分段组合式厌氧生物反应器流态特性

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2012.10.006

化工学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 63 ›› Issue (10): 3045-3051.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2012.10.006

分段组合式厌氧生物反应器流态特性

季军远, 邢雅娟, 郑平

浙江大学环境工程系, 浙江杭州 310058

收稿日期:2012-02-09 修回日期:2012-04-26 出版日期:2012-10-05 发布日期:2012-10-05
通讯作者: 郑平
作者简介:郑平,季军远(1980- ),男,博士研究生。
基金资助:
浙江省重大科技专项(2010C13001);国家高技术研究发展计划项目(2009AA06Z311)。

Flow patterns of compartmentalized anaerobic reactor

JI Junyuan, XING Yajuan, ZHENG Ping

Department of Environmental Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang, China

Received:2012-02-09 Revised:2012-04-26 Online:2012-10-05 Published:2012-10-05
Supported by:
supported by the High-tech Research and Development Program of China(2009AA06Z311).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 厌氧生物反应器高效性与稳定性取决于其流态特性的优良,采用示踪剂脉冲刺激响应技术研究了自主研发的分段组合式厌氧生物反应器的流态,以期揭示其高效机理,便于工程化开发与应用。试验结果表明:常负荷下该反应器的流态趋于平推流;以轴向扩散模型表征,不产气与产气工况下的Peclet数分别为7.94和5.66;以多釜串联模型表征,不产气与产气工况下的串联釜数分别为4.55与3.44。高负荷与超高负荷下该反应器的流态趋于全混流,以轴向扩散模型表征,不产气与产气工况下的Peclet数分别为4.02、2.57和3.93、3.77;以多釜串联模型表征,不产气与产气工况下的串联釜数分别为2.66、2.00与2.62、2.51。反应器总死区的平均值为33.58%,其中水力死区的平均值为13.58%。建立了水力死区V_h(%)与容积水力负荷L(m³·m^-3·d^-1)和容积产气速率G(m³·m^-3·d^-1)之间的关联式。值得注意的是,在分段组合式厌氧反应器中,容积产气速率对水力死区的影响小于容积水力负荷。

关键词: 厌氧反应器, 流态, 死区

Abstract: The compartmentalized anaerobic reactor(CAR)has outstanding potential in wastewater treatment engineering.The flow patterns of CAR were investigated through pulse stimulus-response technique using sodium fluoride as tracer,and were analyzed by means of the axial dispersion(AD)model and the tanks-in-series(TIS)model.The results showed that back-mixing was small and flow pattern tended to be plug-flow at normal loading rate,Peclet numbers of AD model under the condition with or without biogas production were 5.66 and 7.94 respectively,N numbers of TIS model under the condition with or without biogas production were 3.44 and 4.55 respectively.Back-mixing was large and flow pattern tended to be completely mixed flow at high or super-high loading rate,Peclet numbers of AD model under the condition with or without biogas production were 2.57,4.02 and 3.77,3.93 respectively,N numbers of TIS model under the condition with or without biogas production were 2.00,2.66 and 2.51,2.62 respectively.Average total dead space of CAR was 33.58%,of which average hydraulic dead space was 13.58%.Regression equation was established for parameters of hydraulic dead space(V_h),volumetric hydraulic loading rate(L)and volumetric biogas production rate(G).The effect of volumetric biogas production rate(G)on hydraulic dead space(V_h)was less than that of volumetric hydraulic loading rate(L)in CAR.

Key words: anaerobic reactor, flow pattern, dead space

中图分类号:

X703.1

季军远, 邢雅娟, 郑平. 分段组合式厌氧生物反应器流态特性[J]. 化工学报, 2012, 63(10): 3045-3051.

JI Junyuan, XING Yajuan, ZHENG Ping. Flow patterns of compartmentalized anaerobic reactor[J]. CIESC Journal, 2012, 63(10): 3045-3051.

参考文献 19

[1]	Demirel B,Yenigun O,Onay T T.Anaerobic treatment of dairy wastewaters:a review[J].Process Biochemistry,2005,40(8):2583-2595
[2]	Cavinato F,Fatone D,Bolzonella D,Pavan P.Thermophilic anaerobic digestion of Cattle manure with agro-wastes and energy crops:comparison of pilot and full scale experiences[J].Bioresoure Technology,2010,101(2):545-550
[3]	Sanchez E,Borja R,Travieso L,Martin A,Colmenarejo M F.Effect of organic loading rate on the stability,operational parameters and performance of a secondary upflow anaerobic sludge bed reactor treating piggery waste[J].Bioresouce Technology,2005,96(3):335-344
[4]	Rodirguez D C,Belmonte M,Penuela G,Campos J L,Vidal G.Behaviour of molecular weight distribution for the liquid fraction of pig slurry treated by anaerobic digestion[J].Environmental Technology,2011,33(4):419-425
[5]	Ge H Q,Jensen P D,Batstone D J.Increased temperature in the thermophilic stage in temperature phased anaerobic digestion(TPAD)improves degradability of waste activated sludge[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials,2011,187(1/3):355-361
[6]	Seghezzo L,Zeeman G,van Lier J B,Hamelers H V M,Lettinga G.A review:the anaerobic treatment of sewage in UASB and EGSB reactors[J].Bioresource Technology,1998,65(3):175-190
[7]	Ji Junyuan(季军远),Zheng Ping(郑平),Zhang Jiqiang(张吉强).Performance of compartmentalized anaerobic reactor[J].Transactions of the CSAE(农业工程学报),2011,27(11):252-256
[8]	Zheng Ping(郑平),Xu Xiangyang(徐向阳),Hu Baolan(胡宝兰).Novel Biological Nitrogen Removal:Theory and Technology(新型生物脱氮理论与技术)[M].Beijing:Science Press,2004
[9]	China Bureau of Environmental Protection(国家环境保护总局).Methods for Monitor and Analysis of Water and Wastewater(水和废水监测分析方法)[M].4th ed.Beijing:China Press of Environmental Science,2002
[10]	Xu Baojiu(许保玖),Long Tengrui(龙腾锐).Contemporary Principles of Water and Wastewater Treatment(当代给水与废水处理原理)[M].2nd ed.Beijing:China Press of Environmental Science,2008
[11]	Levenspiel O.Chemical Reaction Engineering[M].2nd ed.New York:John Wiley,1974
[12]	Grobicki A,Stuckey D C.Hydrodynamic characteristics of the anaerobic baffled reactor[J].Water Research,1992,26(3):371-378
[13]	Torres J J,Soler A,Saez J,Llorens M.Hydraulic performance of a deep stabilisation pond fed at 3.5 m depth[J].Water Research,2000,34(3):1042-1049
[14]	Yuttachai S,Thammarat K,Antoine M.Hydraulic characteristics of an anaerobic baffled reactor as onsite wastewater treatment system[J].Journal of Environmental Sciences,2010,22(9):1319-1326
[15]	Peňa M R,Mara D D,Avella G P.Dispersion and treatment performance analysis of an UASB reactor under different hydraulic loading rates[J].Water Research,2006,40(3):445-452
[16]	Bhattacharyya D,Singh K S.Understanding the mixing pattern in an anaerobic expanded granular sludge bed reactor:effect of liquid recirculation[J].Journal of Environmental Engineering,2010,136(6):576-584
[17]	Tomlinson E J,Chambers B.The effect of longitudinal mixing on the settleability of activated sludge:Technical Report TR 122.England:Stevenage,1979
[18]	Chen X G,Zheng P,Guo Y J,Mahmood Q,Tang C J,Ding S.Flow patterns of super-high-rate anaerobic bioreactor[J].Bioresource Technology,2010,101(20):7731-7735
[19]	Persson J,Somes N L G,Wong T H F.Hydraulics efficiency of constructed wetlands and ponds[J].Water Science and Technology,1999,40:291-300

分段组合式厌氧生物反应器流态特性

Flow patterns of compartmentalized anaerobic reactor

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 19

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王凯玥, 马永丽, 李琛, 刘明言. 气液固微型流化床的气液传质系数[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(8): 3529-3540.
[2]	胡善伟, 刘新华. 气固流化系统多尺度跨流域EMMS建模[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(6): 2514-2528.
[3]	孔令菲, 陈延佩, 王维. 气固流态化中颗粒介尺度结构的动力学研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(6): 2486-2495.
[4]	周晨阳, 贾颖, 赵跃民, 张勇, 付芝杰, 冯昱清, 段晨龙. 介尺度视角下干法重介流态化分选过程强化[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(6): 2452-2467.
[5]	蒋鸣, 周强. 气固流化床介尺度结构形成机制及过滤曳力模型研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(6): 2468-2485.
[6]	何聪, 钟文琪, 周冠文, 陈曦. 高海拔地区水泥生料悬浮炉分解特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(5): 2120-2129.
[7]	周楠, 王簪, 邵应娟, 钟文琪. 煤沥青球气固流化磨损特性实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(2): 587-594.
[8]	马永丽, 刘明言, 李琛, 胡宗定. 液固和气液固微型流态化研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(1): 46-58.
[9]	张溪,张立龙,李瑞,吴玉龙. 基于能量集成的秸秆生物质快速热解生命周期评价[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(5): 2792-2800.
[10]	王荘, 吕潇, 邵媛媛, 祝京旭. 流态化的往昔寻觅及未来启示[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(12): 5904-5927.
[11]	孙聪,闫博威,蔡长庸,韩振南,许光文. 菱镁矿输送床轻烧过程反应与产物微观结构特性[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(12): 5735-5744.
[12]	马旺宇, 罗正鸿. Geldart-B类颗粒在气固流化床中的床层膨胀与流型转变[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(7): 2472-2479.
[13]	张仪, 白玉龙, 骆丁玲, 路建洲, 关彦军, 张锴. 液固散式流态化CFD模拟中曳力模型的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(11): 4207-4215.
[14]	陈卫, 任瑛. 流态化与物质相变的相似性[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(1): 1-9.
[15]	邱小平, 王利民, 杨宁. 耦合EMMS曳力与简化双流体模型的气固流动模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(5): 1867-1872.