CIESC Journal ›› 2016, Vol. 67 ›› Issue (8): 3179-3190.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20160401

Previous Articles     Next Articles

CFD simulation of novel fluidizer technology in feedstock injection zone of FCC riser

CHEN Sheng1,2, FAN Yiping1, YAN Zihan1, LI Fei2, WANG Wei2, LU Chunxi1   

  1. 1 State Key Laboratory of Heavy Oil Processing, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China;
    2 State Key Laboratory of Multiphase Complex Systems, Institute of Process Engineering, CAS, Beijing 100190, China
  • Received:2016-03-31 Revised:2016-06-09 Online:2016-08-05 Published:2016-08-05
  • Supported by:

    supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (2012CB215000).

催化裂化提升管进料区新型助流剂技术的CFD模拟

陈昇1,2, 范怡平1, 闫子涵1, 李飞2, 王维2, 卢春喜1   

  1. 1 中国石油大学(北京)重质油国家重点实验室, 北京 102249;
    2 中国科学院过程工程研究所多相复杂系统国家重点实验室, 北京 100190
  • 通讯作者: 卢春喜, 王维
  • 基金资助:

    国家重点基础研究发展计划项目(2012CB215000)。

Abstract:

To improve the gas-solid two-phase mixing and eliminate the effect of secondary flow on the back-mixing near the riser wall in the feedstock injection zone, a novel fluidizer technology is proposed. A protective layer is produced by fluidizer to prevent long-duration contact between catalysts and feed near the wall. Three schemes for this technology (reverse-impact, concurrent-flow and crossed schemes) are used to improve the catalyst-feed mixing and back-mixing near wall by using 3-D CFD simulation. The amount of fluidizer of the optimal scheme is further optimized. The results show that the best is the reverse-impact scheme and the worst is the crossed scheme. The optimal reverse-impact scheme(when the mass flux of fluidizer is equal to the 15% mass flux of feed) can improve the catalyst-feed mixing, prevent the expanding of secondary flow and weaken the intensity of back-mixing at the |r/R|>0.9 near the wall.

Key words: riser, feed injection zone, secondary flow, fluidizer, fluid catalytic cracking, EMMS, CFD

摘要:

为改善提升管进料区气固两相混合状况、消除二次流对近壁面处返混的影响,提出了一种新型助流剂技术。该技术在边壁处形成一层助流剂“保护层”,可阻止进料射流与催化剂在边壁处过长接触。通过三维CFD模拟对比了3种助流方式(逆流式、顺流式、交叉式)对传统进料区催化剂与进料混合和边壁返混的改进效果,并对最佳方式下助流剂量做进一步的优化。结果表明,逆流式助流方式最理想,交叉式助流方式最差。合适的逆流式助流方式(如助流剂注入量为进料相总流率的15%时)可改善进料区催化剂与进料相混合,抑制二次流扩张,明显减弱近边壁处(|r/R|>0.9)返混强度。

关键词: 提升管, 进料区, 二次流, 助流剂, 流化催化裂化, 能量最小多尺度模型, 计算流体力学

CLC Number: