基于加权互信息主元分析算法的质量相关故障检测

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20171009

化工学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 69 ›› Issue (3): 962-973.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20171009

基于加权互信息主元分析算法的质量相关故障检测

赵帅, 宋冰, 侍洪波

华东理工大学化工过程先进控制和优化技术教育部重点实验室, 上海 200237

收稿日期:2017-07-31 修回日期:2017-10-15 出版日期:2018-03-05 发布日期:2018-03-05
通讯作者: 侍洪波
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（61374140，61673173）；中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金（222201714031）；中央高校基本科研业务费重点科研基地创新基金项目（222201717006）。

Quality-related fault detection based on weighted mutual information principal component analysis

ZHAO Shuai, SONG Bing, SHI Hongbo

Key Laboratory of Advanced Control and Optimization for Chemical Processes of Ministry of Education, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China

Received:2017-07-31 Revised:2017-10-15 Online:2018-03-05 Published:2018-03-05
Supported by:
supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61374140, 61673173) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Ministry of Education of China(222201714031, 222201717006).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

质量相关的故障检测已成为近几年研究热点，它的目标是在过程监测中，对质量相关的故障检测率更高，对质量无关的故障少报警或不报警。传统主元分析算法的故障检测会对所有故障均报警，不能达到上述要求。另外，在实际工业生产中，质量变量通常难以实时获得，需要后续分析或延时得到。为此，提出一种融合贝叶斯推断与互信息的加权互信息主元分析算法。首先利用贝叶斯推断的加权方法将度量过程变量和质量变量之间相关关系的互信息进行融合，选出包含质量变量信息量最大的一组过程变量。然后对过程变量利用主元分析（principal component analysis，PCA）进行统计建模，再次根据加权互信息选出包含质量变量信息量最大的主元，建立统计量进行故障检测。最后，通过实验验证该方法的可行性和有效性。

关键词: 过程系统, 主元分析, 故障检测, 质量相关, 加权互信息

Abstract:

Quality-related fault detection has been a new research hotspot in recent years. It aims to the higher fault detection rate for quality-related faults and the lower fault detection rate for quality-unrelated faults. The traditional principal component analysis (PCA) will alarm all faults and can't satisfy the above requirements, which will cause lots of downtime and seriously affect the normal production. The quality variables usually are not easy to measure online in actual industrial production. So this paper proposed the weighted mutual information principal component analysis (WMIPCA) to solve these problems. Firstly, the supervision relationship between process variables and quality variables is established via mutual information and Bayesian Inference. Then a set of process variables that contain the largest amount of quality variable information is selected and the PCA is modeled on them. After that, the principal components containing more information on the quality variables are selected and used to establish the statistics and monitor the process. Finally, the feasibility and effectiveness of the WMIPCA are verified by experiments.

Key words: process systems, principal component analysis, fault detection, quality-related, weighted mutual information

中图分类号:

TP277

赵帅, 宋冰, 侍洪波. 基于加权互信息主元分析算法的质量相关故障检测[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(3): 962-973.

ZHAO Shuai, SONG Bing, SHI Hongbo. Quality-related fault detection based on weighted mutual information principal component analysis[J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(3): 962-973.

参考文献 38

[1]	TONG C D, SHI X H, LAN T. Statistical process monitoring based on orthogonal multi-manifold projections and a novel variable contribution analysis[J]. Isa Transactions, 2016, 65:407-417.
[2]	ZHANG S M, WANG F L, ZHAO L P, et al. A novel strategy of the data characteristics test for selecting a process monitoring method automatically[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2016, 55(6):1642-1654.
[3]	JI H Q, HE X, SHANG J, et al. Incipient fault detection with smoothing techniques in statistical process monitoring[J]. Control Engineering Practice, 2017, 62:11-21.
[4]	ZHANG S M, WANG F L, TAN S, et al. Novel monitoring strategy combining the advantages of the multiple modeling strategy and Gaussian mixture model for multimode processes[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2015, 54(47):11866-11880
[5]	SHERIFF M Z, MANSOURI M, KARIM M N, et al. Fault detection using multiscale PCA-based moving window GLRT[J]. Journal of Process Control, 2017, 54:47-64.
[6]	PORTNOY I, MELENDEZ K, PINZON H, et al. An improved weighted recursive PCA algorithm for adaptive fault detection[J]. Control Engineering Practice, 2016, 50:69-83.
[7]	杨健, 宋冰, 谭帅, 等. 时序约束NPE算法在化工过程故障检测中的应用[J]. 化工学报, 2016, 67(12):5131-5139. YANG J, SONG B, TAN S, et al. Time constrained NPE for fault detection in chemical processes[J]. CIESC Journal, 2016, 67(12):5131-5139.
[8]	MORI J, YU J. Quality relevant nonlinear batch process performance monitoring using a kernel based multiway non-Gaussian latent subspace projection approach[J]. Journal of Process Control, 2014, 24(1):57-71.
[9]	YIN S, DING S X, HAGHANI A, et al. A comparison study of basic data-driven fault diagnosis and process monitoring methods on the benchmark Tennessee Eastman process[J]. Journal of Process Control, 2012, 22(9):1567-1581.
[10]	ZHANG K, DONG J, PENG K X. A novel dynamic non-Gaussian approach for quality-related fault diagnosis with application to the hot strip mill process[J]. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 2017, 354(2):702-721.
[11]	SONG B, MA Y X, SHI H B. Improved performance of process monitoring based on selection of key principal components[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2015, 23(12):1951-1957.
[12]	SONG B, TAN S, SHI H B. Key principal components with recursive local outlier factor for multimode chemical process monitoring[J]. Journal of Process Control, 2016, 47:136-149.
[13]	SONG B, TAN S, SHI H B. Process monitoring via enhanced neighborhood preserving embedding[J]. Control Engineering Practice, 2016, 50:48-56.
[14]	WANG F, TAN S, SHI H B. Hidden Markov model-based approach for multimode process monitoring[J]. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2015, 148:51-59.
[15]	WANG F, ZHU H L, TAN S, et al. Orthogonal nonnegative matrix factorization based local hidden Markov model for multimode process monitoring[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2016, 24(7):856-860.
[16]	LI G, QIN S J,ZHOU D. Geometric properties of partial least squares for process monitoring[J]. Automatica, 2010, 46(1):204-210.
[17]	ZHOU D H, LI G, QIN S J. Total projection to latent structures for process monitoring[J]. AIChE Journal, 2010, 56(1):168-178.
[18]	PENG K X, ZHANG K, LI G. Quality-related process monitoring based on total kernel PLS model and its industrial application[J]. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2013, 2013:1-14.
[19]	QIN S J, ZHENG Y Y. Quality-relevant and process-relevant fault monitoring with concurrent projection to latent structures[J]. AIChE Journal, 2013, 59(2):496-504.
[20]	DONG J, ZHANG K, HUANG Y, et al. Adaptive total PLS based quality-relevant process monitoring with application to the Tennessee Eastman process[J]. Neurocomputing, 2015, 154:77-85.
[21]	YIN S, WANG G, GAO H J. Data-driven process monitoring based on modified orthogonal projections to latent structures[J]. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2016, 24(4):1480-1487.
[22]	YIN S, ZHU X P, KAYNAK O. Improved PLS focused on key-performance-indicator-related fault diagnosis[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2015, 62(3):1651-1658.
[23]	JIA Q L, ZHANG Y W. Quality-related fault detection approach based on dynamic kernel partial least squares[J]. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2016, 106:242-252.
[24]	GE Z Q, CHEN X R. Supervised linear dynamic system model for quality related fault detection in dynamic processes[J]. Journal of Process Control, 2016, 44:224-235.
[25]	WANG G, LUO H, PENG K X. Quality-related fault detection using linear and nonlinear principal component regression[J]. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 2016, 353(10):2159-2177.
[26]	PENG K X, ZHANG K, DONG J, et al. Quality-relevant fault detection and diagnosis for hot strip mill process with multi-specification and multi-batch measurements[J]. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 2015, 352(3):987-1006.
[27]	ZHONG B, WANG J, ZHOU J L, et al. Quality-related statistical process monitoring method based on global and local partial least-squares projection[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2016, 55(6):1609-1622.
[28]	WANG G, JIAO J F. A kernel least squares based approach for nonlinear quality-related fault detection[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2017, 64:3195-3204.
[29]	HAO H Y, ZHANG K, DING S X, et al. A data-driven multiplicative fault diagnosis approach for automation processes[J]. Isa Transactions, 2014, 53(5):1436-1445.
[30]	HU Z K, CHEN Z W, GUI W H, et al. Adaptive PCA based fault diagnosis scheme in imperial smelting process[J]. Isa Transactions, 2014, 53(5):1446-1455.
[31]	HAN M, REN W J, LIU X X. Joint mutual information-based input variable selection for multivariate time series modeling[J]. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2015, 37:250-257.
[32]	LI W T. Mutual information function versus correlation function[J]. Journal of Statistical Physics, 1990, 60:823-837.
[33]	HUANG J P, YAN X F. Quality relevant and independent two block monitoring based on mutual information and KPCA[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2017, 64(8):6518-6527.
[34]	MORI J, YU J. Maximized mutual information based non-Gaussian subspace projection method for quality relevant process monitoring and fault detection[C]//PARISINI T, TEMPO R. 52nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control. Washington, DC, USA:IEEE, 2013:4361-4366.
[35]	QIN S J. Statistical process monitoring:basics and beyond[J]. Journal of Chemometrics, 2003, 17(8):480-502.
[36]	童楚东, 蓝艇, 史旭华. 基于互信息的分散式动态PCA故障检测方法[J]. 化工学报, 2016, 67(10):4317-4323. TONG C D, LAN T, SHI X H. Fault detection by decentralized dynamic PCA algorithm on mutual information[J]. CIESC Journal, 2016, 67(10):4317-4323.
[37]	YU J, QIN S J. Multiway Gaussian mixture model based multiphase batch process monitoring[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2009, 48(18):8585-8594.
[38]	RASHID M M, YU J. A new dissimilarity method integrating multidimensional mutual information and independent component analysis for non-Gaussian dynamic process monitoring[J]. Chemometrics & Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2012, 115(7):44-58.

基于加权互信息主元分析算法的质量相关故障检测

Quality-related fault detection based on weighted mutual information principal component analysis

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 38

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	陈哲文, 魏俊杰, 张玉明. 超临界水煤气化耦合SOFC发电系统集成及其能量转化机制[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3888-3902.
[2]	曹跃, 余冲, 李智, 杨明磊. 工业数据驱动的加氢裂化装置多工况切换过渡状态检测[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3841-3854.
[3]	张逸豪, 王振雷. 基于最大信息系数的分组支持向量数据描述故障检测[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3865-3878.
[4]	郑玉圆, 葛志伟, 韩翔宇, 王亮, 陈海生. 中高温钙基材料热化学储热的研究进展与展望[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3171-3192.
[5]	李贵贤, 曹阿波, 孟文亮, 王东亮, 杨勇, 周怀荣. 耦合固体氧化物电解槽的CO₂制甲醇过程设计与评价研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2999-3009.
[6]	王光, 单发顺, 钱禹丞, 焦建芳. 基于集成学习传递熵的化工过程微小故障检测方法[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2967-2978.
[7]	邵远哲, 赵忠盖, 刘飞. 基于共同趋势模型的非平稳过程质量相关故障检测方法[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2522-2537.
[8]	贠程, 王倩琳, 陈锋, 张鑫, 窦站, 颜廷俊. 基于社团结构的化工过程风险演化路径深度挖掘[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1639-1650.
[9]	宋冰, 郑城风, 侍洪波, 陶阳, 谭帅. 基于VAE-OCCA的质量相关故障检测方法研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1630-1638.
[10]	王子宗, 索寒生, 赵学良. 数字孪生智能乙烯工厂研究与构建[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1175-1186.
[11]	杨明辉, 刘晓月, 邓晓刚, 廖明燕, 侯春望. 基于加权概率CVDA的动态化工系统微小故障检测[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 3963-3972.
[12]	王雅琳, 潘雨晴, 刘晨亮. 基于GSA-LSTM动态结构特征提取的间歇过程监测方法[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 3994-4002.
[13]	雍加望, 赵倩倩, 冯能莲. 基于非线性动态模型的质子交换膜燃料电池故障诊断[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 3983-3993.
[14]	郭金玉, 王哲, 李元. 基于核熵独立成分分析的故障检测方法[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(8): 3647-3658.
[15]	杨岭, 崔国民, 周志强, 肖媛. 精细搜索策略应用于质量交换网络综合[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(7): 3145-3155.