SBR中曝气强度对除磷颗粒的影响

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20150941

化工学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (12): 4994-5001.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20150941

SBR中曝气强度对除磷颗粒的影响

李冬¹, 吕育锋¹, 张金库¹, 范丹¹, 姜沙沙¹, 曾辉平¹, 张杰^1,2

1 北京工业大学水质科学与水环境恢复工程北京市重点实验室, 北京 100124;
2 哈尔滨工业大学城市水资源与水环境国家重点实验室, 黑龙江哈尔滨 150090

收稿日期:2015-06-16 修回日期:2015-07-20 出版日期:2015-12-05 发布日期:2015-12-05
通讯作者: 李冬
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(51222807)。

Influence of aeration intensity on phosphorus removal granules in SBR

LI Dong¹, Lü Yufeng¹, ZHANG Jinku¹, FAN Dan¹, JIANG Shasha¹, ZENG Huiping¹, ZHANG Jie^1,2

1 Key Laboratory of Beijing for Water Quality Science and Water Environment Recovery Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China;
2 State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150090, Heilongjiang, China

Received:2015-06-16 Revised:2015-07-20 Online:2015-12-05 Published:2015-12-05
Supported by:
supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51222807).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在3个SBR反应器(R1、R2和R3)中,好氧段分别控制气体流量为0.5、1.0和1.5 L·min^-1,研究了不同曝气强度对除磷颗粒的特性、处理性能和生物量等的影响。3个反应器在不同的曝气强度下30 d均实现了除磷污泥颗粒化,而后稳定运行30 d。试验结果表明,曝气强度对除磷颗粒的粒径、形态、含水率、沉淀性、处理效果、生物量等有着重要的影响。颗粒成熟后,R1、R2和R3中颗粒的平均粒径分别为900、1000和1150 μm,含水率分别为95.6%、94.2%和93.4%,沉淀速度分别为24～144、29～162和33～178 m·h^-1。在40 d后的运行中,R1、R2和R3中COD的平均去除率分别为95%、96%和98%,TP的平均去除率分别为97%、98%和99%。可见,曝气强度较大的反应器中形成的颗粒具有较好的沉淀性、较大的粒径、较低的含水率、较好的处理效果,且形状规则、外表光滑,而较大的生物量及较密实的结构是这些颗粒具有较优性能的主要原因。同时,测定并计算了3个反应器中第51天除磷颗粒的MLVSS/MLSS和生物活性层的厚度,高曝气强度反应器中聚磷颗粒的生物活性层厚度比较大,生物量比较高;并通过计算厌氧阶段P释放量与COD消耗量的比值,证实了本试验除磷颗粒系统中富集了大量的聚磷菌。

关键词: 除磷颗粒, 颗粒化过程, 厌氧, 好氧, 曝气强度, 生物量, 聚磷菌

Abstract:

Three column sequencing batch reactors (SBR) (R1, R2 and R3) were operated under various aeration intensity of 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 L·min^-1, respectively. The influence of aeration intensity on characteristics, treatment performance and biomass of the phosphorus removal granules (PRGs) were investigated. PRGs were formed in all reactors in 30 days and operated steadily for another 30 days. The results showed that the aeration intensity had an important impact on the settling ability, particle size, morphology, moisture content, treatment performance and biomass. With the increase of aeration intensity, the diameter and settling velocity of matured granules were increased, which were 900 μm and 24-144 m·h^-1, 1000 μm and 29-162 m·h^-1, and 1150 μm and 33-178 m·h^-1in R1, R2 and R3, respectively, while the moisture contents were decreased and were 95.6%, 94.2% and 93.4%, respectively. Therefore, compared with the low aeration intensity, the PRGs under the higher aeration intensity had better physical characteristics, settling ability and treatment performance due to the more biomass and denser structure. PRGs under higher aeration intensity were spherical or elliptic and had regular contours, but the structure and shape of PRGs under lower aeration intensity was loosened and irregular. Meanwhile, the MLVSS/MLSS, biomass layer thickness of PRGs and P release/COD uptake ratios in all reactors at the 51th day were calculated. MLVSS/MLSS and biomass layer thickness of granules in R1, R2 and R3 were 78% and 0.34 mm, 82% and 0.35 mm, and 86% and 0.38 mm, respectively. It demonstrated that granules in the reactor with higher aeration intensity had a relatively thicker biomass layer and more biomass. The P release/COD uptake ratios in R1, R2 and R3 were 0.35, 0.35 and 0.36, respectively, indicating that the content of phosphorus accumulating organisms (PAOs) was high in all reactors of this research.

Key words: phosphorus removal granules, particulate processes, anaerobic, aerobic, aeration intensity, biomass, phosphorus accumulating organisms

中图分类号:

X703.1

李冬, 吕育锋, 张金库, 范丹, 姜沙沙, 曾辉平, 张杰. SBR中曝气强度对除磷颗粒的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(12): 4994-5001.

LI Dong, Lü Yufeng, ZHANG Jinku, FAN Dan, JIANG Shasha, ZENG Huiping, ZHANG Jie. Influence of aeration intensity on phosphorus removal granules in SBR[J]. CIESC Journal, 2015, 66(12): 4994-5001.

参考文献 26

[1]	Mielczarek A T, Hien T T N, Nielsen J L, Nielsen P H. Population dynamics of bacteria involved in enhanced biological phosphorus removal in Danish wastewater treatment plants [J]. Water Research, 2013, 47 (4): 1529-1544.
[2]	Oehmen A, Lemos P C, Carvalho G, Yuan Zh G, Keller J, Blackall L L, Reis M A M. Advances in enhanced biological phosphorus removal: from micro to macro scale [J]. Water Research, 2007, 41 (11): 2271-2300.
[3]	Zheng X, Sun P, Han J, Song Y, Hu Z, Fan H, Lü S. Inhibitory factors affecting the process of enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR)-a mini-review [J]. Process Biochemistry, 2014, 49 (12): 2207-2213.
[4]	Fang J, Su B, Sun P, Lou J, Han J. Long-term effect of low concentration Cr(Ⅵ) on P removal in granule-based enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) system [J]. Chemosphere, 2015, 121: 76-83.
[5]	Tay J H, Liu Q S, Liu Y. The effects of shear force on the formation, structure and metabolism of aerobic granules [J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2001, 57 (1-2): 227-233.
[6]	Chen Y, Jiang W, Liang D T, Tay J H. Structure and stability of aerobic granules cultivated under different shear force in sequencing batch reactors [J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2007, 76 (5): 1199-1208.
[7]	Gao D, Liu L, Liang H. Influence of aeration intensity on mature aerobic granules in sequencing batch reactor [J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2013, 97 (9): 4213-4219.
[8]	The Environmental Protection Agency of State (国家环境保护局). The Monitoring and Analysis Methods of Water and Wastewater (水和废水监测分析方法) [M]. Beijing:China Environmental Science Press, 2002: 100-104.
[9]	Zhang L, Feng X, Zhu N, Chen J. Role of extracellular protein in the formation and stability of aerobic granules [J]. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 2007, 41 (5): 551-557.
[10]	Zhou Man (周曼), Yang Changzhu (杨昌柱), Pu Wenhong (濮文虹), Luo Yingdong (罗应东), Gong Jianyu (龚建宇). Research of aerobic granule characteristics with different granule age [J]. Environmental Science (环境科学), 2012, 33 (3): 896-902.
[11]	Tay J H, Liu Q S, Liu Y. Characteristics of aerobic granules grown on glucose and acetate in sequential aerobic sludge blanket reactors [J]. Environmental Technology, 2002, 23 (8): 931-936.
[12]	Winkler M K H, Kleerebezem R, Kuenen J G, Yang J, van Loosdrecht M C M. Segregation of biomass in cyclic anaerobic/aerobic granular sludge allows the enrichment of anaerobic ammonium oxidizing bacteria at low temperatures [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2011, 45 (17): 7330-7337.
[13]	Wu Changyong (吴昌永), Wang Randeng (王然登), Peng Yongzhen (彭永臻). Principle and Application of Granular Sludge Technology in Wastewater Treatment (污水处理颗粒污泥技术原理与应用)[M]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2011: 197.
[14]	Mishima K, Nakamura M. Self immobilization of aerobic activated sludge a pilot study of the aerobic upflow sludge blanket process in municipal sewage treatment [J]. Water Science and Technology, 1991, 23 (4/5/6): 981-990.
[15]	Shin H S, Lim K H, Park H S. Effect of shear stress on granulation in oxygen aerobic upflow sludge bed reactors [J]. Water Science and Technology, 1992, 26 (3/4): 601-605.
[16]	Tay J H, Liu Q S, Liu Y. Microscopic observation of aerobic granulation in sequential aerobic sludge blanket reactor [J]. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 2001, 91 (1): 168-175.
[17]	Tay J H, Liu Q S, Liu Y. The role of cellular polysaccharides in the formation and stability of aerobic granules [J]. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 2001, 33 (3): 222-226.
[18]	Tay J H, Liu Q S, Liu Y. The effects of shear force on the formation, structure and metabolism of aerobic granules [J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2001, 57 (1/2): 227-233.
[19]	Beun J J, van Loosdrecht M, Heijnen J J. Aerobic granulation in a sequencing batch airlift reactor [J]. Water Research, 2002, 36 (3): 702-712.
[20]	Arrojo B, Mosquera-Corral A, Garrido J M, Mendez R. Aerobic granulation with industrial wastewater in sequencing batch reactors [J]. Water Research, 2004, 38 (14/15): 3389-3399.
[21]	Rocktaeschel T, Klarmann C, Ochoa J, Boisson P, Sorensen K, Horn H. Influence of the granulation grade on the concentration of suspended solids in the effluent of a pilot scale sequencing batch reactor operated with aerobic granular sludge [J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2015, 142: 234-241.
[22]	Su Chengyuan (宿程远), Liu Xingzhe (刘兴哲), Wang Kaiyao (王恺尧), Li Weiguang (李伟光). Characteristics of anaerobic granular sludge in EGSB reactor treating traditional Chinese medicine wastewater [J]. CIESC Journal (化工学报), 2014, 65 (9): 3647-3653.
[23]	Ma Bin (马斌), Peng Yongzhen (彭永臻), Wang Shuying (王淑莹), Ge Shijian (葛士建), Yang Yingying (杨莹莹), Zhu Guibing (祝贵兵). Characterization of polyphosphate-accumulating bacteria community structure in enhanced biological phosphorus removal reactor [J]. CIESC Journal (化工学报), 2010, 61 (5): 1282-1285.
[24]	Wu C, Peng Y, Wang S, Ma Y. Enhanced biological phosphorus removal by granular sludge: from macro- to micro-scale [J]. Water Research, 2010, 44 (3): 807-814.
[25]	Brdjanovic D, Vanloosdrecht M, Hooijmans C M, Alaerts G J, Heijnen J J. Temperature effects on physiology of biological phosphorus removal [J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 1997, 123 (2): 144-153.
[26]	Winkler M K H, Bassin J P, Kleerebezem R,de Bruin L M M, van den Brand T P H, van Loosdrecht M C M. Selective sludge removal in a segregated aerobic granular biomass system as a strategy to control PAO-GAO competition at high temperatures [J]. Water Research, 2011, 45 (11): 3291-3299.

SBR中曝气强度对除磷颗粒的影响

Influence of aeration intensity on phosphorus removal granules in SBR

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 26

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	吕龙义, 及文博, 韩沐达, 李伟光, 高文芳, 刘晓阳, 孙丽, 王鹏飞, 任芝军, 张光明. 铁基导电材料强化厌氧去除卤代有机污染物：研究进展及未来展望[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3193-3202.
[2]	胡南, 陶德敏, 杨照岚, 王学兵, 张向旭, 刘玉龙, 丁德馨. 铁炭微电解与硫酸盐还原菌耦合修复铀尾矿库渗滤水的研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2655-2667.
[3]	黄玉龙, 吕凡, 仇俊杰, 章骅, 何品晶. 易腐垃圾厌氧消化沼液理化性质及VOCs分子特征[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1275-1285.
[4]	王燕杉, 朱小超, 宋英今, 李易航. 草屑厌氧消化预处理耦合水热炭化研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(2): 904-913.
[5]	高歆婕, 许载周, 彭永臻, 黄雨薇, 丁静, 安泽铭, 汪传新. 污泥双回流-厌氧/好氧/缺氧强化内源反硝化深度脱氮[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(11): 5098-5105.
[6]	刘海波, 王楠, 刘洪周, 陈铁柱, 李建昌. 电压扰动对EAD代谢通量中微生物与关键酶活性的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(10): 4603-4612.
[7]	巩有奎, 罗佩云, 孙洪伟. 厌氧-限氧SBR处理低C/N生活污水SNDPR启动及N₂O释放[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(8): 4381-4390.
[8]	巩有奎, 李美玲, 孙洪伟. 不同NO₃^-浓度An/A/O-SBR系统PAOs-GAOs竞争及N₂O释放特性[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(3): 1675-1683.
[9]	魏伟, 蔡欣宇, 刘载文, 左敏. 废水处理过程的抗扰控制研究[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(3): 1567-1574.
[10]	张肖静,马冰冰,张涵,位登辉,张红丽,胡浩,赵子睿. 厌氧氨氧化工艺处理不同抗生素废水的性能比较[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(11): 5810-5819.
[11]	吴悦溪, 曾薇, 刘宏, 李健敏, 彭永臻. Feammox系统内氮素转化途径的研究[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(5): 2265-2272.
[12]	张海华,董海泉,李慧,袁璐韫,方哲,程军. 碳化金属-有机骨架强化种间电子传递产甲烷[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(12): 5745-5754.
[13]	邓秋金,宿程远,陆欣雅,关鑫,覃容华,邓钰莲,高澍,黄尊. 氮浓度对新型生物电化学-颗粒污泥反应器运行的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(12): 5802-5812.
[14]	冯尧成,任厉泰,张锋,张志炳. 好氧发酵过程微界面传质耦合模拟分析[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(11): 4936-4944.
[15]	毛政中, 孙怡, 黄志鹏, 李超超, 黄浩斌, 成少安. 微生物电解池产甲烷技术研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(7): 2411-2425.