett shale[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 2009, 79(12):848-861.
[11]	朱阳升, 宋学行, 郭印同, 等. 四川盆地龙马溪组页岩的CH4和CO2气体高压吸附特征及控制因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(10):1942-1952. ZHU Y S, SONG X X, GUO Y T, et al. High-pressure adsorption characteristics and controlling factors of CH4 and CO2 on shales from Longmaxi Formation, Chongqing, Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2016, 27(10):1942-1952.
[12]	孙宝江, 张彦龙, 杜庆杰, 等. CO2在页岩中的吸附解吸性能评价[J]. 中国石油大学学报:自然科学版, 2013, 37(5):95-99. SUN B J, ZHANG Y L, DU Q J, et al. Property evaluation of CO2 adsorption and desorption on shale[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum, 2013, 37(5):747-753.
[13]	王海柱, 沈忠厚, 李根生. 超临界CO2开发页岩气技术[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2011, 39(3):30-35. WANG H Z, SHEN Z H, LI G S. Feasibility analysis on shale gas exploitation with supercritical CO2[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2011, 39(3):30-35.
[14]	LIU F, ELLETT K, XIAO Y, et al. Assessing the feasibility of CO2, storage in the New Albany Shale (Devonian-Mississippian) with potential enhanced gas recovery using reservoir simulation[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2013, 17(17):111-126.
[15]	GASPARIK M, BERTIER P, GENSTERBLUM Y, et al. Geological controls on the methane storage capacity in organic-rich shales[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2013, 123(2):34-51.
[16]	GASPARIK M, GHANIZADEH A, BERTIER P, et al. High-pressure methane sorption isotherms of black shales from the Netherlands[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2012, 26(8):4995-5004.
[17]	CHALMERS G R L, BUSTIN R M. The organic matter distribution and methane capacity of the Lower Cretaceous strata of Northeastern British Columbia, Canada[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2007, 70(1/2/3):223-239.
[18]	侯宇光, 何生, 易积正, 等.页岩孔隙结构对甲烷吸附能力的影响[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2014, 41(2):248-256. HOU Y G, HE S, YI J Z, et al. Effect of pore structure on methane sorption capacity of shales[J]. Petroleum Exploration & Development, 2014, 41(2):248-256.
[19]	杨峰, 宁正福, 胡昌蓬, 等. 页岩储层微观孔隙结构特征[J]. 石油学报, 2013, 34(2):301-311. YANG F, NING Z F, HU C P, et al. Characterization of microscopic pore structures in shale reservoirs[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2013, 34(2):301-311.
[20]	FISHMAN N S, HACKLEY P C, LOWERS H A, et al. The nature of porosity in organic-rich mudstones of the Upper Jurassic Kimmeridge Clay Formation, North Sea, offshore United Kingdom[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2012, 103(23):32-50.
[21]	杨巍, 陈国俊, 吕成福, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东南部延长组长7段富有机质页岩孔隙特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, 26(3):418-426. YANG W, CHEN G J, LÜ C F, et al. Micropore characteristics of the organic-rich shale in the 7~(th) member of the Yanchang Formation in the Southeast of Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2015, 26(3):418-426.
[22]	郭彤楼, 张汉荣. 四川盆地焦石坝页岩气田形成与富集高产模式[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2014, 41(1):28-36. GUO T L, ZHANG H R. Formation and enrichment mode of Jiaoshiba shale gas field, Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration & Development, 2014, 41(1):31-40.
[23]	GUO X, LI Y, LIU R, et al. Characteristics and controlling factors of micropore structures of the Longmaxi Shale in the Jiaoshiba area, Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry B, 2014, 1(2):165-171.
[24]	BARRETT E P, JOYNER L G, HALENDA P P. The determination of pore volume and area distributions in porous substances(Ⅰ):Computations from nitrogen isotherms[J]. Journal of Management in Engineering, 2014, 24(4):207-216.
[25]	LOWELL S, SHIELDS J E, THOMAS M A, et al. Characterization of porous solids and powders:surface area, pore size and density[J]. Particle Technology, 2004, 16(9):1620.
[26]	刘小平, 董谦, 董清源, 等. 苏北地区古生界页岩等温吸附特征[J]. 现代地质, 2013, 27(5):1219-1224. LIU X P, DONG Q, DONG Q Y, et al. Characteristics of methane isothermal adsorption for paleozoic shale in Subei Area[J]. Geoscience, 2013, 27(5):1219-1224.
[27]	郭少斌, 孙寅森, 王义刚, 等. 温度和压力对泥页岩吸附性能的影响[J]. 可持续能源, 2012, 2(1):18-30. GUO S B, SUN Y S, WANG Y G, et al. The effect of temperature and pressure on shale adsorption capability[J]. Sustainable Energy, 2012, 2(1):28-30.
[28]	KANG S M, FATHI E, AMBROSE R J, et al. Carbon dioxide storage capacity of organic-rich shales[J]. SPE Journal, 2013, 16(4):842-855.
[29]	熊伟, 郭为, 刘洪林, 等. 页岩的储层特征以及等温吸附特征[J]. 天然气工业, 2012, 32(1):113-116. XIONG W, GUO W, LIU H L, et al. Shale reservoir characteristics and isothermal adsorption properties[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2012, 32(1):113-116.
[30]	CHALMERS G R L, BUSTIN R M. Lower cretaceous gas shales in northeastern British Columbia(Ⅱ):Evaluation of regional potential gas resources[J]. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, 2008, 56(1):22-61.
[31]	JARVIE D M, HILL R J, RUBLE T E, et al. Unconventional shale-gas systems:the Mississippian Barnett Shale of north-central Texas as one model for thermogenic shale-gas assessment[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2007, 91(4):475-499.

Adsorption characteristics of CH₄ and CO₂ on Silurian shale in Sichuan Basin

四川盆地志留系页岩CH₄和CO₂吸附特征

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References 31

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Ruitao SONG, Pai WANG, Yunpeng WANG, Minxia LI, Chaobin DANG, Zhenguo CHEN, Huan TONG, Jiaqi ZHOU. Numerical simulation of flow boiling heat transfer in pipe arrays of carbon dioxide direct evaporation ice field [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(S1): 96-103.
[2]	Yifei ZHANG, Fangchen LIU, Shuangxing ZHANG, Wenjing DU. Performance analysis of printed circuit heat exchanger for supercritical carbon dioxide [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(S1): 183-190.
[3]	Yepin CHENG, Daqing HU, Yisha XU, Huayan LIU, Hanfeng LU, Guokai CUI. Application of ionic liquid-based deep eutectic solvents for CO₂ conversion [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(9): 3640-3653.
[4]	Bingchun SHENG, Jianguo YU, Sen LIN. Study on lithium resource separation from underground brine with high concentration of sodium by aluminum-based lithium adsorbent [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(8): 3375-3385.
[5]	Ruihang ZHANG, Pan CAO, Feng YANG, Kun LI, Peng XIAO, Chun DENG, Bei LIU, Changyu SUN, Guangjin CHEN. Analysis of key parameters affecting product purity of natural gas ethane recovery process via ZIF-8 nanofluid [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(8): 3386-3393.
[6]	Rui HONG, Baoqiang YUAN, Wenjing DU. Analysis on mechanism of heat transfer deterioration of supercritical carbon dioxide in vertical upward tube [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(8): 3309-3319.
[7]	Yan GAO, Peng WU, Chao SHANG, Zejun HU, Xiaodong CHEN. Preparation of magnetic agarose microspheres based on a two-fluid nozzle and their protein adsorption properties [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(8): 3457-3471.
[8]	Ji CHEN, Ze HONG, Zhao LEI, Qiang LING, Zhigang ZHAO, Chenhui PENG, Ping CUI. Study on coke dissolution loss reaction and its mechanism based on molecular dynamics simulations [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(7): 2935-2946.
[9]	Qiyu ZHANG, Lijun GAO, Yuhang SU, Xiaobo MA, Yicheng WANG, Yating ZHANG, Chao HU. Recent advances in carbon-based catalysts for electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(7): 2753-2772.
[10]	Chao NIU, Shengqiang SHEN, Yan YANG, Bonian PAN, Yiqiao LI. Flow process calculation and performance analysis of methane BOG ejector [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(7): 2858-2868.
[11]	Xiaoyang LIU, Jianliang YU, Yujie HOU, Xingqing YAN, Zhenhua ZHANG, Xianshu LYU. Effect of spiral microchannel on detonation propagation of hydrogen-doped methane [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(7): 3139-3148.
[12]	Jie WANG, Xiaolin QIU, Ye ZHAO, Xinyang LIU, Zhongqiang HAN, Yong XU, Wenhan JIANG. Preparation and properties of polyelectrolyte electrostatic deposition modified PHBV antioxidant films [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(7): 3068-3078.
[13]	Xiaowen ZHOU, Jie DU, Zhanguo ZHANG, Guangwen XU. Study on the methane-pulsing reduction characteristics of Fe₂O₃-Al₂O₃ oxygen carrier [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(6): 2611-2623.
[14]	Caihong LIN, Li WANG, Yu WU, Peng LIU, Jiangfeng YANG, Jinping LI. Effect of alkali cations in zeolites on adsorption and separation of CO₂/N₂O [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(5): 2013-2021.
[15]	Chenxin LI, Yanqiu PAN, Liu HE, Yabin NIU, Lu YU. Carbon membrane model based on carbon microcrystal structure and its gas separation simulation [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(5): 2057-2066.