CIESC Journal ›› 2020, Vol. 71 ›› Issue (8): 3839-3848.DOI: 10.11949/0438-1157.20200318
• Process safety • Previous Articles
Dongdong YANG(),Guoming CHEN(),Yuan ZHU,Jihao SHI
Received:
2020-03-26
Revised:
2020-05-28
Online:
2020-08-05
Published:
2020-08-05
Contact:
Guoming CHEN
通讯作者:
陈国明
作者简介:
杨冬冬(1991—),男,博士研究生,基金资助:
CLC Number:
Dongdong YANG, Guoming CHEN, Yuan ZHU, Jihao SHI. Dynamic assessment of consequences for poisoning accidents caused by H2S release on offshore platforms[J]. CIESC Journal, 2020, 71(8): 3839-3848.
杨冬冬, 陈国明, 朱渊, 师吉浩. 海洋平台泄漏硫化氢中毒事故后果动态评估[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(8): 3839-3848.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
气体成分 | 体积分数/% |
---|---|
甲烷 | 27 |
乙烷 | 33 |
丙烷 | 15 |
戊烷 | 23 |
二氧化碳 | 1 |
硫化氢 | 1 |
Table 1 Composition and content of released gas
气体成分 | 体积分数/% |
---|---|
甲烷 | 27 |
乙烷 | 33 |
丙烷 | 15 |
戊烷 | 23 |
二氧化碳 | 1 |
硫化氢 | 1 |
平地 | 上楼梯 | 下楼梯 |
---|---|---|
1.30 m/s | 0.86 m/s | 0.63 m/s |
Table 2 Moving speed of the operator
平地 | 上楼梯 | 下楼梯 |
---|---|---|
1.30 m/s | 0.86 m/s | 0.63 m/s |
评估方法 | 硫化氢吸入剂量(D) | 死亡率(P) |
---|---|---|
静态评估 | 1.062×105 | 5.396×10-2 |
半动态评估 | 7.230×104 | 2.848×10-3 |
动态评估 | 6.020×104 | 4.571×10-4 |
Table 3 Inhalation dose of hydrogen sulfide and the corresponding mortality
评估方法 | 硫化氢吸入剂量(D) | 死亡率(P) |
---|---|---|
静态评估 | 1.062×105 | 5.396×10-2 |
半动态评估 | 7.230×104 | 2.848×10-3 |
动态评估 | 6.020×104 | 4.571×10-4 |
1 | Dadashzadeh M, Abbassi R, Khan F, et al. Explosion modeling and analysis of BP deepwater horizon accident[J]. Safety Science, 2013, 57(8): 150-160. |
2 | Paik J K, Czujko J, Kim B J, et al. Quantitative assessment of hydrocarbon explosion and fire risks in offshore installations[J]. Marine Structures, 2011, 24(2): 73-96. |
3 | Li X H, Chen G M, Zhu H W, et al. Gas dispersion and deflagration above sea from subsea release and its impact on offshore platform[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2018, 163: 157-168. |
4 | Kashi E, Mirzaei F, Mirzaei F. Analysis of gas dispersion and ventilation within a comprehensive CAD model of an offshore platform via computational fluid dynamics[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2015, 36: 125-133. |
5 | 刘康, 陈国明, 魏超南. 浮式生产系统泄漏天然气扩散规律与危险区域[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(8): 1018-1028. |
Liu K, Chen G M, Wei C N. Combustible gas diffusion law and hazardous area of FPSO[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015, 36(8): 1018-1028. | |
6 | Hansen O R, Gavelli F, Davis S G, et al. Equivalent cloud methods used for explosion risk and consequence studies[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2013, 26(3): 511-527. |
7 | Jin Y L, Jang B S. Probabilistic explosion risk analysis for offshore topside process area. Part II: Development of gas cloud multivariate frequency distribution (MVFD)[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2018, 51: 159-168. |
8 | 杨冬冬, 陈国明, 师吉浩. 海洋平台井喷含硫天然气扩散危险区域研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2017, 13(8): 114-120. |
Yang D D, Chen G M, Shi J H. Research on dangerous region of H2S-containing natural gas diffusion resulting from offshore platform blowout[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2017, 13(8): 114-120. | |
9 | 朱渊, 陈国明. 海洋平台密集作业空间内H2S扩散分析[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2009, 9(6): 140-143. |
Zhu Y, Chen G M. Analysis of H2S dispersion in the congested working environments of offshore platform[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2009, 9(6): 140-143. | |
10 | 邓海发, 陈国明, 朱渊, 等. 海洋钻井平台井喷硫化氢扩散规律研究[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2010, 10(5): 177-180. |
Deng H F, Chen G M, Zhu Y, et al. Study on H2S dispersion from well blowout in offshore drilling platform[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2010, 10(5): 177-180. | |
11 | 刘振翼, 张应安, 钱新明, 等. 酸性气田井喷点火有效空间范围数字模拟[J]. 石油学报, 2009, 30(4): 621-624. |
Liu Z Y, Zhang Y A, Qian X M, et al. Numerical simulation on available ignition range of well blowout in sour gas field[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2009, 30(4): 621-624. | |
12 | 邓海发, 陈国明, 朱渊, 等. 复杂地形条件下气体泄漏扩散规律仿真与试验[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 36(1): 122-126. |
Deng H F, Chen G M, Zhu Y, et al. Simulation and experiment of gas leakage and dispersion in complex topography[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum, 2012, 36(1): 122-126. | |
13 | Zhang J W, Lei D, Feng W X. An approach for estimating toxic releases of H2S-containing natural gas[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2014, 264(2): 350-362. |
14 | 朱渊, 陈国明, 刘德绪. 复杂地形天然气净化厂脱硫装置泄漏事故模拟及危害评价[J]. 化工学报, 2010, 61(10): 2758-2764. |
Zhu Y, Chen G M, Liu D X. Simulation and assessment on leakage hazard from gas sweetening unit of sour gas processing plant in complex terrain[J]. CIESC Journal, 2010, 61(10): 2758-2764. | |
15 | 章博, 王磊, 王志刚. 炼油装置有害气体泄漏区域风险等级划分[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 39(5): 144-149. |
Zhang B, Wang L, Wang Z G. Area risk level classification for hazardous gas release in petroleum refining installations[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science), 2015, 39(5): 144-149. | |
16 | 雷达, 张建文, 冯文兴. 含硫化氢天然气泄漏事故的硫化氢中毒灾害分析[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2012, 12(3): 224-228. |
Lei D, Zhang J W, Feng W X. A new method for analyzing the hazardous hydrogen sulfide poisoning caused by the sulfurous natural gas leakage[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2012, 12(3): 224-228. | |
17 | James M. Simplified methods of using probit analysis in consequence analysis[J]. Process Safety Progress, 2015, 34(1): 58-63. |
18 | Bagheri M, Alamdari A, Davoudi M. Quantitative risk assessment of sour gas transmission pipelines using CFD[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2016, 31: 108-118. |
19 | 朱渊, 王薛强, 陈国明. 基于最小中毒剂量的有毒气体泄漏人员优化疏散路线研究[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2013, 13(4): 270-274. |
Zhu Y, Wang X Q, Chen G M. Evacuating route optimization based on the minimum toxic dose in toxic gas-leaking accidents[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2013, 13(4): 270-274. | |
20 | Zhang B, Chen G M. Quantitative risk analysis of toxic gas release caused poisoning—a CFD and dose–response model combined approach[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2010, 88(4): 253-262. |
21 | Khan F, Abbasi S. A criterion for developing credible accident scenarios for risk assessment[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2002, 15(6): 467-475. |
22 | Dadashzadeh M, Khan F, Abbassi R, et al. Combustion products toxicity risk assessment in an offshore installation[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2014, 92(6): 616-624. |
23 | Li J D, Ma G W, Abdel-Jawad M, et al. Gas dispersion risk analysis of safety gap effect on the innovating FLNG vessel with a cylindrical platform[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2016, 40: 304-316. |
24 | Li X J, Zhou R P, Konovessis D. CFD analysis of natural gas dispersion in engine room space based on multi-factor coupling[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2016, 111: 524-532. |
25 | Savvides C, Tam V, Kinnear D. Dispersion of fuel in offshore modules: comparison of predictions using FLACS and full-scale experiments[C]//Proceedings of Major Hazards Offshore Conference. London: ERA Technology Ltd., 2001. |
26 | Middha P, Hansen O R, Storvik I E. Validation of CFD-model for hydrogen dispersion[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2009, 22(6): 1034-1038. |
27 | Hansen O R, Gavelli F, Ichard M, et al. Validation of FLACS against experimental data sets from the model evaluation database for LNG vapor dispersion[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2010, 23(6): 857-877. |
28 | Shi J H, Khan F, Zhu Y, et al. Robust data-driven model to study dispersion of vapor cloud in offshore facility[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2018, 161: 98-110. |
29 | Shi J H, Li J D, Zhu Y, et al. A simplified statistic-based procedure for gas dispersion prediction of fixed offshore platform[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2018, 114: 48-63. |
30 | Dasgotra A, Varun-Teja G, Sharma A, et al. CFD modeling of large-scale flammable cloud dispersion using FLACS[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2018, 56: 531-536. |
31 | Yang D D, Chen G M, Dai Z L. Accident modeling of toxic gas-containing flammable gas release and explosion on an offshore platform[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2020, 65: 104118. |
32 | 中国安全生产科学研究院. “十五”国家科技攻关计划“城市重大工业危险源评价与监测关键技术研究”专题总结报告[R]. 2006. |
China Academy of Safety Science and Technology. Special summary report on “Research on key technologies for assessment and monitoring of urban major industrial hazard sources” for the Tenth Five-Year Plan of National Scientific and Technological Research[R]. 2006. | |
33 | 中国安全生产科学研究院. 社会公益研究专项资金项目“城市工业安全规划关键技术”研究报告[R]. 2006. |
China Academy of Safety Science and Technology. Research report on “Key technology of urban industrial safety planning” of special fund project of social welfare research[R]. 2006. | |
34 | Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS). Guidelines for Consequence Analysis of Chemical Releases[M]. New York: Wiley-AIChE, 1999. |
35 | Berge W, Zwart A, Appelman L. Concentration-time mortality response relationship of irritant and systemically acting vapours and gases[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 1986, 13(3): 301-309. |
36 | Bieringer P E, Annunzio A J, Platt N, et al. Contrasting the use of single-realization versus ensemble-average atmospheric dispersion solutions for chemical and biological defense analyses[J]. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 2014, 53(6): 1399-1415. |
37 | Zhang Y, Zhao B. Simulation and health risk assessment of residential particle pollution by coal combustion in China[J]. Building and Environment, 2007, 42(2): 614-622. |
38 | 李晶晶. 海洋平台人员应急撤离风险分析与控制研究[D]. 青岛: 中国石油大学 (华东), 2015. |
Li J J. Risk Assessment and control strategy for individual evacuation, escape, rescue on offshore platforms[D]. Qingdao: China University of Petroleum (East China), 2015. | |
39 | 石油工业安全专业标委会. 含硫化氢油气井安全钻井推荐作法: SY/T 5087—2005[S]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2005. |
Petroleum Industry Safety Professional Bidding Committee. Recommended practice for safe drilling operations involving hydrogen sulfide: SY /T 5087—2005[S]. Beijing: China Petroleum Industry Press, 2005. | |
40 | Yang D D, Chen G M, Shi J H, et al. Effect of gas composition on dispersion characteristics of blowout gas on offshore platform[J]. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 2019, 11(2): 914-922. |
41 | Ahmad A, Hassan S A, Ripin A, et al. A risk-based method for determining passive fire protection adequacy[J]. Fire Safety Journal, 2013, 58(4): 160-169. |
42 | IMO. Guidelines for Evacuation Analysis for New and Existing Passenger Ships: MSC.1/Circ.1238[S]. London: International Maritime Organization, 2007. |
[1] | Siyu ZHANG, Yonggao YIN, Pengqi JIA, Wei YE. Study on seasonal thermal energy storage characteristics of double U-shaped buried pipe group [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(S1): 295-301. |
[2] | Mingkun XIAO, Guang YANG, Yonghua HUANG, Jingyi WU. Numerical study on bubble dynamics of liquid oxygen at a submerged orifice [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(S1): 87-95. |
[3] | Linjing YUE, Yihan LIAO, Yuan XUE, Xuejie LI, Yuxing LI, Cuiwei LIU. Study on influence of pit defects on cavitation flow characteristics of throat of thick orifice plates [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(8): 3292-3308. |
[4] | Lei XING, Chunyu MIAO, Minghu JIANG, Lixin ZHAO, Xinya LI. Optimal design and performance analysis of downhole micro gas-liquid hydrocyclone [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(8): 3394-3406. |
[5] | Linzheng WANG, Yubing LU, Ruizhi ZHANG, Yonghao LUO. Analysis on thermal oxidation characteristics of VOCs based on molecular dynamics simulation [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(8): 3242-3255. |
[6] | Xiaokun HE, Rui LIU, Yuan XUE, Ran ZUO. Review of gas phase and surface reactions in AlN MOCVD [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(7): 2800-2813. |
[7] | Daoyin LIU, Bingqi CHEN, Zuyang ZHANG, Yan WU. Effect of agglomerate structure on drag force by numerical simulation [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(6): 2351-2362. |
[8] | Chenxi LI, Yongfeng LIU, Lu ZHANG, Haifeng LIU, Jin’ou SONG, Xu HE. Quantum chemical analysis of n-heptane combustion mechanism under O2/CO2 atmosphere [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(5): 2157-2169. |
[9] | Zhengtao LI, Zhijie YUAN, Gaohong HE, Xiaobin JIANG. Study of the mechanism of internal circulation regulation during evaporation of NaCl droplets on hydrophobic interface [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(5): 1904-1913. |
[10] | Sheng CHEN, Mengke WANG, Bona LU, Xiufeng LI, Cenfan LIU, Mengxi LIU, Yiping FAN, Chunxi LU. CFD investigation of effects of feedstock oil vaporization on FCC cracking reaction and coking [J]. CIESC Journal, 2022, 73(7): 2982-2995. |
[11] | Shanwei HU, Xinhua LIU. Multiscale trans-regime EMMS modeling of gas-solid fluidization systems [J]. CIESC Journal, 2022, 73(6): 2514-2528. |
[12] | Jing WAN, Lin ZHANG, Yachao FAN, Xiemin LIU, Peicheng LUO, Feng ZHANG, Zhibing ZHANG. Bioreactor scale-up simulation and experimental study based on mesoscale PBM model [J]. CIESC Journal, 2022, 73(6): 2698-2707. |
[13] | Limin WANG, Shuyu GUO, Xing XIANG, Shaotong FU. Research progress of energy-minimization multi-scale method for turbulent system [J]. CIESC Journal, 2022, 73(6): 2415-2426. |
[14] | Yilin LIU, Yu LI, Yaxiong YU, Zheqing HUANG, Qiang ZHOU. Construction of two parameter mesoscale heat transfer model for gas-solid flow based on resetting temperature method [J]. CIESC Journal, 2022, 73(6): 2612-2621. |
[15] | Wenlong ZHANG,Shanglei NING,Haibo JIN,Lei MA,Guangxiang HE,Suohe YANG,Xiaoyan GUO,Rongyue ZHANG. Numerical simulation of hydrodynamic parameters with air-acetic acid system using CFD-PBM coupled model [J]. CIESC Journal, 2022, 73(6): 2589-2602. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||